Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "deliberative democracy" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 48
Tytuł:
Deliberative democracy and citizenship
Autorzy:
Pietrzyk-Reeves, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026741.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
democracy
citizenship
deliberative democracy
models of democracy
Opis:
The model of deliberative democracy poses a number of dificult questions about individual rationality, public reason and justification, public spiritedness, and an active and supportive public sphere. It also raises the question about what kind of civic involvement is required for the practices of democratic deliberation to be effective. The aim of this article is to examine the last question by looking at the role and value of citizenship understood in terms of participation. It argues that deliberative democracy implies a category of democratic citizens; its institutional framework calls for the activity and competence of citizenry, and consequently, the participatory forms of deliberative democracy come closest to the democratic ideal as such. Also, the model of participatory-deliberative democracy is more attractive as a truly democratic ideal than the model of formal deliberative democracy, but it certainly faces more dificulties when it comes to the practicalities, and especially the institutional design. This problem is raised in the last section of the article where the possible applicability of such a model to post-communist democracies is addressed. The major dificulty that the participatory-deliberative model poses for the post-communist democratization can be explained by a reference to the cultural approach towards democratization and to the revised modernization theory presented by Inglehart and Welzel. The problem of the applicability of such a model in the post-communist context seems to support the thesis presented here which suggests that active citizenship, civic skills and civic culture are indispensable for the development of deliberative politics.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2006, 35; 43-64
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Słabości i niedostatki procedur demokracji deliberacyjnej
The limitations and shortcomings of deliberative democracy procedures
Autorzy:
Krzewińska, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/413263.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
demokracja deliberacyjna
deliberacja
procedury demokracji deliberacyjnej
facylitator
deliberative democracy
deliberation
procedures of deliberative democracy
facilitator
Opis:
W artykule zostały omówione dwie kwestie. Po pierwsze, wskazano na cechy systemów demokratycznych, które są krytykowane przez zwolenników demokracji deliberacyjnej. Taka perspektywa pozwoliła na prezentację najważniejszych cech demokracji deliberacyjnej. Charakteryzując ten typ demokracji, odniesiono się również do samej procedury deliberacji, czyli grupowego namysłu nad ważnymi kwestiami o wymiarze społecznym, politycznym i gospodarczym. Po drugie, przeprowadzono krytykę demokracji deliberacyjnej, ale nie odnosząc się do jej filozoficzny założeń, lecz wskazując na problemy, które wynikają ze stosowania właściwych dla demokracji deliberacyjnej procedur. Artykuł kończy prezentacja przyczyn niezwykle rzadkiego wykorzystywania procedur deliberacyjnych w Polsce oraz trudności z jakimi wiąże się ich realizacja.
This article presents two main issues. Firstly, it shows the characteristics of democracy which are criticised by supporters of deliberative democracy. This perspective makes it possible to present the main attributes of deliberative democracy. The characteristics of this type of democracy refer to the procedures of deliberation, as a general reflection on important social, political, and economic issues. Secondly, the paper criticises deliberative democracy by showing the problems associated with the implementation of procedures, without considering the philosophical background of the issue under discussion. The article concludes with the presentation of an extremely rare application of the procedures of deliberative democracy in Poland, and the troubles connected with its realisation.
Źródło:
Przegląd Socjologiczny; 2017, 66, 3; 45-72
0033-2356
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Perspektywy sondażu deliberatywnego jako innowacji w polityce zdrowotnej
Perspectives of deliberative poll as an innovation in health policy
Autorzy:
Zabdyr-Jamroz, Michal
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/635294.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
HEALTH POLICY
PARTICIPATION
DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY
DELIBERATIVE POLL
Opis:
The aim of this paper is a systematic description and classification of the deliberative poll (DP) as a potentially innovative method of participation in health policy. The paper discusses the theory of deliberative democracy and a specific method of deliberative polling, as well as examples of its application, along with critical commentary. It summarises the characteristics of DP: advantages and disadvantages, as well as conditions for proper application. In this context an important distinc tion is made between two ideal types of participation: co-decision and consultation. A key feature of the latter is its advisory, and not decisive, character. DP is considered an example of such non-decisive, consultative participation.
Źródło:
Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie; 2010, 8, 2; 30-46
2084-2627
Pojawia się w:
Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Partycypacja obywatelska w demokracji deliberacyjnej ku dobru wspólnemu
Civil participation in deliberative democracy towards the common good
Autorzy:
Stadniczeńko, Stanisław Leszek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697317.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Opolski
Tematy:
civil participation
deliberative democracy
common good
Opis:
The author draws attention to the consideration of the complexity of civil participation in deliberative democracy, indicating that the legislator assumed that dialogue is to be a way of existence, and thus the basis of any social situation in the state. State authorities appointed to serve the people and the common good have to ask citizens about their position in the case, not in order to obtain the desired response, thus emphasizing the departure from the monologue culture in favor of dialogue and communication with the public. The author claims that the normative foundations of the community state are linked by the conviction that public values and purposes are established in the communication process. In this approach, it is important to achieve public purposes and the quality of their achievement, its constructive features are: network, multi-level management, conciliation, participation. The basic mechanisms of action of this type of state are: deliberation, compromise and arrangements are made in the social networks – the dominant type of management of public affairs in this model is co-management. Solicitude of the state as a common good obliges not only a citizen, but means that a citizen has the right to expect that public authority will act so that the Republic of Poland can be considered a common good by citizens. Referring to literature, the author notes that deliberative democracy and its concept put more emphasis on the importance of conversation, discussion and debate on democratic practice than on the importance of voting. Its supporters argue that the debate improves the quality of collective decisions and increases the chances of their acceptance. Varieties of deliberative democracy range from accentuating local representation to reinforcing the debate within representative legislative bodies. The article points out the differences between discourse and deliberation. Moreover, the forms of civic participation and civic participation techniques used in Poland are presented. We have come to live in times when communication, both traditional and with the help of modern media, plays a significant role in shaping societies. It is important to understand the basic laws guiding communication, the ability to properly form interpersonal relationships, cognize the factors affecting the quality of messages transmitted, the technique of freedom of expression, the skill of persuasion and argumentation. The correct perception of the essence of dialogue in a deliberative democracy is its foundation, especially when it concerns institutions aimed at turning natural and legal persons to public decision-making process. Considering the literature, it was found that new participative solutions, primarily the ability to dialogue, could prevent a democratic deficit and also indicated that that civic participation impacts on the creation of deliberative democracy.
Źródło:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2019, 17, 3; 151-171
2658-1922
Pojawia się w:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Preventing the Atrophy of the Deliberative Stance: Considering Non-Decisional Participation as a Prerequisite to Political Freedom
Autorzy:
Zabdyr-Jamróz, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2200446.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Projekt Avant
Tematy:
deliberative democracy
deliberative stance
preference change
deliberative systems
Opis:
In order to be exercised meaningfully, political freedom requires the capacity to actually identify available policy options. To ensure this, society ought to engage in deliberation as a discussion oriented towards mutual learning. In order to highlight this issue, I define deliberation in terms of the participants’ openness to preference change, i.e. the deliberative stance. In the context of the systemic approach to deliberative theory, I find several factors causing the atrophy of such a deliberative stance. I note that this state can occur not only when debaters are representatives or are in the presence of an audience, but also when they face the prospect of a binding decision. It is the latter effect that is a serious challenge to the micro-deliberative strategy, one that strives towards decisional powers being granted to deliberative minipublics. Presenting my findings, I propose—as an alternative to the power-oriented ‘ladder of participation’—a distinction between traditional co-decision and deliberative consultation, the latter one being (in certain systemic contexts) an environment that is more conducive to deliberative stance. This new typology highlights factors that lead to preference petrification and allows for the appreciation of the non-decisional character of micro-deliberation. All of it leads to the conclusion that, in order to preserve their deliberative character in the systemic context, deliberative minipublics should not always be required to have decision-making powers
Źródło:
Avant; 2019, 10, 1; 89-117
2082-6710
Pojawia się w:
Avant
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Socrates and Deliberative Democracy. On Socrates’ Conception of Politics in Plato’s Apology, Crito and Gorgias
Socrates and Deliberative Democracy. On Socrates’ Conception of Politics in Plato’s Apology, Crito and Gorgias
Sokrates und die deliberative Demokratie. Zum sokratischen Politikverständnis in Platons Apologie, Kriton und Gorgias
Autorzy:
Jedan, Christoph
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633565.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
deliberative democracy
politics
religion
Socrates
Plato
Opis:
Die Figur des Sokrates, die uns in den frühen platonischen Dialogen entgegentritt, wird für eine Vielzahl heutiger politischer Theorien als Ahnherr reklamiert. Das Problem bei solchen Vereinnahmungsversuchen ist, dass sie den Blick auf das Sperrige, historisch Besondere und gar nicht zu unseren Erwartungen Passende des sokratischen Denkens verstellen. In diesem Artikel wende ich mich exemplarisch einer solchen Vereinnahmung von Sokrates für heutige politische Theorien zu, nämlich Versuchen, Sokrates zum Ahnherrn heutiger “deliberativer” Demokratiekonzeptionen zu erklären. Ich werde mithilfe einer stark kontextualisierenden Interpretation von drei frühen Platondialogen - der Apologie, dem Kriton und dem Gorgias - zeigen, dass solche Vereinnahmungsversuche den spezifischen religiösen Charakter von Sokrates’ “Berufung” aus dem Auge verlieren. Es ist diese religiöse Berufung, die Sokrates davon abhält, sich in einer für den athenischen “Mainstream” akzeptablen Weise in politische Diskurse einzubringen. Es wäre allerdings auch verkehrt, Sokrates zu einem im Grunde unpolitischen Denker zu erklären.1 Ich werde zeigen, dass Sokrates’ Haltung durchaus politisch zu verstehen ist. Sie repräsentiert eine Strömung im antiken griechischen politischen Denken, die der Perfektion der persönlichen ethischen Haltung einen absoluten Primat einräumt. Dabei gehe ich wie folgt vor: Im ersten Abschnitt zeige ich kurz, auf welche Weise Sokrates für verschiedene deliberative Demokratiekonzeptionen vereinnahmt worden ist. Im zweiten Abschnitt biete ich eine Interpretation der Apologie, des Kriton und des Gorgias. Im dritten Abschnitt analysiere ich zusammenfassend das sokratische Politikverständnis.
The position of Socrates in Plato’s earlier dialogues is often seen as an anticipation of contemporary political theories. This article takes issue with the claim that Socrates anticipated modern theories of deliberative democracy. It examines three early Platonic dialogues (the Apology, the Crito and the Gorgias) and argues that the Socrates presented in the dialogues is actually far more dogmatic in ethical as well as religious matters than such annexations of Socrates can acknowledge. Furthermore, Socrates does not develop a theory that would support Athenian democracy. Although politically inactive within the Athenian political framework, Socrates is nonetheless depicted in the Gorgias as formulating an “ethical” view of politics. According to this conception, true politics is always virtue‑ oriented. It is a matter of improving the characters of one’s fellow citizens, and is detached from the question of how political power should be distributed. Socrates’ political outlook is echoed in several Hellenistic philosophical schools, the Stoics in particular.
The position of Socrates in Plato’s earlier dialogues is often seen as an anticipation of contemporary political theories. This article takes issue with the claim that Socrates anticipated modern theories of deliberative democracy. It examines three early Platonic dialogues (the Apology, the Crito and the Gorgias) and argues that the Socrates presented in the dialogues is actually far more dogmatic in ethical as well as religious matters than such annexations of Socrates can acknowledge. Furthermore, Socrates does not develop a theory that would support Athenian democracy. Although politically inactive within the Athenian political framework, Socrates is nonetheless depicted in the Gorgias as formulating an “ethical” view of politics. According to this conception, true politics is always virtue‑oriented. It is a matter of improving the characters of one’s fellow citizens, and is detached from the question of how political power should be distributed. Socrates’ political outlook is echoed in several Hellenistic philosophical schools, the Stoics in particular.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2010, 1, 1; 31-44
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Vox Populi or abdication of responsibility?: The influence of the Irish Citizens’ Assembly on the public discourse regarding abortion, 2016-2019
Autorzy:
McNamara, Paul
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1920308.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
Tematy:
Ireland
abortion, citizens’ assemblies
deliberative democracy
Opis:
The last four decades have witnessed enormous changes in the Republic of Ireland in terms of society, economy and politics. Formerly perceived as a poor, peripheral and “priest-ridden” country additionally plagued by political violence in Northern Ireland, over recent decades Irish voters have supported a series of “liberal causes”. Indeed, nowhere is this more apparent than Ireland’s laws concerning abortion, an issue which displayed a seismic shift not only among Irish voters but the political parties which claim to represent them, a shift clearly reflected in the public discourse. At the same time, it will be seen that the use of a Citizens’ Assembly as an exercise in “deliberative democracy” has allowed mainstream political parties to pass responsibility, at least partially, for changes to controversial laws to an extra-parliamentary body, thereby allowing them to claim that they were following the will of “the people” and finally settle one of the longest running conflicts in Irish political life. Thus, this article seeks to examine and describe both how effective the Irish Citizens’ Assembly was at achieving its stated goal and its influence on the nation’s public discourse concerning the issue of abortion.
Źródło:
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies; 2019, 2; 131-156
2299-4335
Pojawia się w:
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pluralizm racjonalności i pluralistyczna krytyka imparcjalizmu
Autorzy:
Perlikowski, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1985136.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-03-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
pluralism
rationality
impartialism
deliberative democracy
political philosophy
Opis:
The article aims to present and critically analyze one of the currents of thought within the framework of deliberative democracy. The main dispute that we identify in the framework of this theory is the dispute between the impartialist and pluralistic approach. The role of reason towards the phenomenon of pluralism is the subject of these discussions. The impartialists base their arguments above all on the idea of public reason, while pluralists deny its value to other values. It can therefore be concluded that this dispute consists in opposing the rationality of pluralism to the pluralism of rationality. In addition to analyzing the arguments of the pluralist approach, we also focus on the criticism of the impartialism that these positions have put forward. The article distinguishes three possible forms of pluralism: rationality of pluralism, plurality of rationality prima facie and plurality of rationality sensu proprio. This allows us to show the relationship between impartialism (rationality of pluralism) and pluralism (plurality of rationalities prima facie) and the plurality of pluralism proposed by the critics of impartiality (plurality of rationalities prima facie) with a specific form of pluralism (plurality of rationality sensu proprio). In addition, in the article we identify the directives which pluralists propose to take place of public reason. The pluralistic approach which we analyze in the text is presented by such authors as: Iris Marion Young, Seyla Benhabib, Chantal Mouffe, Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson. The impartialist tradition should be associated with John Rawles and his interpreters and critics such as Joshua Cohen and Brian Barry.
Źródło:
Kultura i Edukacja; 2018, 1(119); 11-28
1230-266X
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Edukacja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola komunikacji społecznej w rozwoju demokracji. Cz. 1, Uwagi o demokracji (deliberatywnej/partycypacyjnej)
The role of social communication in the development of democracy. Pt. 1, Remarks on (deliberative/participative) democracy
Autorzy:
Przybylska-Czajkowska, B.
Czajkowski, W.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/324496.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Politechnika Śląska. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
Tematy:
demokracja
demokracja partycypacyjna
demokracja deliberatywna
democracy
participative democracy
deliberative democracy
Opis:
Artykuł ten stanowi pierwszą cześć eseju poświęconego roli komunikacji społecznej w rozwoju demokracji. Poświęcony jest pojęciu demokracji oraz rozmaitym wartościom, które wiążą się z demokracją. Wartości te – zdaniem autorów – najpełniej realizują się w partycypacyjnej demokracji deliberatywnej.
The paper is the first part of essay devoted to the role social communication plays in the development of democracy. The paper is devoted to the notion of democracy and to various values related to democracy. According to the authors’ view these values are best actualized in participative deliberative democracy.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska; 2018, 123; 397-419
1641-3466
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sondaż deliberatywny – inwentarz problemów
Deliberative polling – a list of problems
Autorzy:
Kubiak, Anna
Krzewińska, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/413328.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
sondaż deliberatywny
demokracja deliberatywna
deliberacja
deliberative polling
deliberative democracy
deliberation
Opis:
W artykule prezentujemy sondaż deliberatywny® – metodę badania opinii, stworzoną i opatentowaną przez Jamesa S. Fishkina. W pierwszej części opisujemy poszczególne etapy prowadzenia tego typu badań oraz prezentujemy sondaż, zrealizowany w Poznaniu w 2009 r. (jedyny przeprowadzony w Polsce), który dotyczył poglądów mieszkańców miasta na temat zarządzania stadionem po Mistrzostwach Europy w Piłce Nożnej EURO 2012. W drugiej części artykułu przedstawiamy wielowątkową metodologiczną analizę tej metody badawczej, wskazując na problemy związane z realizacją takiego badania, a także podkreślając zalety tego przedsięwzięcia, do których zaliczamy przede wszystkim aktywizowanie obywateli i włączanie ich w proces podejmowania decyzji.
In this paper we presented deliberative polling® – the opinion research method created and patented by James S. Fishkin. In the first part of the article we focused on phases of conducting this type of research and presented the only one so far in Poland deliberative polling® which was organized in Poznań in 2009. The researchers were interested in the opinions of residents on the management of the stadium after EURO 2012. In the second part we analysed the research method from a variety of points of view, we highlighted some of the problems connected with organizing of this type of research, but we underline advantages of this research. The most important advantages included on: stimulating of citizens to act and contribute into the process of making decisions.
Źródło:
Przegląd Socjologiczny; 2012, 61, 1; 9 - 30
0033-2356
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 48

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies