Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "HAJDUK, Zygmunt" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29
Tytuł:
Filozofia przyrody: preliminaria
The Philosophy of Nature: Preliminaries
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The paper constitutes part of some more comprehensive textbook and embraces several introductory issues concerning philosophy of nature. 1 examine first different notions of this philosophical discipline used in various historically relevant contexts. Later on, 1 present reasons for claiming the philosophy of nature revival nowadays. Some aspects of its update are examined: the traditional and contemporary aims; roles related to different conceptions of the natural philosophy; its main stages of progressive change followed by its central categories. These developments have been accompanied by the growing view that philosophy of nature has become sufficiently justified in existence.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2001, 49, 3; 5-46
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ostatnia książka Józefa Turka
The Last Book by Józef Turek
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012830.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
dane doświadczenia
empiryczna i filozoficzna interpretacja
teoria naukowa
reinterpretacja
experience data
empirical and philosophical interpretation
scientific theory
reinterpretation
Opis:
The paper brings a concise analysis of the content contained in the book. Considerations concern the metascientific theory of philosophical cosmology, especially the relations between natural sciences and the so called classical philosophy of nature. Procedures of philosophical interpretation of scientific facts are postulated to ensure methodological and epistemological correctness of all philosophical theses. Basic operations in this branch of philosophy include conceptualization, defining, inferring especially in the form of explaining and justifying. Such cognitive operations constitute the whole process of interpretation, insists Joseph Turek.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2011, 59, 2; 31-41
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomasz Rzepiński, Problem niedookreślenia teorii przez dane doświadczenia
Tomasz Rzepiński, Problem niedookreślenia teorii przez dane doświadczenia [The Problem of the Indefiniteness of Theory Through Experiential Data], Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM 2006, pp. 310. ISBN 83-7092-084-5
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013311.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2007, 55, 2; 229-232
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wartości epistemiczne: Aktualne kontrowersje w aksjologii nauki
Epistemic values: Some contemporary controversies in the axiology of science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015980.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
filozofia nauki
aksjologia
neopozytywizm
wartość
philosophy of science
axiology
neo-positivism
value
Opis:
The paper discusses naturalistic axiology of L. Laudan (normative naturalism) and social epistemology of H. Longino (contextual empiricism). Both standpoints are subjected to criticism. G.Doppelt, A.Rosenberg, and H.Siegel argue that Laudan's axiology lacks any naturalistic foundation. K.Freedman shows that this objection is based on a misunderstanding of Laudan's use of the term “naturalism”. He distinguishes two senses of this term running throughout Laudan's work. Once those senses are made explicit the above objection dissappears. Next, the attention is drawn to the virtues of Longino's epistemology as a viable alternative both to positivism and holism. The paper presents objections raised by Ph. Kitcher (the charge of relativism), F.Schmitt (the charge of incoherence) and M.Solomon (the charge of individualism) against Longino's views and arguments defending her position developed by K. B. Wray. The paper claims that the discussions presented can be best understood within the framework of (epistemic) axiology initiated in the fifties of the XXth century – among others – by R. Rudner, C.W.Churchman, I.Levi.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2002, 50, 1; 165-184
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Postęp naukowy, techniczny oraz cywilizacyjno-kulturowy
Scientific, Technological, and Cultural Progress
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917731.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
This paper consists of four parts. The first one is introductory and the second historical in its character. Both are relatively short. Perhaps the most topical is the third part in which several approaches towards different kinds of progress have been exposed. The subject of the analysis is first scientific or cognitive progress, and next technological and social as well as other kinds which are appropriate for different domains of the humanities including philosophy.The analysis proceeds in comparative rather than in absolute terms. In the fourth, i.e.last part of this essay some philosophical, esp. ontological and methodological implications of the progressiveness in science, technology and in humanities are discussed. As an effect of these discussions it becomes evident that in contrast with the neutrality of scientific progress, what is taken to constitue technological and other kinds of nonscientific progress also depends on moral values, since their utilities with their weights (in terms of decision theory) reflect ethically relevant social valuations.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1997, 45, 3; 161-187
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wartościowanie w technologii
Valuation in Technology
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1918281.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
In this paper we have discussed in general terms a number of problems concerning one of the most fundamental questions of the new philosophy of technology. Valuational operations as such a question is analysed in several contexts entitled as follows: importance of this issue; science, technics, technology; philosophy of science and philosophy of technology; value theory or axiology and some oppositions characteristic for this branch of philosophy; values in science and technology; technology as an application field for ethics and morality. We defend the view that science and technology are interconnected activities which have different aims, and different patterns of progress and valuation. The connection between scientific, and technical or technological valuation is also discussed.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1996, 44, 3; 5-33
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Struktury metodologiczne w nauce
Units of Methodological Analysis in Science
Autorzy:
HAJDUK, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488561.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-06
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
nauka
nauki empiryczne
statyka i dynamika nauki
metodologia nauk
kategorie metodologiczne
struktury metodologiczne
struktury
science
natural sciences
statics and dynamics of science
scientific methodology
methodological categories
units of methodological analysis
structures
Opis:
W artykule jest suponowana opozycja między statyką i dynamiką nauki. Przez naukę rozumiemy głównie nauki empiryczne, zwłaszcza przyrodnicze, lub nauki ścisłe (sciences), inaczej: matematyczne przyrodoznawstwo. Przy doborze kategorii jako przedmiotu podjętych analiz kierowano się racjami badawczymi oraz odwołującymi się do praktyki naukowej i metanaukowej. Kontekstowe objaśnienia tych obiektów relatywizowano do sytuacji poznawczej potencjalnych odbiorców. Uwzględniano zarówno adeptów, jak i profesjonalnie zainteresowanych refleksją nad czynnościowo i wytworowo ujmowaną nauką. Podjęte zagadnienia są rozpatrywane poprzez stopniowe dyskusje aspektywnie wyselekcjonowanych problemów. W rozpatrywanej perspektywie należą do nich: ramowe stanowiska; terminy-klucze; statyka/dynamika nauki; rewolucje w filozofii nauki; dwa konteksty; nowa filozofia nauki; nurt normatywny i deskryptywny; kategoria rewolucji naukowych; super-, supra- i maksiteorie jako jednostki ponadteoretyczne; problematyka aksjologiczna; pluralizm filozofii nauki; problem/teoria problemu; wartość — kategoria z zakresu aksjologii epistemicznej; dalsze zagadnienia filozofii nauki; charakterystyka opracowania.
The opposition between statics and dynamics of science in the entire content of the paper is supposed. We understand science as natural science(s). The selection of categories as an object of examining is directed by reasons generated through scientific and metascientific practice. Contextual elucidations are related to actual situation of potential receivers. Among them are so students as well as professional scientists interested in solving scientific problems. To do so the following questions, namely: background standpoints; key-terms; statics/dynamics of science; revolutions in the philosophy of science; two contexts; new philosophy of science; descriptive and normative trends; scientific revolutions category; super-, supra- and maxitheories; problems of epistemic axiology; philosophy of science pluralism; problem/theory of problem; value — category of epistemic axiology; other questions of the philosophy of science; characteristic of the entire elaboration is subsequently discussed.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2018, 66, 2; 9-22
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uwarunkowania postępu poznawczego w teoriach rozwoju nauki (II)
Criteria of Cognitive Progress in Various Philosophies of Science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106677.pdf
Data publikacji:
1992
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
Część pierwsza tego artykułu ukazała się w "Rocznikach Filozoficznych" 37-38:1989-1990 z. 3 s.83-160. Artykuł powstał w ramach dotowanego przez MEN projektu badawczego (18VII 1990)   The article consists of two parts, the first of which was published in "Roczniki Filozoficzne" 36-37:1989-1990 nr 3. The whole essay aims at exposing the current controversies on this topical issue, which we encounter in modern schools of metascience. They are mainly represented by the empiricist tradition, the Popperian standpoint, the post-positivist school and the so called synthetic point of view. According to the logical empiricist image of science the assessment of scientific laws and theories is simply a matter of confrontation between them and the data. If the right kind and quantity of positive evidence can be collected, the theory is acceptable. If, on the other hand, the evidence is negative, then the proposed law or theory has to be rejected. Hence the label − monocriterial appraisal of scientific laws or theories. Science is also cumulative. Thus, through time, the scope of successful science becomes steadely wider, and nothing important is lost in the process. Popper's attempts to provide the concept of cognitive progress include a conception of the conflict that arises in the case of successive scientific theories. His task is to show how one of such conflicting theories has an advantage over the other. Popper takes two factors into account. One concerns the issue of how close each of the false theories is to being true. But this alone is not a sufficient basis for a criterion of progress, for it implies that some relatively trivial generalization might be a progression beyond some comprehensive albeit refuted, theory. Consequently, a second factor must be considered, namely the comprehensiveness or non-triviality of a theory. This latter factor constitutes Popper's concept of content, and a combination of both factors gives his notion of verisimilitude. Explanation and prediction are other main dimensions of theory appraisal and preference. Popper's methodology is, therefore, fallibilist, objecitivistic, preferentionalist and evolutional. During the 1960s and later a number of new theories of scientific change proliferated. The unit of comparative evaluation are large-scale theories (paradigms, research programmes, research traditions), on which different epistemic desiderata are imposed. On this occasion problems of teleological conception of science, questions of rationality and rationalism are discussed. The controversy between absolutism and relativism is also taken into account, as they are related to the status of desiderata. At the end of this part of our essay w e have a look at G. L. Pandit's interactive model of the growth of knowledge. In this model the dynamic interaction between developmental structures of problems and theories is a function of the explanatory power of a scientific theory (TEP) and the so called resolving power of a scientific theory (TRP). Both TEP and TRP serve as methodological bases of critical epistemic appraisals in empirical science. Finally, the analyses of both the problem and various characteristics of scientific progress are followed by the considerations about epistemic and extraepistemic determinants of progressiveness in science. We recognize, in this way, the necessity of multidimensional appraisals. Nevertheless, it presupposes the technological and social progress. In each part of this paper the evaluational considerations are preceded by the descriptions of different approaches to the units of scientific achievements and logical relations between them.
The article consists of two parts, the first of which was published in "Roczniki Filozoficzne" 36-37:1989-1990 nr 3. The whole essay aims at exposing the current controversies on this topical issue, which we encounter in modern schools of metascience. They are mainly represented by the empiricist tradition, the Popperian standpoint, the post-positivist school and the so called synthetic point of view. According to the logical empiricist image of science the assessment of scientific laws and theories is simply a matter of confrontation between them and the data. If the right kind and quantity of positive evidence can be collected, the theory is acceptable. If, on the other hand, the evidence is negative, then the proposed law or theory has to be rejected. Hence the label − monocriterial appraisal of scientific laws or theories. Science is also cumulative. Thus, through time, the scope of successful science becomes steadely wider, and nothing important is lost in the process. Popper's attempts to provide the concept of cognitive progress include a conception of the conflict that arises in the case of successive scientific theories. His task is to show how one of such conflicting theories has an advantage over the other. Popper takes two factors into account. One concerns the issue of how close each of the false theories is to being true. But this alone is not a sufficient basis for a criterion of progress, for it implies that some relatively trivial generalization might be a progression beyond some comprehensive albeit refuted, theory. Consequently, a second factor must be considered, namely the comprehensiveness or non-triviality of a theory. This latter factor constitutes Popper's concept of content, and a combination of both factors gives his notion of verisimilitude. Explanation and prediction are other main dimensions of theory appraisal and preference. Popper's methodology is, therefore, fallibilist, objecitivistic, preferentionalist and evolutional. During the 1960s and later a number of new theories of scientific change proliferated. The unit of comparative evaluation are large-scale theories (paradigms, research programmes, research traditions), on which different epistemic desiderata are imposed. On this occasion problems of teleological conception of science, questions of rationality and rationalism are discussed. The controversy between absolutism and relativism is also taken into account, as they are related to the status of desiderata. At the end of this part of our essay w e have a look at G. L. Pandit's interactive model of the growth of knowledge. In this model the dynamic interaction between developmental structures of problems and theories is a function of the explanatory power of a scientific theory (TEP) and the so called resolving power of a scientific theory (TRP). Both TEP and TRP serve as methodological bases of critical epistemic appraisals in empirical science. Finally, the analyses of both the problem and various characteristics of scientific progress are followed by the considerations about epistemic and extraepistemic determinants of progressiveness in science. We recognize, in this way, the necessity of multidimensional appraisals. Nevertheless, it presupposes the technological and social progress. In each part of this paper the evaluational considerations are preceded by the descriptions of different approaches to the units of scientific achievements and logical relations between them.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1992, 39-40, 3; 23-56
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Granice natury — granice nauki; granice i ograniczenia nauki
Limits of the Nature — Limits of the Science; Limits and Limitations of the Science
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488254.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2017, 65, 1; 143-149
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
METODOLOGICZNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA RELACJI MIĘDZY TEORIĄ I DOŚWIADCZENIEM
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS CONCERNING RELATIONS BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC THEORIES AND EXPERIENCE
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488497.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
doświadczenie
obserwacja
porównywalność
relacje między teorią a doświadczeniem
teoria naukowa
experience
observation
comparability
relations between theory and experience
scientific theory
Opis:
The paper is divided in several parts, entitled as follows: introduction; the standard view, its characteristic; constructive challenge of the received standpoint; attempted resolutions of the prob- lem of comparability; how do work visual perceptions in scientific observations? meaning variance of scientific terms; an attempt to construe the ground for comparability — concluding remarks.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2012, 60, 4; 147-180
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sposoby uzasadniania teorii metodologicznych
Ways to Justify Methodological Theories
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/963888.pdf
Data publikacji:
1996-09-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:
In the article the criteria of evaluation of methodological theories are formulated. Methodology of Laudan and Lakatos are examined in more detailed way.
Źródło:
Filozofia Nauki; 1996, 4, 3; 87-94
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niedookreślenie teorii przez dane doświadczenia: Stanowisko Larryego Laudana a uhistorycznione meta metodologie
Theory Underdetermination: Larry Laudans Approach versus Historical Metamethodologies
Autorzy:
Hajduk, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917638.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to show arelatively present state of the discussion concerning the theory underdetermination thesis as it is analysed in different historical matamethodologies. This relation involved esp. in american philosophy of science constitutes aunifying theme of our survey which is dominated by different phases of Larry Laudan's standpoint.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1999, 47, 3; 5-29
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies