Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "wojny bałkańskie" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 33
Tytuł:
Rumuńskie roszczenia terytorialne wobec Bułgarii w dobie wojen bałkańskich
Romanian claims against Bulgaria during the period of the Balkan Wars
Autorzy:
Znamierowska-Rakk, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909880.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
Romania
Bulgaria
Dobrudja
Bessarabia
Wojny Bałkańskie
Rumunia
Bułgaria
Dobrudża
Besarabia
Opis:
This article is to demonstrate the genesis and repercussions of the Romanian territorial claims against Bulgaria during the war period of the 1912-1913 in the Balkan Peninsula. What is most stressed is the direct relationship of the said claims with the separation of Bessarabia from the Romanian state, executed by the 1878 Berlin truce and annexation of Northern Dobrudja, a region inhabited mostly by Bulgarians. This last fact inspired the anxiety in Bucharest, that Bulgaria might claim that land by force. This was worsened after 1908, when Bulgaria proclaimed itself a sovereign empire, intent on incorporating major parts of Macedonia and Thrace since the decisive victory over the Ottoman Turkey. Such broadening of the Bulgarian borders was regarded in Bucharest as a threat to the political equilibrium in the Balkans, endangering the Romanian state security and territorial integrity. As a result the government of Romania issued a claim to reestablish the border with Bulgaria, which was in essence a claim over Southern Dobrudja. In spite of rather favorable international circumstances in the early XX century, the Romanians were unable to bring this notion into being until the second half of 1913, the outbreak of an inter-alliance war, a result of frictions between Bulgaria, Serbia and Greece. The lack of success on the side of the Bulgarian armed forces at the western front and the fact that their northern and northeastern provinces were left unprotected incited Romania to invade Bulgaria and annex the Southern Dobrudja. A Turkish invasion followed shortly. As a consequence, and with recognition of the European superpowers of the time, on 10th August 1913 in Bucharest a harsh treaty was imposed on Bulgarians, with the loss of the contested Southern Dobrudja amongst other terms.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 287-295
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Cele polityczne i terytorialne Królestwa Czarnogóry w przededniu i w trakcie I wojny bałkańskiej
Political and territorial objectives of the Kingdom of Montenegro on the eve of and during the First Balkan War
Autorzy:
Szczepański, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan wars
Montenegro
Serbia
Sandjak
Metohia
wojny bałkańskie
Czarnogóra
Sandžak
Metohija
Opis:
Montenegro, the smallest of the Balkan states in the beginning of the 20th century, was especially interested in creating an anti-Turkish alliance. It aimed at attaching the fertile lands of Sandžak of Novi Pazar, Metohija and Shkodër. Finally, as a result of the I Balkan War, it managed to achieve the first two aims, only if partially, because it had to share those lands with Serbia. Montenegro did not manage to take over control of Shkodër and the surroundings inhabited mainly by Albanians. There were many reasons why Montenegro did not manage to realize its territorial aspirations: – the poor financial condition of the state of Montenegro on the eve of the war, which prevented them from gaining a strong position in the Balkan alliance and made a success in its military actions dependent on the allies, especially on Serbia; – the detrimental pressure exerted by king Nicolas I to fight at any cost for the control over Shkodër; – a conflict of interest and mistakes made by the Montenegro authorities in developing their relations with Serbia, which weighed later on the relations between Montenegro and Serbia in the period between the Balkan wars and the First World War, as well as at the time when Yugoslavia began to unite around the idea of building the common state. – not appreciating to a sufficient degree the significance of the Albanian problem and not using the possession of the North Albanian lands as a bargaining chip in the relations with neighbors, particularly with Serbia.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2013, 20, 1; 117-136
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pułkownik Redl. Polityczne wątki afery w prasie polskiej
Colonel Redl. Political motifs of the affair in Polish press releases
Autorzy:
Stępnik, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909882.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Alfred Redl
Balkan Wars
Austro-Hungary
antisemitism
Wojny Bałkańskie
Austro-Węgry
antysemityzm
Opis:
The most famous spy scandal before the outbreak of the First World War, took place during the time of intensified diplomatic actions taken to stop the Balkan War. At night on May 24th 1913, Colonel Alfred Redl, the chief of staff for the VIII. Corps stationed in Prague – having been exposed by counterintelligence – committed suicide in Klomser Hotel in Vienna. His death was directly connected to the fact that the special commission that consisted of high ranking officers was established in the extraordinary mode. The case of Russian spy was known only to an exclusive group of ‘initiates’. Nevertheless, it was almost immediately leaked to the press and evoked scandal that stirred up public opinion in Austria-Hungary. The motifs of the scandal – described in Polish press releases of that time: in Cracow, Lvov and Warsaw – have been analyzed in the article. They were significant in the context of political struggle, led mainly between two antagonistic forces: the Austrophiles and the Russophiles. Seemingly distant from Polish matters, the spy affair turned out to be an important factor that ‘catalyzed’ political attitudes of the Poles. The aspect of Redl’s nationality became a significant element of the polemics. And the scandal undermined Austro-Hungarian morale, especially the morale of Slavic nations subject to the Empire; the more so as, at exactly the same time, a political corruption affair which Hungarian Prime Minister was involved in, happened in Budapest. The events that happened in Galicia in May and June 1913 – as connected with political and economical turning point that autonomous country reached, which was caused by Austro-Hungarian preparations for Balkan War – have been examined here as the background context. In this article, basing on a wide range of press sources, the author classifies and describes some key political motifs of the Redl affair: especially the change of ideas about the Balkan War – in accordance to common opinions expressed in Polish press – now bringing the fatal threat to Austro-Hungary. (Russia came into possession of mobilization plans). The other topics are: the decline of Austro-Hungarian prestige on the international arena, the criticism of the code applying to officer corps, assigning Redl the Jewish origin by the anti-Semitic press, attacks on the ones that supported Austro-Hungarian orientations, including those who organized a kind of ‘substitute” for Polish military forces under the auspices of the monarchy, and finally – the spy psychosis.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 249-286
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pierwsza wojna bałkańska według francuskiego dziennika „Le Temps”, a zachodnioeuropejskie stereotypy dotyczące ludów bałkańskich
The First Balkan War according to French journal Le Temps” and the Western European stereotypes concerning the Balkan peoples
Autorzy:
Sajkowski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909883.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
“Le Temps”
France
stereotypes
Wojny Bałkańskie
Francja
stereotypy
Opis:
“Le Temps” was one of the most important French newspapers of the first half of XXth century. In the first two months of the first Balkan war the progress of this conflict was the most important subject for the editors of “Le Temps”. The information provided by the daily had a binary character. On the one hand the readers might found the descriptions of diplomatic and military operations of the states participating in conflict, and the other political powers interested in the situation in the region. On the other hand the journal systematically published large commentaries made by the political commentators and the Balkan correspondents of the daily. In the articles published in “Le Temps” one can find the images of Balkans which are typical for Western European image of Balkans, which started to emerge in the beginning of XVIIIth century. It is important to underline that this image of Balkans presented in “Le Temps” did not concern only politics and war. The conflict became a pretext for the presentation of wild Balkan nature and the traditional culture of the Balkans. In the articles published in the newspaper it is possible to find also the reflections concerning the backwardness of social structures of Balkan people and their civilizations, as well as the remarks on the process of modernizations of those societies caused by military mobilization. “Le Temps” promoted the Western European stereotypes about Balkans, which up to that time were present mainly in travel journals, not so influential as the daily journals. The representation of Balkans presented by “Le Temps” was the synthesis of the images already known. The example of this journal shows that the image of Balkan people in the time of the Balkan war may be considered as the climax of the process of evolution of the Balkan stereotypes.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 241-248
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mocarstwa centralne a Bałkany. Studium działań dyplomatycznych Niemiec i Austro-Węgier w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej (1909–1913)
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/653768.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
Niemcy
Austro-Węgry
mocarstwa centralne
Bałkany
Europa Południowo-Wschodnia
wojny bałkańskie 1912–1913
Germany
Austro-Hungary
Central Powers
the Balkans
South-Eastern Europe
Balkan wars of 1912–1913
Opis:
Półwysep Bałkański ze względu na swoje geograficzne położenie na styku „świata zachodniego” i „świata Orientu” od wieków odgrywał ważną rolę zarówno w europejskiej polityce, jak i ekonomii. Jego znaczenie znacznie wzrosło w połowie XIX w., kiedy europejskie mocarstwa wkroczyły w tzw. erę imperialną. Trudno zatem dziwić się, że w tym właśnie czasie ten niewielki region, leżący na „krańcach cywilizowanej Europy”, stał się polem zaciętej walki o strefy wpływów. W rywalizacji tej wzięły udział także Niemcy i Austro-Węgry. Jakkolwiek państwa te odmiennie postrzegały ostateczne cele, zarówno w Berlinie, jak i w Wiedniu zdawano sobie sprawę, że uzyskanie przewagi nad konkurentami może mieć istotny wpływ nie tylko na rozwój rodzimego przemysłu, który zyskiwałby nowe rynki zbytu dla swojej produkcji, ale także na kształtowanie ogólnoeuropejskiej polityki. Tymczasem zachodzące na Bałkanach na początku XX w. procesy i głębokie zmiany, błędnie oceniane i bagatelizowane przez dyplomację mocarstw centralnych, przesądziły o dotkliwej porażce, którą poniosły one w walce o ugruntowanie swej pozycji w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej.Due to its geographical location nestled between the “Western World” and the “World of the Orient”, the Balkan Peninsula has for centuries been playing an important part both in European politics, and economy. Its significance increased sharply in the mid-nineteenth century, after the European powers entered the so-called imperial era. It is therefore not surprising that at that time this relatively small region at “the end of the civilised world” became the battlefield for zones of influence. The rivalry was also joined by Germany and Austro-Hungary. And although these states had different ultimate ends, it was known both in Berlin, and in Vienna that the advantage over the competitors and opponents could have a great impact not only on the development of national industry, which would gain a new ready market, but also on the shape of European policy. However, the processes of deep changes and transformations that occurred in the Balkans in the early twentieth century, wrongly identified and underestimated by the Central Powers, determined their abject failure in the attempts to strengthen their position in South-Eastern Europe.
Źródło:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej; 2018, 53, 1
2353-6403
1230-5057
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosunki bułgarsko-rumuńskie w latach 1912–1913 (na podstawie bułgarskich, niemieckich i austro-węgierskich dokumentów dyplomatycznych)
Bulgarian-Romanian relations in the years 1912–1913 (on the base of Bulgarian, German and Austro-Hungarian diplomatic sources)
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32328809.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Bulgaria
Romania
Balkan wars 1912–1913
Dobruja
great powers
Bułgaria
Rumunia
wojny bałkańskie 1912–1913
Dobrudża
wielkie mocarstwa
Opis:
Trwające od ponad trzydziestu lat napięcie w stosunkach bułgarsko-rumuńskich osiągnęło apogeum w latach 1912–1913, a perspektywa naruszenia przez Bułgarię status quo na Bałkanach skłoniła Rumunię do wystąpienia z żądaniami nowych gwarancji bezpieczeństwa i odszkodowań terytorialnych. Podjęte pertraktacje między Bukaresztem i Sofią wykazały jednak znaczne rozbieżności w stanowiskach stron w kwestii modyfikacji granicy Dobrudży, których nie były w stanie zniwelować nawet naciski wielkich mocarstw. Dlatego Rumunia wypowiedziała Bułgarii wojnę, ale modyfikacja granicy w Dobrudży opisana w traktacie bukareszteńskim z 1913 r. nie przywróciła dobrych relacji między sąsiednimi państwami.
Bulgarian-Romanian relations in the years 1912–1913 (on the base of Bulgarian, German and Austro-Hungarian diplomatic sources). The tensions in Bulgarian-Romanian relations, which had lasted for over thirty years, reached their peak in 1912–1913, and the prospect of Bulgaria breaching the status quo in the Balkans prompted Romania to ask for new security guarantees and territorial compensation. However, the negotiations between Bucharest and Sofia showed significant divergences in the positions of the parties regarding the modification of the Dobruja border, which even the pressure of the great powers could not offset. Therefore, Romania declared war on Bulgaria, but the modification of the border in Dobruja described in the Treaty of Bucharest of 1913 did not restore good relations between neighbouring countries.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2022, 29; 199-212
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Central Powers and the Balkans A Study of Diplomatic Activities of Germany and Austro-Hungary in Southeast Europe (1909–1913)
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/654117.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
Niemcy
Austro-Węgry
mocarstwa centralne
Bałkany
Europa PołudniowoWschodnia
wojny bałkańskie 1912–1913
Germany
Austro-Hungary
Central Powers
Balkans
Balkan Wars 1912–1913
Opis:
Półwysep Bałkański ze względu na swoje geograficzne położenie na styku „świata zachodniego” i „świata Orientu” od wieków odgrywał ważną rolę zarówno w europejskiej polityce, jak i ekonomii. Jego znaczenie znacznie wzrosło w połowie XIX w., kiedy europejskie mocarstwa wkroczyły w tzw. erę imperialną. Trudno zatem dziwić się, że w tym właśnie czasie ten niewielki region, leżący na „krańcach cywilizowanej Europy”, stał się polem zaciętej walki o strefy wpływów. W rywalizacji tej wzięły udział także Niemcy i Austro-Węgry. Jakkolwiek państwa te odmiennie postrzegały ostateczne cele, zarówno w Berlinie, jak i w Wiedniu zdawano sobie sprawę, że uzyskanie przewagi nad konkurentami może mieć istotny wpływ nie tylko na rozwój rodzimego przemysłu, który zyskiwałby nowe rynki zbytu dla swojej produkcji, ale także na kształtowanie ogólnoeuropejskiej polityki. Tymczasem zachodzące na Bałkanach na początku XX w. procesy i głębokie zmiany, błędnie oceniane i bagatelizowane przez dyplomację mocarstw centralnych, przesądziły o dotkliwej porażce, którą poniosły one w walce o ugruntowanie swej pozycji w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej. Because of its geographic location at the meeting point of the Western world and the Orient, the Balkan Peninsula for many centuries had figured largely both in the European politics and in its economy, and its importance increased in the mid-nineteenth century, when the European powers entered the so-called “imperial phase.” It is hardly surprising then that at this particular period this small region, situated at “the edge of civilized Europe,” had become the arena of fierce fighting for spheres of influence. Germany and Austro-Hungary joined this struggle, too. Even though these two states variously defined their ultimate objectives in the Balkans, it was widely acknowledged both in Berlin and in Vienna that gaining an advantage over the rivals could not only significantly influence the development of domestic industry, which would acquire new markets for its output, but it could also affect the state of European politics. Nevertheless, the new developments and deep transformations occurring in the Balkans at the outset of the twentieth century, misjudged and belittled by the diplomatic services of the Central Powers, resulted in a heavy defeat that they suffered in the endeavors to consolidate their position in Southeast Europe.
Źródło:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej; 2018, 53, 3
2353-6403
1230-5057
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wielkie mocarstwa europejskie wobec wojen bałkańskich 1912-1913
The Great European Powers and Balkan Wars 1912-1913
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909890.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan wars
great powers
Balkans
Mediterranean sea
Thessaloniki
Wojny Bałkańskie
mocarstwa
Morze Śródziemne
Saloniki
Opis:
Balkan Wars 1912-1913 were a milestone event in the history of the Balkans. They ending, started in 1878, process of expulsion of Turkey from its European possessions, and creating the possibility of realizing popular in this part of Europe slogan “The Balkans for the Balkan nations”. It should be noted that taking on the Balkan Peninsula events were with attention watched by the European great powers, because this part of Europe they are treated as a region of special economic and politic-military interest. This situation was dictated primarily by dynamic industrialization of Europe, which already in the middle of the nineteenth century led to the exacerbation of the struggle for access to the raw materials and especially to sales markets. In the context of the Balkans the essential importance had the rivalry between Austria-Hungary, which was seeking a safe and comfortable way to the port of Thessaloniki, and Russia, which was striving to change the status of Bosporus and the Dardanelles, for ensure grain exports through the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. It must be remembered that the Balkans and Turkey played an equally important role in the economic plans of other powers – Great Britain, France, and from the late nineteenth century also Italy and Germany. An equally important role played by political and military considerations. The entry of great powers in the so-called imperial era greatly influenced the intensification of the competition for the “undisputed leader” in Europe and the range of spheres of influence, and the crystallization of the opposing military-political blocks in the Europe, pay attention of politicians to those European countries, which was created the possibility of blocking the enemy actions and obtain tactical advantage. For obvious reasons, the Balkans have played in this rivalry special role. Although the imposition of all these factors complicated the situation on the Balkan Peninsula, the persistent tension between the great powers created Balkan states and nations the feasibility of their policy plans. Thus, in the era of the Balkan wars, they did not intend to follow the guidelines of European diplomacy, and taken by the great powers the efforts to save peace and acquisition of potential allies did not lead to the expected success, which clearly confirmed the events of WWI.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 207-220
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nadzieje i stracone złudzenia. Wojny bałkańskie w świetle tekstów z kręgu Dimitriji Čupovskiego i Krste P. Misirkova
Hopes and lost illusions. Balkan Wars in the light of the texts from the circle Dimitrija Čupovski and Krste P. Misirkov
Autorzy:
Moroz-Grzelak, Lilla
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909879.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
Dimitrija Čupovski
Krste Misirkov
Macedonia
Wojny Bałkańskie
Opis:
This paper addresses the sense of national identity of the Macedonians in the period of the Balkan wars and their aftermath. The first source material were used journalistic texts and calls in the journal „Makedonskij Golos” published by Macedonian expatriates gathered around Dimitrija Čupovski in St. Petersburg in the years 1913-1914. Second was diary Dnevnik) written by Krste Petkov Misirkov in 1913. Expression of these two major characters in the Macedonian history reflect geopolitical policies conducted in the Slavic population in the Balkans. It is an important source material documenting the national consciousness of intelligence derived from the Macedonian lands. This indicates that the main topics which were then undertaken focused on the defense of the whole Macedonian territory, aspirations to create their own state and diversified approach to the idea of the Slavic community.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 297-308
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 33

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies