Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Krąpiec Mieczysław A." wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Tytuł:
Koncepcja istnienia w ujęciu Mieczysława Gogacza. Przyczynek do dziejów formowania się tomizmu konsekwentnego
The Conception of Existence According to Mieczyslaw Gogacz. A Contribution to the History of Consequential Thomism’s Formation
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452689.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
Mieczysław Gogacz
Mieczysław Krąpiec
tomizm egzystencjalny
tomizm konsekwentny
akt istnienia
Thomas Aquinas
Existential Thomism
Consequential Thomism
act of being
Opis:
The concept of existence (esse) as an act of making realistic and actual individual being describes the basic feature of Consequential Thomism which refers to all possible philosophical analysis from the topic of existence (esse), because existence (esse) is the first and initiating principle of being. Professor Gogacz claims that the beginning of the modification of depictions the issue of esse in the context of Existential Thomism is published in book Istnieć i poznawać in 1969. Theses of this book also are found in the script about philosophy of being (1973) entitled Ważniejsze zagadnienia metafizyki. The most mature formula of Consequential Thomism is in the Elementarz metafizyki (1987). Some topics were developed in details in the articles that also are in the following books: Historia filozofii w poszukiwaniu realizmu (2011) and W kierunku tomizmu konsekwentnego (2012). The analysis of these texts allows to separate ten topics connected with the problem of esse: 1) act of existence’s characteristic, 2) types of acts of existence, 3) making realistic and actual as an act of existence’s ‘action’, 4) the issue of Ipsum Esse Subsistens, 5) the problem of not independent being (accident) of act of being (ipsum esse), 6) the issue of transcendentals, 7) the knowledge of the existence (esse), 8) the issue of creatio esse and conservatio esse 9) the order of thesis in metaphysics, 10) the historical and philosophical aspects of the modification of Thomism which led to its consistent version. In Istnieć i poznawać M. Gogacz represents an Existential Thomism and he is influenced by thought of M. A. Krąpiec. Elementarz metafizyki is the most mature version of Consequential Thomism. According it Consequential Thomism is characterized by: 1) Recognition of statements of Avicenna’s philosophy and taking them out from Existential Thomism; 2) Understanding of existence (esse) as a created principle which initiate an individual being; 3) The experience essential principles in verbum cordis; 4) Application the essential order of causes and results with consistent notice of pluralism; 5) Distinguishing the relationship connected with esse and the relationship connected with essentia and joining the experience of ipsum esse with relationship connected with esse and joining experience of unity of esse-principles with essential relationship; 6) Using the depiction of essence (essentia) permeated by existence (esse), what should be understanding as a subsistentia, in the issue of person.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 45-72
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recenzja: Paweł Gondek, Projekt autonomicznej filozofii realistycznej. Mieczysława A. Krąpca i Stanisława Kamińskiego teoria bytu, Lublin 2015, ss. 316
Review: Paweł Gondek, Project of autonomous realistic philosophy. Mieczyslaw A. Krąpiec’s and Stanislaw Kaminsky’s theory of being, Lublin 2015, pp. 316
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452571.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 433-437
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wspomnienie o Profesorze Mieczysławie A. Krąpcu OP (1921–2008)
Воспоминания о Профессоре Мечиславе А. Крампце ОП (1921–2008)
Recollections of Professor Mieczysław A. Krąpiec OP (1921–2008)
Autorzy:
Bochenek, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/497791.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Filozofów Krajów Słowiańskich
Źródło:
ΣΟΦΙΑ. Pismo Filozofów Krajów Słowiańskich; 2009, 9; 373-378
1642-1248
Pojawia się w:
ΣΟΦΙΑ. Pismo Filozofów Krajów Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomizm egzystencjalny Mieczysława A. Krąpca a tomizm konsekwentny Mieczysława Gogacza. Ku analizie porównawczej
The Existential Thomism of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec and Consequential Thomism of Mieczysław Gogacz. Perspectives for Comparative Analysis
Autorzy:
Ćwiertniak, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078907.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec
Mieczysław Gogacz
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
filozofia
metafizyka
Thomas Aquinas
thomism
philosophy
metaphysics
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the perspectives for a comparative analysis of the philosophical views of two renowned Polish representatives of existential Thomism. The authors mentioned above are known as the main representatives of the most important Polish Thomistic schools: Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec is the most important representative of the Lublin School of Classical Philosophy, while Mieczysław Gogacz is the founder of the Warsaw School of Consequential Thomism. At the base of this article, meant as an introduction to more advanced analyses, lies the conviction that mutual isolation between philosophical schools is harmful. It shows the necessity of a reciprocal confrontation of research results. In this paper, following a short historical introduction, the Author first presents the main areas in the thought of the two philosophers, which – due to differences in the concepts they employ – are most in need of thorough comparative research. Afterwards, the Author points out the most important achievements of both philosophers and makes an outline of the main difficulties and aporias connected with their ideas. Finally, an outline of further research is presented, which could help to overcome the aporias demonstrated here.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 173-195
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Człowiek i jego prawa w ujęciu Mieczysława A. Krąpca
Man and His Rights According to Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Autorzy:
Ćwiertniak, Tomasz Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/665110.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
człowiek
osoba
ciało
dusza
prawa człowieka
man
person
body
soul
human rights
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the philosophical conception of man formulated by M.A. Krąpiec, one of the foremost representatives of existential Thomism. This conception is shown within the context of the philosophical foundations of social and political life. It is justified by the fact that man is the real purpose and subject of political activity. However, the understanding of politics depends on the understanding of man; from this perspective man appears as a person - an independently existing subject, comprising a unity of body and soul and endowed with intellectual cognition and free will. Such a person expresses him-/herself most fully through acts of decision; in these acts, as well as in acts of cognition and love, the human person transcends nature and society. This attests to the particular dignity of the human person and points to the fact that every human person has inherent inalienable rights.
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie koncepcji człowieka sformułowanej przez M.A. Krąpca, czołowego przedstawiciela tomizmu egzystencjalnego. Koncepcja ta przedstawiona jest w kontekście wskazania filozoficznych fundamentów szeroko rozumianej społeczno-politycznej sfery życia człowieka. Jest to o tyle zasadne, iż to właśnie człowiek jest podmiotem i celem działalności politycznej. Samo zaś rozumienie polityki jest w znacznej mierze zależne od przyjętego rozumienia człowieka. W wyniku przeprowadzonych analiz człowiek jawi się jako osoba, a więc samodzielnie istniejący podmiot stanowiący psychofizyczną jedność, obdarzony zdolnością intelektualnego poznania i wolnością woli, najpełniej wyrażający się poprzez akty decyzyjne. Osoba ludzka w swych aktach poznania, miłości i decyzji transcenduje przyrodę i społeczeństwo. Świadczy to o szczególnej godności przysługującej człowiekowi, a ponadto wskazuje na fakt przysługiwania każdej osobie ludzkiej niezbywalnych praw (prawa człowieka).
Źródło:
Folia Philosophica; 2018, 40
1231-0913
2353-9445
Pojawia się w:
Folia Philosophica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Personalism in the Lublin School of Philosophy (Card. Karol Wojtyła, Fr. Mieczysław A. Krąpiec)
Autorzy:
Duma, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507334.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin School of Philosophy
Karol Wojtyła
Mieczysław Krąpiec
personalism
philosophy
metaphysics
person
man
experience
nature
culture
Opis:
The article presents the conception of personalism and the understanding of human person developed by two Polish philosophers: Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, the framers and the main representatives of the Lublin School of Philosophy. The author comes to the following conclusions: (1) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of personalism comes from experience and seeks verification in experience; it does not accept any a priori explanations or theses, though it does not shy away from drawing upon different branches of knowledge in its attempts to broaden experience, being aware that not everything is given to immediate experiential perception; (2) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s personalism wants to draw on the whole philosophical tradition, taking into account, at the same time, the findings of different sciences of man or humanities which broaden the experience of man or contribute something to the interpretation of experience; (3) bringing together genetic empiricism and methodical rationalism, Wojtyła and Krąpiec are able to avoid radicalism in the explanation of man, making a successful attempt to join in a complementary way these aspects of personal human being which carry some opposition; (4) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of person does not bear any traces of antagonism since it is not directed against anyone; in the light of this conception every human person has a character of the honest good which is the unconditional good, that is the highest and the ultimate good not competing with the value of anything else; (5) Wojtyła and Krąpiec prove that the conception of human person lies at the basis of understanding society, culture, ethics, law, politics, economy, art, and even religion.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 2; 365-390
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
TO KNOW OR TO THINK—THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE UNDERSTANDING OF PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE LIGHT OF THE STUDIES OF MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC
Autorzy:
Duma, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507566.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
thinking
cognition
philosophy
knowledge
reality
abstract
sign
understanding
metaphysics
realism
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Opis:
The article concentrates on the specificity of philosophical cognition. Referring to Mieczysław A. Krąpiec’s study, the author proves that the process of thinking is not to be necessarily identified with the process of cognition, as in fact the former is merely a secondary phase of the latter. When identified with thinking, the philosophical cognition would undermine the very sense of cognition, which means the understanding of reality. When based on thinking alone, philosophy does not grasp real things, but operates with abstracts of being and being’s representations (concepts). As for the correctness of philosophical thinking the laws of logic, with ensuring non-contradictory operations, are sufficient enough. However, any knowledge that aspires to be philosophical has to start from really existing beings. In the next phases of cognition, such beings are grasped more and more particularly and precisely—starting from their transcendental properties and principles, then their structure and categorial properties, and finally their individual characteristics and actions. The very first act of cognition is directed to real beings, which are immediately grasped in respect of their existence and real essence. The second act of cognition deals with signs. The precedence of being in human cognition makes the philosophy charged not with a task of thinking about the world, but with the task of knowing and understanding it within possible and verifiable limits. Therefore, according to Krapiec, the very first philosophical discipline is metaphysics, which has real beings as its object. Thus, philosophical cognition should preserve its objective character, as this is the only way to guarantee its realism.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 277-299
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ Étienne’a Gilsona na filozofię w Polsce
The Influence of Étienne Gilson on Philosophy in Poland
Autorzy:
Gogacz, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Étienne Gilson
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
Stefan Swieżawski
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Thomas Aquinas
Thomism
Opis:
After the Second World War, Stefan Swieżawski gave his lectures on the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics at the Catholic University of Lublin. The lectures were based on the approaches and methodologies of Etienne Gilson. In this way, Gilson’s thought came in Polish culture. The influence of Gilson’s thought on Polish philosophers had three tangible effects. First of all, positive knowledge about the Middle Ages as such and in particular the medieval philosophy was more able to penetrate the insightful minds. Secondly, a completely new, different from Aristotelian definition of metaphysics was adopted. The definition was developed by Gilson who based on the texts of Thomas Aquinas. Finally, thirdly, Gilson’s theory of history was creatively developed in Poland philosophy, as a study of the philosophical problems that ancients authors took and which have been elaborated in ancient texts. Pedagogical activity of Swieżawski and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, who in the creative way took over Gilson’s thought, caused that existential Thomism has become one of the most known philosophical trends in Poland. At the end of the Stalinist night in Poland, Swieżawski manager to send to Gilson a series of philosophical works done at the Catholic University in Lublin; the texts concerned the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics. In a response, Gilson encouraged him to step up his efforts to initiate research on the history of Polish medieval philosophy and philosophy of the fifteenth century in Europe. With time, a number of translations of Gilson’s books appeared in Poland. Until today they influence their readers. Today, in 21st century, Gilsonian works are used by the next - after the Swieżawski’s and Krąpiec’s students - Polish generation of Thomists.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 119-128
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, Dlaczego zło
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, Dlaczego zło [Why Evil], Lublin: Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu 2005, pp. 225. Series: Biblioteka Filozofii Realistycznej. ISBN 83-60144-10-9
Autorzy:
Gretka, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013315.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2007, 55, 2; 226-228
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, Stanisław Kamiński, Zofia J. Zdybicka, Andrzej Maryniarczyk, Piotr Jaroszyński, Wprowadzenie do filozofii
Autorzy:
Gretka, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015796.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2003, 51, 2; 159-164
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czym jest filozofia klasyczna?
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917767.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1997, 45, 1; 156-165
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kryzys społeczno-gospodarczy kryzysem człowieka
The Social-economic Crisis as the Crisis of Man
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106720.pdf
Data publikacji:
1992
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The present crisis in economy and culture is deeply rooted in the crisis of man himself. The man is menaced in his existence by the degradation of the environment (earth, water, air), and by the ozone hole. Certainly one result will be an increase in cataracts and skin cancer. The man is also menaced in his personal life by the system of the lie, organized pornography and by the foundation of the system for the cooperative realization of the evil. The counteract is possible by the deep study of the man and by the recognition of personal structure of the human being. The next step is to build ”the civilization of love”, proposed by Paul VI and John Paul II. The principles of that civilization are: priority of the person before the thing, ethics before technology, ”to be” before ”to have” and the mercy before the justice.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1992, 39-40, 2; 39-51
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Man in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507460.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
man
soul
body
creation
death
resurrection
person
decision
nature
second nature
action
morality
fulfillment
Aristotle
Thomas Aquinas
Jesus Christ
Christian philosophy
Christian anthropology
Thomistic personalism
Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Opis:
The author attempts to first review the most general and culturally important statements on the subject of man, and then present the developed and rationally justified conception of man as a personal being who, by his action, transcends nature, society, and himself. This conception, unique in world literature, finds its expression in St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae, which presents a justifying context for man’s origin and life, ontic structure, individual and social actions, and his eschatic fulfillment by the intervention of the Incarnate God—Jesus Christ. In his Summa, Aquinas not only considers and rationally justifies all the basic aspects of the nature of man who transcends the world by his conscious and free action, but also takes into consideration various anthropological theories developed in ancient Greece and Rome.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2018, 7, 4; 597-664
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metaphysics in the Lublin Philosophical School
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
McDonald, Hugh
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507618.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin Philosophical School
metaphysics
philosophy
cognition
object
being
method
demonstration
justification
reason
cause
separation
reality
world
Opis:
The article is aimed at presenting the way in which metaphysics is understood and cultivated in the Lublin Philosophical School, Poland. It includes such topics as: the definition of metaphysics, metaphysical cognition (its object and the method for singling it out), ways of metaphysical demonstration and rational justification, and the relation of metaphysics to other domains of philosophy. In the light of the information delivered, it can be concluded that metaphysics in the Lublin Philosophical School is understood as a way of knowing in which the reason employs the universal laws of being and thought and strives to discover the first and singular factors or causes that render free of contradiction that which exists and which is given to us in a germinal way in the empirical intuition of the material world.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 2; 391-427
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Lublin Philosophical School: Achievements, Identity and Prospects
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
McDonald, Hugh
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507540.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin Philosophical School
metaphysics
realism
philosophy
Krąpiec
Kalinowski
Swieżawski
Wojtyła
Opis:
The article is concentrated on the Lublin Philosophical School which came into being in the institutional framework of the Department of Philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; it describes its achievements, which took place at different stages of the School’s development, as well as the School’s new initiatives and challenges. The development of the School was connected with the involvement of new people and successive generations of new students who joined in the cultivation of realistic philosophy. One can regard the years 1950–1966 as the first stage of the School’s development, in which the School’s program was formulated. The following stages are the years 1967–1980, and 1981–2004, and the years that follow, in which new generations of students who take up inquiries in the spirit of the School’s program arrive. The article also explains the reasons why today the Lublin Philosophical School cannot be identified with the Department of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin, but rather with a special style of cultivating philosophy.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 423-441
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies