Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Grochowski, Zbigniew" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 32
Tytuł:
Cinque discepoli, radunati ai piedi della croce, accompagnano Gesù morente come il vero e autentico Maestro (Gv 19, 24h-27)
Five Disciples, gathered at the Foot of the Cross, accompany dying Jesus as the true and authentic Master (John 19:24h-27)
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/512219.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-03-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum
Tematy:
disciples of Jesus
rabbi
women
Jn 19,25-27
Opis:
The episode of the division of Jesus’ garments (Gv 19,23-24g) and the scene of the “testament from the cross” (Jn 19:24h-27) is strongly contrasted by the correlative and antithetical particles μέν-οὖν-δέ (Jn 19:24h.25a). It suggests, among other things, to see precisely four women below the cross of Christ (and the disciple whom Jesus loved). Other arguments also lead to this conjecture. The importance concerning the number of Jesus’ followers, accompanying their dying Master, is connected with a rabbinical tradition that says: to deserve the title of a true and authentic master it was necessary to have at least five disciples around him. The inclusion of the whole Fourth Gospel, obtained thanks to the pericopes Jn 1:35-51 and Jn 19:24h-27, where five disciples appear – first called by Jesus to follow him, then present at the foot of the cross – leads to the conclusion that Jesus, from the beginning of his activity on earth until his last breath, appears as the true and authentic Master, always ac-companied by his disciples, whose number was incessantly sufficient to ascribe to Jesus the title of the Rabbi.
Źródło:
Studia Ełckie; 2019, 21, 1; 11-26
1896-6896
2353-1274
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ełckie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Feigned Ignorance of Judas. Rhetorical Question from the Category interrogatio/ἐρώτημα in Matt 26:25
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158364.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-21
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Judas
betrayal
misleading
pretense
rhetorical question
interrogatio/ἐρώτημα
Opis:
The article analyzes the utterance made by Judas in the Cenacle (1) in the context of his efforts to hand Jesus over to the chief priests (Matt 26:14–25). The fact that his question (Matt 26:25) includes the particle μήτι which assumes a negative response from the interlocutor (1–2) suggests that the disciple was unaware that he was betraying Jesus. Consequently, there is no shortage of positive opinions about Judas, expressed both in the past and today. Matthew’s narrative, however, says something different in this regard. The research problem is therefore seeking an answer to the question: how to interpret Judas’ words? The referenced various biblical translations (3.1) and claims of exegetes (3.2) quote the words of the apostles (Matt 26:22,25) and explain them in an ambiguous manner. The attempts to solve the problem shown in sections 2 and 3.1–2 do not provide a satisfactory conclusion. In the last section (4), the grammatical rules and narrative logic – which are clearly in contradiction – are supplemented with a rhetorical perspective, which leads to a definitive resolution of the dilemma. The synchronic approach applied to the pericope Matt 26:14–25 allows one to draw the conclusion that in Judas’ utterance one should identify a rhetorical question from the category interrogatio/ἐρώτημα whose function in Matt 26:25 is auferendae dissimulationis (“misleading pretense”). Many exegetes have decrypted Judas’ dishonest conduct, but it is only this article that precisely defines this rhetorical phenomenon.
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2022, 40, 4; 1035-1054
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Spirò” o piuttosto „consegnò lo Spirito”? La morte di Gesù e il dono del Paràclito presentati in Gv 19,30
He „Expired” or rather He „Handed Over the Spirit”? The Death of Jesus and the Gift of the Paraclete Presented in John 19:30
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148089.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne Diecezji Elbląskiej w Elblągu
Tematy:
la morte di Gesù
consegnare lo Spirito Santo
la famiglia di Dio
Gv 19
30
the death of Jesus
to hand the Holy Spirit over
God’s family
Jn 19
Opis:
Il racconto giovanneo che parla della morte di Gesù si caratterizza per l’uso di una specifica formulazione, non tipica per quanto riguarda il riferire la morte di qualsiasi persona: παρέδωκεν τὸ πνεῦμα (Gv 19,30). Bisognerebbe tradurla all’italiano con la frase „consegnò lo Spirito / spirito” (e non „spirò / rese lo spirito”, come della morte di Gesù parlano i Sinottici: cf. Mc 15,37 e Lc 23,46 – ἐξέπνευσεν; Mt 27,50 – ἀφῆκεν τὸ πνεῦμα). Anche se la maggioranza delle traduzioni moderne e dei commentari degli esegeti non è d’accordo con l’interpretazione che suggerisce che Gesù – nell’atto della propria morte salvatrice – realmente consegnò lo Spirito Santo ai suoi discepoli radunati presso la croce, insieme alla minoranza degli studiosi consideriamo, che il dono del Paràclito non deve necessariamente essere limitato al giorno della risurrezione del Signore (cf. Gv 20,22), ma – siccome esso non è un avvenimento singolare nella vita della Chiesa (cf. At 2,1 – 13 i 4,31!) – al nostro parere esso divenne una partecipazione di quel specifico „nucleo dei credenti” già pure sul Calvario. Questo dono è stato un „anticipo” per il giorno di una solenne effusione dello Spirito Santo nel Cenacolo il giorno della risurrezione (Gv 20,19 – 23). Il quarto evangelista comunica questa verità, scrivendo tali e non altre parole in Gv 19,30. Egli inoltre desidera sottolineare che il dono dello Spirito è strettamente legato alla costituzione della famiglia di Dio ai piedi della croce (Gv 19,24h–27) come il suo fondamento vitale e la forza unificante.
John’s description of the death of Jesus on the cross is characterized by the use of a specific expression by the evangelist, untypical for the story speaking of one’s death: παρέδωκεντὸ πνεῦμα (Jn 19:30). It should be translated into English as „he handed over the Spirit / spirit” (but not „he expired / he gave up the spirit”, as expressed in the synoptic Gospels: Mc 15:37 and Lc 23:46 – ἐξέπνευσεν; Mt 27:50 – ἀφῆκεν τὸ πνεῦμα). Even if most of translations of the Bible and exegetic commentaries do not agree with an interpretation suggesting that Jesus, in the act of his saving death, actually gave the Holy Spirit to his disciplesgathered beside the cross, together with the minority of scholars we believe that the gift of the Paraclete does not necessarily have to be limited only to the day of Lord’s resurrection (cf. Jn 20:22), but – as it is not a one-off event in the life of the Church (cf. Acts 2:1 – 13 and 4:31!) – it has become a participation of this „nucleus of believers” also on Calvary. This gift was a „deposit / advancement” for the day of the solemn effusion of the Holy Spirit in the Upper Room on the day of the resurrection (Jn 20:19 – 23). This truth is communicated to the readers by the evangelist John, providing such and not other words in 19:30. He alsoemphasizes that the gift of the Spirit is closely related to the constitution of God’s family at the foot of the cross (Jn 19:24h–27) as its vital foundation and unifying force.
Źródło:
Studia Elbląskie; 2018, 19; 291-303
1507-9058
Pojawia się w:
Studia Elbląskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dobry Pasterz, pojmany w Ogrójcu, daje życie swoim uczniom (J 10,1 – 18; 18,1 – 14)
The Good Shepherd, Arrested in the Garden, Gives a New Life to His Disciples (Jn 10:1 – 18; 18:1 – 14)
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148599.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne Diecezji Elbląskiej w Elblągu
Tematy:
dobry pasterz
pojmanie Jezusa
uczniowie
zbawienie
nowe życie
good shepherd
arrest of Jesus
disciples
salvation
new life
Opis:
Perykopa J 18,1–14, mówiąca o „Pojmaniu Jezusa w Ogrójcu” – nawet jeśli położona jest w Czwartej Ewangelii w dość dużej odległości w stosunku do J 10,1–18 i nie występują w niej takie terminy, jak „pasterz”, „owce”, „brama”, owczarnia”, itp. – stanowi relekturę „Przypowieści o Dobrym Pasterzu”. Niniejszy artykuł prezentuje siedem elementów (motywów, idei, słów) wspólnych obu tekstom, co stanowi mocny link łączący je ze sobą. Paralelna lektura obu perykop przekonuje, że to, co Jezus zapowiedział w J 10,1–18, doskonale zrealizowało się na początku Jego Męki (J 18,1–14). Dlatego uzasadnionym jest stwierdzenie, że „Dobry Pasterz, pojmany w Ogrójcu, daje życie swoim uczniom”.
The pericope Jn 18:1 – 14, speaking of „The arrest of Jesus in the garden” – even though its location in the Fourth Gospel is rather far from Jn 10:1 – 18 and there are no terms like „shepherd”, „sheep”, „pasture”, „gate” ecc. in it – constitutes a rereading of „The parable of the Good Shepherd”. The article presents seven elements (motives, ideas, words) common to both texts which are strong links connecting them and showing that what is foretold byJesus in Jn 10:1 – 18, in the beginning of His Passion (Jn 18:1 – 14) is perfectly fulfilled. This is why it is legitimate to say that „The Good Shepherd, arrested in the garden, gives a new life to His disciples”.
Źródło:
Studia Elbląskie; 2017, 18; 323-350
1507-9058
Pojawia się w:
Studia Elbląskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Jerozolimo, dla wszysytkich Twoich pieśni jestem harfą”. Pole semantyczne hebrajskiego rzeczownika רוֹנִּכּ (kinnôr)
“Jerusalem, for all your songs i am a «Harp»”. The semantic field of the Hebrew substantive נּוֹרִכּ (kinnôr)
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2166011.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne Diecezji Elbląskiej w Elblągu
Tematy:
kinnôr
biblical musical instruments
harp
lyre
zither
Opis:
What was the instrument played by the king David (cf. 1 Sam 16:16,23)? What kind of musical instrument did the exiles hang upon the willow in Babylon (cf. Ps 137,2)? Such a questions could be multiplied, and the first association which often comes on one’s mind is that very probably it was a “harp”. But the research done on the Hebrew substantive kinnôr (this is the original word expressing the musical instrument being in question) brings to a conclusion that also “zither”, “lyre” and “lute” should be taken in consideration. This substantive (rather frequent in the Old Testament: 42 occurrences in the Masoretic Text) inspired the translators of the Holy Scripture and the authors of the biblical lexicons, dictionaries and encyclopedias to a vast (and, consequently, sometimes quite complicated) interpretation of this word: it is not so easy to decide, which instrument actually represents the noun kinnôr. It seems to be rather sure that “zither” has not too high probability to be a designatum of this Hebrew word (and much more “lute” should be refused). A “lyre” is the most famous interpretation of kinnôr given by modern authors, but a “harp” which is also a very popular opinion is our favourite rendition, regarding kinnôr. That is why the title of this article is as follows: “«Jerusalem, for all your songs I am a harp». The semantic field of the Hebrew כִּנּוֹר (kinnôr).
Źródło:
Studia Elbląskie; 2013, 14; 253-269
1507-9058
Pojawia się w:
Studia Elbląskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
I discepoli di Gesù nell’ora della prova (Gv 18–19) come luogo di rivelazione del Maestro
Jesus’ Disciples in the Hour of the Trial (John 18–19) as a Place of the Revelation of the Master
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1053272.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-11-07
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Vangelo secondo Giovanni
Quarto Vangelo
racconto della Passione
discepolato
Ora di Gesù
ora dei discepoli
rivelazione di Gesù
Fourth Gospel
Passion Narrative
discipleship
the hour of Jesus
revelation of Jesus
Opis:
The Passion Narrative in the Fourth Gospel is usually analyzed from the purely christological point of view. The number of monographs and articles that would pay attention to the ecclesiastical and anthropological aspect of the Passion of Jesus revealed in the conduct of his disciples in John 18–19 is quite limited. It seems that the “Hour of Jesus” is also the “hour of the trial of his followers” (cf. John 16:2, 4, 21, 32). The present study discusses this issue in John 18:1-14, 15-27; 19:24h-27, (35), 38-42 and presents different characterizations of Jesus’ disciples who appear as the locus of the revelation of their Master.
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 2013, 3, 1; 67-92
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jezus jako świadek w Ewangelii wg św. Jana
Jesus as a Witness in the Gospel of John
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621767.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-10-25
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
świadectwo Jezusa
świadek
prawda
objawienie Boga
miłość
świat
Żydzi
bracia Jezusa
Jesus’ testimony
witness
truth
revelation of God
love
world
Jews
Jesus’ brothers
Opis:
Jesus is usually an object of someone’s testimony in the Gospel of St. John, but there are a few texts speaking of Jesus as the One who gives or bears His testimony to something. Accepting as a criterion the occurrences of the terms marture,w („to bear testimony”) and marturi,a („testimony”) – the noun ma,rtuj („witness”) does not occur in the Fourth Gospel – it is possible to distribute them into four categories: (1) Jesus “testifies about what he has seen and heard” (3:32-33), which means He reveals His Father to the world. (2) Jesus testifies about Himself (5:31.[36]; 8:13-14.17-18; [10,25]) – and He is supported in this by His Father – that He did nothing wrong healing a sick man at the Bethesda pool, even though it happened on the Sabbath (cf. 5:1-9); (3) Jesus “is testifying about the world that its deeds are evil” (7:7) seeing as – some Jews even wanted to kill Him (cf. 7:1.19.25.30.44); (4) Jesus testifies to the truth (18:37), which ultimately means the definitive revelation of God which Jesus brings to the world and with which He identifies Himself (cf. 14:6). Sentenced by Pilate, dying on the cross, Christ – in the most credible way – testified to love: This truth about God – obligating Jesus’ disciples to also assume this attitude in their lives (cf. 13:14.34-35) – can be expressed by a principle: “no one has greater love than this – that one lays down his life for his friends” (15:13).
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2015, 27; 169-186
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Światłość w ciemności świeci i ciemność jej nie zaskoczyła / nie przyłapała”. Narracyjne uzasadnienie nowego tłumaczenia J 1,5
„And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not surprised / caught it”. A narrative justification of the new translation of Jn 1:5
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2150922.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne Diecezji Elbląskiej w Elblągu
Tematy:
światło
ciemność
Ewangelia wg św. Jana
Pojmanie Jezusa
light
darkness
Gospel of John
Arrest of Jesus
Opis:
The verb καταλαμβάνω is usually translated in Jn 1:5 as to „comprehend”, „overpower”, „overcome”. The same word, however, in Jn 12:35 is understood differently (as to „comeupon”, „overtake”, ecc.), although in both cases the subject is the same: „the darkness”. To be frank the object is different: in Jn 1:5 it is „the light”, in Jn 12:35 – „the people”. But by the opinion of the author of the article it is allowed to discover the idea of to „surprise” / „catch” / „come upon” / „overtake” also in Jn 1:5. The logic of the narrative of the Gospel of John and especially the scene of the Arrest of Jesus (Jn 18:1 – 14) authorizes this (a littleinnovatory) translation.
Das Verb καταλαμβάνω bei Joh 1,5 ist in der Regel als „erfassen” und „ergreifen” übersetzt. Aber dieses Wort ist anders verstanden bei Joh 12,35 (als „überfallen”, „überraschen”, „hereinbrechen”) obwohl in beiden Fällen dasselbe Subjekt ist: „die Finsternis”. In der Wahrheit handelt es sich um ein anderes Objekt: bei Joh 1,5 ist es „das Licht” und bei Joh 12,35 – „die Leute”. Nach der Meinung vom Autor dieses Artikels, kann man eine Idee zu entdecken unerwartet „überrascht” / „ertappt” zu sein auch bei Joh 1,5. Der Logik der Erzählung von Johannesevangelium und vor allem eine Szene von Gefangennanhme Jesus bei Joh 18,1 – 14, begründet dieser Übersetzung.
Źródło:
Studia Elbląskie; 2016, 17; 119-133
1507-9058
Pojawia się w:
Studia Elbląskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Figury retoryczne pytań w pierwszej części Męki Pańskiej w Ewangelii św. Jana (J 18,1 – 27)
Rhetorical question figures of speech in the first part of the Passion Narrative in the gospel according to St. John (18,1 – 27)
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2154335.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-12
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne Diecezji Elbląskiej w Elblągu
Tematy:
Passion Narratives
St. John Gospel
rhetoric
rhetorical question
erotema
pysma
Opis:
There is a general agreement among the exegetes that the language of the Fourth Gospel is very simple. But surprising is the accusation against St. John regarding his knowledge of the rhetoric: „John did not know many of the rhetorical techniques described by Aristotle, Cicero, and other later rhetoricians” (Ellis).The purpose of this article is to challenge this opinion by presentation of the rhetorical questions, present in the first part of the Passion Narrative according to St. John. As it turns out, each one of nine questions encountered during the reading of Jn 18,1–27 represents a concrete rhetoric question (usually of the category interrogatio/ἐρώτημα, but twice also of the category quaesitum/πύσμα) and each one of them performs a definite function in the text. Therefore, in spite of the simplicity of St. John’s narration, the Evangelist displays quite great literary craftsmanship and demonstrates a very good knowledge of the classical rhetoric andthe ability of its application.
Źródło:
Studia Elbląskie; 2014, 15; 301-311
1507-9058
Pojawia się w:
Studia Elbląskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Godzina uczniów Jezusa (J 16,32; 18–19) okazją do objawiania się Mistrza
The Hour of Jesus’ Disciples (Jn 16:32; 18–19) as an Opportunity for the Revelation of the Master
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1043870.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-21
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Ewangelia wg świętego Jana
narracja o Męce Pańskiej
uczniowie Jezusa
„godzina” Jezusa
„godzina” uczniów Jezusa
objawienie Jezusa
Fourth Gospel
Passion Narrative
discipleship
the hour of Jesus
the hour of Jesus’s disciples
revelation of Jesus
Opis:
Pojęcie „godzina próby w Czwartej Ewangelii” najczęściej kojarzy się z męką Pańską. Okazuje się, że jest to moment trudnego doświadczenia, jaki będą przeżywać także uczniowie Jezusa, zarówno podczas pojmania Mistrza (por. J 16,32), jak i później, gdy przyjdą prześladowania chrześcijan (por. J 16,2.4.21). Niniejszy artykuł prezentuje sześć typów postaw uczniów Jezusa opisanych w „Męce Pańskiej” (J 18–19), ale także – aby nie zaniedbać chrystologii – pokazuje, w jaki sposób stają się oni przy tej okazji „lustrem” dla objawienia Jezusa. Chrystus objawia się bowiem nie tylko za pośrednictwem własnych verba et facta, lecz czyni to także dzięki interakcji ze swymi uczniami lub w zestawieniu (σύγκρισις) własnej postawy z ich zachowaniem. W ten sposób stają się oni locus theologicus objawienia Jezusa. Godzina uczniów staje się więc okazją, w której objawienie Mistrza wybrzmiewa jeszcze dobitniej i w sposób bardziej zrozumiały.
The term “the hour of trial” in the Fourth Gospel is most often associated with the Passion of the Lord. The present work reminds us that Jesus’ disciples lived through and reacted to this difficult and pivotal experience as well, both during the arrest of the Master (cf. Jn 16:32) and later, when the persecution of Christians comes (cf. Jn 16:2.4.21). This article presents six types of attitudes exhibited by Jesus’ disciples as described in the Passion Narrative (Jn 18–19). In addition, from a  Christological perspective, it demonstrates how the disciples’ various responses become a “mirror” for Jesus’ own revelation on this occasion. Christ gives his revelation not only through his own verba et facta, but also through interaction with his disciples, or in the juxtaposition (σύγκρισις) of his own attitude with their behavior. In this way, they become the locus theologicus of Jesus’ revelation. Thus the hour of the disciples becomes an occasion in which the revelation of the Master resounds even more forcefully and in a more understandable way.
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2020, 38, 1; 149-177
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
L’incoronazione di spine (Mc 15,16-20a). Tortura fisica, subita da Gesù, o piuttosto la derisione della Sua dignità regale?
Coronation of Thorns (Mk 15:16-20a). A Physic Torture, Endured by Jesus, or Rather the Derision of His Royal Dignity?
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1053464.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-10-06
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
coronation of thorns
suffering of Christ
derision of Jesus
Passion Narrative
Gospel of Mark
Opis:
The Passion Narrative constitutes the “heart” of all the Gospels. The attention of Christians who feed their faith on the Word of God usually concentrates on the physical suffering of Jesus. But the purpose of the Gospels seems to be different: cf. the lack of description of significant, long-lasting and cruel scenes, such as the “flagellation” and the “crucifixion” of Christ in Mc 15:15 and 15:24 (these episodes are “depicted” by one simple word: fragellw,saj and staurou/sin). That is why the pericope Mc 15:16-20a should be considered not (only) as the “Coronation of Thorns,” as it commonly is, but as a “Derision of Christ’s Royal Dignity”, as the context of the singular “act of thorns” suggests. In fact, aside from dressing Jesus in purple and beating his head with the reed, which indeed could cause physical suffering of the Savior (here we think of Jesus flogged and crowned by thorns), other elements of scorning (a mocking “saluting” of Jesus, spitting on him and the scoffing prostration of soldiers) had not touched Jesus’ body at all! As a consequence, these acts were surely not the source of his physical pain. Also, the crown itself did not necessarily have to cause Christ such huge suffering as is usually imagined. The pericope Mc 15:16-20a portrays the “Derision of Christ’s Royal Dignity” and, speaking of Jesus as the King, inscribes itself in the theme of “The Reign of God” in the Gospel of Mark.
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 2016, 6, 4; 655-688
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Elementy retoryki greckiej obecne w opisie grobu Jezusa w J 19,41
Elements of Greek Rhetoric in the Description of Jesus’ Tomb in John 19:41
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1789189.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09-30
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
J 19,41
retoryka grecko-rzymska
figury retoryczne
conexio
inclusio
amplificatio per incrementum
recapitulatio
allitteratio
Jezus Król
świętość Jezusa
John 19:41
Roman-Greek Rhetoric
rhetorical figures (of speech
Jesus the King
Jesus’ Holiness
Opis:
Artykuł poddaje analizie krótki tekst J 19,41. Owocem badań – po określeniu kontekstu tego wersetu (punkt 1) – jest zidentyfikowanie w nim takich figur retorycznych, jak: conexio, inclusio, amplificatio per incrementum i recapitulatio (punkt 2) oraz allitteratio (punkt 3). Ostatnia z nich, oparta na syntagmie οὐδέπω οὐδείς („nigdy nikt”), stanowi hapax legomenon w całym greckim Starym i Nowym Testamencie oraz podkreśla czystość rytualną miejsca pochówku Jezusa, a tym samym (pośrednio) potwierdza godność Ciała Chrystusa oraz Jego świętość. Pozostałe figury retoryczne uwypuklają wagę miejsca, w którym odbył się pogrzeb Jezusa, służąc potwierdzeniu Jego królewskiej tożsamości. Wykazany retoryczny kunszt czwartego ewangelisty zaprzecza twierdzeniu, jakoby „Jan nie znał wielu technik retorycznych, opisanych przez Arystotelesa, Cycerona czy innych późniejszych retorów” (P.F. Ellis).
The article provides an analysis of the short text John 19:41. The fruit of the research – after defining the context of this verse (point 1) – is the identification of rhetorical figures such as conexio, inclusio, amplificatio per incrementum and recapitulatio (point 2), and allitteratio (point 3). The latter, based on the syntagm οὐδέπω οὐδείς (“never anyone”), is a hapax legomenon throughout the Greek Old and New Testaments and emphasizes the ritual purity of Jesus’ burial place and thus (indirectly) confirms the dignity of the Body of Christ and His Holiness. The other rhetorical figures emphasize the importance of the place where Jesus’ funeral took place, serving to confirm his royal identity. The rhetorical artistry of the fourth evangelist, demonstrated in the article, contradicts the claim saying that “John did not know many of the rhetorical techniques described by Aristotle, Cicero, and other later rhetoricians” (P.F. Ellis).
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2021, 39, 3; 771-789
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nicodemus. A Disciple Liberated by the Cross of the Christ from the Darkness of Fear and Disbelief
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178743.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-05-17
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
nicodemus
discipleship
cross
witness
conversion
Opis:
Nicodemus, a Pharisee and one of the Jewish leaders, appears only in the Fourth Gospel. Three events in which he participates—a night meeting with Jesus (John 3:1-21), a verbal clash with members of the Sanhedrin (John 7:50-52) and a funeral, performed for Jesus together with Joseph of Arimathea (John 19:38-42)—are perceived negatively by numerous exegetes, and Nicodemus’s attitude is (sometimes harshly) criticised. However, taking into consideration the significance of all the details of the current narrative and the context of the occurring events, one should be led to the conclusion that this man, nowhere explicitly referred by the Evangelist with the term μαθητής, deserves to be called “a disciple of Christ,” who passed through the three-stage process of maturation in faith. Gradually he began to gain courage in advocating for Christ, and at the decisive moment—during Jesus’ death on the Cross—he definitely stepped out of hiding and gave a public testimony of his adherence to the Master of Nazareth. His person, through a gesture shown to the Crucified, became the locus theologicus in which Jesus revealed himself as the immortal Messiah, Prophet, and King.
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 2020, 10, 4; 637-676
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kogut w Biblii z uwzględnieniem jego narracyjnej funkcji pełnionej w Ewangeliach
The Cock in the Bible: Considering its Narrative Function in the Gospels
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Zbigniew Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1603375.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-10-19
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Kogut
pianie koguta
straż nocna
zaparcie się Piotra
skrucha
żal
gnorisma
cock
cockcrow
night watch
Peter’s denial of Jesus
repentance
Opis:
Dziki ptak Gallus gallus, z czasem udomowiony (domesticus) i rozpowszechniony po świecie, stał się bardzo popularnym źródłem smacznego mięsa i jaj. Bogata symbolika z nim związana zainspirowała autorów ST do zauważenia w nim zdolności do odróżniania dnia od nocy (por. Hi 38,36; 3 Mch 5,23 LXX) oraz troskliwej (a także dumnej) opiekuńczości względem powierzonych mu kur (por. Prz 30,31 LXX). Jednak kogut najbardziej „zasłynął” z wydarzenia opisanego w NT: wpisał się w epizod związany z Męką Pańską, gdy – zgodnie z przepowiednią Jezusa (por. Mt 26,34; Mk 14,30; Łk 22,34; J 13,38) – swoim pianiem uwieńczył niechlubną postawę św. Piotra (por. Mt 26,69-75; Mk 14,66-72; Łk 22,54-62; J 18,15-27). Warto jednak zauważyć, że podczas gdy w Ewangeliach Synoptycznych kogut stał się znakiem rozpoznawczym (gnṓrisma) uświadamiającym Piotrowi popełniony błąd i wzywającym go skutecznie do wzbudzenia natychmiastowego żalu, tak u św. Jana jego pianie jawi się jako ironiczny i smutny „ostatni głos epizodu”, a dla czytelnika staje się znakiem wskazującym na Jezusa jako Proroka pełnego mocy w swym słowie. Dzięki temu rodzi się jednocześnie nadzieja, że skoro precyzyjnie zrealizowała się zapowiedź tego dramatycznego wydarzenia, tak też z pewnością dojdzie do skutku przepowiednia męczeństwa św. Piotra (J 13,36; 21,18-19). Dzięki niemu jego upadek będzie w pełni odpokutowany, a apostoł, który stanie się przez to autentycznym uczniem Jezusa – będzie zrehabilitowany. 
A once-wild jungle bird, Gallus gallus, was at some point domesticated, spread throughout the world, and became a universally popular source of meat and eggs (Section 1). The rich symbolism associated with this creature, drawn upon already by the authors of the Old Testament, issues from two characteristics of the male bird: its ability to distinguish between day and night (cf. Job 38:36; 3 Mac 5:23 LXX) and its caring and proud protectiveness toward the hens entrusted to him (cf. Prov 30:31 LXX) (Section 2). However, the cock is probably most famous for an event described in the New Testament: he figures in the episode within the Passion narrative where – according to the prophecy of Jesus (cf. Matt 26:34; Mc 14:30; Luc 22,34 and Jn 14:30) – the cock confirms by his crowing Peter’s threefold denial of Jesus (cf. Matt 26:69-75; Mc 14:66-72; Luc 22:54-62; Jn 18:15-27). It is worth noting that, while in the Synoptic Gospels the rooster becomes a recognizable sign (gnṓrisma) by which Peter is made aware of his error and is immediately aroused to profound grief (Section 3), in John’s Gospel the cock's crowing appears as an ironic and sad “last voice of the episode”, becoming for the reader a sign indicating that Jesus is the Prophet whose words are full of power. This gives rise to the hope that, just as the prior announcement of this dramatic event is fulfilled precisely, the prophecy regarding St. Peter’s martyrdom will likewise surely take place as spoken (cf. Jn 13:36; 21:18-19). Thanks to the future martyrdom of Peter, his fall will be fully redeemed, and the apostle, who will become the authentic disciple of Jesus, will be rehabilitated (Section 4).
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2017, 32; 255-284
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 32

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies