Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "chronography" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Julius Cassianus, Pseudo-Thallus, and the Identity of ‘Cassius Longinus’ in the Chronogaraphia of Eusebius
Autorzy:
Kokkinos, Nikos
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/638593.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
ANCIENT HISTORY
CHRONOGRAPHY
HELLENISTIC PERIOD
JEWS
Opis:
Eusebius' Chronika was a remarkable achievement in the field of ancient chronography, not least as the conclusion of extensive research running since the beginning of the Hellenistic period. It was a double work, composed some time before AD 311 and expanded shortly after AD 325. The first part, now usually called Chronographia, was a detailed introduction, aiming at collecting the raw material from all sources then available, and setting out the plan of the project. The second part, known as Kanones (Chronikoi Kanones), which carried its own preface, was a grand exposition (utilising the data of the first part) in the form of a table consisting of up to nine parallel columns to be read across, thus presenting a synchronistic universal history at a glance.1 Only fragments survive of the Greek original, primarily in George the Syncellus (ca. AD 800) and an anonymous excerptor (known as 'Excerpta Eusebiana' from a MS of the 15th century AD). But we have a nearly complete Armenian translation (earliest copy ca. 13th century AD), a Latin translation of the second part by Jerome (with his own preface and extended to AD 380/1), as well as two Syriac epitomes, one of which is believed to have been compiled by Joshua the Stylite (8th century AD), and other witnesses including two very early Arab chroniclers, one being Agapius of Hierapolis, ca. AD 942.
Źródło:
Scripta Judaica Cracoviensia; 2010, 8; 15-28
2084-3925
Pojawia się w:
Scripta Judaica Cracoviensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Karaite chronography of the 16th–19th centuries from the Crimea and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Autorzy:
Akhiezer, Golda
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/916401.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Chronography
Avraham ben Yoshiyahu
Azaria ben Eliya
Crimea
Troki
Opis:
This article focuses on a genre of Karaite historical writing of the Crimea and Poland-Lithuania – the chronography of which has never been researched by scholars. The object of this study is to analyze the main characteristics of this chronography. This genre existed in the Crimea in the 16th-19th centuries and supposedly emerged due to the influence of both Tatar chronicles and Rabbanite historiography. The scanty number of Polish-Lithuanian chronicles from the 17th century on were supposedly affected by Polish chronicles and by Crimean Karaite chronicles. This genre includes a diversity of writings with different characteristics. In order to define them as historical writings I sorted them and divided them into sub-genres. This division, as well as the authors’ purpose in their writings, help us to define whether a certain text is associated with the historical writing and to come to some conclusions about the author’s views concerning history, his self-identification and his mentality in general.
Źródło:
Karaite Archives; 2013, 1; 5-16
2353-2327
Pojawia się w:
Karaite Archives
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Fono-chrono-grafia. Archiwalia dźwiękowe Mirona Białoszewskiego
Phono-chrono-graphia: Miron Białoszewski’s Sound Archives
Autorzy:
Karpowicz, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2194870.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
archiwa dźwiękowe
taśma magnetyczna
Miron Białoszewski
szum
czas
kaseta
głos
magnetofon
fonografia
chronografia
sound archives
magnetic tape
noise
time
cassette
voice
tape recorder
phonography
chronography
Opis:
W artykule analizie poddano archiwalne nagrania Mirona Białoszewskiego odnalezione w Muzeum Literackim im. Józefa Czechowicza w Lublinie oraz przechowywane w Muzeum Literatury im. Adama Mickiewicza w Warszawie. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na pozawerbalną warstwę dźwiękową nagrań. Przedmiotem zainteresowania autorki artykułu są głównie brzmienia stanowiące zakłócenia i zanieczyszczenia na taśmie magnetofonowej, takie jak szum, które zwykle znikają lub są minimalizowane wraz z digitalizacją i obróbką nagrań służącymi ich udostępnianiu. Analiza jest punktem wyjścia rozważań na temat autentyczności i oryginalności archiwalnych materiałów fonograficznych w kontekście relacji nagrania do czasu i miejsca: wydarzenia, rejestrowania go, przechowywania taśm, z uwzględnieniem chronotopiczności wersji zdigitalizowanych i udostępnianych odbiorcom przez muzea. Związane z kwestiami technicznymi zakłócenia słyszalne na nagraniach (jakość nagrania, cechy taśmy magnetycznej i inne) odsyłają tu do problemu temporalności – rejestracji magnetofonowej jako zapisu czasu (chronografii) i jej związków z nagrywaniem jako praktyką literacką Białoszewskiego. Wszelkiego rodzaju nieczystości, również te odnoszące się do emisji głosu pisarza i jego cielesności, a także do przestrzennego kontekstu nagrywania, zostały tu potraktowane jako pełnowartościowe elementy sensotwórcze, mające wartość i archiwalną, i interpretacyjną.
In her article, Agnieszka Karpowicz analyses the archival recordings of Miron Białoszewski found in the Józef Czechowicz Literary Museum in Lublin and stored in the Adam Mickiewicz Museum of Literature in Warsaw. She pays particular attention to the non-verbal sound layer of the recordings. She is mainly interested in various background noises and other impurities on the cassette tapes, i.e., sounds which usually disappear or are minimized when recordings are digitized and processed before they are made available to the audience. The analysis is the starting point of reflections on the authenticity and originality of archival phonographic materials in the context of the relationship of the recording to time and place: the event, the recording of it, the storing of tapes. Karpowicz’s considerations take into account the chronotopicity of the digitized versions made available to the public by museums. The noise that can be heard on the recordings is related to technical issues (the quality of the recording, the features of the magnetic tape, and others); this, in turn, is related to the idea of temporality: tape recording is perceived as time recording (chronography), which allows Karpowicz to place it in the context of recording as a feature of Białoszewski’s literary practice. All kinds of impurities, including the poet’s way of spoking and his corporeality as well as the spatial context of recording, have been treated here as full-fledged sense-forming elements, having both archival and interpretative value.
Źródło:
Śląskie Studia Polonistyczne; 2022, 19, 1; 1-12
2084-0772
2353-0928
Pojawia się w:
Śląskie Studia Polonistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gnesioi filoi: the Search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s Own Words, and the Authorship of Their Oeuvre
Autorzy:
Kompa, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682328.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Theophanes Confessor
George Syncellus
Georgios Synkellos
Byzantine chronography
Chronographia
Ekloge chronographias
gnesios filos
friendship
historia tripartita
TLG
world chronicles
aphormai, prophemi
hos proephen
kathos kai proephen
hos proephemen
Opis:
In a nutshell: 1. I believe that Ekloge Chronographias of George Syncellus and Chronographia of Theophanes the Confessor should be treated as a single project, undertaken in turn by two authors; 2. There are important stylistic differences between the two parts, noticeable in the fragments, in which the authors deliver some editorial remarks or disclose their personal opinions; from a wider selection of such phrases, references to the past or future such as ‘as I have mentioned/as I said/as have been said/as we demonstrated above, etc.’, being diverse and individual, are especially helpful. 3. This observation is of great use not only for the texts analysed here, it may be used to confirm authorship of many other texts. 4. As for George and Theophanes, the TLG search of such structures in all extant classical Greek and Byzantine output confirms the statement nr 1, with clauses like ὡς προέφην/καθὼς καὶ προέφην/ὡς προέφημεν/καθὼς προέφημεν both rare in the whole preserved corpus, and relatively often used by the author of Chronographia. The style of the proemium of Chronographia fits the rest of the work and differs from Ekloge Chronographias. 5. Precise analysis of a wider group of similar clauses shows that Ekloge Chronographias and Chronographia were written by two different authors; Chronographia was created by one author, distinctive and independent, no matter how reproductive at the same time he was. I see no convincing arguments not to call this author Theophanes. Some later and partial editiorial interventions to Chronographia, conceivable (rubrics?) and in some instances even certain, do not challenge this view. 6. Only a few entries from the initial parts of Chronographia fit more the George’s work; their style and content bear much more similarities with Ekloge (in AM 5796, 5814, 5818, 5827, 5828). These paragraphs, George’s aphormai, probably in form of loose notes, were inserted to Chronographia by its author the same way as he used his sources for the subsequent parts; they did not reach beyond the times of Constantine I. 7. I do not dismiss the message of the proemium to the Chronographia as it is much more credible than the discussion, sometimes hypercritical, on the vitae and the scraps of the Confessor’s biography. I see no reason not to believe that the idea established and developed by George was then taken over by his friend; the differences result from the independent work of the former and then of the latter, presumably with only rudimentary guidance at the beginning. 8. The ‘genuine friendship’, the crucial relation between the two authors is still the most useful key to understand the history of the tripartita – therefore, I analyse it in the final part of the paper.
Źródło:
Studia Ceranea; 2015, 5; 155-230
2084-140X
2449-8378
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ceranea
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gnesioi filoi: George Syncellus and Theophanes the Confessor – Addenda
Autorzy:
Kompa, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/26469788.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Theophanes the Confessor
George Syncellus
Georgios Synkellos
Byzantine chronography
Byzantine historiography
Chronographia
Ekloge chronographias
gnesios philos
TLG
world chronicles
hos proephen
kathos kai proephen
hos proephemen
hos ephen
hos ephemen
ὡς προέφην
καθὼς καὶ προέφην
ὡς προέφημεν
καθὼς προέφημεν
ὡς ἔφην
ὡς ἔφημεν
stylometry
Opis:
The paper provides the addenda to A. Kompa, Gnesioi filoi: the search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s own words, and the authorship of their oeuvre, Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 155–230. All the expressions crucial to the stylistic and stylometric argument on the authorship of the Chronography of Theophanes have been updated after 7 years and verified in the expanded TLG database. The updated results are presented below. The conclusions confirm the previous opinions on the individual, singular authorship of the chronicle of Theophanes with differences in style from the first part of the universal history, written by George Syncellus. At the same time, both works should be treated as a single project, and the prooimion to Theophanes’ part as a sound base faor the reconstruction of the writing process. The clauses ὡς προέφην, καθὼς καὶ προέφην, ὡς προέφημεν, and καθὼς προέφημεν are specific to the Chronography of Theophanes in their frequency and diversity, but they seem to be known and used by the circles from which Theophanes acquired his literary skills.
Źródło:
Studia Ceranea; 2022, 12; 599-632
2084-140X
2449-8378
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ceranea
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies