Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "HAJDUK, Zygmunt" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-25 z 29
Tytuł:
Filozofia przyrody: preliminaria
The Philosophy of Nature: Preliminaries
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The paper constitutes part of some more comprehensive textbook and embraces several introductory issues concerning philosophy of nature. 1 examine first different notions of this philosophical discipline used in various historically relevant contexts. Later on, 1 present reasons for claiming the philosophy of nature revival nowadays. Some aspects of its update are examined: the traditional and contemporary aims; roles related to different conceptions of the natural philosophy; its main stages of progressive change followed by its central categories. These developments have been accompanied by the growing view that philosophy of nature has become sufficiently justified in existence.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2001, 49, 3; 5-46
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ostatnia książka Józefa Turka
The Last Book by Józef Turek
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012830.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
dane doświadczenia
empiryczna i filozoficzna interpretacja
teoria naukowa
reinterpretacja
experience data
empirical and philosophical interpretation
scientific theory
reinterpretation
Opis:
The paper brings a concise analysis of the content contained in the book. Considerations concern the metascientific theory of philosophical cosmology, especially the relations between natural sciences and the so called classical philosophy of nature. Procedures of philosophical interpretation of scientific facts are postulated to ensure methodological and epistemological correctness of all philosophical theses. Basic operations in this branch of philosophy include conceptualization, defining, inferring especially in the form of explaining and justifying. Such cognitive operations constitute the whole process of interpretation, insists Joseph Turek.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2011, 59, 2; 31-41
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomasz Rzepiński, Problem niedookreślenia teorii przez dane doświadczenia
Tomasz Rzepiński, Problem niedookreślenia teorii przez dane doświadczenia [The Problem of the Indefiniteness of Theory Through Experiential Data], Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM 2006, pp. 310. ISBN 83-7092-084-5
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013311.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2007, 55, 2; 229-232
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wartości epistemiczne: Aktualne kontrowersje w aksjologii nauki
Epistemic values: Some contemporary controversies in the axiology of science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015980.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
filozofia nauki
aksjologia
neopozytywizm
wartość
philosophy of science
axiology
neo-positivism
value
Opis:
The paper discusses naturalistic axiology of L. Laudan (normative naturalism) and social epistemology of H. Longino (contextual empiricism). Both standpoints are subjected to criticism. G.Doppelt, A.Rosenberg, and H.Siegel argue that Laudan's axiology lacks any naturalistic foundation. K.Freedman shows that this objection is based on a misunderstanding of Laudan's use of the term “naturalism”. He distinguishes two senses of this term running throughout Laudan's work. Once those senses are made explicit the above objection dissappears. Next, the attention is drawn to the virtues of Longino's epistemology as a viable alternative both to positivism and holism. The paper presents objections raised by Ph. Kitcher (the charge of relativism), F.Schmitt (the charge of incoherence) and M.Solomon (the charge of individualism) against Longino's views and arguments defending her position developed by K. B. Wray. The paper claims that the discussions presented can be best understood within the framework of (epistemic) axiology initiated in the fifties of the XXth century – among others – by R. Rudner, C.W.Churchman, I.Levi.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2002, 50, 1; 165-184
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Postęp naukowy, techniczny oraz cywilizacyjno-kulturowy
Scientific, Technological, and Cultural Progress
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917731.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
This paper consists of four parts. The first one is introductory and the second historical in its character. Both are relatively short. Perhaps the most topical is the third part in which several approaches towards different kinds of progress have been exposed. The subject of the analysis is first scientific or cognitive progress, and next technological and social as well as other kinds which are appropriate for different domains of the humanities including philosophy.The analysis proceeds in comparative rather than in absolute terms. In the fourth, i.e.last part of this essay some philosophical, esp. ontological and methodological implications of the progressiveness in science, technology and in humanities are discussed. As an effect of these discussions it becomes evident that in contrast with the neutrality of scientific progress, what is taken to constitue technological and other kinds of nonscientific progress also depends on moral values, since their utilities with their weights (in terms of decision theory) reflect ethically relevant social valuations.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1997, 45, 3; 161-187
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wartościowanie w technologii
Valuation in Technology
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1918281.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
In this paper we have discussed in general terms a number of problems concerning one of the most fundamental questions of the new philosophy of technology. Valuational operations as such a question is analysed in several contexts entitled as follows: importance of this issue; science, technics, technology; philosophy of science and philosophy of technology; value theory or axiology and some oppositions characteristic for this branch of philosophy; values in science and technology; technology as an application field for ethics and morality. We defend the view that science and technology are interconnected activities which have different aims, and different patterns of progress and valuation. The connection between scientific, and technical or technological valuation is also discussed.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1996, 44, 3; 5-33
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Struktury metodologiczne w nauce
Units of Methodological Analysis in Science
Autorzy:
HAJDUK, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488561.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-06
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
nauka
nauki empiryczne
statyka i dynamika nauki
metodologia nauk
kategorie metodologiczne
struktury metodologiczne
struktury
science
natural sciences
statics and dynamics of science
scientific methodology
methodological categories
units of methodological analysis
structures
Opis:
W artykule jest suponowana opozycja między statyką i dynamiką nauki. Przez naukę rozumiemy głównie nauki empiryczne, zwłaszcza przyrodnicze, lub nauki ścisłe (sciences), inaczej: matematyczne przyrodoznawstwo. Przy doborze kategorii jako przedmiotu podjętych analiz kierowano się racjami badawczymi oraz odwołującymi się do praktyki naukowej i metanaukowej. Kontekstowe objaśnienia tych obiektów relatywizowano do sytuacji poznawczej potencjalnych odbiorców. Uwzględniano zarówno adeptów, jak i profesjonalnie zainteresowanych refleksją nad czynnościowo i wytworowo ujmowaną nauką. Podjęte zagadnienia są rozpatrywane poprzez stopniowe dyskusje aspektywnie wyselekcjonowanych problemów. W rozpatrywanej perspektywie należą do nich: ramowe stanowiska; terminy-klucze; statyka/dynamika nauki; rewolucje w filozofii nauki; dwa konteksty; nowa filozofia nauki; nurt normatywny i deskryptywny; kategoria rewolucji naukowych; super-, supra- i maksiteorie jako jednostki ponadteoretyczne; problematyka aksjologiczna; pluralizm filozofii nauki; problem/teoria problemu; wartość — kategoria z zakresu aksjologii epistemicznej; dalsze zagadnienia filozofii nauki; charakterystyka opracowania.
The opposition between statics and dynamics of science in the entire content of the paper is supposed. We understand science as natural science(s). The selection of categories as an object of examining is directed by reasons generated through scientific and metascientific practice. Contextual elucidations are related to actual situation of potential receivers. Among them are so students as well as professional scientists interested in solving scientific problems. To do so the following questions, namely: background standpoints; key-terms; statics/dynamics of science; revolutions in the philosophy of science; two contexts; new philosophy of science; descriptive and normative trends; scientific revolutions category; super-, supra- and maxitheories; problems of epistemic axiology; philosophy of science pluralism; problem/theory of problem; value — category of epistemic axiology; other questions of the philosophy of science; characteristic of the entire elaboration is subsequently discussed.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2018, 66, 2; 9-22
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uwarunkowania postępu poznawczego w teoriach rozwoju nauki (II)
Criteria of Cognitive Progress in Various Philosophies of Science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106677.pdf
Data publikacji:
1992
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
Część pierwsza tego artykułu ukazała się w "Rocznikach Filozoficznych" 37-38:1989-1990 z. 3 s.83-160. Artykuł powstał w ramach dotowanego przez MEN projektu badawczego (18VII 1990)   The article consists of two parts, the first of which was published in "Roczniki Filozoficzne" 36-37:1989-1990 nr 3. The whole essay aims at exposing the current controversies on this topical issue, which we encounter in modern schools of metascience. They are mainly represented by the empiricist tradition, the Popperian standpoint, the post-positivist school and the so called synthetic point of view. According to the logical empiricist image of science the assessment of scientific laws and theories is simply a matter of confrontation between them and the data. If the right kind and quantity of positive evidence can be collected, the theory is acceptable. If, on the other hand, the evidence is negative, then the proposed law or theory has to be rejected. Hence the label − monocriterial appraisal of scientific laws or theories. Science is also cumulative. Thus, through time, the scope of successful science becomes steadely wider, and nothing important is lost in the process. Popper's attempts to provide the concept of cognitive progress include a conception of the conflict that arises in the case of successive scientific theories. His task is to show how one of such conflicting theories has an advantage over the other. Popper takes two factors into account. One concerns the issue of how close each of the false theories is to being true. But this alone is not a sufficient basis for a criterion of progress, for it implies that some relatively trivial generalization might be a progression beyond some comprehensive albeit refuted, theory. Consequently, a second factor must be considered, namely the comprehensiveness or non-triviality of a theory. This latter factor constitutes Popper's concept of content, and a combination of both factors gives his notion of verisimilitude. Explanation and prediction are other main dimensions of theory appraisal and preference. Popper's methodology is, therefore, fallibilist, objecitivistic, preferentionalist and evolutional. During the 1960s and later a number of new theories of scientific change proliferated. The unit of comparative evaluation are large-scale theories (paradigms, research programmes, research traditions), on which different epistemic desiderata are imposed. On this occasion problems of teleological conception of science, questions of rationality and rationalism are discussed. The controversy between absolutism and relativism is also taken into account, as they are related to the status of desiderata. At the end of this part of our essay w e have a look at G. L. Pandit's interactive model of the growth of knowledge. In this model the dynamic interaction between developmental structures of problems and theories is a function of the explanatory power of a scientific theory (TEP) and the so called resolving power of a scientific theory (TRP). Both TEP and TRP serve as methodological bases of critical epistemic appraisals in empirical science. Finally, the analyses of both the problem and various characteristics of scientific progress are followed by the considerations about epistemic and extraepistemic determinants of progressiveness in science. We recognize, in this way, the necessity of multidimensional appraisals. Nevertheless, it presupposes the technological and social progress. In each part of this paper the evaluational considerations are preceded by the descriptions of different approaches to the units of scientific achievements and logical relations between them.
The article consists of two parts, the first of which was published in "Roczniki Filozoficzne" 36-37:1989-1990 nr 3. The whole essay aims at exposing the current controversies on this topical issue, which we encounter in modern schools of metascience. They are mainly represented by the empiricist tradition, the Popperian standpoint, the post-positivist school and the so called synthetic point of view. According to the logical empiricist image of science the assessment of scientific laws and theories is simply a matter of confrontation between them and the data. If the right kind and quantity of positive evidence can be collected, the theory is acceptable. If, on the other hand, the evidence is negative, then the proposed law or theory has to be rejected. Hence the label − monocriterial appraisal of scientific laws or theories. Science is also cumulative. Thus, through time, the scope of successful science becomes steadely wider, and nothing important is lost in the process. Popper's attempts to provide the concept of cognitive progress include a conception of the conflict that arises in the case of successive scientific theories. His task is to show how one of such conflicting theories has an advantage over the other. Popper takes two factors into account. One concerns the issue of how close each of the false theories is to being true. But this alone is not a sufficient basis for a criterion of progress, for it implies that some relatively trivial generalization might be a progression beyond some comprehensive albeit refuted, theory. Consequently, a second factor must be considered, namely the comprehensiveness or non-triviality of a theory. This latter factor constitutes Popper's concept of content, and a combination of both factors gives his notion of verisimilitude. Explanation and prediction are other main dimensions of theory appraisal and preference. Popper's methodology is, therefore, fallibilist, objecitivistic, preferentionalist and evolutional. During the 1960s and later a number of new theories of scientific change proliferated. The unit of comparative evaluation are large-scale theories (paradigms, research programmes, research traditions), on which different epistemic desiderata are imposed. On this occasion problems of teleological conception of science, questions of rationality and rationalism are discussed. The controversy between absolutism and relativism is also taken into account, as they are related to the status of desiderata. At the end of this part of our essay w e have a look at G. L. Pandit's interactive model of the growth of knowledge. In this model the dynamic interaction between developmental structures of problems and theories is a function of the explanatory power of a scientific theory (TEP) and the so called resolving power of a scientific theory (TRP). Both TEP and TRP serve as methodological bases of critical epistemic appraisals in empirical science. Finally, the analyses of both the problem and various characteristics of scientific progress are followed by the considerations about epistemic and extraepistemic determinants of progressiveness in science. We recognize, in this way, the necessity of multidimensional appraisals. Nevertheless, it presupposes the technological and social progress. In each part of this paper the evaluational considerations are preceded by the descriptions of different approaches to the units of scientific achievements and logical relations between them.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1992, 39-40, 3; 23-56
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Granice natury — granice nauki; granice i ograniczenia nauki
Limits of the Nature — Limits of the Science; Limits and Limitations of the Science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488254.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2017, 65, 1; 143-149
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
METODOLOGICZNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA RELACJI MIĘDZY TEORIĄ I DOŚWIADCZENIEM
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS CONCERNING RELATIONS BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC THEORIES AND EXPERIENCE
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488497.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
doświadczenie
obserwacja
porównywalność
relacje między teorią a doświadczeniem
teoria naukowa
experience
observation
comparability
relations between theory and experience
scientific theory
Opis:
The paper is divided in several parts, entitled as follows: introduction; the standard view, its characteristic; constructive challenge of the received standpoint; attempted resolutions of the prob- lem of comparability; how do work visual perceptions in scientific observations? meaning variance of scientific terms; an attempt to construe the ground for comparability — concluding remarks.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2012, 60, 4; 147-180
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sposoby uzasadniania teorii metodologicznych
Ways to Justify Methodological Theories
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/963888.pdf
Data publikacji:
1996-09-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:
In the article the criteria of evaluation of methodological theories are formulated. Methodology of Laudan and Lakatos are examined in more detailed way.
Źródło:
Filozofia Nauki; 1996, 4, 3; 87-94
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niedookreślenie teorii przez dane doświadczenia: Stanowisko Larryego Laudana a uhistorycznione meta metodologie
Theory Underdetermination: Larry Laudans Approach versus Historical Metamethodologies
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917638.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to show arelatively present state of the discussion concerning the theory underdetermination thesis as it is analysed in different historical matamethodologies. This relation involved esp. in american philosophy of science constitutes aunifying theme of our survey which is dominated by different phases of Larry Laudan's standpoint.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1999, 47, 3; 5-29
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Temporalność epistemologii formą naturalizmu filozoficznego
Temporality of Epistemology as a Form of Philosophical Naturalism
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917646.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The article surveys recent work on naturalized epistemology and its different kinds. In the first part the author concentrates on the historical aspect. In the second different kinds of continuity between epistemology and sciences are described. Naturalists differ among one another over the specific character of that continuity. This theme describes the third part of our paper. In the last one debate over the proper scope of epistemology naturalization and kinds of argumentation is examined. Throughout this paper the author explores some difficulties facing analyzed forms of naturalism.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1999, 47, 3; 107-120
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Reprezentatywne tradycje oceniania teorii metodologicznych
Towards an Appraisal of Methodological Theories: Some Representative Approaches
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1918683.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-13
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
There are three kinds of scientific level. First level contains the historical sequences of substantive scientific theories that have been proposed concerning each domain of phenomena. Second-order traditions (level II) comprise theories of scientific method or methodologies of science. Third-order traditions or meta-methodologies (level III) comprise one or more distinct rules or principles for adjudicating between rival level II methodologies. In our paper we are concerned with three types of meta-methodology: Popper's, Lakatos' and Laudan's. These three kinds of meta-methodological theories are in various perspectives discussed. These perspectives can be reduced in principle to fact-value perspective. For this one relevant is the relation between philosophy of science and other (the so called humanistic) metasciences.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1995, 43, 3; 163-186
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ks. Jerzy Dadaczyński, Heurystyczne funkcje założeń filozoficznych w kontekście odkrycia teorii mnogości Georga Cantora
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1918684.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-13
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1995, 43, 3; 187-190
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jacek Rodzeń, Czy sukcesy nauki są cudem? Studium filozoficzno-metodologiczne argumentacji z sukcesu nauki na rzecz realizmu naukowego
Jacek Rodzeń, Are Successes Miracles of Science? A Philosophical-Methodological Study on the Argumentation from the Success of Science on Behalf of Scientific Realism, Kraków/Tarnów: OBI/BIBLOS 2005, pp. 353. ISBN 83-7332-316-3
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013387.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2006, 54, 2; 429-432
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Komu i po co potrzebna jest dziś filozofia przyrody?
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013890.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
filozofia przyrody
filozofia przyrodoznawstwa
kryzys legitymizacyjny
philosophy of nature
philosophy of science
justificatory crisis
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2005, 53, 2; 412-415
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Teologiczna i światopoglądowa relewantność filozofii przyrody
Theological and Worldview Relevancy of the Philosophy of Nature
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015644.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
relewantność
światopogląd
teologia
filozofia przyrody
relevancy
worldview
theology
philosophy of nature
Opis:
While establishing the first type of relevancy, one takes into account the standard issues of the classical philosophy of nature. In particular, they are focused on the question of hylomorphism, evolutionism and miraculous events. This type of relevancy is defined through the relationships between the results of the natural sciences. They imply philosophical problems, a fact that enables us to establish the relationships between these sciences and theology. As a rule, it is the philosophy of nature and philosophy of God (I. G. Barbour, A. Anderwald) that play the role of mediators between the natural sciences and theology. The problems in question continue the relationships between evolution and creation, between science and religion, or religious faith, and between theology and the natural sciences. A discussion on the second type of relevancy depends to a large extent on the aspectual additional definitions of its terms. Obviously, they contain the concepts of science, philosophy, worldview, ideology, religion, and theology. These explicative manoeuvres allow us to take advantage of the strategies, introduced beforehand, of establishing the relationship between science and religion. It is essential for our context to construct a coherent image of the world, an image that is characteristic of the philosophy of nature. This image combines some aspects of science, philosophy, including metaphysics, ethics, and theology.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2004, 52, 2; 189-208
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inferencyjna funkcja konstruktów teoretycznych w nauce
The Inferential Function of Theoretical Constructs in Science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015691.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
konstrukty teoretyczne
wnioskowanie
wnioskowanie niededukcyjne
wnioskowanie heurystyczne
wnioskowanie indukcyjne
theoretical constructs
inference
nondeductive inference
heuristic inference
inductive inference
Opis:
The paper has an ordering character with regard to the current discussions on the issue formulated in its title, and it contains of three parts and conclusion. In the first part some standard functions of theoretical constructs have been presented, e.g. laws, hypotheses, and scientific theories. The most representative among them is the projective function (pro- and retro-gnosis) and the explanatory one. In the set of such functions we find also the inferential role, which is presented in the second part of the paper for traditionally comprehended theoretical constructs. The third part focuses on an alternative approach to the theoretical constructs of inference, i.e. inferences that are actually used in research practice. An important role is given to inconclusive forms of inference. Some schemes of heuristic inferences have been given here, a fact that does not belittle the role of formal logic in the theory of reasonings that occur in science. The methodological position presented in the paper is clearly combined with the epistemological version of scientific realism.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2004, 52, 1; 93-111
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontrowersyjność antynaturalizmu w racjonalizmie krytycznym
Antinaturalism Controversy in Critical Rationalism
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015767.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
antynaturalizm
racjonalizm krytyczny
antinaturalism
critical rationalism
Opis:
The paper demonstrates the actual in critical rationalism naturalism – antinaturalism opposition. It is aimed at showing diagnoses of the recent discussion and critique of some classical conceptions of this opposition and possible application especially to social sciences philosophy. Current work on consolidation of the disciplinary synthesis of internalist history and philosophy of science as a response to criticisms of logical reconstructivism may take philosophy of science including philosophy of social sciences in new directions.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2003, 51, 3; 215-223
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geneza teorii naukowych: uaktualniona forma kontrowersji o pluralizm metodologii
The Genesis of Scientific Theories: a Modern Form of the Controversy over Methodology Pluralism
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015900.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
geneza
pluralizm metodologii
odkrycie
ocena
genesis
methodology pluralism
discovery
appraisal
Opis:
The main topic of this paper is embraced by the post-positivistic criticism of the empiricist approach to the philosophy of science. A special stress on the pluralism of the (meta-)methodology is laid down. On the second level we have distinguished the following two main kinds of metascientific discourse: methodology of appraisal or evaluation vs methodology of invention or discvovery. In opposition to the traditional dichotomy of the well known two contexts we do not exclude some kind of relevance between these two sorts of metascientifc inquiry. Four groups of reasons being involved in an attempt to exclude therationalizability process of invention are then critically discussed. These four types of arguments against such a possibility of scientific heuristics (methodology of theory construction) appeal to 1)intuition, chance or unexplainability, 2) induction, 3) T-terms, and 4) predictability. Previously to this critical analysis of the arguments some attention upon preparatory issues is given. Such a role play especially: the status of methodology, historical approaches to the methodology of theory construction and rational reconstruction of the context of invention.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2002, 50, 3; 83-98
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-25 z 29

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies