Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "antitrust" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 100
Tytuł:
Key Legislative and Jurisprudential Developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2012
Autorzy:
Piszcz, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530223.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust legislation
judicial antitrust proceedings
guidelines
antitrust jurisprudence
anticompetitive agreements
abuse of a dominant position
concentrations
fines
Opis:
This article has two objectives. First, it presents the most important developments of Polish antitrust legislation of 2012. These include recent amendments to legal provisions on judicial antitrust proceedings contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, and some novel issues in the area of non-binding guidelines of the Polish NCA, the UOKiK President. Second, the article introduces key developments in Polish competition law jurisprudence of 2012. It characterises selected rulings delivered by the Polish Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals in Warsaw and the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection. Judgments are divided according to their subject matter.
Cet article a deux objectifs. Premièrement, il présente les développements les plus importants de la législation antitrust polonais de 2012. Il s'agit notamment de récentes modifications apportées à des dispositions juridiques en matière de procédure antitrust judiciaires qui se trouve dans le Code de procédure civile, et quelques nouvelles questions dans le domaine des lignes directrices non-contraignantes de l'Autorité natinale du contrôle polonaise, le président de l’Organe pour la protection de la concurrence et des consommateurs (UOKiK). Deuxièmement, l'article présente les développements principaux en matière de jurisprudence de 2012 relative à la loi polonaise de la concurrence. Il caractérise des jugements sélectionnés prononcés par la Cour suprême polonaise, la Cour d'appel de Varsovie et la Cour de la concurrence et de la protection des consommateurs. Les jugements sont présentés selon les sujects qu’ils concernent.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2013, 6(8); 141-158
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Antitrust Damages Actions in Ukraine: Current Situation and Perspectives
Autorzy:
Gerasymenko, Anzhelika
Mazaraki, Nataliia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530348.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust damages actions
private antitrust enforcement
harm from antitrust infringement
non-infringement scenario
economic effect of cease of antitrust infringements
welfare loss from market power
Opis:
The article gives an overview of Ukrainian legislation and experiences concerning antitrust damages actions. The analysis has led to a number of conclusions: private claims are rare in Ukraine due to difficulties in obtaining evidence, high legal costs, and lacking confidence in the Ukrainian court system. The paper gives examples of Ukrainian private antitrust enforcement practice and provides a statistical analysis of the dynamics of ‘compensated’ damages caused by antitrust infringements in Ukraine. The value of ‘compensated’ damages is compared to the value of the economic effect of stopping antitrust infringements, as well as to the value of the overall welfare loss deriving from market power in the national economy. Finally, some new sources of damages caused by market power are discussed considering the development perspectives of this branch of antitrust activity.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(12); 195-214
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Interaction of Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Lithuania
Autorzy:
Stanikunas, Rimantas Antanas
Burinskas, Arunas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1395542.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust damages actions
private enforcement of antitrust rules
competition law
leniency programme
Opis:
This paper provides a study of the interaction between public and private enforcement of Lithuanian antitrust law. The study refers to the Damages Directive. It has been found that private enforcement depends greatly on public enforcement of competition law. Therefore, their compatibility and balance are of great importance to antitrust policy. The Lithuanian NCA prioritises cases where an economic effect on competition does not have to be proven. This creates uncertainty about the outcome of private enforcement cases. Private enforcement in Lithuania is also in need of detailed rules on the identification of harm and causality. The analysis reveals how challenging it can be to estimate and prove harm or a causal link in private enforcement cases. Support from the NCA is therefore exceedingly needed. Moreover, even though the use of the leniency programme helps, it remains insufficient to solve the problem of under-deterrence. However, measures introduced by the Damages Directive do not make the leniency programme safe.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(12); 237-258
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Passing-on of Overcharges and the Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE Countries
Autorzy:
Moisejevas, Raimundas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530033.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-06-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust damage
consumers
passing-on of overcharges
Lithuania
private enforcement of competition law
antitrust damage claims
Directive on antitrust damages actions
calculation of damages
Opis:
The article focuses on the concept of passing-on of overcharges and the peculiarities of its regulation by the Damages Directive. The Damages Directive obliges Member States to ensure that the defendant in an action for damages may invoke the passing-on defence. Moreover, the Directive establishes the new framework and the main principles that govern the application of the passing-on defence. The national case law on passing-on is very insignificant in Central and Eastern European countries and many questions are expected to be raised in the courts of the CEE Member States. While discussing the concept of passing-on in the Damages Directive, a lot of emphasis should be paid to the issue of causation. Causation will definitely be the subject of most of the questions in cases when an indirect purchaser will bring a claim for damages. Causation may be tricky when an indirect purchaser claims it suffered an ‘overcharge harm’ because of passing-on. In most cases, the issue of causation will be decided mainly by national courts based on national procedural rules. Depending on the situation, passing-on may be used as a basis for the claim (as a ‘sword’) or as a defence (as a ‘shield’). It could be used as a basis for the claim by an indirect purchaser, in case s/he has suffered any harm because of the illegal actions of a cartelist or a dominant company. At the same time, it could be used as a defence by the infringer against a claim for damages. The article also analyses the specifics of the implementation of the Directive into the national laws of CEE Member States.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2017, 10(15); 133-146
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Evolution of Classical Evaluation Standards in Competition Law: The Legal Assessment of Tying in View of Challenges Raised by Digital Markets
The evolution of classical evaluation standards in competition law: the legal assessment of tying in view of challenges raised by digital markets
Autorzy:
Musielak, Mateusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2037501.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
tying
competition law
antitrust
digital markets
Opis:
This paper provides a detailed review of evaluation standards for the legal assessment of tying. This practice, which constitutes an abuse of a dominant position, is a significant breach of competition law. The mechanism of this type of abuse is based on taking advantage of market power in the supply of one product to create packed offerings capable of precluding competition from superior rival solutions. Tying occurs when one product, the “tying product”, is sold only with another product, the “tied product”. In the prevailing number of cases, tying serves to consolidate the company’s dominant position on the tied product market, which usually aims to share the tying product’s large customer group with the less-desired product. However, tying is not illegal per se. In many cases, it does not lead to any anti-competitive concerns, and might be beneficial for consumers. This is why each assessment of this conduct must be carefully evaluated with special attention given to the effects, in accordance with the generally applied effect-based approach, and also potential efficiencies. An analysis of the case-law and literature reveals the basic mechanisms for conducting a legal assessment of tying. However, the use of these mechanisms will not be possible without their adaptation to the ongoing changes caused by technological development. Digital markets not only generate incremental revenues, but are also the sources of new or unusual legal arrangements. It will more frequently be the case that existing provisions will not be able to address every new practice accurately without new acts. The Digital Markets Act aims to adapt the existing legal framework to contemporary market realities and to become a modern tool for enforcing competition law rules on digital markets. The European Commission is seeking to broaden its powers to intervene at the earliest possible stage, before an undertaking affects the competition on a market.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2021, 3, 35; 113-139
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recent Developments in Slovak Competition Law - Legislation and Case Law Review
Autorzy:
Šabová, Zuzana
Fodorová, Katarína
Lukáčová, Daniela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/529896.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust
competition
competition advocacy
concentration
Slovakia
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2013, 6(8); 223-243
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Can an Ideal Court Model in Private Antitrust Enforcement Be Established?
Autorzy:
Wolski, Dominik
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/529927.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust private enforcement
specialized
quasi-specialized and non-specialized courts
antitrust litigations
judges
jury
judicial review
Opis:
Any discussion of private antitrust enforcement usually focuses on substantive law and proceedings applicable to private antitrust cases. Those elements are important, however, the efficacy of both public and private enforcement relies upon rules of law (substantive and procedural) along with their application. The latter constitutes a substantial aspect affecting the institutions which make decisions in private antitrust enforcement cases, namely the relevant courts. The enforcement of competition law is inextricably intertwined with the economy and markets. As a result, antitrust cases are demanding for non-specialist judges, who usually do not have enough knowledge and experience in the field of competition. Even if the Damages Directive has already been implemented in all EU Member States, there is still room for discussion about developing an optimal court model for the adjudication of private antitrust enforcement cases. In the aforementioned discussion the issue of the binding effect of decisions made by the European Commission (EC) and National Competition Authorities (NCAs) in private enforcement cases, as well as the experience of judges stemming from the number of cases they have resolved, cannot be missed. Bearing this in mind, the main aim of this paper is to analyse the model of competent courts operating in private antitrust cases in twenty selected countries including the US, the UK and the vast majority of EU Member States. Taking into account that a theoretically pure concept of an ideal model of relevant court operations presumably does not exist, it is essential to try to figure out what the main characteristics of the courts might be that can lead to effective private antitrust enforcement.
Toute discussion sur l’application privée du droit de la concurrence se concentre habituellement sur le droit matériel et sur les procédures applicables aux affaires antitrust privées. Ces éléments sont importants, cependant, l’efficacité de l’application publique et privée repose sur des règles de droit (matériel et procédural) ainsi que leur application. Ce dernier constitue un aspect important affectant les institutions qui prennent des décisions dans les cas d’application des lois antitrust privées, qui sont les tribunaux compétents. L’application du droit de la concurrence est inextricablement liée à l’économie et aux marchés. En conséquence, les affaires antitrust exigent des juges non spécialisés, qui n’ont généralement pas suffisamment de connaissances et d’expérience dans le domaine de la concurrence. Même si la directive ‘dommages-intérêts’ a été mise en œuvre dans tous les États membres de l’Union européenne, il reste encore des discussions sur la mise au point d’un modèle judiciaire optimal pour le règlement des affaires d’antitrust privées. Dans la discussion susmentionnée, la question de l’effet contraignant des décisions prises par la Commission européenne et par les autorités nationales de la concurrence dans les affaires privées, ainsi que l’expérience des juges découlant du nombre d’affaires résolues, ne peuvent manquer. Dans cet esprit, l’objectif principal de cet article est d’analyser le modèle des tribunaux compétents opérant dans les affaires antitrust privées dans vingt pays sélectionnés, y compris les États-Unis, le Royaume-Uni et la grande majorité des États membres. Puisqu’un concept théoriquement pur de modèle idéal d’activités judiciaires pertinentes n’existe pas, il est essentiel de tenter de déterminer quelles pourraient être les caractéristiques principales des tribunaux susceptibles de conduire à une application efficace des lois antitrust dans les affaires privées
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2018, 11(18); 115-152
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Damages Directive and Consensual Approach to Antitrust Enforcement
Autorzy:
Moisejevas, Raimundas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530189.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust damage
consumers
arbitration
alternative dispute resolution
mediation
consensual dispute resolution
Lithuania
private enforcement of competition law
antitrust damage claims
Directive on antitrust damages actions
consensual settlements
Opis:
The article focuses on the novelties introduced by the Damages Directive in the field of consensual settlements of disputes concerning private enforcement. The Damages Directive obliges Member States to ensure that the limitation period for bringing an action for damages is suspended for the duration of any consensual dispute resolution process. The Directive also establishes the main principles that govern the effect of consensual settlements on subsequent actions for damages. Since the EU framework for consensual dispute resolution of private enforcement disputes is quite new, many issues must still be solved in Member States’ practice. While analysing consensual dispute resolution in private enforcement cases, particular interest should be paid to mediation and arbitration as a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Mediation is often used in competition law litigation. In a mediation process, parties are subject to fewer legal costs than in litigation and arbitration. It may thus be concluded that consensual dispute resolution is usually a faster way to receive compensation. However, voluntary arrangements and ADR in competition law still raise many problems concerning both procedural and substantial legal acts.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(12); 181-194
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Development of Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Lithuania
Autorzy:
Moisejevas, Raimundas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/529902.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-06-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust damage
antitrust damage claims
Directive on antitrust damages actions
evidence
follow-on action
Lithuania
nullity
private enforcement of competition law
public enforcement of competition law
Opis:
The article reviews the jurisprudence of Lithuanian courts on private enforcement of competition law and identifies the main obstacles for the development of this practice. The analysis of the jurisprudence makes it possible to summarise that: most rulings of the Lithuanian courts relate to cases on the abuse of dominance; usually, dominant undertakings were allegedly applying discriminatory conditions towards the injured party and; most of the claims were presented as follow-on actions after a decision of the Competition Council. The courts held that damages caused by a breach of competition law have to be recovered in accordance with Lithuania’s main principles of civil responsibility. At the same time, the courts made it clear that their jurisprudence is based on the rulings of European Courts and the main principles of EU competition law. The main obstacles for the successful development of antitrust damages claims in Lithuania are, inter alia: complexity of competition cases; difficulty in obtaining substantive evidence; proving a consequential relationship and; high legal costs. The article also analyses substantial and procedural provisions of Lithuanian legislation that regulate the submission of antitrust damage claims.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(11); 35-52
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Access to Documents in Antitrust Litigation – EU and Croatian Perspective
Autorzy:
Butorac Malnar, Vlatka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530371.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
EU Damages Directive
private enforcement
cartels
antitrust litigation
access to documents
access to file
evidence in antitrust litigation
Opis:
The paper analyses access to documents in cartel-based damages cases from the EU and Croatian perspective. It considers all relevant EU and Croatian legislation and case-law primarily focusing on the expected impact of the newly enacted Damages Directive. It is argued that the new rules on access to documents provided by the Directive will not necessarily have a significant impact on damages proceedings following cartel decisions issued by the Commission. This is due to the introduction of an absolute ban on the disclosure of leniency statements and settlement submissions via a ‘maximum harmonization’ rule. This conclusion is drawn from statistic figures showing that EU cartel enforcement rests solely on the leniency and settlement procedures. With that in mind, it is concluded that the Directive’s general, permissive rules on access to documents (other than leniency and settlement procedures) will not be applicable in most damages cases following the cartel infringement decision issued by the Commission. However, it is also observed that the Damages Directive’s new rules on access to documents may have the opposite impact on private enforcement in cases following infringement decisions issued by National Competition Authorities (NCAs) which do not rely as much on leniency in their fight against cartels as the Commission. The Directive’s general rule on access to documents will apply in jurisdictions such as Croatia, where all of its cartel decisions so far have been reached within the regular procedure. It is argued that the general access rule, coupled with other rules strengthening the position of claimants in antitrust damages proceedings, might actually be beneficial for both public and private enforcement in such jurisdictions.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(12); 127-160
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Antitrust and Copyright Collectives – an Economic Analysis
Autorzy:
Zabłocka, Adrianna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530183.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008-12-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
collecting societies
copyright
antitrust
transaction costs
welfare
Opis:
The activity of the copyright collecting societies had been scrutinized by many antitrust authorities. The paper presents the decision taken by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK), which deals with abusing practices of Polish copyright collective society – ZAiKS. The paper concentrates on the economic aspects of the decision from the President of UOKiK.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2008, 1(1); 152-165
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Antitrust liability in the context of online platforms. Case comment to the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice of 21 January 2016 ‘Eturas’ UAB v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (Case C-74/14)
Autorzy:
Targański, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530294.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
antitrust
coordination
e-commerce
online platforms
compliance
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2016, 9(14); 293-298
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Disclosure of Evidence in Central and Eastern European Countries in Light of the Implementation of the Damages Directive
Autorzy:
Druviete, Inese
Jerņeva, Jūlija
Ulaganathan Ravindran, Aravamudhan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1395547.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-06-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
private antitrust enforcement
implementation
Damages Directive
evidence
Opis:
The article looks primarily at the material comprised in the volume edited by A. Piszcz, Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries published in 2017 and based on that compares aspects of the disclosure of evidence issue in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. The purpose of this article is to look into how the process for the disclosure of evidence has evolved in eleven countries of the European Union in light of Directive 2014/104/EU. The article looks at six key issues with regard to disclosure of evidence in light of Directive 2014/104/EU: general procedural issues; procedure for the submission of evidence; criteria for the disclosure of evidence; restrictions on the disclosure of evidence; disclosure of evidence by parties other than the defendant; and consequences of the failure to comply with a request to submit evidence. The article relies on primary data from eleven EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2017, 10(15); 197-222
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Antykonkurencyjne innowacje – oksymoron czy realne wyzwanie prawa antymonopolowego?
Anticompetitive innovations – oxymoron or a real challenge for antitrust law?
Autorzy:
Molski, Rajmund
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927223.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
anticompetitive innovations
unilateral conduct restricting competition
antitrust law
Opis:
One of the overriding principles of modern economic policy is promotion of innovation. It also turns out, however, that innovations may work against competition, thus becoming a major challenge for antitrust law. The importance and the degree of diffi culty surrounding this challenge as well as some controversies related to it can be evidenced by the antitrust enforcement policy referring to innovations. This policy has thus far been highly enigmatic and labile. It seems that no consensus can be reached on the relation between competition and innovations as much as it cannot be achieved on the validity of including the latter in the antitrust enforcement regime, particularly when it comes to applying the prohibition of the abuse of a dominant position. While it is true that innovations compound the risk of antitrust errors, especially those consisting in de-legalisation of innovations which are not anticompetitive, it would nevertheless be wrong to underestimate, and even more so to ignore, the risk of errors amounting to an unjustifi ed tolerance of anticompetitive innovations and an overstated belief in the self-regulatory ability of the market. In any case, considering the priority objective of the economic policy which should be to support and promote innovations, as well as taking into account that the goal of antitrust law is not only to settle real confl icts arising between innovations and the protection of competition, but also to provide for an innovation-friendly environment, the antitrust intervention into innovations should be sensible, farsighted and predictable. Otherwise, antitrust law may become a burden for the actual and potential innovators – like the mythical sword above the head of Damocles.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2017, 2 (18); 9-41
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przekazanie sądowi powszechnemu sprawowania kontroli administracji publicznej jako odstępstwo od kognicji sądów administracyjnych na przykładzie Sądu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów
Transferring the Conducting of the Review of Public Administration to a Common Court as a Departure from the Cognition of Administrative Courts on the Example of the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection
Autorzy:
Frey, Robert
Małecka, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27310057.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
sąd antymonopolowy
liberalizacja
konkurencja
antitrust court
liberalization
competition
Opis:
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie historycznego rozwoju wyjątku od zasady kontroli administracji sądowej przez sądy administracyjne, jaki stanowi powierzenie jej sprawowania przez Sąd Antymonopolowy – obecnie Sąd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (SOKiK). Celem dodatkowym jest odpowiedź na pytanie o zasadność przekazania sądowi powszechnemu orzecznictwa w sprawach antymonopolowych, a później regulacyjnych. Autorzy sformułowali dwie tezy. Teza pierwsza, że źródłem takiego ukształtowania polskiego modelu sądownictwa antymonopolowego były procesy liberalizacyjne. Teza druga, że pomimo wadliwych rozwiązań w obszarze proceduralnym, jego funkcjonowanie i orzecznictwo SOKiK przyczyniło się do rozwoju konkurencyjnej gospodarki w Polsce. Artykuł dzieli się na dwie części. W pierwszej kolejności zostanie przedstawiony rys historyczny kontroli administracji publicznej przez sądy administracyjne w Polsce, następnie stan obecny kontroli administracji publicznej przez sądy administracyjne i powszechne. Autorzy rozpoczynają swoje rozważania od ustawy z dnia 17 marca 1921 r. Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (tzw. Konstytucja marcowa) oraz ustawy z dnia 3 sierpnia 1922 r. o Najwyższym Trybunale Administracyjnym (NTA). Ponadto, analizują procesy liberalizacyjne, które następowały w Polsce po zmianach 1989 r. Druga cześć obejmuje genezę Sądu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów, ewolucję właściwości Sądu Antymonopolowego w latach 1990–2017 oraz analizę problematyki hybrydowego postępowania odwoławczego. W tej części Autorzy odwołują się do projektów ustaw, stenogramów posiedzeń Sejmu RP oraz poddają analizie statystykę orzecznictwa Sądu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów w latach 1992–2020. Rozważania będą prowadzone w oparciu o przepisy prawa oraz opracowania naukowe. Analizie zostaną poddane projekty ustaw oraz związany z nimi proces legislacyjny. W artykule zostały zastosowane metody: dogmatyczno-prawna oraz analityczno-syntetyczna.
The goal of the article is to present the historical development of the exception from the rule of the court administration review by administrative courts, which is the transference of its conducting to the Antitrust Court (currently the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection). The additional goal is to answer the question of the grounds of the transference to a popular court the jurisdiction in antitrust cases, and then in regulatory cases. Two theses were formulated by the authors. The first thesis states that the Polish antitrust court model were based on the liberalization processes. The second thesis assumes that, despite faulty solutions in the procedural area, the functioning of the jurisdiction of the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection contributed to the development of competitive economy in Poland. The authors begin their consideration with the Act from 17th March 1921. The Constitution of the Republic of Poland (the so-called March Constitution) and the Act of 3rd August 1922 on the Supreme Administrative Tribunal. In addition, they analyze the liberalization processes that took place in Poland after the changes of 1989. The second part covers the genesis of the Competition and Consumer Protection Court, the evolution of the jurisdiction of the Antimonopoly Court from 1990 to 2017 and the analysis of the issue of hybrid appeal proceedings. In this part, the authors refer to draft laws, transcripts of the sittings of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and analyze the statistics of the case law of the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection from 1992 to 2020. The deliberation shall be based on legal regulations and scientific papers. The analysis shall focus on the proposed bills and on the related legislative process. The following methods were applied in the article: dogmatic-legal and analytic-synthetic.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2023, 22, 2; 77-102
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 100

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies