Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "recepcija" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11
Tytuł:
Miljenko Jergović w Polsce i o Polsce — na marginesie komentarza do powieści Wilimowski
Miljenko Jergović u Poljskoj i o Poljskoj — na margini komentara na roman Wilimowski
Miljenko Jergović in and about Poland — Notes in the Margin while Discussing Wilimowski the Novel
Autorzy:
Kurtok, Antonina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486828.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Miljenko Jergović
hrvatska književnost
poljski prijevodi
recepcija
Croatian literature
Polish translations
reception
Opis:
U članku se sintetično ukazuje književnu nazočnost Miljenka Jergovića u Poljskoj te se pregledava poljske prijevode njegovih djela. Predstavlja se Jergovićeve veze s Poljskom, npr. njegovu suradnju s Magdalenom Petryńskom (prevoditeljicom svih poljskih izdanja njegovih romana) i njezin utjecaj na piščevu popularnost u našoj zemlji. U odnosu na to, članak se koncentrira na Jergovićevu najviše poljskom djelu — (kratkom) romanu Wilimowski. Zahvaljajući Petryńskoj roman je bio objavljen u Poljskoj u travnju 2016., što je bila svjetska premijera ove knjige u tiskanom izdanju. U članku se ukratko prezentira okolnosti izdanja poljskog prijevoda Wilimowskog, razloge piščevog interesa za Poljsku (između ostalog za naslovni lik romana — poljskog nogometaša Ernesta Wilimowskog) te recepciju knjige u Poljskoj. isto tako se ukazuju osnovne crte Jergovićevog književnog rada npr. naracijska strategija ili najčešće teme koje se pojavljuju u njegovim djelima.
The article gives a brief summary of Miljenko Jergović’s literary presence in Poland. It concentrates upon the writer’s poems, short stories, novels and essays hitherto translated into Polish and published in Poland. Additionally, jergović’s manifold connections with Poland are presented, starting with the history of his cooperation with Magdalena Petryńska, who translated all of his novels into Polish. This translator’s impact on the writer’s popularity in our country is underscored. Within this scope, the article concentrates on the Jergović’s “most Polish” work, a short novel entitled Wilimowski. Thanks to Petryńska’s efforts, the book was published in Polish in april 2016, which constituted the novel’s world premiere. The article concisely addresses and describes the circumstances of Wilimowski’s several editions, concurrently discussing motives behind the writer’s interest in Poland (among others, the novel’s protagonist — a Polish football player Ernest Wilimowski), and the book’s reception in Poland. Last but not least, Jergović’s writing technique is characterized along with leitmotifs of his literary works.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2017, 8, 2; 37-49
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zagorka. Fenomen (nie)obecny.
Zagorka. The (Not)Present Phenomenon.
Zagorka. (Ne)prisutan fenomen
Autorzy:
Gostomska, Anita
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25182953.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Marija Jurić Zagorka (1873—1957)
kritička recepcija
feminizam
Hrvatska
Poljska
critical reception
feminism
Croatia
Polska
Opis:
This article shows the phenomenon of Croatian journalist and writer Marija Jurić Zagorka. Well-known in Croatia and recently very popular not only among her readers but also scholars (especially feminist-oriented), she remains almost completely absent in Poland today despite the fact that her first novel, The Slaves [Roblje], was translated at the very beginning of the 20th century and she herself was commemorated as the first female journalist from Central Europe in the 1930s.
Članak prikazuje fenomen Marije Jurić Zagorke — najpopularnije hrvatske spisateljice i prve novinarke iz Srednje Europe, iz perspektive njezine recepcije u Hrvatskoj i Poljskoj. Kritičku recepciju njezine produkcije u Hrvatskoj karakterizira velika dinamika i dihotomija; u posljednjih desetak godina došlo je do svojevrsne renesanse interesa za ovu figuru, u akademskoj dimenziji (osobito feministički orijentiranoj) uzimajući oblik valorizacije i revalorizacije Zagorkine bogate ostavštine. Suvremeni poljski književni diskurs slabo reagira na fenomenalnu popularnost Zagorke u njezinoj domovini, iako se u Poljskoj pojavila i kao spisateljica i kao novinarka već početkom 20. stoljeća.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2022, 12; 1-25
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Le drugo ime za ljubezen…”. Novejše knjižno italijanjenje slovenskega leposlovja (2000—2013)
„To tylko inna nazwa miłości…”. Nowe włoskie przekłady słoweńskiej literatury pięknej (2000—2013)
„Just a kind of love…“. Recent Italian translation of the Slovenian literature (2000—2013)
Autorzy:
Košuta, Miran
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486753.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-10-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
prevajanje
recepcija
slovenska književnost
Translation Studies
dialog
przekład
recepcja
literatura słoweńska
translation
reception
Slovenian literature
dialogue
Opis:
V letih 2000—2013 je izšlo približno 160 knjižnih prevodov slovenske proze, poezije ali dramatike v italijanski jezik. Na podlagi bibliografskega popisa prispevek razčlenjuje najopaznejše kolikostne, kakovostne in estetske značilnosti obravnavanega prevodnega korpusa, jih primerja s predhodno recepcijo slovenskega leposlovja v italijanskem prostoru, podatkovno ugotavlja, kako se je od leta 2000 do danes, posebej po vstopu Slovenije v Evropsko unijo ter v schengensko brezcarinsko območje, znatno okrepilo slovensko-italijansko literarno dajdamstvo in hkrati argumentirano osvetljuje nekaj tipoloških, za prevodoslovje splošno povednih stalnic dialoga med številčno večjimi in manjšimi jeziki, literaturami, kulturami.
Between 2000 and 2013, 160 volumes of Slovene poems, plays and prose texts were published in Italian translation. This article investigates this corpus of translations in terms of quantitative, qualitative and aesthetic issues, while also comparing it with previous receptions of Slovenian literature in the Italian cultural milieu and observing/stressing the significant increase in the literary exchange between Slovenia and Italy since 2000 (particulary after the entry of Slovenia into the European Union and the Schengen area). Within the field of Translation Studies, this article also illustrates some fundamental typological paradigms of dialogue between numerically large and small languages, literatures and cultures.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2014, 5, 1; 217-256
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Skazani na komparatystykę i przekład
Nema alternative za komparatistiku i traduktologiju
There is no other way but comparative studies and translation studies
Autorzy:
Małczak, Leszek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486696.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-10-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
komparatystyka
przekładoznawstwo
recepcja
zagraniczna kroatystyka
komparatistika
traduktologija
recepcija
inozemna kroatistika
comparative studies
translation studies
reception
Croatian Studies abroad
Opis:
Svijet u kojem živimo čini se stvoren za komparatističko‑traduktološka istraživanja. U humanistici i na području filoloških znanosti događa se prava revolucija, promjena sustava, uopće završava jedna era u povijesti civilizacije, počinje nova, digitalna epoha. Mijenjaju se dosadašnje metode istraživanja i predmet istraživanja. S jedne je strane književnost izgubila dosadašnju, visoku poziciju u društvu i zato nova formula komparatistike ne može se ograničavati na književnost ili na kulturu nego mora uzimati u obzir izvanumjetnička polja ljudske aktivnosti; filološki studij ako želi opstati ne može više biti književno i tekstocentričan. S druge strane doba Interneta i globalizacije, munjevite komunikacije, transkulturnog društva ne može funkcionirati bez prevođenja koje je najbolji način da se različite kulture zaista upoznaju i uzajamno obogate. Ovaj prostor između kultura i jezika, granična zona, koja implicira višeperspektivnost, čini se najprimjerenija za neofilološki studij i istraživanja.
The world we live in seems to be created for comparative-translation studies. There is real revolution, the change of system in the humanities and philology studies; there is the end of one world and the beginning of new digital era. Research methods and research themes are changing. On the one hand literature has lost its position in society and this is why a new formula of comparative studies cannot be limited to literature or culture but comparative studies must take into account non-artistic spheres of man’s activity; philology studies, if they want to survive, cannot be limited to exclusively literary, text oriented studies. On the other hand age of Internet, globalization, communication, transcultural society cannot function without translation which is the best way to get to know other cultures and enrich each other. The space between culture and languages, border zone which implies multiperspectivism seems to be the most appropriate for neo-philology studies and research.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2014, 5, 1; 137-148
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O stereotypach w recepcji literatury chorwackiej w Polsce w latach 1944—1956
O stereotipima u recepciji hrvatske književnosti u razdoblju 1944—1956
Stereotypes in the reception of Croatian literature in the period of 1944—1956
Autorzy:
Małczak, Leszek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486908.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-07-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
recepcja
polityka kulturalna
stereotyp
rezolucja Kominformu
recepcija
kulturna politika
stereotip
rezolucija Informbiroa
reception
cultural policy
stereotype
Cominform Resolution
Opis:
U članku se govori o dvama stereotipima u recepciji hrvatske književnosti u razdoblju od 1944. do 1956. g. Najprije je Jugoslavija politički saveznik, srodan po slavenskom porijeklu, poslije postaje najveći neprijatelj. Ovo se razdoblje sastoji od dva dijela. U prvom od 1944. do 1948. autori iz Jugoslavije prikazuju književnost kao jedinstvenu, jugoslavensku, dok poljski autori instistiraju na razlikama. Tematski književnost se svodi na književnost o ratnoj tematici, a pisci su vrednovani na temelju njihovih političkih opredjeljenja. Oni koji su bili skloni partizanima jesu napredni, socijalistički, oni koji su živjeli u okupiranim zemljama ostaju pod štetnim uticajem zapadne kulture, buržoazijskih principa. U drugom razdoblju od 1949. do 1956., poslije rezolucije Informbiroa, književnost Jugoslavije u Poljskoj prikazuje se kao jedinstvena, prekinuta je svaka vrsta suradnje i komunikacije, govori se da u književnom stvaralaštvu dolazi do niza negativnih pojava koje se opisuju pomoću ratne retorike i najčešće imenuju kao fašizacija, amerikanizacija kulture.
There are two stereotypes in the reception of Croatian literature in the period of 1944—1956. Yugoslavia was a political ally for Comunist and Slavic countries in the begining. After 1948, after the Cominform Resolution of June 28th, it became one of their worst enemies. In the first period from 1944 to 1948 the Yugoslav authors present literature as coherent Yugoslav literature, with Polish reviewers insisting on the diffrences between the Yugoslav republics. Yugoslav literature in this period was about war, and writers are judged according to their political profiles and attitude during the World War II. The ones who symphatized with Partisans were progressive, the ones who lived in the occupied coutries were under the harmful infulence of Western culture, with its bourgeois values. After the Cominform Resolution, the literatures of the various Yugoslav republics are presented as homogeneous with no cultural differences. Every type of communication between Yugoslavia and Poland is broken down at that time. There is war rethoric in extremely negative Polish presentations of literary production in Yugoslavia in the second period.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2013, 4, 1; 253-268
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dvadeset pet godina bilježenja prijevoda: hrvatsko i poljsko ogledalo
O dwudziestu pięciu latach przekładów literatury polskiej i chorwackiej: zwierciadła przekładu
Twenty five years of translation: a cultural mirror of Croatian and Polish literature
Autorzy:
Gverić Katana, Petra
Kurtok, Antonina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486683.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
egzilna književnost
recepcija
hrvatski prijevodi
poljski prijevodi
prevoditeljski izbori
literature of exile
reception
Croatian translations
Polish translations
translation choices
Opis:
U članku se skicira slika hrvatske književnosti u ciljnoj, poljskoj kulturi, kao i vice versa, koje se formiraju tijekom 25 -godišnjeg razdoblja. Temelji se ona uglavnom na bibliografijama i komentarima objavljenima u časopisu „Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich”, koji već desetak godina sustavno i detaljno bilježi i opisuje prijevode slavenskih književnosti. Analiza monografskih izdanja, kad je hrvatska književnost u pitanju, pokazuje da izbor poljskih prevoditelja pada na egzilnu literaturu, koja dobrim dijelom nije bila smatrana kanonom, te djela autora s graničnih područja jezika i kultura bivše Jugoslavije, i tematski se veže uz jugonostalgiju, ratne traume i potragu za identitetom. Hrvatska književnost — i kultura — u Poljskoj često stoga nose ponajprije odrednicu „balkanskog” i „postjugoslavenskog”. S druge strane, poljska književnost u hrvatskim prijevodima uglavnom se predstavlja reprezentativnim autorima, čiji se opus smatra kanonskim i u izvornoj kulturi. Ogledanje jedne kulture u drugoj donosi širu sliku predstavljanja Drugoga i otvara problem odnosa kulturne auto - i heteropredodžbe.
In this article, we have tried to draw an image of Croatian literature in Polish culture, as well as vice versa, in the last 25 years, based on bibliographies and articles on translations in PLS. It has been concluded that, due to translators’ choices of Croatian exile literature, works perceived in the source culture as non -canon, themes related to war, Yugonostalgia and authors whose work belong to the “borderline” of a few nations, Croatian literature in Poland exists as “Balkan” literature. On the other hand, choices of Polish literature in Croatia mainly concerns classic Polish authors. Both cases draw a wider picture of national imagery — a hetero -image — in the target culture.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2016, 7, 2; 35-52/53-72
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przekłady literatury serbskiej w Polsce w latach 2007—2013
Prevodi srpske književnosti u Poljskoj u razdoblju od 2007. do 2013.
Translation of Serbian literature in the period from 2007 to 2013
Autorzy:
Małczak, Leszek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/487141.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
literatura tłumaczona
literatura serbska w Polsce
recepcja
prevodna književnost
srpska književnost
recepcija
translation literature
Serbian literature in Poland
reception
Opis:
U razdoblju od 2007. do 2013. godine prevedeno je tridesetak knjiga, većinom u pitanju su zbirke pjesama. Zabilježena je slaba emisija prevoda u časopisima. Broj prevoda knjiga je veliki ali recepcija srpske književnosti i kulture slaba. Put je srpske književnosti u Poljskoj otežan zbog ratova koji su pratili raspad druge Jugoslavije za vreme kojih je imidž Srbije stradao. Posle pada komunizma književne veze zavise od inicijative pojedinih osoba, nekadašnja državna institucija prevodne književnosti doživela je privatizaciju.
There were translated about thirty books of Serbian literature in the period from 2007 to 2013, most of them were books of poetry. There were little number of translations in the literary magazines and journals. The number of translations is quite big but the reception of Serbian literature and culture was weak. The wars which accompanied the decay of the Second Yugoslavia has had big negative influence on the reception of Serbian literature and culture. Nowadays, after the fall of communism, literary contacts depend on initiative of individuals, the institution of translation literature has gone through the process of privatization.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2014, 5, 2; 141-149
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Poezja w podroży i translatorskie synopsis. Komentarz do Bibliografii przekładów literatury chorwackiej w Polsce w 2018 roku
Travelling Poetry and Translation’s Synopsis Commentary on The Bibliography of Translations of Croatian Literature in Poland in 2018
Pjesništvo na putovanju i prevodilački sinopsis Osvrt na Bibliografiju poljskih prijevoda iz hrvatske književnosti u 2018. godini
Autorzy:
Majdzik Papić, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373591.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Croatian literature in Poland
reception of translation
Dorta Jagić
multilingual edition
hrvatska književnost u Poljskoj
recepcija prijevoda
višejezično izdanje
sinopsis
Opis:
This article summarizes and discusses the body of translations from Croatian literature published in Poland in 2018. The most significant offering to appear on the Polish market that year was a multilingual collection of mid-career poetry by Dorta Jagić entitled The Portrait of The Body, containing Croatian originals and their translations into Polish (by M. Wierzbicka) and English (by D. Šodan, M. Đurđević). “Synoptic” editions (bilingual or multilingual) allow the reader to view both the original and its translation, which has three major benefits: it contributes to a better circulation of texts; enables deziluzionist reading (the awareness of the difference between the original and the translation); and establishes an intertextual bond between the collected texts.
Članak sumira stanje prijevoda iz hrvatske književnosti koji su objavljeni u Poljskoj 2018. godine. Najvažnijom se pozicijom na poljskom izdavačkom tržištu pokazao višejezični izbor iz zrele poezije Dorte Jagić pod naslovom Portret tijela koji sadrži hrvatski original i njegov prijevod na poljski (M. Wierzbicka) i engleski (D. Šodan, M. Đurđević) jezik. Sinoptička izdanja (dvo- ili višejezična) omogućuju čitatelju da se sukobi s originalom i prijevodom, pridonose boljoj cirkulaciji tekstova, omogućuju deziluzionističko čitanje (tj. sa sviješću o razlici između originala i prijevoda) te uspostave intertekstualnu vezu između povezanih tekstova.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2020, 10, 2; 63-77
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przekłady literatury słoweńskiej w Polsce w latach 2007—2013 — komentarz
Prevodi slovenske literature na Poljskem v letih od 2007 do 2013 — komentar
Slovenian literature translations published in Poland between 2007—2013 — the commentary
Autorzy:
Gawlak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/487039.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
przekład literacki
recepcja literatury słoweńskiej
polityka kulturalna
przekłady w Polsce
literarno prevajanje
recepcija slovenske literature
kulturna politika
prevodi na Poljskem
literary translation
Reception of Slovenian literature
cultural politics
translations in Poland
Opis:
Komentar predstavlja prevode slovenske literature, izdane na Poljskem v letih 2007—2013. V tem obdobju so izšli prevodi slovenske proze (mdr. Jančarja, Virka, Žabota, Mazzinija , Vojnovića, Möderndorferja, Frančiča, Novakove) in poezije (mdr. Šalamuna, Čučnika, Kosovela, Franči ča, Osojnika, Kušarjeve) — tako v knjižni obliki kot tudi v revijalnih in časopisnih objavah. Izšle so še druge publikacije, kot so antologije ter zvezki, ki so sad prevajalskih delavnic. Komentar zajema knjižne izdaje, saj prav te oblikujejo literarno zavest sekundarne kulture. Razveseljivo je, da trenutno lahko opazimo vse več objav prevodov slovenske literature, saj se povečuje tudi potreba po dopolnitvi in izostritvi slike slovenske kulture v zavesti poljskega prejemnika, nekega »kulturnega stereotipa«, ki ga bralci usvajajo s prihajajočimi besedili. Kar zadeva recepcijo, se zdi ključnega pomena, da so prevodi slovenskih avtorjev izšli v samozaložbah ali pri lokalnih založnikih (z izjemo Jančarja, Virka in Čučnika). Razvidno je, da bi bilo koristno ustanoviti dosledno kulturno in založniško politiko ter zagotoviti ustrezno širitveno strategijo, ki bi prispevala k okrepljenemu in razširjenemu tvornemu dialogu med slovensko in poljsko literaturo.
The commentary constitues a presentation of Slovenian literature translations published in Poland between 2007—2013. In mentioned period of time the translation of prose (among others written by Jančar, Virk, Žabot, Mazzini, Vojnovic, Möderndorfer, Frančič, Novak) and Slovenian poetry (Šalamun, Čučnik, Kosovel, Frančič, Osojnik, Kušar) appeared both as independent book publications as well as texts presented in periodicals and regular press. Also publications printed as anthology and releases which were a result of translation workshops were developed. In the commentary the author’s concern focuses mainly on books publications due to the fact that they are shaping the literary awareness of secondary culture. It is comforting that presently the increasing tendency for publishing translations of Slovenian literature can be observed. There is a growing need to strengthen and complement the image of Slovenian culture in the Polish reader’s consciousness, a kind of “cultural stereotype” which the reading community assimilate along with the growth of another texts. From the perspective of reception the most important issue seems to be that translations of Slovenian authors (besides Jančar, Virk and Čučnik) were published by independent, local and niche publishing houses. It is clearly seen that creating a coherent cultural‑publishing strategy and providing appropriate popularizing strategy would contribute to enriching, creative dialogue between Slovenian and Polish literature.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2014, 5, 2; 209-221
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Między polityką a estetyką — o recepcji i przekładzie "Przedstawienia Hamleta we wsi Głucha Dolna" Ivo Brešana
Između politike i estetike — o recepciji i prijevodu Brešanove "Predstave Hamleta u selu Mrduša Donja"
Between politics and aesthetic — about the reception and translation of Brešan’s "Predstava Hamleta u selu Mrduša Donja"
Autorzy:
Małczak, Leszek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/487167.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-10-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Ivo Brešan
Pryedstawienie “Hamleta” we wsi Gucha Dolna
recepcja
przekład
polityka
estetyka
Predstava „Hamleta” u selu Mrduša Donja
recepcija
prijevod
politika
estetika
Predstava “Hamleta” u selu Mrduša Donja
reception
translation
politics
aesthetic
Opis:
"Predstava Hamleta u selu Mrduša Donja" je najpopularnija u Poljskoj hrvatska i šire bivša jugoslovenska drama i predstava. Njezin je prijevod prvi put objavljen u časopisu Dialog (br. 1/1975), a zatim u knjizi "Antologia współczesnego dramatu jugosłowiańskiego" 1988. Prva je predstava realizirana 1975. u Zielonoj Góri, posljednja 2009. u Krakowu. Ukupno Brešanov tekst je bio izvođen u 16 poljskih kazališta. U članku se analizira recepciju i interpretaciju koje oscili¬raju između dva suprotna pola: ili se naglašava općeljudsku dimenziju teksta pa pruža universa¬lističku intepretaciju, ili se inzistira na političkom i društvenom kontekstu.
"Predstava Hamleta u selu Mrduša Donja" is the most popular Croatian and former Yu¬goslav drama and play in Poland. The Polish translation of "Predstava…" was published in the magazine Dialog (nr. 1/1975) and then in 1988 in the book "Antologia współczesnego dramatu jugosłowiańskiego". The first play was realised in Zielona Góra in 1975, the last one in Krakow in 2009. In total, Brešan’s text was played in 16 Polish theatres. The subject of the analisys is the reception and translation which oscillates between two opposite poles: universal interpretation which emphasises human, timeless meaning of the drama and political interpretation which emphasises political and social context presented in the drama.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2012, 3, 1; 75-94
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Słoweńskie tłumaczenia literatury polskiej w latach 2019 i 2020
Slovenian Translations of Polish Literature in 2019 and 2020
Slovenski prevodi poljske književnosti v letih 2019 in 2020
Autorzy:
Rezoničnik, Lidija
Borowy, Joanna
Gawlak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25185682.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
literary translation
Polish-Slovenian translations in 2019 and 2020
literary critiques
reception of Polish literature
literarni prevod
prevodi poljske književnosti v letih 2019 in 2020 v slovenščino
literarna kritika
recepcija poljske književnosti
Opis:
The article provides an overview of Slovenian translations of Polish literature in the 2019’s and 2020’s and reviewers’ responses to these works. A total of 23 translations of books were published in 2019, including five literary works (three collections of poetry and two novels). Among the 13 published translations of the following year there were eight literary works (one drama, a collection of short stories, three novels and three collections of poetry). The publishing of e-books also increased significantly in 2020. The published translations give Slovenian readers access to familiar, mostly world-renowned authors such as O. Tokarczuk, Z. Herbert, W. Szymborska, C. Miłosz, I. Karpowicz, while works by I. Ostachowicz, B. Nowicka, A. Kulisiewicz, J. Małecki, R. Franczak, and K. Dąbrowska were translated into Slovenian for the first time. With the exception of J. Kochanowski’s drama, all of the literary works translated were from the second half of the 20th century or the 21st century.
Pregled prevodov poljske književnosti v slovenščino kaže, da je bilo v letu 2019 izdanih 23 knjižnih prevodov, med njimi pet leposlovnih del, tj. tri zbirke poezije in dva romana (poleg tega še 15 otroških/mladinskih knjig in prevodi treh neleposlovnih del). V letu 2020 je opazno pospešeno izdajanje elektronskih knjig, ki je najverjetneje posledica omejene dostopnosti knjižnic in knjigarn v času epidemije koronavirusne bolezni. Izšlo je osem elektronskih knjig, ki so bile v preteklih letih že izdane v fizični obliki, in 13 tiskanih knjig novo prevedenih del. Poleg treh otroških in dveh neleposlovnih, je bilo prevedenih osem leposlovnih del: ena drama, trije romani, ena zbirka kratkih zgodb in tri zbirke poezije. Prevodi prinašajo dela slovenskim bralcem že znanih in večinoma svetovno prepoznavnih avtoric in avtorjev, kot so O. Tokarczuk, Z. Herbert, W. Szymborska, C. Miłosz, I.Karpowicz, prvič pa so bila v slovenščino prevedena dela I. Ostachowicza, B. Nowicke, A.Kulisiewicza, J. Małeckega, R. Franczak in K. Dąbrowske. Z izjemo drame J.Kochanowskega gre za prevode književnosti druge polovice 20.stoletja oz. 21.stoletja, ki so v slovenskih medijih večinoma doživeli recepcijski odziv (z izjemo Kochanowskega in Miłosza), ta je skoraj v vseh primerih zelo pozitiven. Avtorji prevodov leposlovnih del so uveljavljeni prevajalci: J. Unuk, N. Jež, K. Šalamun-Biedrzycka, K. Pisk, med njimi pa se pojavljajo tudi nova imena, kot je J. Snoj. Pomemben medij za objavo prevodov (fragmentov) del v Sloveniji manj prepoznavnih avtoric in avtorjev ter za prve objave mladih prevajalcev so bile tudi v letih 2019 in 2020 tiskane in spletne revije.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2022, 12; 1-20
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies