Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Balkan wars" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-17 z 17
Tytuł:
British and Austrian documents for the position of the Muslim population in Salonica and its surrounding area during the Balkan Wars
Autorzy:
Goseva, Vera
Kotlar-Traykova, Natasha
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909884.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan wars
Macedonia
great powers
Muslims
Salonica
Opis:
In the article we shall study the position of the second largest community in the city of Salonica – the Muslim community – during the Balkan Wars (1912-1913), using British and Austrian documents. We can conclude that the Balkan Wars satisfied the ambitions of the Balkan states’ nationalist circles which, of course, had the politics of the Great Powers behind them. That such of the case was obvious at both conferences that took place in London at the same time – the Conference of the Ambassadors of the Great Powers and the Peace Conference of the Balkan states engaged in war. 80 years after these wars, a new war threatened the Balkans and was led, with all its attributes of cruelty, on the territory of former Yugoslavia. Reflecting on this phenomenon from today’s perspective, we can come to the conclusion that the historical lesson taught by the Balkan Wars (1912/13) had not been learnt.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 232-239
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Балканские войны: победа и поражение для Болгарии (1912-1913)
The Balkan Wars – victory and defeat for Bulgaria (1912-1913)
Autorzy:
Хаков, Дженгиз
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909897.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Балканские войны
Болгария
Балканский союз
Balkan wars
Bulgaria
Balkan Alliance
Opis:
After declaring its independence in 1908, in the name of the unification of all Bulgarians in one state Bulgaria carried out a policy of expanding its territory at the expense of the Ottoman provinces in the Balkans. The same policy was followed by all the other Balkan states. In the spring of 1912 under Russian auspices was formed the Balkan Alliance in which took part Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece and Montenegro. In the course of one year two wars with opposite goals and objectives were waged in the Balkans. The first war was between the states from the Balkan Alliance and Turkey, and the second – between Bulgaria and its allies from the Balkan Alliance. The Balkan wars changed radically the map of the Balkans. The Balkan Alliance disintegrated, the contradictions among the Balkan states aggravated and that again set them against each other in the First World War.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 139-148
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nadzieje i stracone złudzenia. Wojny bałkańskie w świetle tekstów z kręgu Dimitriji Čupovskiego i Krste P. Misirkova
Hopes and lost illusions. Balkan Wars in the light of the texts from the circle Dimitrija Čupovski and Krste P. Misirkov
Autorzy:
Moroz-Grzelak, Lilla
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909879.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
Dimitrija Čupovski
Krste Misirkov
Macedonia
Wojny Bałkańskie
Opis:
This paper addresses the sense of national identity of the Macedonians in the period of the Balkan wars and their aftermath. The first source material were used journalistic texts and calls in the journal „Makedonskij Golos” published by Macedonian expatriates gathered around Dimitrija Čupovski in St. Petersburg in the years 1913-1914. Second was diary Dnevnik) written by Krste Petkov Misirkov in 1913. Expression of these two major characters in the Macedonian history reflect geopolitical policies conducted in the Slavic population in the Balkans. It is an important source material documenting the national consciousness of intelligence derived from the Macedonian lands. This indicates that the main topics which were then undertaken focused on the defense of the whole Macedonian territory, aspirations to create their own state and diversified approach to the idea of the Slavic community.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 297-308
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pierwsza wojna bałkańska według francuskiego dziennika „Le Temps”, a zachodnioeuropejskie stereotypy dotyczące ludów bałkańskich
The First Balkan War according to French journal Le Temps” and the Western European stereotypes concerning the Balkan peoples
Autorzy:
Sajkowski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909883.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
“Le Temps”
France
stereotypes
Wojny Bałkańskie
Francja
stereotypy
Opis:
“Le Temps” was one of the most important French newspapers of the first half of XXth century. In the first two months of the first Balkan war the progress of this conflict was the most important subject for the editors of “Le Temps”. The information provided by the daily had a binary character. On the one hand the readers might found the descriptions of diplomatic and military operations of the states participating in conflict, and the other political powers interested in the situation in the region. On the other hand the journal systematically published large commentaries made by the political commentators and the Balkan correspondents of the daily. In the articles published in “Le Temps” one can find the images of Balkans which are typical for Western European image of Balkans, which started to emerge in the beginning of XVIIIth century. It is important to underline that this image of Balkans presented in “Le Temps” did not concern only politics and war. The conflict became a pretext for the presentation of wild Balkan nature and the traditional culture of the Balkans. In the articles published in the newspaper it is possible to find also the reflections concerning the backwardness of social structures of Balkan people and their civilizations, as well as the remarks on the process of modernizations of those societies caused by military mobilization. “Le Temps” promoted the Western European stereotypes about Balkans, which up to that time were present mainly in travel journals, not so influential as the daily journals. The representation of Balkans presented by “Le Temps” was the synthesis of the images already known. The example of this journal shows that the image of Balkan people in the time of the Balkan war may be considered as the climax of the process of evolution of the Balkan stereotypes.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 241-248
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Półwysep Bałkański jako obszar działań militarnych podczas wojen bałkańskich. Charakterystyka geograficzno-wojskowa
Balkan peninsula as the area of military operation during Balkan wars. Geographical-military characteristics
Autorzy:
Krzak, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909895.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Półwysep Bałkański
Wojny bałkańskie
strategie wojskowe
Balkan wars
Balkan peninsula
military strategies
Opis:
The Balkan peninsula on account of its peculiar location and the terrain constitutes the unusually interesting object of the research on military conflicts. Forms of operations applied in conflicts, which took place in the range border of the geographical-political Balkans, let read wars run in this area in the course of a few hundred years. Based on experience resulting from the conflicts of Balkan and other antagonisms, which occurred on the Peninsula during the last century, it is possible to state that the conducted research on meaning of this area can constitute the initial base to next research on Balkan military conflicts. Furthermore, the terrain and its components always serve as a toll to pinpoint the indispensable measures to conduct the wars.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 149-168
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rumuńskie roszczenia terytorialne wobec Bułgarii w dobie wojen bałkańskich
Romanian claims against Bulgaria during the period of the Balkan Wars
Autorzy:
Znamierowska-Rakk, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909880.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
Romania
Bulgaria
Dobrudja
Bessarabia
Wojny Bałkańskie
Rumunia
Bułgaria
Dobrudża
Besarabia
Opis:
This article is to demonstrate the genesis and repercussions of the Romanian territorial claims against Bulgaria during the war period of the 1912-1913 in the Balkan Peninsula. What is most stressed is the direct relationship of the said claims with the separation of Bessarabia from the Romanian state, executed by the 1878 Berlin truce and annexation of Northern Dobrudja, a region inhabited mostly by Bulgarians. This last fact inspired the anxiety in Bucharest, that Bulgaria might claim that land by force. This was worsened after 1908, when Bulgaria proclaimed itself a sovereign empire, intent on incorporating major parts of Macedonia and Thrace since the decisive victory over the Ottoman Turkey. Such broadening of the Bulgarian borders was regarded in Bucharest as a threat to the political equilibrium in the Balkans, endangering the Romanian state security and territorial integrity. As a result the government of Romania issued a claim to reestablish the border with Bulgaria, which was in essence a claim over Southern Dobrudja. In spite of rather favorable international circumstances in the early XX century, the Romanians were unable to bring this notion into being until the second half of 1913, the outbreak of an inter-alliance war, a result of frictions between Bulgaria, Serbia and Greece. The lack of success on the side of the Bulgarian armed forces at the western front and the fact that their northern and northeastern provinces were left unprotected incited Romania to invade Bulgaria and annex the Southern Dobrudja. A Turkish invasion followed shortly. As a consequence, and with recognition of the European superpowers of the time, on 10th August 1913 in Bucharest a harsh treaty was imposed on Bulgarians, with the loss of the contested Southern Dobrudja amongst other terms.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 287-295
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pułkownik Redl. Polityczne wątki afery w prasie polskiej
Colonel Redl. Political motifs of the affair in Polish press releases
Autorzy:
Stępnik, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909882.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Alfred Redl
Balkan Wars
Austro-Hungary
antisemitism
Wojny Bałkańskie
Austro-Węgry
antysemityzm
Opis:
The most famous spy scandal before the outbreak of the First World War, took place during the time of intensified diplomatic actions taken to stop the Balkan War. At night on May 24th 1913, Colonel Alfred Redl, the chief of staff for the VIII. Corps stationed in Prague – having been exposed by counterintelligence – committed suicide in Klomser Hotel in Vienna. His death was directly connected to the fact that the special commission that consisted of high ranking officers was established in the extraordinary mode. The case of Russian spy was known only to an exclusive group of ‘initiates’. Nevertheless, it was almost immediately leaked to the press and evoked scandal that stirred up public opinion in Austria-Hungary. The motifs of the scandal – described in Polish press releases of that time: in Cracow, Lvov and Warsaw – have been analyzed in the article. They were significant in the context of political struggle, led mainly between two antagonistic forces: the Austrophiles and the Russophiles. Seemingly distant from Polish matters, the spy affair turned out to be an important factor that ‘catalyzed’ political attitudes of the Poles. The aspect of Redl’s nationality became a significant element of the polemics. And the scandal undermined Austro-Hungarian morale, especially the morale of Slavic nations subject to the Empire; the more so as, at exactly the same time, a political corruption affair which Hungarian Prime Minister was involved in, happened in Budapest. The events that happened in Galicia in May and June 1913 – as connected with political and economical turning point that autonomous country reached, which was caused by Austro-Hungarian preparations for Balkan War – have been examined here as the background context. In this article, basing on a wide range of press sources, the author classifies and describes some key political motifs of the Redl affair: especially the change of ideas about the Balkan War – in accordance to common opinions expressed in Polish press – now bringing the fatal threat to Austro-Hungary. (Russia came into possession of mobilization plans). The other topics are: the decline of Austro-Hungarian prestige on the international arena, the criticism of the code applying to officer corps, assigning Redl the Jewish origin by the anti-Semitic press, attacks on the ones that supported Austro-Hungarian orientations, including those who organized a kind of ‘substitute” for Polish military forces under the auspices of the monarchy, and finally – the spy psychosis.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 249-286
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Cele polityczne i terytorialne Królestwa Czarnogóry w przededniu i w trakcie I wojny bałkańskiej
Political and territorial objectives of the Kingdom of Montenegro on the eve of and during the First Balkan War
Autorzy:
Szczepański, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan wars
Montenegro
Serbia
Sandjak
Metohia
wojny bałkańskie
Czarnogóra
Sandžak
Metohija
Opis:
Montenegro, the smallest of the Balkan states in the beginning of the 20th century, was especially interested in creating an anti-Turkish alliance. It aimed at attaching the fertile lands of Sandžak of Novi Pazar, Metohija and Shkodër. Finally, as a result of the I Balkan War, it managed to achieve the first two aims, only if partially, because it had to share those lands with Serbia. Montenegro did not manage to take over control of Shkodër and the surroundings inhabited mainly by Albanians. There were many reasons why Montenegro did not manage to realize its territorial aspirations: – the poor financial condition of the state of Montenegro on the eve of the war, which prevented them from gaining a strong position in the Balkan alliance and made a success in its military actions dependent on the allies, especially on Serbia; – the detrimental pressure exerted by king Nicolas I to fight at any cost for the control over Shkodër; – a conflict of interest and mistakes made by the Montenegro authorities in developing their relations with Serbia, which weighed later on the relations between Montenegro and Serbia in the period between the Balkan wars and the First World War, as well as at the time when Yugoslavia began to unite around the idea of building the common state. – not appreciating to a sufficient degree the significance of the Albanian problem and not using the possession of the North Albanian lands as a bargaining chip in the relations with neighbors, particularly with Serbia.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2013, 20, 1; 117-136
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Балканските војни и актуелните состојби на Балканот
The Balkan Wars and the contemporary Balkans
Autorzy:
Mitrova, Makedonka
Pandevska, Маrija
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909831.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Балканските војни
Балканот
Грција
Македонија
Balkan wars
Balkans
Greece
Bulgaria
Macedonia
Opis:
A populist slogan, with a crusade like overtones: “to liberate our Christian brothers”, served as an unassailable alibi for the expansionist aspirations of the small Balkan states in order to mobilize their population during the First Balkan War. The different interpretations of the phrase “Christian brothers” could already be seen in the Balkan pacts and their hidden annexes. The Second Balkan War quite openly revealed the sole objective of the Balkan states for territorial expansion in those wars. To each his own: Greece longed for the wheat fields of Macedonia and Edirne; Bulgaria longed for the warm seas of Macedonia and Edirne; Serbia longed to be a coastal country at any cost- if they could not reach the Salonika Bay, then through the Durres port; Montenegro longed for the Skhodër (Skadar/Shkodra) port, etc. The Second Balkan War proved to be the quintessence of different interpretation of the word “to liberate”. Even though the Balkan Wars lasted for almost a year (between 1912 and 1913), they left the Balkan people with severe consequences. Namely, since the Balkan territory was ethnically diverse, especially in a period when not all of the nations were yet completely defined, it was not possible to draw the state lines which could please everybody and which would not dissatisfy the population later. Thus, the same actors would actively participate in both World Wars. Because of this, the discontentment originating in the period of the Balkan Wars still burdens the relations between the Balkan countries to this day. The unresolved political questions, such as the problem of Macedonia and Kosovo, may have lasted the whole century. This, however, does not mean that history repeats itself, because history can never be the same. Frozen conflicts and unresolved issues still burden the Balkans and contribute to the very slow and hard development of its political culture.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2013, 20, 1; 106-116
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wielkie mocarstwa europejskie wobec wojen bałkańskich 1912-1913
The Great European Powers and Balkan Wars 1912-1913
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909890.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan wars
great powers
Balkans
Mediterranean sea
Thessaloniki
Wojny Bałkańskie
mocarstwa
Morze Śródziemne
Saloniki
Opis:
Balkan Wars 1912-1913 were a milestone event in the history of the Balkans. They ending, started in 1878, process of expulsion of Turkey from its European possessions, and creating the possibility of realizing popular in this part of Europe slogan “The Balkans for the Balkan nations”. It should be noted that taking on the Balkan Peninsula events were with attention watched by the European great powers, because this part of Europe they are treated as a region of special economic and politic-military interest. This situation was dictated primarily by dynamic industrialization of Europe, which already in the middle of the nineteenth century led to the exacerbation of the struggle for access to the raw materials and especially to sales markets. In the context of the Balkans the essential importance had the rivalry between Austria-Hungary, which was seeking a safe and comfortable way to the port of Thessaloniki, and Russia, which was striving to change the status of Bosporus and the Dardanelles, for ensure grain exports through the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. It must be remembered that the Balkans and Turkey played an equally important role in the economic plans of other powers – Great Britain, France, and from the late nineteenth century also Italy and Germany. An equally important role played by political and military considerations. The entry of great powers in the so-called imperial era greatly influenced the intensification of the competition for the “undisputed leader” in Europe and the range of spheres of influence, and the crystallization of the opposing military-political blocks in the Europe, pay attention of politicians to those European countries, which was created the possibility of blocking the enemy actions and obtain tactical advantage. For obvious reasons, the Balkans have played in this rivalry special role. Although the imposition of all these factors complicated the situation on the Balkan Peninsula, the persistent tension between the great powers created Balkan states and nations the feasibility of their policy plans. Thus, in the era of the Balkan wars, they did not intend to follow the guidelines of European diplomacy, and taken by the great powers the efforts to save peace and acquisition of potential allies did not lead to the expected success, which clearly confirmed the events of WWI.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 207-220
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aspekty ekonomiczne i społeczne wojen bałkańskich 1912-1913
The economic and social aspects of the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars
Autorzy:
Dymarski, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909886.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
economy
costs of war
refugees
Wojny Bałkańskie
gospodarka
koszty wojenne
uchodźcy
Opis:
At the dawn of the XXth century the Balkan countries were intent on waging war against Turkey. In the preparation period, however, they had severely exceeded their economic and demographic capabilities. The arms production consumed vast amounts of money, leading to an extraordinary debt of the Balkan states. The 1912-1913 wars have proved to be a veritable ordeal for the economies of the involved countries as well as their social endurance. This great sacrifice was supposed to further the national goal of defeating Turkey and finally establishing the inter-state borders, even in the face of an impending economic collapse. The Balkan conflicts turned into a war of attrition, a harbinger of what was to come during the World War I. The pre-war efforts and the cost of the actual warfare brought Bulgaria, Greece,Serbia, Montenegro as well as Turkey to the brink of economical breakdown and major social turbulence. The calling of 1.3 million men to arms resulted in halting the industrial production and an agricultural crisis in the countries of the Balkan Alliance. The civilian transport sector was non-existent (since all the means and assets had been requisitioned by the military) which proved fatal to the commerce. This in turn greatly diminished the states’ tax income, further worsening the financial repercussions of the war. The number of soldiers fallen, wounded or killed by cholera were reaching hundreds of thousands. Due to the harsh war conditions and the lack of suitable attention many of the wounded have become disabled, which banned them from the work market and doomed them to social benefits. Amongst the consequences of the war were also migrations of the civilians, forced by the war itself and the following border changes. The Christian refugees alone numbered hundreds of thousands, while any real means of administering to the basic needs of the displaced masses were actually non-existent. On the Muslim side the losses amounted to 620,000 Turkish soldiers and civilians. A further 440,000 have been displaced and moved to Anatolia. Moreover the pillage, the atrocity, as well as the destruction of private property have engraved the feelings of mutual hatred and longing for a vendetta in the minds of the Balkan people.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 221-230
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wojny bałkańskie 1912-1913 przyczyną rozwoju nacjonalizmu „gorącego” na Bałkanach w XX wieku. Zarys problemu
The Balkan Wars 1912-1913 as a cause of the development of “hot nationalism” in the Balkans. The outline of the problem
Autorzy:
Gibas-Krzak, Danuta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909898.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Nationalism
Balkan wars
International Carnegie’s Commission
Nacjonalizm
wojny bałkańskie
Międzynarodowa Komisja Carnegiego
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to examine the origin of “hot nationalism” in the Balkans. Undoubtedly, this kind of nationalism was the final element of the Balkan Wars, that erupted in 1912. The author presents the hypothesis that all Balkan conflicts have in common many factors. First of all, they were leading to develop of the modern nationalism. The ethnic cleansing, which were conducted during the Balkans Wars became the origin of the next Balkan conflicts in XX and XXI centuries. Furthermore, the most important acts of cruelty, violations, rapes, murders are being described along with the overall as it is being manifested in the case of Macedonia. The crucial source of this article constitutes The other Balkan Wars. A 1913 Carnegie Endowment inquiry in retrospect with a new introduction and reflections on the present conflict by George F. Kennan, written in Washington 1993, based on Carnegie Commission Report (1914), whose authors emphasized that “hot nationalism” manifested itself on the field of battle, drew on deeper traits of character inherited, presumably, from a distant tribal past, a tendency to view the outsider, with dark suspicion, and to see the political opponent as a fearful and implacable enemy to be rendered harmless only by total and unpitying destruction. The author asks the question if the “Eastern nationalism”, the most ferocious nationalism, still causes the threat to the security not only in the South Europe but also in the Old Continent?
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 121-138
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bitwa pod Kumanowem na łamach gazety „Politika” – mit umacniający pozycję polityczną króla Aleksandra Karadjordjevicia
The battle of Kumanovo in the newspaper „Politika”, as a myth strengthening political position of king Aleksander Karadjordjević
Autorzy:
Michalak, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909894.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Balkan Wars
The battle of Kumanovo
Aleksander Karadjordjević
“Politika”
Wojny bałkańskie
bitwa pod Kumanovem
„Politika”
Opis:
Although the commander-in-chief of the Serbian army during both Balkan wars was the chief of staff, general Radomir Putnik, it was his subordinate, a mere 24 years-old Prince Aleksander. The battle of Kumanovo (23rd–24th October 1912), considered as one of the most important battles of the First Balkan War, brought him a great prestige. It seems, that Aleksander tried to strengthen his image as an honest and honorable soldier fighting in defense of his homeland and for the liberation of all South Slavs. It was an effective way of obtaining sympathy subjects, the way, which began to be used on a larger scale after taking the throne by Aleksander Karadjordjević (16th August 1921). The largest and most popular newspaper in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (since 1929 Yugoslavia), the daily “Politika” supported the official political line of the king. A very interesting aspect of this activity is its way of presenting events associated with the commemoration of the battle of Kumanovo. The cultivation of the so-called “myth of Kumanovo” was important aspect of king’s Aleksander policy, who in the face of ongoing problems and disputes in the internal policy of the country, wanted to be seen as “unifier”, soldier and hero, who was not interested in political games. Much of his subjects perceived him exactly in that way.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2012, 19, 1; 169-179
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosunki bułgarsko-rumuńskie w latach 1912–1913 (na podstawie bułgarskich, niemieckich i austro-węgierskich dokumentów dyplomatycznych)
Bulgarian-Romanian relations in the years 1912–1913 (on the base of Bulgarian, German and Austro-Hungarian diplomatic sources)
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32328809.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Bulgaria
Romania
Balkan wars 1912–1913
Dobruja
great powers
Bułgaria
Rumunia
wojny bałkańskie 1912–1913
Dobrudża
wielkie mocarstwa
Opis:
Trwające od ponad trzydziestu lat napięcie w stosunkach bułgarsko-rumuńskich osiągnęło apogeum w latach 1912–1913, a perspektywa naruszenia przez Bułgarię status quo na Bałkanach skłoniła Rumunię do wystąpienia z żądaniami nowych gwarancji bezpieczeństwa i odszkodowań terytorialnych. Podjęte pertraktacje między Bukaresztem i Sofią wykazały jednak znaczne rozbieżności w stanowiskach stron w kwestii modyfikacji granicy Dobrudży, których nie były w stanie zniwelować nawet naciski wielkich mocarstw. Dlatego Rumunia wypowiedziała Bułgarii wojnę, ale modyfikacja granicy w Dobrudży opisana w traktacie bukareszteńskim z 1913 r. nie przywróciła dobrych relacji między sąsiednimi państwami.
Bulgarian-Romanian relations in the years 1912–1913 (on the base of Bulgarian, German and Austro-Hungarian diplomatic sources). The tensions in Bulgarian-Romanian relations, which had lasted for over thirty years, reached their peak in 1912–1913, and the prospect of Bulgaria breaching the status quo in the Balkans prompted Romania to ask for new security guarantees and territorial compensation. However, the negotiations between Bucharest and Sofia showed significant divergences in the positions of the parties regarding the modification of the Dobruja border, which even the pressure of the great powers could not offset. Therefore, Romania declared war on Bulgaria, but the modification of the border in Dobruja described in the Treaty of Bucharest of 1913 did not restore good relations between neighbouring countries.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2022, 29; 199-212
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Central Powers and the Balkans A Study of Diplomatic Activities of Germany and Austro-Hungary in Southeast Europe (1909–1913)
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/654117.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
Niemcy
Austro-Węgry
mocarstwa centralne
Bałkany
Europa PołudniowoWschodnia
wojny bałkańskie 1912–1913
Germany
Austro-Hungary
Central Powers
Balkans
Balkan Wars 1912–1913
Opis:
Półwysep Bałkański ze względu na swoje geograficzne położenie na styku „świata zachodniego” i „świata Orientu” od wieków odgrywał ważną rolę zarówno w europejskiej polityce, jak i ekonomii. Jego znaczenie znacznie wzrosło w połowie XIX w., kiedy europejskie mocarstwa wkroczyły w tzw. erę imperialną. Trudno zatem dziwić się, że w tym właśnie czasie ten niewielki region, leżący na „krańcach cywilizowanej Europy”, stał się polem zaciętej walki o strefy wpływów. W rywalizacji tej wzięły udział także Niemcy i Austro-Węgry. Jakkolwiek państwa te odmiennie postrzegały ostateczne cele, zarówno w Berlinie, jak i w Wiedniu zdawano sobie sprawę, że uzyskanie przewagi nad konkurentami może mieć istotny wpływ nie tylko na rozwój rodzimego przemysłu, który zyskiwałby nowe rynki zbytu dla swojej produkcji, ale także na kształtowanie ogólnoeuropejskiej polityki. Tymczasem zachodzące na Bałkanach na początku XX w. procesy i głębokie zmiany, błędnie oceniane i bagatelizowane przez dyplomację mocarstw centralnych, przesądziły o dotkliwej porażce, którą poniosły one w walce o ugruntowanie swej pozycji w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej. Because of its geographic location at the meeting point of the Western world and the Orient, the Balkan Peninsula for many centuries had figured largely both in the European politics and in its economy, and its importance increased in the mid-nineteenth century, when the European powers entered the so-called “imperial phase.” It is hardly surprising then that at this particular period this small region, situated at “the edge of civilized Europe,” had become the arena of fierce fighting for spheres of influence. Germany and Austro-Hungary joined this struggle, too. Even though these two states variously defined their ultimate objectives in the Balkans, it was widely acknowledged both in Berlin and in Vienna that gaining an advantage over the rivals could not only significantly influence the development of domestic industry, which would acquire new markets for its output, but it could also affect the state of European politics. Nevertheless, the new developments and deep transformations occurring in the Balkans at the outset of the twentieth century, misjudged and belittled by the diplomatic services of the Central Powers, resulted in a heavy defeat that they suffered in the endeavors to consolidate their position in Southeast Europe.
Źródło:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej; 2018, 53, 3
2353-6403
1230-5057
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mocarstwa centralne a Bałkany. Studium działań dyplomatycznych Niemiec i Austro-Węgier w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej (1909–1913)
Autorzy:
Rubacha, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/653768.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
Niemcy
Austro-Węgry
mocarstwa centralne
Bałkany
Europa Południowo-Wschodnia
wojny bałkańskie 1912–1913
Germany
Austro-Hungary
Central Powers
the Balkans
South-Eastern Europe
Balkan wars of 1912–1913
Opis:
Półwysep Bałkański ze względu na swoje geograficzne położenie na styku „świata zachodniego” i „świata Orientu” od wieków odgrywał ważną rolę zarówno w europejskiej polityce, jak i ekonomii. Jego znaczenie znacznie wzrosło w połowie XIX w., kiedy europejskie mocarstwa wkroczyły w tzw. erę imperialną. Trudno zatem dziwić się, że w tym właśnie czasie ten niewielki region, leżący na „krańcach cywilizowanej Europy”, stał się polem zaciętej walki o strefy wpływów. W rywalizacji tej wzięły udział także Niemcy i Austro-Węgry. Jakkolwiek państwa te odmiennie postrzegały ostateczne cele, zarówno w Berlinie, jak i w Wiedniu zdawano sobie sprawę, że uzyskanie przewagi nad konkurentami może mieć istotny wpływ nie tylko na rozwój rodzimego przemysłu, który zyskiwałby nowe rynki zbytu dla swojej produkcji, ale także na kształtowanie ogólnoeuropejskiej polityki. Tymczasem zachodzące na Bałkanach na początku XX w. procesy i głębokie zmiany, błędnie oceniane i bagatelizowane przez dyplomację mocarstw centralnych, przesądziły o dotkliwej porażce, którą poniosły one w walce o ugruntowanie swej pozycji w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej.Due to its geographical location nestled between the “Western World” and the “World of the Orient”, the Balkan Peninsula has for centuries been playing an important part both in European politics, and economy. Its significance increased sharply in the mid-nineteenth century, after the European powers entered the so-called imperial era. It is therefore not surprising that at that time this relatively small region at “the end of the civilised world” became the battlefield for zones of influence. The rivalry was also joined by Germany and Austro-Hungary. And although these states had different ultimate ends, it was known both in Berlin, and in Vienna that the advantage over the competitors and opponents could have a great impact not only on the development of national industry, which would gain a new ready market, but also on the shape of European policy. However, the processes of deep changes and transformations that occurred in the Balkans in the early twentieth century, wrongly identified and underestimated by the Central Powers, determined their abject failure in the attempts to strengthen their position in South-Eastern Europe.
Źródło:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej; 2018, 53, 1
2353-6403
1230-5057
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
"Letters from Bulgaria": Bulgarian problems on the pages of The Kyiv Rada Magazine (1906-1914)
"Listy z Bułgarii": Bułgarskie problemy na łamach kijowskiego magazynu «Rada» (1906-1914)
"Листи з Болгарії": Болгарські проблеми на шпальтах київського часопису "Рада" (1906-1914)
Autorzy:
Hedo, Anna
Iwaniuk, Oleg
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31233741.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
history of Bulgaria
Rada magazine
Balkan wars
L. Shishmanova-Drahomanova
Bulgarian-Turkish relations
national education
Bulgarian-Ukrainian cultural contacts
historia Bułgarii
gazeta Rada
wojny bałkańskie
L. Shishmanov-Dragomanova
stosunki bułgarsko-tureckie
edukacja narodowa
bułgarsko-ukraińskie kontakty kulturalne
Opis:
The article analyzes the publications in the Kyiv Rada magazine concerning the events in Bulgaria in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The magazine was published during 1906-1914. It published materials on a regular basis that addressed urgent issues of economic, social and cultural life of the Slavic peoples neighboring Ukraine. In the course of the research, it has been established that the history and features of the national revival of Bulgaria attracted the attention of the editors and readers. The pages of the magazine published correspondence about international relations in the Balkans, Ukrainian-Bulgarian cultural contacts, etc. The magazine focused on statehood and political system, freedoms, participation in self-government, high patriotism and self-awareness. It was a hint for Ukrainians of the need to cherish their native language, respect the past, consolidate in the struggle for their own future, and study the successful experience of the neighboring Slavic people.
У статті проаналізовано публікації у київській газеті “Рада” які стосувалися подій у Болгарії наприкінці ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст. Часопис виходив упродовж 1906-1914 рр. Він, на постійній основі оприлюднював матеріали які розглядали актуальні питання економічного, громадського і культурного життя сусідніх з Україною слов’янських народів. У процесі дослідження, встановлено, що увагу редакції та читачів привертали історія і особливості національного відродження Болгарії. На шпальтах часопису друкувалися кореспонденції які розповідали про міжнародні відносини на Балканах, україно-болгарські культурні контакти, тощо. Широко висвітлювалися заходи із вшанування пам’яті Т. Шевченка. Детально розповідаючи про економіне, політичне, культурне життя тогочасної Болгарії, заглиблюючись у військові дії і перебіг Балканських війн, часопис акцентував увагу на держаності і політичній системі, свободах, участі населення у самоврядуванні, високому рівні патріотизму і самосвідомості. Це був натяк, для українців, на необхідність плекати рідну мову, шанувати минуле, консолідуватися у боротьбі за власне майбутнє і вивчати і запозичувати успішний досвід сусіднього слов’янського народу. Болгарську проблематику висвітлювали кілька кореспондентів видання А. Ніковський, С. Бардяєв, О. Бочковський, Ф. Матушевський, Л. Пахаревський, С. Драгоманов, Л. Шишманова-Драгоманова.
Artykuł analizuje publikacje w kijowskim czasopismie «Rada» dotyczące wydarzeń w Bułgarii końca XIX i początku XX wieku. Pismo ukazywało się w latach 1906-1914. Na stałe publikował materiały dotyczące aktualnych problemów życia gospodarczego, społecznego i kulturalnego sąsiadujących z Ukrainą narodów słowiańskich. W trakcie badań ustalono, że uwagę redaktorów i czytelników przyciągnęła historia i osobliwości odrodzenia narodowego Bułgarii. Na łamach czasopisma drukowano korespondencję, która opowiadała o stosunkach międzynarodowych na Bałkanach, kontaktach kulturalnych ukraińsko-bułgarskich itp. Wydarzenia upamiętniające T. Szewczenkę były szeroko relacjonowane. Mówiąc szczegółowo o życiu gospodarczym, politycznym i kulturalnym Bułgarii w tym czasie, zagłębiając się w operacje wojskowe i przebieg wojen bałkańskich, czasopismo skupiono na państwowość i ustrój polityczny, wolności, udział ludności w samorządzie, wysoki poziom patriotyzmu i samoświadomości. Była to wskazówka dla Ukraińców, że trzeba pielęgnować swój język ojczysty, szanować przeszłość, umacniać się w walce o własną przyszłość, studiować i zapożyczać pomyślne doświadczenia sąsiednich Słowian. Kwestie bułgarskie poruszało kilku korespondentów w swoich publikacjach: A. Nikovsky, S. Bardiaev, O. Bochkovsky, F. Matushevsky, L. Pakhaevsky, S. Dragomanov, L. Shishmanova-Dragomanova.
Źródło:
TEKA Komisji Polsko-Ukraińskich Związków Kulturowych; 2022, 6, 17; 1-18
1733-2249
Pojawia się w:
TEKA Komisji Polsko-Ukraińskich Związków Kulturowych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-17 z 17

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies