Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "informal logic" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Użyteczność metod logiki nieformalnej w badaniu argumentów w dyskusjach między teistami a ateistami
    Autorzy:
    Trombik, Kamil
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/429093.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    argumentation
    informal logic
    atheism
    theism
    critical thinking
    Opis:
    This paper argues that methods used in informal logic (sometimes called CriticalThinking) could be helpful in examining the arguments in discussionsbetween theists and atheists. Application of the techniques of informal logiccould reveal the substantive value of many commonly shared views about theism(and theists) and atheism (and atheists). The utility of applying informallogic methods has illustrated by several examples.
    Źródło:
    Semina Scientiarum; 2017, 16
    1644-3365
    Pojawia się w:
    Semina Scientiarum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Language and Argument: a Review of the Field
    Autorzy:
    Hinton, Martin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1026741.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-03-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    corpus linguistics
    argumentation
    informal logic
    discourse
    rhetoric
    fallacy
    Opis:
    This paper has a dual purpose: it both seeks to introduce the other works in this issue by illustrating how they are related to the field of argumentation as a whole, and to make clear the tremendous range of research currently being carried out by argumentation theorists which is concerned with the interaction and inter-reliance of language and argument. After a brief introduction to the development of the field of argumentation, as many as eight language-based approaches to the study of argument are identified, taking as their perspective: rhetoric, argument structure, argument as act, discourse analysis, corpus methods, emotive argument, and narrative argument. The conclusion makes it clear that these branches of study are all themselves interconnected and that it is the fusion of methodologies and theory from linguistics and the philosophical study of argument which lends this area of research its dynamism.
    Źródło:
    Research in Language; 2019, 17, 1; 93-103
    1731-7533
    Pojawia się w:
    Research in Language
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Uwagi o systemie logiki formalnej skonstruowanym dla logików nieformalnych
    Remarks on the System of Formal Logic Construed for Informal Logicians
    Autorzy:
    Kiczuk, Stanisław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012940.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    funktor prawdziwościowy
    logika nieformalna
    logika nieklasyczna
    klasyczny rachunek zdań
    truth-functional operator
    informal logic
    non-classical logic
    classical propositional calculus
    Opis:
    D. Sherry’s main theses included in his essay entitled “Formal Logic for Informal Logicians” are presented in the article. In a discussion with his theses it is shown that he prefers this kind of logic that has a lot of elements that are the same as in Aristotle’s logic understood as the art of thinking and the technique of discussion taken from Topics, and not the logic that was started in his Prior Analytics. It is also shown that not only patterns of inferring, but also the theses of logic, as well as theses to which no patterns correspond, that are guarantee reliability of inference patterns, may be intuitively obvious. In the article also attention is drawn to the fact that the PL- system of logic presented by Sherry was characterized by him by means of a rather poor logical terminology. In the American author’s argument there are no clear distinctions between the thesis of logic, the logical inference pattern and the rule of the procedure of proving. However, it can be established that the PL- system is constituted by argumentation patterns that are reliable owing to such theses of propositional logic as modus potens, modus tollens, disjunctive syllogism, conjunctive syllogism, complex destructive dilemma, and the two rules concerning creating proofs, i.e. the rule of conditional proof and the rule of reduction to the absurd. In the PL- system there are fewer theses than in the classical propositional calculus, but this has nothing in common with the so-called multivalent logics to which some theses of classical logic supposedly do not apply. Everything suggests that some systems of non-classical logic systems may be built on the PL- system; namely, the ones in which theses are given that govern the correct use of non-extensional operators connected with key terms appearing in many sciences, like e.g. “time”, “change”, “causality”. Sherry’s essay reveals that he is a supporter of the thesis that knowledge of formal logic is necessary for using informal logic efficiently, which is necessary for teaching logic properly.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2010, 58, 1; 95-108
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Persuasive argumentation as a cultural practice
    Autorzy:
    Gałkowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437484.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
    Tematy:
    informal logic
    argument as social practice
    philosophy of culture
    Jurgen Habermas
    Jerzy Kmita
    logika nieformalna
    argumentacja jako praktyka społeczna
    filozofia kultury
    Jürgen Habermas
    Opis:
    In this article author traces relation between argumentation and cultural practice. The first part focuses on definition of argumentation in informal logic tradition. In particular, it discusses argument in terms of verbal and social activity involving the use of everyday language. Author claims that there is no argumentation beyond language. The second part explains persuasive argumentation as a form of cultural practice. The persuasive arguments found in “social practice” can be understood as a social activity, analysable within the context of a given cultural system. Author refers to an approach taking the argumentative expression as a certain type of communicative practice, directed towards respecting, recognising or accepting specific actions. The inclusion of persuasive argumentation in the “circuit of cultural activities” to be studied makes it possible to compare this type of argumentation with other social practices, and to posit a clear historical dimension in the study of argumentation. It also makes it possible to view persuasive argumentation as one of many cultural activities aimed at changing or perpetuating behaviours, attitudes, thinking, etc. The third part of the paper concerns the problem of humanistic interpretation of persuasive argumentation. Author attempts to develop this intuition, at the same time demonstrating the problems that arise from this approach. In conclusion, author tries to analyze argumentation in terms of culture theory and humanistic interpretation.
    Źródło:
    ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2014, 4, 1; 123-134
    2083-6635
    2084-1043
    Pojawia się w:
    ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Variant of Material Connexive Logic
    Autorzy:
    Belikov, Alexander
    Zaitsev, Dmitry
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2142753.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-11-09
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    many-valued logics
    connexive logic
    four-valued logic MC
    informal reasoning
    Opis:
    The relationship between formal (standard) logic and informal (common-sense, everyday) reasoning has always been a hot topic. In this paper, we propose another possible way to bring it up inspired by connexive logic. Our approach is based on the following presupposition: whatever method of formalizing informal reasoning you choose, there will always be some classically acceptable deductive principles that will have to be abandoned, and some desired schemes of argument that clearly are not classically valid. That way, we start with a new version of connexive logic which validates Boethius’ (and thus, Aristotle’s) Theses and quashes their converse from right to left. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of this logic. We also study the implication-negation fragment of this logic supplied with Boolean negation as a second negation.
    Źródło:
    Bulletin of the Section of Logic; 2022, 51, 2; 227-242
    0138-0680
    2449-836X
    Pojawia się w:
    Bulletin of the Section of Logic
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies