Temat: ECONOMICS - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Economics as an Empirical Science
Autorzy:: Czarny, Bogusław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/942261.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2010
Wydawca:: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie
Tematy:: economics
theory of economics
experimental economics
Opis:: The author seeks an answer to a complex question whether and on what conditions economy may be considered an empirical science. In the first part, basic epistemological and methodological issues along with the problems of rhetorical nature encountered by economists are discussed. In the next part peculiarities of economics are explored, in particular limited possibility of experimenting, uncertainty and generality of forecasts, how research and publication of results influence an object of research and the linkages between economics and human interests. Finally the future directions for economic research are debated, especially, the possible potential of experimental economics and observation, as well as whether and to what extent results of a research can be predicted.
Źródło:: Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology; 2010, 1, 2; 7-34
2081-9633
Pojawia się w:: Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Disputes Over the Concept of Ecological Economics and Environmental Economics in the Light of the Works of Professor Tomasz Żylicz
Autorzy:: Czaja, Stanisław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1964902.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-08-20
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
Tematy:: ecological economics
environmental economics
modern economics
Opis:: The problem of the concept of ecological and environmental economics and the relationship between them is the vital research problem in modern economics. The presentation of disputes in this respect is the subject of the presented article. For obvious, substantive and non-substantive reasons, the scientific views of Professor Tomasz Żylicz will be the central axis. The purpose of the topic presented in this paper analysis is not to settle the controversy but to present the dispute using the views of some discussion participants, especially the comments formulated by Professor Tomasz Żylicz. The research method is based on a critical analysis of the literature and desktop research. Conclusion 1: The problem of understanding ecological and environmental economics is just one of the many important issues that can be found in the works of Professor Tomasz Żylicz. Conclusion 2: This problem is connected with very interesting theoretical, cognitive and terminological issues and practical issues related to the implemented environmental policies or sustainable development strategies at their various levels.
Źródło:: Central European Economic Journal; 2021, 8, 55; 201-211
2543-6821
Pojawia się w:: Central European Economic Journal
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Dydaktyczne znaczenie ekonomii instytucjonalnej, jako nurtu ukazującego rolę moralności w życiu gospodarczym
The Didactic Meaning of Institutional Economics as a School of Economic Thought: the Role of Morality in the Economic Life
Autorzy:: Fjałkowski, Karol
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/964235.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2009-05-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:: institutional economics
mainstream economics
teaching economics
teaching business ethics
Opis:: In the paper a thesis is stated that institutional economics presents considerable support for business ethics teaching. The assumptions of main-stream economics eliminated the problems of morality in economic life. The dominance of neo-classical economics in economic studies curricula contributes to the social opinion that business is deprived of moral dimensions. From this point of view, it is argued that business ethicists should be more interested in institutional economics. Some institutionalists see economics close to social moral philosophy and claim that a normative approach in economics is natural and necessary. The questions of aims and economic morality are integral parts of many institutional research agendas. Especially the New Institutional Economics has developed tools that enable formalization and empirical verification of theories of morality in business. Institutional economics enriches the theoretical and empirical context of business ethics teaching.
Źródło:: Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym; 2009, 12, 2
1899-2226
2353-4869
Pojawia się w:: Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Po co ekonomom mózgi, czyli o pożytkach z neuroekonomii
Why Do Economists Need Brains: About Usefulness of Neuroeconomics
Autorzy:: Gęsiarz, Filip
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/637881.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2011
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: necuroeconomics
behavioral economics
classical economics
Opis:: Necuroeconomics should be treated not like new direction in research, but rather like natural continuity of behavioral economics, which can benefit from neuroscientific component in analogous way as psychology does. Searching for neural correlates of behavior can be useful in delimitating between plausible and implausible theories, and also can be a source of new hypothesis about underlying mechanisms. Moreover methods used in neuroscience can help in formal description of constructs ignored by classical economics so far, such as emotions and individual differences.
Źródło:: Rocznik Kognitywistyczny; 2011, 5; 49-55
1689-927X
Pojawia się w:: Rocznik Kognitywistyczny
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Methodology…?! Why? Some methodological aspects of the controversy between mainstream economics and institutionalism
Autorzy:: Galbács, Peter
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943139.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017-09-30
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
Tematy:: mainstream economics
institutional economics
methodology of economics
isolation
homo oeconomicus
Opis:: Mainstream economics has been running the gauntlet of adverse criticism for decades. These critiques claim as a message of central importance that mainstream economics has lost its relevance for understanding reality. By making a brief comparison between the methodological strategies of the main stream and institutional economics I suggest that the firm demarcation between the streams stems from the difference between their methodologies. Its peculiar interest directed mainstream economics to take a unique methodological path and consequently the adherents have not been able to be on the lookout for certain facets of socio-economic reality. However, the chosen path, the axiomatic-deductive strategy proved to be an appropriate method for identifying economic laws. This claim is justified even by some recent efforts of new institutional economics. In order to support the conversation between the schools I highlight some causes that currently make it impossible to start a rational discourse.
Źródło:: Economics and Business Review; 2017, 3(17), 3; 112-134
2392-1641
Pojawia się w:: Economics and Business Review
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Ekonomia behawioralna: od koncepcji racjonalności do wizji ustroju ekonomicznego
Behavioral economics: from a concept of rationality to a vision of an economic system
Autorzy:: Godłów-Legiędź, Janina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/434649.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:: behavioral economics
rationality
neoclassical economics
institutionalism
Opis:: The purpose of this article is to show the diversity in behavioral economics from both a normative and an explanatory point of view. Based on a critical analysis of the literature, the author presents behavioral economics from three perspectives: the perspective of diversification of the ideas about the way of functioning of human mind and normative suggestions concerning rationality, the perspective of connections between views on rationality and on the optimal economic system, and the perspective of the relationship between a psychological and institutional approach in economics. The analysis leads to the conclusion that in behavioral economics, we can find two opposite approaches to rationality, which result in different assessments of both individual behavior as well as the functioning of social institutions. The ”old” school of behavioral economics, which developed the concept of ecological rationality, is closely related to the institutional approach. The ”new” behavioral economics is less critical of neoclassical economics. It is a consequence of their tendency to interpret rationality in a constructivist spirit. But it is worth emphasizing the important common feature connecting both schools of behavioral economics with institutional economics. Institutionalism and the old school of behavioral economics emphasize the role of institutions from the cognitive, normative, and regulatory perspectives. The new behavioral economics adopts a normative conception of rationality close to that of neoclassical economics, but strongly accentuates the contextual character of human knowledge and behavior, i.e. one of the fundamental principles of the Kahneman school is framing decisions. There is an analogy between how social institutions on the one hand, and the formulation of the problem on the other affect the decisions of the individual. An architecture of choice is created as a result of the activities of private entities and governments. The advocates of libertarian paternalism are conscious of the threat stemming from the fact that cognitive deficiencies affect not only individuals as private entities, but also individuals as regulators and experts, hence their caution with respect to regulatory solutions. Behavioral economics as well as institutional economics both show various aspects and the complexity of the problem of coordination and regulation in a social system. The development of these two streams of economic thought reflects a return to a more balanced approach, both with respect to the assumptions of economic theory as well as with respect to reaching political conclusions based on economic theory.
Źródło:: Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu; 2013, 4 (25); 24-41
2080-5977
Pojawia się w:: Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Mainstream economics versus heterodox economics – between dispute and dialogue
Autorzy:: Kiełczewski, Dariusz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2128546.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:: mainstream economics
heterodox economics
reductionism
pluralism
Opis:: Purpose – The purpose of this article is to highlight the differences between mainstream and heterodox economics and essence of the dispute between them, as well as to indicate that this dispute results from attachment to a reductionist Cartesian research approach. Research method – The work utilises a review and analysis of the literature on the subject, deductive and inductive inference, as well as a linguistic descriptive method and tabular summaries. Results – The author concludes that the contemporary discussion between economic trends can be reduced to a confrontation of two reductionisms in the perception of economics: individualistic and objective, as well as social and normative. Breaking this methodological limitation provides an opportunity to search for pluralistic (integrated) economic positions in the future. Originality / value / implications / recommendations – Awareness of methodological aspects of the dispute between economic trends. Indication of the possibility of building pluralistic and integrated positions. Usefulness in building economic theory. Awareness of the need for diversity in economic research.
Źródło:: Optimum. Economic Studies; 2020, 2(100); 121-131
1506-7637
Pojawia się w:: Optimum. Economic Studies
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Economics Imperialism and some of its Unintended Consequences
Autorzy:: Kucz, Mateusz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903489.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017-04-26
Wydawca:: Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej. Wydawnictwo APS
Tematy:: economics imperialism
neoliberalism
commercialization
values in economics
definition of economics
Opis:: Studying the problem of the invisible hand may be very insightful, but also it brings up some dangers. As an ethicist, I would like to mention one very important axiological danger that occurs in some studies conducted by social scientists on the market especially linked to the invisible hand assumption. It is a danger of moral reductionism that results from assumption that rules of invisible hand are scientific laws. We might say that economic imperialism is not anything special. It is popular that when a scholar develops good theory, he tries to apply it to the widest possible range of phenomena, but in most cases, he is put in his place by fellow scientists. Economists, surprisingly, succeeded in widening the scope of their investigation without any loud objections. In my paper, I would like to explore the idea that economic imperialism is a leading paradigm in many spheres of science which has resulted in unintended social consequences. If we want to overcome this paradigm, we need to start with redefining, reinventing, revaluing the language we use.
Źródło:: Studies in Global Ethics and Global Education; 2016, 6; 14-29
2392-0890
Pojawia się w:: Studies in Global Ethics and Global Education
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: Does Profit Still Matter? The Implementation of Buddhist Ideas to Contemporary Business: Theory and Practice
Autorzy:: Tusińska, Magdalena
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2107034.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020-06-29
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:: Buddhism
Buddhist economics
Buddhist enterprise
heterodox economics
mainstream economics
social enterprise
Opis:: The subject matter of this paper is Buddhist economics in theory and practice. The goal is to point out the main concepts of Buddhist economics, which is different from Western mainstream economics, and then explain how applying Buddhist teachings to business can possibly improve societal well-being and the condition of the natural environment. The main contribution of the article is twofold. Firstly, it aims to plumb the literature to identify characteristics of Buddhist economics, which is a relatively new field. Secondly, it compares Buddhist enterprises to relatively well-known social enterprises, showing the main differences between them. “Buddhist ideas in practice” are illustrated by examples of such companies as Benefit System or Patagonia. The main conclusion is that money and wealth are allowed in Buddhism, but religion reminds people not to become attached to their possessions and to share them with others. Examples described in the paper lead to an awareness that economic activity can be a means to a noble life. New criteria of assessment of business success including social engagement and care for the environment should be created. Thus, deep institutional changes which redefine the roles and duties of business would be required. The paper is based on literature, documents and online sources. The research methods used are the critique of literature covering the subject matter, comparative analysis and elements of case studies.
Źródło:: Przedsiębiorczość - Edukacja; 2020, 16, 1; 388-400
2083-3296
2449-9048
Pojawia się w:: Przedsiębiorczość - Edukacja
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: Inequality in Economics: The Concept, Perception, Types, and Driving Forces
Autorzy:: Jabłoński, Łukasz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1810493.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-03-25
Wydawca:: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: inequality
classification
mainstream economics
heterodox economics
Opis:: Purpose: The aim of the paper is to overview the research on inequalities in economics. The paper is based on mainstream and heterodox economic theories and approaches addressing inequality and its economic interdependence. Methodology: Due to its positive and normative nature, inequality is a complex concept that eludes precise definition. The available application of mainstream and heterodox approach to study inequality and its economic interdependence allows for the identification of various components of inequality. Classifications that fall within the mainstream economics especially reveal less numerous and often even different types of inequalities compared to heterodox approaches. Moreover, what determines within-country inequality is the number of driving forces related to the factual and regulatory sphere of an economy. Findings: This study does not exhaust the general debate over inequality in economics. The question remains about the state of research dedicated to the outcomes of inequality, for instance, perceived in its dynamic and historical perspective. Moreover, there emerges a need to overview the theoretical and empirical research dedicated to inequality in terms of not only its driving forces but also economic outcomes.
Źródło:: Central European Management Journal; 2019, 27(1); 17-43
2658-0845
2658-2430
Pojawia się w:: Central European Management Journal
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "ECONOMICS" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język