Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "misconduct in science" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
On what is important when we think of psychology in Poland
Autorzy:
Brzeziński, Jerzy Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2128053.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-04-04
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
psychology
scientific research
publishing
replications
misconduct in science
Opis:
The author takes up the problem of the condition of psychology as an academic discipline. He narrows down the scope of his reflections to answering four questions concerning the context of the country in which psychology is developed – in this case: Poland. The author answers Question 1 – Does it make sense to speak of any specificity of research carried out by psychologists in Poland? – in the negative. In his opinion, it is possible (and advisable) to speak of the cultural context of psychological practice but not research practice. Psychological cognition is intersubjective and has a global character. The author’s answer to Question 2 – Should psychologists publish (also) in their native language and should they publish their work also in Poland? – is positive. In the context of Question 3 – What indices are used (or should be used) to determine a psychologist’s position in world science? – the author comments critically on the practice of overusing various not always well thought-out bibliometric indices and is in favor of increasing the role of peer review assessments. Answering Question 4 – What conclusions should we draw from the scientific pathologies that have come to light and what should our reaction to those pathologies be? – the author suggests that psychologists should make their raw data available and share them with other researchers so as to make external replications of empirical studies possible.
Źródło:
Roczniki Psychologiczne; 2014, 17, 3; 495-515
1507-7888
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Drapieżne konferencje: nieetyczne praktyki konferencyjne zagrażające nauce
Predatory Conferences: Unethical Conference Practices Threatening Science
Autorzy:
Burdzik, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2096376.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Instytut Socjologii
Tematy:
predatory conferences
ethics in science
scientific misconduct
good scientific practice
drapieżne konferencje
etyka w nauce
nierzetelność naukowa
dobre praktyki akademickie
Opis:
Esej opisuje zjawisko „drapieżnych konferencji”, przedstawia ich charakterystyczne cechy oraz opisuje spowodowane tym problemy, przynoszące szkodę nauce.  Drapieżne konferencje nie prowadzą rzetelnego procesu recenzyjnego, często mają fikcyjny komitet organizacyjny, nie są przejrzyste w kwestiach finansowych oraz siedziby, i publikują niemalże wszystko w publikacjach pokonferencyjnych. W zakończeniu artykułu wskazane jest, jak można walczyć z „drapieżnymi konferencjami”.
This paper describes the phenomenon of ‘predatory conferences’, with the focus on the problems they cause for science. Predatory conferences fail to properly manage peer review, frequently have fictitious organizing committee, do not operate on any quality control, are unclear about their finances and about conference organizer or location. They are not selective in terms of post-conference volume contributions. Towards the end of the paper it is discussed what can and should be done to eliminate or reduce the effects of predatory conferences.
Źródło:
Konteksty Społeczne; 2017, 5, 2; 118-124
2300-6277
Pojawia się w:
Konteksty Społeczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Po co psychologia?
What is psychology for?
Autorzy:
Brzeziński, Jerzy Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178119.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy
Tematy:
5-year master’s degree
Empirically Based Assessment
antireductionism
empirical research
empirical theory
ethical awareness
falsification
full-time
methodological awareness
plagiarism
program in psychology
psychology
science
scientific misconduct: fabrication
social practice
Opis:
Three main problems are considered. The first is that psychology should avoid any inclination towards neuroscience or a type of brain science. Making use of the achievements of natural sciences, psychology should take into regard the cultural conditions [determinants] and methods worked out in social sciences. Thus, it should adopt the antireductionistic methodological programme. The second problem is that psychology must reject the papers that entice with apparent scientific approach being actually of no real worth. Also the threat posed to psychological practice by pseudo-scientific monographs and pseudo-test should be recognised. They offer scientifically false basis of practical work of psychologists in the sphere of social practice. The third problem is that each psychological practice should be preceded by a psychological theory that is empirical and needs to be verified by a methodologically correct method. Thee underlying empirical psychological theory makes a given psychological practice sensible and ethical. The status of psychology as a science and the status of psychological practice are related to the quality of education of future psychologists. The author definitely opts for the model of full-time 5-year master’s degree studies (so against the Bologna model of 3-year licentiate (BA) followed by a 2-year master’s degree study (MA)), supplemented with a one-year training under supervision of an experienced specialist. The effective and ethical work of professional psychologists in Poland suffers from the lack of legal regulations that would protect this profession against the infiltration of all kinds of charlatans offering pseudo-scientific diagnostic tools like e.g. the Tree test of Charles Koch and therapies like e.g. the Systemic Constellation of Bert Hellinger. Of utmost importance is development of not only methodological awareness but also ethical awareness in psychologists and students of psychology. Moreover, the education should bring the realisation of the effects and danger of scientific misconduct of FFP type, that is fabrication, falsification, plagiarism.
Źródło:
Polskie Forum Psychologiczne; 2014, XIX, 3; 285-304
1642-1043
Pojawia się w:
Polskie Forum Psychologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies