Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Epicureanism" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Polemika przeciwko polemice. Plutarcha krytyka epikureizmu
Autorzy:
Łapiński, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/944451.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
Plutarch
Epicurus
Epicureanism
tetrapharmakos
Opis:
Polemic against polemics. Plutarch’s attacks on Epicureanism Plutarch’s attitude toward Epicurean philosophy is extremely hostile. According to him, at the core of Epicureanism is subversiveness, an attempt to attack the most fundamental components of Greek culture: traditional morality, religious beliefs, educational, and political commitment. Moreover, the Epicureans were the only philosophers in antiquity who openly criticised Socrates, first and foremost for his εἰρωνεία and “unreasonable” death. In the article, the main tenets of Epicureanism, as well as Plutarch’s polemical efforts, are centered around the figure of τετραφάρμα-κος, or the “fourfold remedy”.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2017, 7, 2; 211-221
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
La herencia de las Sententiae de Publilio Siro en las paremias españolas en torno a la avaricia
Reception of Publilius Syrus’ Sententiae in Spanish proverbs on greed
Autorzy:
Pascual-López, Xavier
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1048214.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
paremiology
Spanish proverbs
Publilius Syrus’ sentences
greed
stoicism
epicureanism
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to present the Spanish proverbs related to the topic of greed that can be understood as a continuation of Publilius Syrus’ sentences. For the analysis are taken into account the contributions of two Hellenistic philosophical schools (Stoicism and Epicureanism), which illuminate the scope of the criticism of greed that occurs in these proverbs, both from a psychological as a social point of view. Latin sentences and Spanish proverbs are compared according to their formal or semantic continuity, as well as depending on other aspects (such as the tone or prosodic issues).
Źródło:
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia; 2019, 46, 4; 101-110
0137-2475
2084-4158
Pojawia się w:
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Corinthian Opponents of the Resurrection in 1 Cor 15:12. The Epicurean Hypothesis Reconsidered
Autorzy:
Szymik, Stefan Henryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178897.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-04-09
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
1 Cor 15:12
resurrection
resurrection of the dead
New Testament vs. Epicureanism
Opis:
The paper contributes to the discussion regarding the Corinthian opponents of the resurrection of the dead (1 Cor 15:12). In particular, it attempts to re-examine the thesis of the Epicurean framework of this controversy. The first part focuses on the main lines of interpretation of 1 Cor 15:12 and the presentation of the Epicurean thesis. It is followed by an analysis of Paul’s polemical statements against the thesis of his Corinthian opponents, “there is no resurrection of the dead” (1 Cor 15:12; cf. vv. 19, 29-34, 35). It is assumed that Paul clearly says that his opponents deny a bodily resurrection and future life – there is nothing after death. The third part of the paper reconsiders some hermeneutic factors concerning the identity of the Corinthian opponents of the resurrection. 1 Cor 15 contains terminological and ideological parallels to Epicureanism, especially, by way of opposition. Yet, the valuation of these data remains an open question.
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 2020, 10, 3; 437-456
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Religion, Platonist Dialectics, and Pragmatist Analysis: Marcus Tullius Cicero’s Contributions to the Philosophy and Sociology of Divine and Human Knowing
Autorzy:
Prus, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138929.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-27
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Religion
God(s)
Cicero
Plato
Philosophy
Pragmatism
Symbolic Interaction
Dialectic Analysis
Knowing
Epicureanism
Stoicism
Fatalism
Divination
Opis:
Whereas Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Augustine are probably the best known of the early Western philosophers of religion, Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) also played a particularly consequential role in the development and continuity of Greco-Latin-European social thought. Cicero may be best known for his work on rhetoric and his involvements in the political intrigues of Rome, but Cicero’s comparative examinations of the Greco-Roman philosophies of his day merit much more attention than they have received from contemporary scholars. Cicero’s considerations of philosophy encompass much more than the theological issues considered in this statement, but, in the process of engaging Epicurean and Stoic thought from an Academician (Platonist) perspective, Cicero significantly extends the remarkable insights provided by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Although especially central to the present analysis, Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods (1972) is only one of several texts that Cicero directs to a comparative (multiparadigmatic and transhistorical) analysis of divine and human knowing. Much of Cicero’s treatment of the philosophy of religion revolves around variants of the Socratic standpoints (i.e., dialectics, theology, moralism) that characterized the philosophies of Cicero’s era (i.e., Stoicism, Epicureanism, Academician dialectics), but Cicero also engages the matters of human knowing and acting in what may be envisioned as more distinctively pragmatist sociological terms. As well, although Cicero’s materials reflect the socio-historical context in which he worked, his detailed analysis of religion represents a valuable source of comparison with present day viewpoints and practices. Likewise, a closer examination of Cicero’s texts indicates that many of the issues of divine and human knowing, with which he explicitly grapples, have maintained an enduring conceptual currency. This paper concludes with a consideration of the relevance of Cicero’s works for a contemporary pragmatist sociological (symbolic interactionist) approach to the more generic study of human knowing and acting.
Źródło:
Qualitative Sociology Review; 2011, 7, 3; 1-30
1733-8077
Pojawia się w:
Qualitative Sociology Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ESCHATOLOGIA I EPIKUREIZM W STAROŻYTNYM ŚWIECIE: JULIAN KUŁAKOWSKI O LUDZKIEJ NATURZE W MITOLOGII GRECKO-RZYMSKIEJ
ESCHATOLOGY AND EPICUREANISM IN THE ANCIENT WORLD: JULIAN KUŁAKOWSKI ON THE HUMAN NATURE IN THE GRECO-ROMAN MYTHOLOGY
Autorzy:
Puczkow, Andriej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/423491.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Julian Kułakowski
eschatology
ancient Greece
Epicurus
Epicureanism
the Ancient Greece Mythology
The Roman Mythology
Julian Kułakowski (1855–1919)
eschatologia antycznej Grecji
Epikur i epikureizm
mitologia starożytnej Grecji
mitologia rzymska
Opis:
Julian A. Kułakowski (1855-1919), Professor of the Roman rhetoric on the Imperial St. Włodzimierz’s University, Russified Pole, gave two public lectures in Kiev, one was about Lucretius (in 1887), the second one about Epicurus (in 1889). In 1899 he published the book titled: "Death and immortality in the ancient Greeks’ images". Taken together, they are probably the first in the Russian humanities historico-philosophical views that concern the process of the integration of the form of Greco-Roman world view into eschatology and epicureanism at that time, views that at the turn of the XIX and XX century were moderated by decadent (tu brakuje słowa w polskim abstrakcie) of the intellectuals of the Silver Age. In the article, on the basis of archives, careful reading and analysis of different contexts, the problematics of the history, theory of origin and functioning in the mythico-poetical space of this epoch was elaborated. The article shows the way in which Kułakowski reconstructs the ancient idea of human being based on the mythical attributivity, wherein human being functions integrally and exhaustively in both: the realistic world, and in the afterlife. This situation results from the specific corporality figure construed on the basis of the myth, corporality that has different levels and embraces the body, as well as the soul, and finally it allows this human soul to continue the existence in the afterlife.
Julian A. Kułakowski (1855-1919), profesor rzymskiej retoryki, Cesarskiego Uniwersytetu Św. Włodzimierza, zrusyfikowany Polak, wystąpił w Kijowie z dwoma wykładami publicznymi: o Lukrecjuszu (1887) i Epikurze (1889). W 1899 roku opublikował książkę „Śmierć i nieśmiertelność w wyobrażeniach starożytnych Greków”. Rozpatrywane łącznie, teksty te są prawdopodobnie pierwszymi w rosyjskiej humanistyce historyczno-filozoficznymi poglądami dotyczącymi procesu włączenie form światopoglądu grecko-rzymskiego do ówczesnej eschatologii i epikureizmu, które na przełomie XIX-XX wieku zostały złagodzone dekadenckimi intelektualistów Srebrnego Wieku. W artykule na podstawie materiałów archiwalnych i uważnej lektury i ponownego odczytania kontekstów rozpatrzono problematykę historii i teorii ich powstawania oraz funkcjonowanie w mityczno- poetyckiej przestrzeni postgutenbergowskiej epoki. Artykuł ukazuje jak Kulakowski rekonstruuje antyczną wizję człowieka zbudowaną na atrybutywności mitycznej, w której człowiek integralnie i całościowo funkcjonuje zarówno w świecie i w rzeczywistości pozagrobowej. Wynika to ze specyficznej, ukonstytuowanej na micie, figury cielesności, która posiadając różne poziomy jakościowo obejmuje zarówno ciało jak i dusze, pozwalając duszy ludzkiej kontynuować istnienie „po śmierci”.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lubuski; 2016, 42, 2; 189-202
0485-3083
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lubuski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geneza herezji wczesnochrześcijańskich w ujęciu Filastriusza z Brescii
The origin of early Christian heresies according to Philastrius of Brescia
Autorzy:
Szram, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/614216.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Filastriusz z Brescii
herezje wczesnochrześcijańskie
judaizm
starożytna filozofia grecka
platonizm
stoicyzm
epikureizm
gnostycyzm
manicheizm
montanizm
Philastrius of Brescia
early Christian heresies
Judaism
ancient Greek philosophy
Platonism
Stoicism
Epicureanism
Gnosticism
Manichaeism
Montanism
Opis:
The original Latin catalogue of heresies, produced by Saint Philastrius of Brescia in the second half of IVth century, encompasses several observations regarding the source of early Christian heterodox movements. These views are dispersed and interwoven into the analysis of particular heresies, and as such do not constitute an integral and standalone teaching on the nature of unorthodoxy and its genesis. The present work attempts at enucleating this standpoint and summarising it in a comprehensive and complementary manner. Regarding the issue of the foundation of heresy, Philastrius proposed his own point of view based on the following threefold argumentation: the theological (Satan is the father of all the world’s heterodoxy – comprehended as a lapse form God’s truth), the moral (heresies rise due to one’s pride), and historical and cultural (errors in early Christian doctrine derive from the Judaic sects or else from the counterfactual views of the ancient Greek philosophers). Philastrius’ perspective refers back to an extensive and modestly younger work Panarion by Epiphanius of Salamis, in which the topic of Jewish-deriving deviations from the doctrine was treated even more at length. The Bishop of Brescia’s index has been the inspiration for the later catalogues of unorthodoxy by St. Augustine (narrow in the topic of Judaic origins of heretical movements and rather focused on influences from the ancient philosophical schools) and Isidore of Seville (intermingling both sources of early heretical movements – i.e. Judaic and Greek – withholding the determination which of them has in fact more influenced the uprising of heterodoxy and the doctrine itself).
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2016, 65; 631-651
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies