Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "impossibilium" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Impossibilium nulla obligatio est celsusa (d. 50,17,185) a początkowa . niemożliwość świadczenia prawie niemieckim
“Impossibilium nulla obligatio est of Celsus” (d. 50,17,185) and initial impossibility of performance in German law
Autorzy:
Skrzywanek-Jaworska, Dagmara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/595799.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Impossibilium nulla obligatio est, Początkowa niemożliwość świadczenia, Prawo niemieckie
Impossibilium nulla obligatio est, Initial impossibility of performance, German Law
Opis:
On 1 January 2002 the Act on the Modernisation of the Law of Obligations (Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Schuldrechts vom 26 November 2001, BGBl I, 3138 ff.) entered into force, which fundamentally changed large parts of the German law of obligations. The aim of the reform was not only a need of cover gaps in the over hundred years old German Civil Code (BGB) regulations concerning the national obligation law. Beyond that was the reform aimed at bringing some of the most outdated parts of the German Civil Code into line with modern international developments. According to this, during the preparation of the reform the stipulations of Community law (expecially the need of implementation by 1 January 2002 the Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and Council on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees) and the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) as well as the Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) were taken into consideration. In the end, a number of specific statutes aiming at the consumer protection have been integrated into the BGB as well as many areas of the law of obligations (for instance sales contracts, credit transactions, etc.) have been affected. However, the largest changes concerned the breach of contract, which one of the part is the regulation of initial impossibility of performance. According to the old § 306 BGB, a contract, the performance of which was impossible, was void. § 307 BGB (old version) allowed the purchaser to recover his negative interest if the vendor knew or should have known about the impossibility. It was incorrectly said that the rule from the old § 306 BGB has its origin in Roman law, more precisely in the Celsus phrase impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D.50.17.185). According to the new § 311 a BGB a contract is not invalid merely because at the time it was concluded performance of the obligation assumed was impossible. The new regulation stays in line with Art. 4:102 PECL and Art. 3.3 Principles of International Commercial Contracts (The Unidroit-Principles).
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2010, LXXXI (81); 131-155
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nieważne zobowiązania ex stipulatione. Znaczenie “Impossibilium nulla obligatio est” Celsusa (D. 50,17,185) w prawie rzymskim
Invalid obligations ex stipulatione. The meaning of Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) of Celsus in Roman law
Autorzy:
Skrzywanek-Jaworska, Dagmara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/595988.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
zobowizania ex stipulatione
Prawo rzymskie
Impossibilium nulla obligatio est
Roman Law
obligations ex stipulatione
Opis:
This article concerns the issues of invalid obligations ex stipulatione and the meaning of the Celsus phrase Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) in Roman law. It presents in a polemic way two groups of the opinions, which can be found in the literature. The older theories adapt the civil law achievments to the ground of Roman law, what does not help to understand the concept of initial impossibility in Roman law. This research method is concentrate on the function of impossibility and does not indicate the reason of invalidity of the ex stipulatione obligations. At the same time it does not explain the meaning of the Celsus sentence. In the opposition there are in the newer literature an alternative theories to found, which analyse the invalid obligations ex stipulatione in relation to the concept of the valid formation of contract. According to these newer attempts the explanation of the meaning of the Celsus’ phrase seems to be more reliable.
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2011, LXXXIII (83); 205-235
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nieważne zobowiązania ex venditione. Nec emptio nec venditio sine re quae veneat potest intellegi (D. 18,1,8 pr.) Pomponiusa a Impossibilium nulla obligatio est Celsusa (D. 50,17,185
Invalid obligations ex venditione. Nec emptio nec venditio sine re quae veneat potest intellegi (D. 18,1,8 pr.) Pomponiusa and Impossibilium nulla obligatio est Celsusa (D. 50,17,185)
Autorzy:
Skrzywnanek-Jaworska, Dagmara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/596025.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Prawo rzymskie
Impossibilium nulla obligatio est
zobowiązania ex venditione
Roman Law
obligations ex venditione
Opis:
This article is a continuation of the “Invalid obligations ex stipulatione. The meaning of Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) of Celsus in Roman law” (Law and Economics Studies, LXXXIII/2011, pp. 205–235). It leans on the similar construction and presents in a polemic way two groups of opinions with reference to invalid obligations ex venditione. It shows, similar to invalid obligations ex stipulatione, that the adaptation of civil law achievments to the ground of Roman law does not help to understand the concept of initial impossibility in Roman law. Alternative theories on the other hand, which analyse invalid obligations ex venditione in relation to the concept of valid formation of contract, put the main meaning to the regula iuris of Pomponius: Nec emptio nec venditio sine re quae veneat potest intellegi (D. 18,1,8 pr.) and at the same time allow to negate the application of the phrase of Celsus pertaining to obligations ex venditione.
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2011, LXXXIV (84); 209-238
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Historyczne tło ustawowego sformułowania zasady Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) w niemieckim kodeksie cywilnym
The historical background for the legal expression of the rule Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) in the German civil code
Autorzy:
Skrzywanek-Jaworska, Dagmara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2140195.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Prawo zobowiązań
Regulacje prawne
Prawo cywilne
Obligation law
Legal regulations
Civil law
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2012, LXXXVI (86); 93-123
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rozszerzająca interpretacja zasady Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) a dogmatyczna niespójność koncepcji odpowiedzialności odszkodowawczej z § 311a (2) BGB
The extending interpretation of the rule Impossibilium nulla obligation est (D. 50,17,185) and the luck of doctrinal consistency in the concept of damage liability from § 311a (2) BGB
Autorzy:
Skrzywanek-Jaworska, Dagmara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/595746.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Prawo zobowiązań
Regulacje prawne
Prawo cywilne
Obligation law
Legal regulations
Civil law
Opis:
This article is directly connected with the issues presented in the article “The historical background for the legal expression of the rule Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) in the German Civil Code”. The mentioned article criticizes, from historical point of view, the enlargement of the application of the Celsus’s rule to the cases of initial subjective and subsequent – both objective and subjective, impossibility of performance. The following article shows some of doctrinal consequences of such an enlargement interpretation. One of them concerns the § 311a (2) BGB, which contains the separate liability regime for the initial impediments of performance. This paragraph entitles the creditor to claim damages in lieu of performance, unless the debtor did know of the impediment when the contract was concluded, and was not responsible for not having known about it. The debtor held liable for the positive interest. This regulations is firstly presented in relation to its doctrinal inconsistency. Afterwards, it is presented in relation to the proposition of the analogy application of § 122 BGB when the debtor is not responsible for not knowing about the impediment, to make him liable at least for the negative interest. Finally this regulation was evaluated in relation to the demand of staying in the line with the Principles of European Contract Law and the UNIDROIT-Principles.
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2012, LXXXVI (86); 125-156
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Następcza niemożliwość świadczenia producenta rolnego z umowy kontraktacji
Consequent Inability of an Agricultural Producer to Perform Obligations from the Cultivation Contract
Autorzy:
Adamus, Rafał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1197594.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
cultivation contract
inability to provide
force majeure
impossibilium
nulla obligatio est
umowa kontraktacji
niemożliwość świadczenia
siła wyższa
impossibilium nulla obligatio est
Opis:
This study is devoted to the issue of the subsequent inability to provide services by an agricultural producer under a cultivation contract, in a situation where the inability to perform an obligation is a consequence of circumstances for which neither party is responsible. The legislator has specifically regulated the inability to provide services by an agricultural producer in art. 622 of the Civil Code. However, for a full analysis of this issue, it is necessary to refer to the provisions of the general part of the law on obligations. The current legal regulation puts the risk of the agricultural producer in too asymmetrical way. Therefore, the current legal status has been critically addressed.
Niniejsze opracowanie poświęcone jest zagadnieniu następczej niemożliwości świadczenia producenta rolnego z umowy kontraktacji w sytuacji, gdy brak możliwości wykonania zobowiązania jest następstwem okoliczności, za które żadna ze stron nie ponosi odpowiedzialności. Ustawodawca w sposób szczególny uregulował przypadek niemożliwości świadczenia producenta rolnego w art. 622 Kodeksu cywilnego. Niemniej dla pełnej analizy tego zagadnienia niezbędne jest sięgnięcie do przepisów części ogólnej prawa zobowiązań. Obecna regulacja prawna w sposób zbyt niesymetryczny obciąża ryzykiem producenta rolnego. Do aktualnego stanu prawnego odniesiono się zatem w sposób krytyczny.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały; 2020, 2(27); 5-22
1689-8052
2451-0807
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies