Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "European competition law" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19
Tytuł:
Container shipping in period of Freight Conference breakup
Autorzy:
Drozhzhyn, O.
Revenko, O.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2140892.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Fundacja Centrum Badań Socjologicznych
Tematy:
liner shipping conferences
Repeal of the Liner Shipping Conference Exemption from European Union Competition Law
trading competition
Opis:
The most important development in the liner shipping industry last 10 years was the repeal of the block exemption that Liner freight conferences had received in the European Union (EU) with regard to price and capacity settings. From of 18 October 2008, former members of the Far East Freight Conference have had to establish their specific rates and freight additions, resulting in different rates and amounts applied across the board. This paper examines the general conditions of competition in a market economy, as well as special conditions for competition in the market for liner transportation, regarding descriptive analysis summarized the available information on the subject. The study is based on EU documents, official EU reviews, and paper of international researchers on the issue of current state and prospects of liner shipping market development. In particular, the history of the emergence and formation of linear conferences and overviews the European Union decision and impact of the repealing it’s block exemption from European competition law for Liner shipping conferences. As a result, the causes and implications were identified of these changes to liner container shipping industry.
Źródło:
Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics; 2018, 3, 1; 53-59
2520-2979
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Consolidation or Fragmentation? European Competition Law in the EU Air Transport Sector: A Policy Analysis
Autorzy:
Kociubiński, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706610.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
EU, competition law, European Union law, air transport sector, antitrust law, merger control, state aid
Opis:
This article analyses the priorities of European competition law in the air transport sector in the light of the ongoing process of the industry’s consolidation. The oligopolistic nature of the airline business results in a natural tendency towards its concentration. From the standpoint of regulatory oversight, the question is how to manage or counteract this tendency in order to achieve defined policy goals. In this vein, European competition law has departed from the model whereby the competitive process in itself is the priority and turned to an instrumental approach, with preference given to the welfare of customers. This analysis will highlight three policy areas relevant to the discussed subject. It begins with antitrust law, with special emphasis on the sector-specific phenomenon of airline alliances; then discusses merger control, especially in the context of pro-competitive remedies, and finally State aid, with particular focus on the effects of the compensatory scaling-down of operations which are imposed on recipients of a rescue and restructuring aid grant.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 189-203
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Increasing use of “negotiated” instruments of European competition law enforcement towards foreign companies
Autorzy:
Sage, Ewelina D.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530014.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
European competition law
cooperation
negotiations
dialogue
conditional merger clearances
commitments decisions
leniency
settlement
US companies
East Asian companies
Japanese companies
South Korean companies
Opis:
This paper considers the increasing use of “negotiated” instruments of European competition law (ECL) enforcement as illustrated by the European Commission’s (EC) enforcement practice directed at firms of American and East Asian origin. The paper first defines the notion of “negotiated” instruments of ECL enforcement as a non-confrontational enforcement method that centres on the existence of a public-private dialogue and mutual will to solve the contested issue, which in turn facilitate mutual benefits in enforcement outcomes (e.g. faster market improvements v. no fines). Three key “negotiated” instruments of ECL enforcement are presented next: conditional merger clearances, commitments decisions, as well as leniency and the settlement procedure. The EC’s decision to introduce negotiated enforcement instruments into its toolkit has been largely embraced by the market. Their ever growing practical application suggests that public-private dialogue is becoming a rule, rather than an exemption, in public enforcement of ECL. This thesis is illustrated by a selection of ECL cases involving US (e.g. Microsoft) and East Asian (e.g. Samsung, Sony) companies which chose to cooperate with the EC in order to generate tangible benefits for themselves, which are largely precluded in a more adversarial procedure
Cet article examine l’utilisation croissante de l’application des instruments européens «négociés» du droit de la concurrence (ECL) comme il est illustré par la pratique de l’application de la Commission européenne (CE) dirigée vers les entreprises d’origine américaine et asiatique (Asie de l’Est). L’article définit d’abord la notion d’instruments «négociés» de l’application de l’ECL comme une méthode d’application non conflictuelle qui se concentre sur l’existence d’un dialogue public - privé et la volonté commune de résoudre la question en litige, qui, en revenche, facilite les avantages mutuels dans les résultats de l’application (par exemple, des améliorations plus rapides du marché v. aucunes amendes). Trois instruments «négociés» de l’application de l’ECL principaux sont présentés ci-dessous: les autorisations conditionnelles de fusion, les décisions d’engagement, ainsi que la coopération et la procédure de règlement. La décision de la CE à introduire des instruments négociés de l’application dans sa boîte à outils (toolkit) a été largement acceptée par le marché. Leur application pratique en croissance constante suggère que le dialogue public-privé devient une règle, plutôt que d’une exemption, en application publique de l’ECL. Cette thèse est illustrée par une sélection de cas d’ECL concernant les entreprises en provenvence des États-Unis (par exemple Microsoft) et de l’Asie de l’Est (par exemple Samsung, Sony) qui ont choisi de coopérer avec la Commission européenne afin de générer des bénéfices tangibles pour eux-mêmes, qui sont en grande partie exclue dans une procédure plus contradictoire.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2014, 7(10); 235-262
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Accession to the EU’s Competition Law Regime: A Law and Governance Approach
Autorzy:
Cseres, Katalin J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/529976.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
competition law
governance
enlargement
Regulation 1/2003
European Competition Network
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to analyse the interplay between the EU’s external (pre-accession) and internal (post-accession) governance model in the field of competition law and to reach a deeper understanding of the EU’s Europeanization strategy at the intersection of these two governance models. The paper will critically examine the effectiveness of the internal governance mechanisms of Regulation 1/2003 with regard to the goals of the decentralized enforcement system, as well as with regard to their effectiveness in steering post-accession compliance and Europeanization among the Member States. Following the Introduction, section II of the paper maps out the EU’s external law and governance model that applies vis-à-vis third countries that wish to join the EU. In section III, the paper examines the extent and the manner in which this external model has shaped the EU’s internal governance model vis-à-vis its Member States. Section IV analyses Regulation 1/2003 as the main driver behind the effective implementation of EU competition law in the Member States as well as its governance mechanisms as they framed the Europeanization process. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of post-accession compliance, section IV examines the compound procedural framework, composed of EU and national administrative rules, which underlies and challenges the enforcement of EU competition law. Also specifically investigated here is how the administrative capacity of national competition authorities affects competition law enforcement. This inquiry is enriched in section V with a detailed assessment of the European Competition Network as the EU’s main mechanism for the monitoring of Member States’ post-accession compliance with EU law.
Le but de cet article est d'analyser l'interaction entre le modèle de gouvernance externe (pré -adhésion) et interne (post-adhésion) de l’UE dans le domaine du droit de la concurrence et d'arriver à une compréhension plus profonde de la stratégie de l'UE sur l’européanisation de l'intersection entre les modèles de gouvernance interne et externe. L’article examinera l'efficacité des mécanismes de gouvernance interne du règlement 1/2003 en ce qui concerne les objectifs du système de mise en oeuvre décentralisée et en ce qui concerne leur efficacité dans le respect de guider la conformité de post-adhésion et l'européanisation entre les États membres. Par conséquent, la première partie de l’article (qui suit l’«Introduction») décrit le droit externe de l’UE et le modèle de gouvernance qui s’applique aux pays tiers souhaitant d’adhérer à l'UE. Et dans la section III, il examine à quel point et dans quelle manière ce modèle externe a façonné le modèle de gouvernance interne de l'UE vis-à-vis ses États membres. La section IV analyse le règlement 1/2003 comme le moteur principal de la mise en œuvre effective du droit communautaire de la concurrence dans les États membres et de ses mécanismes de gouvernance qui encadraient le processus de l'européanisation. Afin d'évaluer l'efficacité de la conformité de post-adhésion, la section IV examine le cadre procédural composé des règles administratives européennes et nationales qui soumet et conteste l'application du droit communautaire de la concurrence et étudie la façon dont, en particulier, la capacité administrative des autorités nationales de la concurrence affecte l’application du droit de la concurrence. Cette demande est enrichie dans la section V avec une évaluation détaillée du Réseau européen de la concurrence qui est le mécanisme principal de l'UE pour surveiller la conformité des États membres avec la législation de l'UE dans la phase de post-adhésion.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2014, 7(9); 31-66
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Twenty Years of Harmonisation and Still Divergent: Development of Slovak Competition Law
Autorzy:
Blažo, Ondrej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530203.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
competition law
Slovak competition law
EU competition law
harmonisation of competition law
divergence from EU law
European Commission
concept of undertaking
essential facilities
settlement procedure
Opis:
Since the time when the first competition rules were adopted after the Velvet Revolution in early 1990s, Slovak competition law has undergone several changes. Three acts on economic competition were subsequently adopted (in 1991, 1994, 2001), each of them several times amended. Although Slovakia became a member of the EU in 2004, the convergence of national competition rules with the law of the European Union is evident in the significant changes that were introduced in 2004. The evolution of Slovak competition rules cannot be considered finished – major amendments are expected in 2014. The following paper will analyze in which aspects Slovak competition law is diverging from the rules of the European Union. Court jurisprudence reviewing administrative decisions issued in competition matters is also important in the assessment of the competition law environment. The paper will provide an overview of those features of Slovak competition law that shall be harmonised, as well as reasons for their harmonisations. Yet it must be stressed that European law is not the universal model of convergence and hence the paper will provide thoughts on which features of Slovak competition law might remain country-specific.
Depuis l'époque où les premières règles de concurrence ont été adoptées après la Révolution de velours en début des années 1990, le droit slovaque de la concurrence a subi plusieurs changements: trois actes sur la concurrence économique ont été adoptés par la suite (1991, 1994, 2001); chacun d'entre eux a également été modifié à plusieurs reprises. Bien que la Slovaquie soit devenue membre de l'UE en 2004, la convergence du droit slovaque de la concurrence vers des règles européennes de concurrence est évidente et des changements importants ont été introduits en 2004. Les modifications de la législation slovaque en matière de la concurrence ne peuvent pas être considérées comme terminées – les modifications considérables sont attendues en 2014. Le présent article analysera dans quels aspects le droit slovaque de la concurrence est divergent. De plus, la jurisprudence des tribunaux, examinant les cas en matière de la concurrence, est importante dans l'évaluation de l'environnement de la réglementation de la concurrence. Cet article offre un aperçu des caractéristiques du droit slovaque de la concurrence qui doit être harmonisé, ainsi que les raisons pour ces harmonisations. D'autre part, il faut souligner que le droit européen n'est pas le modèle universel de convergence et donc l’article présentera des pensées sur lesquelles les caractéristiques du droit national de la concurrence pourraient rester spécifique.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2014, 7(9); 109-123
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ten Years in the European Union – Selected Remarks Related to the Harmonisation of Slovak Competition Law with EU Competition Law
Autorzy:
Králičková, Barbora
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530137.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
Slovak Republic
competition law
development of the Slovak competition regulatio
Act on the Protection of Competition
harmonisation with European law
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the application of competition law in the Slovak Republic since it became a member of the European Union 10 years ago. Special emphasis is placed on selected problems and questions which arose in the application of European competition rules and the need for an adjustment of Slovak competition legislation to EU requirements. The paper presents the relevant amendments in the Slovak Competition Act and analyses in detail their background. Slovak competition law has undergone many changes in the past 10 years, not always without problems. The aim of this paper is to identify the most important of those difficulties and explain why they have occurred. The correct application of national and EU competition rules by Slovak courts has proven to be one of the biggest challenge here, ultimately even causing the European Commission to intervene as amicus curiae. The actions taken by the European Commission in relation to competition matters within the Slovak Republic, and its resulting recommendations, will also be considered. The paper will outline how Slovak competition law has been step-by-step increasing its harmonisation with EU competition law over the last 10 years. Indeed, it is now possible to claim that Slovak competition legislation is fully harmonised with the rules of the European Union. The paper will thus mainly focus on those elements of Slovak law which can give a clear picture of the state of convergence of both legal systems. Nevertheless, the end of the road has not yet been reached. Further harmonisation of selected current topics within Slovak competition law will need to be assessed also. It will also be necessary to analyse which direction should Slovak competition law take in the future with regard to current EU trends. These issues include the need to find a balance between the protection of business secrets and the right of procedural parties to due process, especially in connection with the protection of leniency documents.
Cette contribution vise à fournir un aperçu de l'application de la loi sur la concurrence de la République slovaque au cours des 10 dernières années - depuis l'époque d’adhésion de la Slovaquie à l'UE. L’accent particulier est mis sur certains problèmes et questions qui se posent dans l'application des règles de concurrence de l'UE et sur la nécessité d'une adaptation du droit slovaque de la concurrence aux exigences de l'UE. Cet article présentera les changements pertinents dans la Loi slovaque sur la concurrence aussi qu’un analyse détaillé de l'arrière-plan de ces changements. Au cours des 10 dernières années, la loi slovaque de la concurrence a subi de nombreux changements – pas toujours sans problèmes. Le présent article tentera d'identifier les problèmes principaux et donner au lecteur une explication quant à la raison pour laquelle ils ont eu lieu. Dans ce sens-là, l'un des plus grands problèmes est la bonne application des règles nationales et communautaires de concurrence par les juridictions slovaques au moment de décider sur des affaires relatives à la concurrence. Cela a même abouti à la nécessité pour la Commission européenne d'intervenir comme un amicus curiae. Cet article vise également à fournir une analyse des actions de la Commission européenne en ce qui concerne les questions de concurrence en Slovaquie et les recommandations qui en découlent. Le présent article tente de présenter la manière dont le droit slovaque de la concurrence a suivi, étape par étape, un chemin vers l'harmonisation avec le droit communautaire de la concurrence au cours des 10 dernières années. Aujourd'hui, nous pouvons déjà affirmer que la réglementation juridique slovaque de droit de la concurrence est entièrement harmonisée avec la réglementation juridique de l'UE. Par conséquent, nous concentrerons notre attention sur les points dans la loi slovaque qui peuvent donner une image claire de la convergence de ces deux règlements juridiques. Néanmoins, nous ne sommes pas encore à la fin de la route. L'harmonisation supplémentaire de certains sujets actuels dans le droit slovaque de la concurrence devra être évaluée et il sera nécessaire d'analyser la direction vers l'avenir, en particulier ce qui sera le meilleur pour le droit de la concurrence slovaque en ce qui concerne les tendances actuelles dans le droit de la concurrence de l'UE. Parmi ces questions, il y a une nécessité d'un équilibre entre la protection des secrets d'affaires et le droit des participants à la procédure de concurrence pour un procès équitable, en particulier dans le cadre de la protection des documents de clémence.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2014, 7(9); 125-139
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Usługi portów lotniczych a prawo konkurencji i regulacje lotniskowe
Airport services – the competition law and airport regulations
Autorzy:
Kosz, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/478581.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Europejskie Stowarzyszenie Studentów Prawa ELSA Poland
Tematy:
airports services
competition law
airports regulation
airport charges
European Union law
traffic distribution between airports
air law
Opis:
There are two types of conditions relating to the provision of airport services- conditions resulting from competition law and conditions resulting from sectoral regulations. These conditions differ mainly in the nature of public intervention. Present competition law considerations of airport services in the EU and Poland derive from legislation and case law on the three major areas of application of the competition rules of (mainly) European Union: the prohibition of restrictive practices (agreements restricting competition and abuse of a dominant position) , preventive merger control and prohibition of anti-competitive practices. In all these areas could potentially occur violations of competition rules, both by airport managers and the airport users.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawniczy Europejskiego Stowarzyszenia Studentów Prawa ELSA Poland; 2014, 2; 117-126
2299-8055
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawniczy Europejskiego Stowarzyszenia Studentów Prawa ELSA Poland
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
What Do Limitation Periods for Sanctions in Antitrust Matters Really Limit?
Autorzy:
Blažo, Ondrej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530322.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011-11-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
competition law
antitrust procedure
sanctions
administrative responsibility
Slovakia
EU law
limitation period
criminal law
private enforcement
legal certainty
safeguards
powers of competition authority
European Commission
Opis:
Limitation periods represent a legal safeguard for a person who has once broken the law in order not to be put at risk of sanctions and other legal liabilities for an indefinite amount of time. By contrast, public interest can sometimes require that a person who has committed a serious breach of law cannot benefit from limitation periods and that it is necessary to declare that the law had indeed been infringed and that legal liability shall be expected irrespective of the passage of time. This article aims to answer the question whether limitation periods for sanctions attached to competition restricting practices by Slovak competition law also limit the powers of its competition authority to declare the illegality of illicit behaviour or to prohibit it. Although this question can arise, and has done so already, as a defence in antitrust proceedings, as well as the fact that an answer to this question can potentially, as well as actually, affect rights of undertakings which have broken competition rules, Slovak jurisprudence cannot be seen as explicit in answering this question.
Les délais de prescription représentent une garantie juridique pour éviter que celui qui a violé la loi soit pour toujours exposé à la contrainte d’une sanction ou d’un autre type de responsabilté juridique. Toutefois, dans certains cas, il est dans l’intérêt public que la personne qui a gravement enfreint la loi ne puisse pas bénéficier du délai de prescription et qu’il soit possible de constater la violation du droit et d’engager la responsabilité juridique. Le présent article essaie de répondre à la question fondamentale, celle de savoir si les délais de prescription prévus, dans le droit slovaque actuel, pour infliger des sanctions pour accords limitant la concurrence ou pour abus de position dominante sont, également, en situation de limiter la compétence de l’autorité slovaque de la concurrence de constater l’illégalité d’une démarche d’une entreprise ou sa compétence d’interdire une telle démarche. Même si cette question peut être posée, ou a déjà été posée, en défense contre les démarches anti-cartel et la réponse à la question peut, potentiellement mais aussi réellement, avoir une influence sur les droits de l’entreprise qui a violé les règles de concurrence, la jurisprudence slovaque donne une réponse claire à cette question.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2012, 5(7); 79-103
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nowe narzędzie w unijnym prawie konkurencji — uwagi de lege ferenda
New tool in EU competition law — remarks de lege ferenda
Autorzy:
Mleczko, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1075722.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-31
Wydawca:
Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne
Tematy:
prawo konkurencji
komisja europejska
badanie rynku
prawo ue
competition law
european commission
market investigation
eu law
Opis:
Artykuł stanowi analizę inicjatywy Komisji Europejskiej dotyczącej wprowadzenia nowego, komplementarnego narzędzia do przepisów unijnego prawa konkurencji. Inicjatywa ta ma być jednym ze środków dostosowujących prawo i politykę konkurencji do realiów nowoczesnej gospodarki. Nowe narzędzie miałoby umożliwić Komisji prowadzenie badań rynkowych w zakresie problemów strukturalnych związanych z konkurencją, z możliwością narzucenia przedsiębiorcom środków zaradczych. W artykule przedstawiono uwagi dotyczące podstawy prawnej inicjatywy, wyboru odpowiedniego wariantu oraz kwestii związanych z zasadą proporcjonalności i środków zaradczych. Postulowane jest wypracowanie rozwiązania, które eliminowałoby luki w egzekwowaniu przepisów przy jednoczesnym zachowaniu jasnych ram prawnych i zapewnieniu skutecznej kontroli sądowej.
The article analyses the European Commission's initiative to introduce a new, complementary tool to EU competition law. The initiative is one of the measures aimed at making sure that competition policy and rules are fit for the modern economy. The new tool would enable the Commission to conduct market investigations on structural problems, with the possibility of imposing remedies. The article presents some comments on the legal basis of the initiative, selection of the appropriate option, and issues related to the principle of proportionality and remedies. It is postulated to find a solution that would eliminate the gaps in enforcement while maintaining a clear legal framework and ensuring effective judicial control.
Źródło:
Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego; 2020, 10; 47-52
0137-5490
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Glosa do wyroku Sądu Unii Europejskiej z 9 lutego 2022 r. w sprawie T-791/19 – Sped-Pro S.A. przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej – „Zasada państwa prawnego a współpraca krajów członkowskich Unii Europejskiej w obszarze ochrony konkurencji”
Case comment on the judgment dated 9 February 2022 in the case T- 791/19 Sped-Pro vs European Commission – “Rule of law principle and cooperation of the member states in the field of European policy on competition”.
Autorzy:
Kłopocki, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28409255.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Competition law
European Commission
national administrative competition authorities
the court of competition and consumer protection
the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection
Opis:
The aim of this case comment is to discuss whether it was justified that the General Court in its judgment dated 9 February 2022 in the case Sped-Pro (T-791/19) annulled the European Commission’s Decision No. C(2019) 6099 final dated 12 August 2019 r. (case AT.40459) connected to the potential abuse by PKP Cargo of a dominant position on the market for rail freight in Poland. In this judgement, the General Court argued on the basis of the rule of law principle and applied analogically the judgment on the European Arrest Warrant. In this regard, the analysis starts with the rule of law principle, the judicial independence of courts and administrative authorities, the obligation of loyal cooperation between European Union and member states to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty, both in the light of Union law and European courts case law.The next part of this case comment attempts to assess whether the General Court was justified in analogically applying the judgement dated 25 VII 2018 r. C-216/18 PPU Minister for Justice and Equality on the European Arrest Warrant in the field of European policy on competition. The analysis ends with the description of the practical consequences of the Commission’s finding that the President of UOKiK and the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection are not independent. In the last part of the text, the author also indicates the consequences of the proper implementation of the Directive ECN+ for analysing the scope of independence of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection. The author indicates the necessity to separate in future analysis the issue of the independence of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (national administrative competition authority) and the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection, which in Polish is a common court.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2023, 1 (41); 159-182
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ways of Harmonising Polish Competition Law with the Competition Law of the EU
Autorzy:
Kowalik-Bańczyk, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530344.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
harmonisation
spontaneous harmonisation
judicial harmonisation
convergence of competition law regimes in the European Union
Opis:
This article discusses the harmonisation of laws within the EU focusing on the specific ways of achieving an approximation of the Polish legal system with European competition law. It identifies and gives an overview of three specific ways of harmonising national laws with EU antitrust provisions: (1) spontaneous (or bottom-up) harmonisation; (2) judicial harmonisation and; (3) legislative harmonisation by means of EU Directives. With respect to the last category, particular attention is drawn to the legislative competences of the EU, allowing it to harmonise antitrust issues either on the basis of Articles 103 and 114 TFUE, or perhaps even on the basis of Article 82 TFEU
Le présent article explique la notion d'harmonisation du droit dans l'UE et se concentre sur les moyens particuliers de réalisation du rapprochement du droit polonais au droit de la concurrence de l'UE. Il identifie et offre un aperçu des trois façons de l'harmonisation du droit national avec le droit antitrust de l'UE: (1) l'harmonisation spontanée (ou bottom-up); (2) l’harmonisation juridique et (3) l'harmonisation législative par voie de directives. Dans ce dernier cas, une attention particulière est accordée aux compétences législatives de l'UE, ce qui lui permet d'harmoniser les questions du droit de la concurrence de l'UE, soit sur la base des articles 103 et 114 du TFUE, soit même, peut-être, sur la base de l'article 82 TFUE.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2014, 7(9); 141-159
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Enforcement of Competition Rules in the Association Agreement between the EU & Ukraine
Autorzy:
Smyrnova, Kseniya
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/529898.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
competition law
European Union
Ukraine
Association Agreement
Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine
harmonization
state aid
transparency
Opis:
This article analyzes the legal preconditions for the harmonization of Ukrainian legislation in the field of competition law with the law of the European Union. Due to its evolution, it is noticeable that competition law has been, and remains, a priority in the harmonization process of Ukrainian legislation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of competition related provisions of the Association Agreement. The latter contains norms on the obligatory approximation of substantial competition law provisions and sets out the necessity to transform their enforcement system. Special attention is paid to the analysis of state aid which currently remains unregulated in Ukraine
Cet article analyse les conditions juridiques préalables rélatives à l’harmonisation de la législation ukrainienne dans le domaine du droit de la concurrence avec le droit de l’Union européenne. En raison de son évolution, il est à noter que le droit de la concurrence a été, et demeure, une priorité dans le processus d’harmonisation de la législation ukrainienne. Cet article fournit une analyse détaillée des dispositions relatives à la concurrence de l’Accord d’association. Ce dernier contient des normes concernant le rapprochement obligatoire des dispositions substa ntielles de droit de la concurrence et énonce la nécessité de transformer leur système d’application. Une attention particulière est accordée à l’analyse des aides d’État, actuellement pas réglementées en Ukraine.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2014, 7(10); 263-278
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ogólne prawne warunki konkurencji w Albanii
The overall albanian legal framework of competition
Autorzy:
Tozaj, Loreta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1826566.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach
Tematy:
Competition Authority
Competitive Intelligence (CI)
European Union
Law
Albania
Analiza konkurencyjności
Urząd ds. konkurencji
Prawo
Unia Europejska
Opis:
Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu odzwierciedlenie i analizę zmian prawnych i instytu-cjonalnych warunków konkurencji w Albanii, prezentując punkt widzenia autora na podstawie różnych dokumentów, aktów prawnych i artykułów różnych autorów. Albania jest małym krajem europejskim, który od wejścia w życie Układu o Stabilizacji i Stowarzyszeniu był prawnie zobowiązany do spełnienia tzw. “kryteriów kopenhaskich", a mianowicie: kryteriów politycznych (demokracja, praworządność, prawa człowieka, ochrona mniejszości) oraz kryteriów ekonomicznych (funkcjonująca gospodarka rynkowa i zdolność do radzenia sobie z presją konkurencji na rynku wewnętrznym Unii Europejskiej). W tym kontekście Albania poczyniła znaczne postępy w rozwijaniu stabilnej i funkcjonującej gospodarki rynkowej, jednak istnieje wiele możliwości dalszej poprawy w wielu aspektach. Wydaje się, że gospodarka albańska ma większość podstawowych elementów funkcjonalnej polityki konkurencji, chociaż istnieją pewne luki, a zapisy dotyczące egzekwowania przepisów wydają się ograniczone. Dążąc do rynku UE, Albania jest spóźniona i przede wszystkim wchodzi na rynek, który jest wysoce konkurencyjny i bardzo wymagający pod względem jakości, niezawodności i wydajności dostaw.
This paper aims to reflect and analyze developments in the legal and institutional frame-work of competition in Albania bringing the author's point of view based on various documents, legal acts and numerous papers of different authors. This paper also seeks to identify, the results achieved by the implementation of the new legal and institutional Albanian framework, regarding the fact that since 2004 Albania has been applying competition law/policy as an economic regulation that affects both the structure of markets and the conduct of market participants. Albania is a small European country, which since the entry into force of the SAA, has been legally obliged to fulfill the so-called “Copenhagen criteria”, namely: political criteria (democracy, rule of law, human rights, protection of minorities) and economic criteria (functioning market economy and capacity to cope with competition pressure within the internal market of the European Union). In this context Albania has made some good progress in developing a stable and functioning market economy, however, there is significant room for further improvement in many aspects. The Albanian economy appears to have most of the basic building blocks of a functional competition policy regime, though some gaps persist and enforcement records appear limited. Aiming at the EU market, Albania is a latecomer and, above all, enters a market that is highly competitive and very demanding with regard to quality, reliability and efficiency of supply
Źródło:
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach; 2018, 44, 117; 65-70
2082-5501
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Środowisko i konkurencja – Wspólna Polityka Rolna po 2020 r.
Autorzy:
Agata, Niewiadomska,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903078.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
agricultural law
competition
environment
European payments
Common Agricultural Policy
prawo rolne
konkurencja
środowisko
płatności europejskie
Wspólna Polityka Rolna
Opis:
The article presents selected planned legal instruments for the implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2020. Special legal analysis has been made of mechanisms to increase the competitiveness of agriculture and preserve the elements of impact on the environment and climate. The analysis by observing the current evolution of the CAP and the effects of choosing individual legal instruments to implement it has been made. Recommendations regarding possible legal solutions on the basis of Polish law in the area of possible needs of farmers has been also included.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 78; 359-372
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Does the ‘more appropriate’ authority need to be independent? Rule of law implications for case referrals with respect of concentrations
Autorzy:
Malaga, Miłosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158408.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
referrals of concentrations
national competition authority
regulator’s
independence
rule of law
EU merger regulation
control of concentrations
European Competition Network
effective judicial protection
internal market
Opis:
In the recent Sped-Pro judgment, the General Court ruled that in order to guarantee effective judicial protection of the complainant, the Commission is obliged to examine the given national competition authority’s independence, and overall rule of law concerns, when it rejects complaints regarding Article 102 TFEU and concludes that such an authority is ‘best placed’ to hear the case. This contribution aims to discuss whether such obligation applies to case referrals from the Commission to Member States with respect of concentrations. On one hand, these are the same national competition authorities and the same standards should apply. On the other – the case referral system differs from the characteristics of the Articles 101–102 TFEU framework. Thus, this paper contains a discussion on the General Court’s judgment in Sped-Pro, the legal framework and practice regarding merger referrals, and, finally, the consequences of the judgment for the future approach of the Commission in the discussed matter.
Dans le récent arrêt Sped-Pro, le Tribunal a jugé qu’afin de garantir une protection juridictionnelle efficace du plaignant, la Commission est tenue d’examiner l’indépendance de l’autorité nationale de la concurrence concernée, ainsi que les préoccupations générales en matière d’État de droit, lorsqu’elle rejette des plaintes au titre de l’article 102 du TFUE et conclut qu’une telle autorité est «mieux placée» pour connaître de l’affaire. Cette contribution vise à discuter si une telle obligation s’applique aux renvois d’affaires de la Commission aux États membres en matière de concentrations. D’une part, il s’agit des mêmes autorités nationales de concurrence et les mêmes standards devraient s’appliquer. D’autre part, le système de renvoi des affaires diffère des caractéristiques du cadre des articles 101 et 102 du TFUE. Ainsi, cet article discute de l’arrêt du Tribunal dans l’affaire Sped-Pro, du cadre juridique et de la pratique concernant les renvois en matière de concentrations et, enfin, des conséquences de l’arrêt pour l’approche future de la Commission dans la matière discutée.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2022, 15, 25; 109 - 136
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies