Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "xenophon" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19
Tytuł:
Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa
Xanthippe – Good Wife of Socrates
Autorzy:
Marchewka, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/648686.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
wife of Socrates
Plato
Xenophon
letter from Pseudo-Xenophon
Opis:
After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the hellcat wife in the shape of Xanthippe, to which we still eagerly refer to. But did Socrates’ wife really deserve such a bad opinion? Is it possible for such a rating to be given by the desultory information we owe to Plato (Phaed. 60a) and Xenophon (Mem. II 2, Conv. II 10)? When attempting to defend the Xanthippe, an important source turned out to be a letter from Pseudo-Xenophon (vel Pseudo-Aeschines), which allowed us to look at the philosopher’s wife as his pupil, leading life according to Socrates’ teachings and surrounded by the care of his friends (Epist. XXI, Hercher 1873: 624).
Źródło:
Collectanea Philologica; 2018, 21; 75-86
1733-0319
2353-0901
Pojawia się w:
Collectanea Philologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
THE TREATISE ON THE ATHENIAN CONSTITUTION (Ustrój Atenczyków i jego nieznany autor)
Autorzy:
Rodziewicz, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/702693.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
ATHENIAN CONSTITUTION
GREEK LITERATURE
PSEUDO-XENOPHON
Opis:
A translation of the work attributed to Xenophon, preceded by an introduction concentrating on the question of its authorship and the philosophical value of the work.
Źródło:
Meander; 2006, 61, 3-4; 195-212
0025-6285
Pojawia się w:
Meander
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prodico al bivio. Ancora sull’antilogia
Prodicus at the Crossroads. Once Again on the Antilogy
Autorzy:
Giombini, Stefania
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938280.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Prodicus
Antilogy
Xenophon
Heracles
Horai
Sophists
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to analyze the tale of Heracles at the Crossroads, attributed to Prodicus by Socrates in Xenophon’s Memorabilia, through the notion of antilogy. The apologue has got an antilogic structure that is immediately outlined in the description of the situation in which the young Heracles finds himself. But the text, seemingly antilogic, does not develop itself according to one of the most important rules of antilogies, i.e., the epistemic parity of two speeches, since it appears to be completely in favor of just one of the theses. Prodicus would have had no interest in writing a text that did not demonstrate his rhetorical and linguistic abilities. According to this perspective, Xenophon’s version of Heracles at the Crossroads does not seem to be the original version by Prodicus, as can be seen by analyzing its structure and properties.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2017, 8, 1; 187-200
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Value of Opheleia in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus
Pożytek (opheleia) jako wartość etyczna w Ekonomiku Ksenofonta
Autorzy:
Tymura, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1376018.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Sokrates, Xenophon
Oikonomikos
Nutzen
Opheleia
Wissen
Akrasia
Socrates
Xenophon
Oeconomicus
benefit
opheleia
knowledge
akrasia
Sokrates
Ksenofont
Ekonomik
pożytek
wiedza
Opis:
This article portrays the unique position occupied by the notion of benefit (opheleia) in the philosophy of Xenophon’s Socrates. Apparently, opheleia was one of Socrates’ most frequently used ethical concepts, and its particular importance was emphasized in Oeconomicus. In Xenophon’s dialogue Socrates treats benefit as a value that forms the basis for true friendship, good family relations and especially so in marriage, proper professional attitudes, and thus for all the most important interpersonal contacts. Benefit is also presented as a true spiritual value that shapes the moral behaviour of the individual toward himself and others. It holds a prime place in Socrates’s ethics. As such a value, it must, however, be based on knowledge and proper moral behavior, especially in line with the demands of enkrateia.  It can therefore be ascertained that opheleia, equated also with the good and the beautiful, is strictly tied up with the most important concepts in Socrates’ philosophy, such as  knowledge, virtue, friendship and moral education and plays a  very essential part in his considerations.
Der Artikel setzt sich zum Ziel, Opheleia von Sokrates als wesentlichen ethischen Wert im Leben des Menschen anhand des Textes Oikonomikos aufzuzeigen. Opheleia könnte als einer der von Sokrates am häufigsten verwendeten ethischen Begriffe angesehen werden, wobei sein besonderer Status im Text Oikonomikos hervorgehoben wurde. Im Dialog von Xenophon behandelt Sokrates den Nutzen als einen Wert, der der wahren Freundschaft, guten familiären Beziehungen, insbesondere den ehelichen, richtigen beruflichen Beziehungen, insgesamt den wichtigsten menschlichen Beziehungen zugrunde liegt. Er wird auch als ein wahrer spiritueller Wert dargestellt, der das moralische Verhalten des Menschen gegenüber sich selbst und gegenüber anderen prägt und damit einen führenden Platz in der sokratischen Ethik einnimmt. Als ein solcher Wert muss er jedoch auf Wissen und angemessenem moralischem Verhalten beruhen, insbesondere in Übereinstimmung mit den Geboten der Encrateia. Deswegen kann behauptet werden, dass die auch mit dem Guten und Schönen gleichgesetzte Opheleia, eng mit den wichtigsten Begriffen der Philosophie von Sokrates verbunden ist, wie Wissen, Tugend, Freundschaft und moralische Erziehung, und eine sehr wichtige Rolle in seinen Überlegungen spielt.
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie Sokratejskiej opheleia jako istotnej wartości etycznej w życiu człowieka - na podstawie tekstu Ekonomika. Można sądzić, że opheleia była jednym z najczęściej przez Sokratesa używanych pojęć etycznych, a jego szczególna pozycja  została uwypuklona w tekście Ekonomika. W dialogu Ksenofonta Sokrates traktuje pożytek jako wartość, która stanowi podstawę prawdziwej przyjaźni, dobrych relacji rodzinnych, w tym szczególnie małżeńskich, właściwych stosunków zawodowych, a więc wszystkich najważniejszych relacji międzyludzkich. Jest on równie ukazany jako prawdziwa wartość duchowa kształtująca zachowanie moralne człowieka zarówno względem samego siebie, jak i innych ludzi, zajmując tym samym czołowe miejsce w etyce Sokratejskiej. Jako taka wartość musi on być jednak oparty na wiedzy i właściwym moralnym postępowaniu, w szczególności w zgodzie z nakazami enkrateia. Dlatego można twierdzić, że opheleia, utożsamiana również z dobrem i pięknem, jest ściśle powiązana z najważniejszymi pojęciami filozofii Sokratesa, takimi jak wiedza, cnota, przyjaźń i moralne wychowanie, i odgrywa  w jego rozważaniach bardzo istotną rolę.
Źródło:
Kultura i Wartości; 2020, 30; 69-84
2299-7806
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Wartości
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Plato – The Motto of Delphi of the Alcibiades I: Between Emphases and Retractions of the Socratics?
Plato – The Motto of Delphi of the Alcibiades I: Between Emphases and Retractions of the Socratics?
Autorzy:
Mazzara, Giuseppe
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633486.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Plato
the Motto of Delphi
Alcibiades I
Xenophon and Antisthenes
Opis:
The present article aims to examine whether this Platonic dialogue can be regarded as polemical and competing with the similar educational proposals put forward by Xenophon and Antisthenes for the young  Alcibiades aspiring to power in the city of Athens. The present article has been divided into two major parts. In the first one, I propose to unify the two opposing points of view that are reflected in the interpretations of the motto: the one that takes it to be a solitary dialogue of a soul talking to itself (Platonic origin) and the one that takes it to be an intersubjective dialogue (Socratic origin). In the second part, I try to highlight a few points of contact and conflict between Plato, Xenophon and Antisthenes, arguing that it is the latter two that may be alluded to in the dialogue, albeit indirectly, as competing and polemical targets.
The present article aims to examine whether this Platonic dialogue can be regarded as polemical and competing with the similar educational proposals put forward by Xenophon and Antisthenes for the young Alcibiades aspiring to power in the city of Athens. The present article has been divided into two major parts. In the first one, I propose to unify the two opposing points of view that are reflected in the interpretations of the motto: the one that takes it to be a solitary dialogue of a soul talking to itself (Platonic origin) and the one that takes it to be an intersubjective dialogue (Socratic origin). In the second part, I try to highlight a few points of contact and conflict between Plato, Xenophon and Antisthenes, arguing that it is the latter two that may be alluded to in the dialogue, albeit indirectly, as competing and polemical targets.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2014, 5, 1; 13-42
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Standaryzacja wymowy polskich nazw własnych w niemczyźnie ponadregionalnej w świetle współczesnych badań mowoznawczych. Założenie i koncepcje prac kodyfikacyjnych
Standarization of Polish Proper Names Pronunciation in the Supra-regional German Language in the View of the Contemporary Speech Competence. Research
Autorzy:
Skoczek, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/568225.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
Tematy:
moderate germanization of pronunciation
xenophon
endonym
proper names
codification
theory of speech
Opis:
Initiated by structuralists at the beginning of the 20th century, the concepts of language and methods of its exploration, in their basic assumption, methodology and approach, remain binding to the present day. Cultivated independently, scientific disciplines, such as Linguistics and Speech Competence, have been constituted in Germany thanks to Ferdinand de Saussure's concept of language and the division of areas of scientific interests into linguistique de la langue and linguistique de la parole. Since the time of de Saussure, as part of the latter discipline, different research has been being conduceted, includin 'speech' (in its broadest sense) being studied as an act. After more than a hundred years, work on the codification of the standard German pronunciation is still being conducted in the Department of Speech Competence and Phonetics in Halle. The studies in question are based on actual language convention, current technical possibilities as well as the capability to carry out research pursuant to a diverse language corpus and sociophonological methods. As part of this work some studies are also being conducted on the pronuncitaion of proper names that coe from different languages and that have currently appeared in public use. The research of English, Russian and Polish names has gained a particular momentum in accordance with the so-called moderate germanization of pronunciation by Hans Krech. This article presents the concept of the research conducted, emphasizing the pronunciation of Polish proper names.
Źródło:
Linguistica Copernicana; 2014, 11; 193-209
2080-1068
2391-7768
Pojawia się w:
Linguistica Copernicana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ctesias and the Importance of His Writings Revisited
Autorzy:
Almagor, Eran
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/637962.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
Ctesias
Persica
Indica
Artaxerxes II
Xenophon
Anabasis
Greek Historiography
Photius
Plutarch
Deinon
Opis:
Following the recent attempts to rehabilitate the reputation of Ctesias and the information given in his works, this paper proposes to understand certain of the seemingly fanciful details that were associated with the physician and his writings. It tries to shed some light on several uncertainties connected with Ctesias (i.e., his sojourn in Persia) and the Persica (i.e., date, original style and sources of imagery). It argues that the pedestrian lists included in the work might have been later interpolations and that the minor works circulating under Ctesias’ name might have been either sections of the Persica that were taken out to be presented as stand-alone volumes or else falsely attributed to him. The paper addresses the Indica and puts forward several possibilities concerning its relation with the Persica. The influence of Ctesias on the author Deinon is examined, and in the appendix the impact of the Persica on Xenophon’s Anabasis is analyzed.
Źródło:
Electrum; 2012, 19; 9-40
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:
Electrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Platone, Smp. 212 e 4–223 a 9. Alcibiade: un elogio per quale Socrate? Quello di Platone, di Antistene e Senofonte o di tutti e tre?
Plato: Smp. 212e4-223a9. Alcibiades: An Eulogy of Which Socrates? That of Plato, That of Antisthenes and Xenophon or That of All Three?
Autorzy:
Mazzara, Giuseppe
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938438.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Socrates
Alcibiades
Agathon
Antisthenes
Xenophon
revelation
woman of Mantinea
tradition
hybris
nēpios
Opis:
In the Symposium, there are two revelations: one is that of the woman of Mantinea, the other that of Alcibiades. The former (201d 1–212e 3) proposes a Socrates reshaped by Plato, but what Socrates does the latter (216a 6–217a 3) express? Can the praise for Socrates contained in the latter also be considered a tribute by Plato to his teacher? The opinions are divided. I looked at two scholars: Michel Narcy (2008) and Bruno Centrone (20142), whose judgments, as they are set out and argued, are irreconcilable. The contrast may be determined by a certain ambiguity in Plato’s attitude towards Alcibiades. Part One – In order to clarify this ambiguity and to overcome the contrast between the two scholars I have tried to show how in the praise of Alcibiades there overlap different portraits of Socrates that refer to the tradition, to different experiences of various Socratics and of Plato himself in Apologia, and how this differs from the others and from himself by proposing a whole new portrait of Socrates as a representative of an Eros megas daimōn, revealed by the woman of Mantinea, in contrast to an Eros megas theos. Part Two – As instead regards the accusation of hybris, the hypothesis is this: for Plato his colleagues, and especially Antisthenes and Xenophon, offering an image of Socrates founded exclusively on his way of life and not also on the erotic aspects alluding to the super-sensible world, seem to end up arousing laughter and looking like “fools” (nēpioi), like Alcibiades, who at the end of his speech, after making the audience laugh, is unmasked by Socrates for his clumsy attempt to impart a “life lesson” to Agathon, which he did not need at all, paying at his own expenses for his ignorance of the revelation through arriving late at the party.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2016, 7, 1; 25-54
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków
Xenophont In Pseudo-Xenophont’s Letters and in Fictional Letters of Socrates and Socratics
Autorzy:
Marchewka, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1791390.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-02-07
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Ksenofont
Sokrates
sokratycy
fikcyjne listy
intertekstualność
Xenophon
Socrates
socratic
fictional letters
intertextuality
Opis:
Celem podjętej w tym artykule analizy apokryficznej korespondencji Pseudo-Ksenofonta, którą tradycja przekazała nam dwiema niezależnymi drogami – 7 ekscerptów zachowanych w Antologii Stobajosa oraz 6 całych listów, wchodzących w skład zbioru Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher) – jest próba nakreślenia na ich podstawie powszechnie akceptowanego w dobie cesarstwa rzymskiego portretu Ksenofonta. Pseudo-Ksenofontowe listy jednoznacznie definiują twórcę Anabazy jako filozofa sokratyka, w zasadzie przemilczając jego twórczość historyczną. Dają nam świadectwo o głęboko zakorzenionej w etyce sokratejskiej jego myśli, skoncentrowanej na kalokagathii. Nieprzerwane dążenie do cnoty poprzez konsekwentne doskonalenie się nie tylko czysto etyczne, ale również w konkretnych umiejętnościach, które mają przynieść pożytek, wskazywało na kluczowe znaczenie paidei w twórczości Ksenofonta jako ucznia Sokratesa. W omawianych listach punktami odniesienia są przeważnie ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία czy wreszcie σωφροσύνη, czyli cnoty stanowiące rdzeń etyki sokratejskiej.
The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2020, 68, 3; 37-56
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Meaning of Genus in Ancient Greek Philosophy up to Aristotle and in Thomas Aquinas
Autorzy:
D’Antuono, Matthew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507598.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-08-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Homer
Isaeus
Xenophon
Heraclitus
Parmenides
Empedocles
Plato
Aristotle
Thomas Aquinas
genus
philosophy
science
metaphysics
Opis:
The term “genus” has evolved over time. This paper traces development of the word from the common usage of Ancient Greece, through the pre-Socratic philosophers and Plato, and up to the more technical use in Aristotle. It began in common use to mean a class or race of people, most specifically referring to people with a common parentage. The pre-Socratics applied the term to refer to things that were generated. Plato used the term to refer to groups of people generated by a common interest or aim. Aristotle employed it in different ways based on his predecessors. This paper makes comparisons between these usages and the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. It argues that understanding the development of “genus” facilitates understanding how Thomas Aquinas used it.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 3; 515-545
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ethnographic Trailblazers: Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon
Autorzy:
Prus, Robert
Burk, Matthew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138659.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Ethnography
Classical Greek
Herodotus
Thucydides
Xenophon
Symbolic Interaction
Anthropology
History
Pragmatism
Generic Social Process
Opis:
While ethnographic research is often envisioned as a 19th or 20th century development in the social sciences (Wax 1971; Prus 1996), a closer examination of the classical Greek literature (circa 700-300BCE) reveals at least three authors from this era whose works have explicit and extended ethnographic qualities. Following a consideration of “what constitutes ethnographic research,” specific attention is given to the texts developed by Herodotus (c484-425BCE), Thucydides (c460-400BCE), and Xenophon (c430-340BCE). Classical Greek scholarship pertaining to the study of the human community deteriorated notably following the death of Alexander the Great (c384-323BCE) and has never been fully approximated over the intervening centuries. Thus, it is not until the 20th century that sociologists and anthropologists have more adequately rivaled the ethnographic materials developed by these early Greek scholars. Still, there is much to be learned from these earlier sources and few contemporary social scientists appear cognizant of (a) the groundbreaking nature of the works of Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon and (b) the obstacles that these earlier ethnographers faced in developing their materials. Also, lacking awareness of (c) the specific materials that these scholars developed, there is little appreciation of the particular life-worlds depicted therein or (d) the considerable value of their texts as ethnographic resources for developing more extended substantive and conceptual comparative analysis.  Providing accounts of several different peoples’ life-worlds in the eastern Mediterranean arena amidst an extended account of the development of Persia as a military power and related Persian-Greek conflicts, Herodotus (The Histories) provides Western scholars with the earliest, sustained ethnographic materials of record. Thucydides (History of the Peloponnesian War) generates an extended (20 year) and remarkably detailed account of a series of wars between Athens and Sparta and others in the broader Hellenistic theater. Xenophon’s Anabasis is a participantobserver account of a Greek military expedition into Persia. These three authors do not exhaust the ethnographic dimensions of the classical Greek literature, but they provide some particularly compelling participant observer accounts that are supplemented by observations and open-ended inquiries. Because the three authors considered here also approach the study of human behavior in ways that attest to the problematic, multiperspectival, reflective, negotiated, relational, and processual nature of human interaction, contemporary social scientists are apt to find instructive the rich array of materials and insights that these early ethnographers introduce within their texts. Still, these are substantial texts and readers are cautioned that we can do little more in the present statement than provide an introduction to these three authors and their works.
Źródło:
Qualitative Sociology Review; 2010, 6, 3; 3-28
1733-8077
Pojawia się w:
Qualitative Sociology Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pobyt Adama Mickiewicza w Rosji w świetle Zapisków Ksenofonta Polewoja
Adam Mickiewicz’s stay in Russia in light of The Notesby Xenophon Polevoy
Autorzy:
Dąbrowska, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/482416.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Tematy:
Xenophon Polevoy
Nikolai Polevoy
Adam Mickiewicz
Russia
Moscow
Saint Peters-burg
Konrad Wallenrod
reception
improvisation
Opis:
This paper presents The Notes (published in Saint Petersburg, 1888) by Xenophon Polevoy (1801–1867), Nikolai’s brother, from a perspective of Adam Mickiewicz’s stay in Russia. It concerns Mickiewicz’s meetings with the Russian poets (A. Pushkin, I. Kozlov and others) in 1825 and 1826, his relations with them and the reception of Crimean Sonnets and Konrad Wallenrod in Russia. Polevoy highly values the Polish poet and considers his contacts with Russians to be friendly. An interpretive background is the periodical “Moskovskij tielegraf”.
Źródło:
Acta Polono-Ruthenica; 2019, 4, XXIV; 115-126
1427-549X
Pojawia się w:
Acta Polono-Ruthenica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wyprawa Cyrusa i odwrót Dziesięciu Tysięcy w przekazie Diodora (14.19–31; 37.1–4): Przekład i komentarz
The Expedition of Cyrus and the Retreat of the Ten Thousand in the Account of Diodorus (14.19–31; 37.1–4): Translation and Commentary)
Autorzy:
Głogowski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1045843.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-08-24
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Diodorus Siculus
Cyrus the Younger
The Ten Thousand
Ephorus of Cyme
Xenophon
Anabasis
Ctesias of Cnidus
Opis:
The author presents the first Polish translation of the section of the work by Diodorus Siculus devoted to the expedition of Cyrus the Younger and the Retreat of the Ten Thousand (Diod. 14.19–31; 37.1–4). The translation is supplemented by the commentary, which focuses mainly on the problem of the sources exploited by the direct source of Diodorus in this part of his work – Ephorus of Cyme. Therefore, the basic aim of the commentary is to display the similarities and differences between the narrative of Diodorus and the Anabasis of Xenophon and other sources, e.g. Persica by Ctesias of Cnidus.
Źródło:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2018, 28, 1; 5-32
0302-7384
Pojawia się w:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Исповедь В. С. Печерина: рецепция античной традиции в образовательном пространстве XIX века
Autorzy:
Можайский, Андрей
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1833706.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-07-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach
Tematy:
educational space
Vladimir Sergeyevich Pecherin
classical tradition
antique tradition
Xenophon
Socrates
Altes Museum
The Berlin Athlete
Playing knucklebones
John Henry Newman
Opis:
The article presents the reflection of the antique tradition in the memoirs of the Russian emigrant of the nineteenth century V.S. Pecherin. Written in epistolary form these memoirs are confessional in their character and one can traced a strong classical influence, formed by his education. Particular attention is given to Berlin as educational space, where V.S. Pecherin studied at the university and regularly visited the Altes Museum. There is a close relationship between the influence of Ancient Greek art V.S. Pecherin saw in the museum and his cultural and aesthetic views presented in his memoirs. According to the author, V.S. Pecherin presented himself as the second Xenophon wandering around Europe and expelled from his homeland in absentia. The title of the memoir Apologia pro vita mea, probably, has as its prototype both the Socratic tradition and the Christian tradition, especially expressed in the title of the work Apologia pro vita sua by John Henry Newman.
Źródło:
Conversatoria Litteraria; 2020, 14; 85-97
1897-1423
Pojawia się w:
Conversatoria Litteraria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Źródła Diodora do dziejów wyprawy dziesięciu tysięcy
The Sources of Diodorus on the History of the Expedition of the Ten Thousand
Autorzy:
Głogowski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1798758.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-24
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Diodor Sycylijski; Efor z Kyme; Ksenofont; Anabasis; Ktezjasz z Knidos; Cyrus Młodszy
Diodorus Siculus; Ephorus of Cyme; Xenophon; Anabasis; Ctesias of Cnidus; Cyrus the Younger
Opis:
Wiemy, że Anabasis Ksenofonta nie była jedynym przekazem współczesnym poświęconym wyprawie Cyrusa Młodszego. Świadectwa te jednak zaginęły i znane są nam jedynie dzięki tradycji pośredniej. Jak się powszechnie uważa, opowieść Diodora o wyprawie Cyrusa (14, 19-31; 14, 37, 1-4) opiera się na zaginionej pracy Efora z Kyme. Przekaz ten różni się jednak w pewnej mierze od opowieści Ksenofonta. Rodzi się zatem pytanie o źródła, z których korzystał sam Efor. W niniejszym artykule wykazane zostają zarówno różnice, jak i podobieństwa występujące między zachowanymi przekazami. Omówione zostają również najważniejsze poglądy uczonych współczesnych dotyczące tej sprawy. Okoliczności, które mogłyby świadczyć o wykorzystaniu tradycji odmiennej od Anabasis, są w istocie raczej drugorzędne i w wielu przypadkach dają się one przekonująco wytłumaczyć w inny sposób niż wykorzystanie przez Efora jakichś innych źródeł niż świadectwo Ksenofonta i Ktezjasza. Mimo różnic językowych występujących między Anabasis a tekstem Bibliotheke, u Diodora spotykamy wyrażenia bliźniaczo przypominające te Ksenofonta. Biorąc pod uwagę podobieństwa obu tych opowieści, można zatem założyć, że głównymi źródłami, których wpływ dostrzec można u Efora i Diodora, jest przekaz Ksenofonta uzupełniany wiadomościami z dzieła Ktezjasza.
The Anabasis of Xenophon was not the only account of the expedition of Cyrus. However, the other accounts were lost, and they are known today only thanks to the intermediate tradition. As it is thought, the narrative of Diodorus on the expedition of Cyrus (14, 19-31; 14, 37, 1-4) is based on the lost work of Ephorus of Cyme. It is necessary to state that this account differs to some extent from the narrative of Xenophon. Therefore, the question is what the sources exploited by Ephorus are. The aim of the current work is to present the selection of the most significant differences and similarities between the extent accounts. Furthermore, the most important views concerning this issue are discussed. The evidence which could suggest that the Anabasis is not a source of Ephorus is rather of secondary importance and in many cases could be interpreted otherwise. Despite the linguistic differences between the Anabasis and the Bibliothece, we can notice that in Diodorus there are expressions which resemble greatly these of Xenophon. By considering the similarities between these two narratives, we can assume that the main sources which could be identified in the story of Ephorus and Diodorus are the account of Xenophon supplemented by the information taken from the work of Ctesias.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2019, 67, 3; 23-44
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies