Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "kingdom" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 26
Tytuł:
Ocena tematów zawartych w notatce informacyjnej Kancelarii Węgierskiego Zgromadzenia Narodowego z uwzględnieniem szans i zagrożeń dla Polski w procesie brexitu
Assessments of issues contained in a note of the Office of the Hungarian National Assembly’s, with taking into consideration Poland’s chances and threats in the course BREXIT process
Autorzy:
Wawrzyk, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215724.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
European Union
the United Kingdom
Opis:
The author presents an analysis of withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (BREXIT) as well as expected solutions. Legal ways of withdrawal, negotiations, conditions of implementation of procedure set out in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union are characterized. It is pointed that because of Brexit Poland faces a great challenge, but an effective diplomacy should protect Poland from negative political and economic impacts. An own strategy of functioning in the reformed EU ought to be formulated as soon as possible.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 3(55); 105-125
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Public opinion attitudes towards the European Union and its future in the United Kingdom. Study based on the results of Eurobarometer surveys in the UK and Poland
Autorzy:
Beata, Słupek,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/894975.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-04-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
European Union
Eurobarometer
euroscepticism
United Kingdom
Opis:
The subject of this publication is the scepticism regarding the future of the European Union in the UK. The research is based on Eurobarometer surveys conducted over the period of five years. A purpose of the research is to show the relationship between the results of the Eurobarometer survey on the future of the EU, and the eurosceptic views in the UK. The main research questions is: is the UK sceptical about the future of the EU? Hypothesis of this publication is that the UK is sceptical about the future of the European Union. The reasons for such attitudes are not analysed here – the article is merely an attempt to present the societal attitudes. The research method employed is the comparative critical analysis of quantitative data. The conclusion is that Great Britain is not significantly eurosceptic. British people are, however, less enthusiastic about what is happening at present in the EU, and also are showing greater anxieties when it comes to the future of the EU. Tematem badawczym niniejszej publikacji jest eurosceptycyzm w Wielkiej Brytanii, opiera się ona na badaniach Eurobarometru, które dotyczyły przyszłości Unii Europejskiej, prowadzonych na przestrzeni pięciu lat. Celem badań jest wykazanie związku pomiędzy wynikami badań Eurobarometru na temat przyszłości UE, a poglądem, że Wielka Brytania jest państwem eurosceptycznym. Głównym pytaniem badawczym jest: czy Wielka Brytania jest sceptycznie nastawiona co do przyszłości UE? Hipoteza potwierdza zadane pytanie i brzmi, że Wielka Brytania jest sceptycznie nastawiona co do przyszłości Unii Europejskiej. W artykule nie są analizowane przyczyny takich postaw. Artykuł jest jedynie próbą przedstawieniem postaw społecznych. Użytą metodą badawczą była porównawcza, krytyczna analiza danych ilościowych. Z analizy wynika, że Wielka Brytania nie jest wyróżniająco się eurosceptycznym państwem. Brytyjczycy mają jednak mniej entuzjastyczne poglądy na to co obecnie dzieje się w UE i otwarcie wyrażają większe obawy w kwestii przyszłości UE.
Źródło:
Przegląd Europejski; 2014, 1 (31); 116-131
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na tematy zawarte w notatce informacyjnej Kancelarii Węgierskiego Zgromadzenia Narodowego
Legal opinion on issues contained in a note of the Office of the Hungarian National Assembly
Autorzy:
Jaroszyński, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215725.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
ratification
European Union
the United Kingdom
Opis:
Leaving the European Union by the United Kingdom will cause changes in the Treaty on the European Union as well as in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. These changes are covered by the ordinary legislative procedure which includes the necessity of their ratification by Poland. The Sejm may take a position on Brexit, however it should take into account the role of the Council of Ministers in foreign policy. The result of UK’s withdrawal from the EU will be a considerable number of changes in the Polish legislation. Due to their scope as well as short time constraints, work on these issues should be held parallelly with negotiations on Brexit.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 3(55); 93-104
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
David Cameron’s ‘Huge Mistake’. Closing of the United Kingdom Labour Market for Eastern European Immigrants from Polish and British Perspective
Autorzy:
Toszek, Bartłomiej H.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031828.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
European Union
United Kingdom
immigration
labour market
Polska
Opis:
Eastern European immigrants coming to the UK since 2004 (in 2/3 from Poland) by their amount of work have concurred to serious growth of the GDP. But simultaneously they have been burden for British welfare system (among others by taking benefits for family members living outside the UK) and taking job even for minimum salary what have caused growth of native British unemployment. In this situation Conservative-Liberal Government leading by David Cameron have decided to limit an access to the UK labour market by language knowledge tests and tightening social benefits policy to job seekers. With informal support of main opposition parties (i.e. the Labour Party and the UKIP) D. Cameron have taken risky game showing he has been able to fight for his nation’s interests even in spite of huge protests of Polish and other Eastern European countries politicians and against the European Parliament resolution of 16 January 2014. But when turning out into a defender of Britons’ rights he also has showed that there have been deep divisions between “old” and “new” Europe still after 10 years of the EU’s biggest enlargement in 2004.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2014, 5; 122-138
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brexit Negotiations: Interests, Red Lines and Stumbling Blocks
Autorzy:
Somai, Miklós
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/969458.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
Brexit
Disintegration
European Union
United Kingdom
Withdrawal Negotiations
Opis:
Brexit will officially fall on 29 March 2019 at midnight, Brussels time, and will undoubtedly represents a milestone in the history of European integration: after long years of deepening and enlarging, this is the first time a sovereign member state will leave the EU. This article is a humble effort to provide an overview of Brexit, by identifying the interests and red lines of the EU and the UK, as well as pointing to the key elements of negotiations, as they are known at the time of writing, the end of May 2018. For the research primary and secondary sources have been analysed, and historical methodology has been combined with the critical analysis method to understand the background of the process and point to its main stumbling blocks. The paper concludes that despite apparent rigidities and deadlocks, mutual trust and goodwill, as well as time constraint and practical considerations, may help overcome divides and find technically workable solutions.
Źródło:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2018, 4; 109-124
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brexit as a Challenge for the European Union
Autorzy:
Pawlas, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/420588.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
European Union
United Kingdom
Brexit
regional economic integration
Opis:
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims at analysing the results of the EU referendum in the UK and the implications and challenges of Brexit for the European Union. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The basic problem of this publication is the analysis of special status of the UK in the EU, its significance as EU Member State and the immediate effects and future implications of Brexit. The research tools used in the article include literature studies, descriptive and comparative analysis. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The line of reasoning consists of four essential elements. At first, the UK’s membership in the EU is presented, and in particular its special status in the EU as well as the role of the UK’s economy in the EU. The next part focuses on the EU referendum in the UK – its results and effects for the British politics. The last two parts concentrate on the analysis of alternatives to membership in the EU and implications and challenges for the EU resulting from Brexit. RESEARCH RESULTS: Brexit is considered one of the most dangerous events in the global economy (some believe Brexit is more threatening than global financial crisis 2008+). Brexit has created a number of political, economic and social challenges for the EU, which have been intensified by other internal and external threats for the EU. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The situation in the UK and in the EU after Brexit is quite dynamic. It is hard to anticipate all the effects and implications of Brexit. The way the EU negotiates with the UK future British‑EU relations will determine its international position. The withdrawal negotiations of the UK will include operational and strategic, legal and financial issues. Brexit will considerably reduce demographic and economic potential of the EU. It will complicate financial aspects of EU integration. Brexit will necessitate reforms of the EU policies. Brexit will also limit political power of the EU.
Źródło:
Horyzonty Polityki; 2016, 7, 20; 57-76
2082-5897
Pojawia się w:
Horyzonty Polityki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szkockie dążenia niepodległościowe – główne wyzwania w sferze ekonomicznej w aspekcie ewentualnego odłączenia się Szkocji od Zjednoczonego Królestwa
Scotland’s Independence Movements – The Main Challenges in the Economic Sphere in the Aspect of Potential Separation of Scotland from the United Kingdom
Autorzy:
Radomska, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/558083.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
Scotland
independence
autonomy
United Kingdom
Great Britain
European Union
economy
Opis:
The purpose of his article is to analyze the process of Scotland`s independence movements and to identify the main challenges in the economic sphere in the aspect of potential separation of Scotland from United Kingdom. As a basis for the research method a study based on the analysis of selected information sources was used. The attempts by Scotland to separation from the Great Britain, taken over the centuries, ended in failure, but have contributed to increase of Scottish autonomy. The results of the referendum on the United Kingom’s continuing membership of the European Union have become the impulse for intensifi cation of Scottish activity towards secession from the Great Britain. Scotland wants to decide independently on its own economic development based mainly on oil and natural gas as well as renewable energy sources. The EU membership would enable Scotland to attain the goals set up by Scottish government. The benefits of being a member of the EU, such as access to the Single European Market, structural funds, ect., Scotland may lose if it stays within the United Kingdom. The government in London is fully committed to maintaining the unity of the United Kingdom and blocks Scottish activities aimed at independence. Further scenario will depend on the results of the negotiations and decisions reached by the United Kingdom and the European Union on the conditions on exiting the Union and the future directions, forms and principles for further co-operation.
Źródło:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2018, 1; 117-139
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Europejska po brexicie – dezintegracja czy zmiana paradygmatu
The European Union after Brexit – Disintegration or Paradigm Change
Autorzy:
Kobza, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/558080.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
Brexit
United Kingdom
European Union
Future of Europe
Federalism
Disintegration
Opis:
The referendum on leaving the European Union held in the United Kingdom in June 2016 undoubtedly opened a new chapter in the history of the European integration. The general theory of international organizations tells us that countries normally leave international institutions as an act of last resort, when they are sidelined or feeling unable to shape their future. Was the UK in such a position in the EU? Or was the result of the British referendum rather a side effect of a small adaptability of the European institutions to global challenges, which in turn sparked a democratic revolt, erupted in an eurosceptic country? It is argued here that, regardless of the causes, the British issue influenced further polarization between federal and anti-federal forces in the European Union, and because the former are still in minority, the European Union will most likely pass over the Brexit to proceed according to the old agenda, maybe with some minor institutional changes, like readjustment of the seats in the European Parliament, but signifi cantly weakened on the global scene.
Źródło:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2018, 1; 9-22
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie roli parlamentów narodowych (z uwzględnieniem roli Sejmu i Senatu) w procedurze wyjścia Zjednoczonego Królestwa z Unii Europejskiej
Legal opinion on the role of national parliaments (including the role of Sejm and Senate) in the process of withdrawing of the United Kingdom from the European Union
Autorzy:
Jaśkowski, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216708.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Parliament
Sejm
Senate
United Kingdom
procedure of leaving
European Union
Opis:
The author of the article observes that the provisions of TEU and TFEU do not envisage any role for national parliaments in the procedure of withdrawing from the European Union. In Poland, such rights can be interpreted from internal legal order of the Republic of Poland, for example from the act on cooperation between the Council of Ministers and Sejm and Senate. Sejm and Senate can request bills concerning the UK leaving the European Union from the Council of Ministers. In case a revision treaty is concluded, the procedure of ratification involving the Polish Parliament will be necessary. Such ratification will be also needed in case a new mixed agreement with the United Kingdom is concluded.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 4(52); 107-112
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanse i zagrożenia dla Irlandii Północnej po referendum i decyzji Wielkiej Brytanii o wystąpieniu z Unii Europejskiej
Opportunities and Threats for Northern Ireland after the EU Referendum in the United Kingdom
Autorzy:
Radomska, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/558248.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
Northern Ireland
Republic of Ireland
United Kingdom
European Union
Referendum
Unification
Opis:
The purpose of this article is to analyze the opportunities and threats for Northern Ireland after the EU referendum in United Kingdom. As a basis for the research method a study based on the analysis of selected information sources was used. The referendum on the United Kingdom’s continuing membership of the European Union resulted in a victory for those wishing to leave the Union, and has become the impulse for discussions on the possible directions for future developments in Northern Ireland. There are two scenarios being considered: Northern Ireland remaining within the United Kingdom, but outside the European Union, leaving the United Kingdom and uniting with the Republic of Ireland, which would enable it to retain its membership of the European Union. A referendum on unifying Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, which is supported by republicans, is currently neither justified – the lackof sufficient support of the population, nor is it possible – as the proposition would be vetoed by the main unionist parties and by the government in London which is fully committed to maintaining the unity of the United Kingdom. If, however, the unifi cation of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland occurred, in addition to the enormous initial cost, it could instigate the threat of destabilisation of the political scene and rekindle conflicts between Catholic and Protesant groups. In the long term, uniting with the Republic of Ireland would enable Northern Ireland to maintain a strong developmental impulse arising from the benefits of being a member of the EU; such as access to the Single European Market, structural funds, etc., which the province may lose if it stays within the United Kingdom. The real effects on Northern Ireland will depend on the results of the negotiations and decisions reached by the United Kingdom and the European Union on the conditions on exiting the Union and the future directions, forms and principles for further co-operation. Its economic development is of fundamental signifi cance for the future of Northern Ireland, including the peace process.
Źródło:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2017, 1; 99-118
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Landscape after Brexit as Seen from Ankara. Will the UK’s Divorce from the European Union Additionally Loosen Tights Between Europe and Turkey and Have an Impact on the Future of the Continent?
Krajobraz po Brexicie obserwowany z perspektywy Ankary. Czy “rozwodowa” decyzja Wielkiej Brytanii dodatkowo rozluźni więzi UE–Turcja i wpłynie na przyszłość Europy?
Autorzy:
Marszałek-Kawa, Joanna
Burak, Ahmet
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/616912.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Brexit
United Kingdom
Turkey
European Union
Wielka Brytania
Turcja
Unia Europejska
Opis:
29 marca 2017 r. szef Rady Europejskiej Donald Tusk otrzymał od brytyjskiego ambasadora Tima Barrowa pismo, które uruchamia zapisaną w artykule 50 traktatu lizbońskiego procedurę wystąpienia Wielkiej Brytanii z Unii Europejskiej. Gideon Rachman z “Financial Times” porównał Brexit z rozwodem, stwierdzając, że przedstawiciel rządu brytyjskiego w Brukseli “wręczył papiery rozwodowe” i tym samym zapoczątkował “długotrwałą (na razie zaplanowaną na ponad dwa lata) próbę poukładania sobie stosunków na nowo”. Z kolei w oświadczeniu dla prasy D. Tusk skomentował to wydarzenie w następujący sposób: “Nie ma powodu, żeby udawać, że to szczęśliwy dzień, zarówno w Brukseli, jak i Londynie […] Większość Europejczyków, włączając w to prawie połowę brytyjskich głosujących, wolałaby, żebyśmy zostali razem”. Z całą pewnością stanowisko RE odzwierciedla nastroje wywołane przez decyzję o Brexicie, które są i będą odczuwalne dla wszystkich państw członkowskich Wspólnoty. Warto jednak zauważyć, że opuszczenie przez Brytyjczyków UE oddziałuje nie tylko na sytuację polityczną ich samych, ale także określa działania władz państw aspirujących do członkostwa we Wspólnocie. Celem niniejszego artykułu nie jest omówienie powodów Brexitu, ale zaprezentowanie postawy tureckiego rządu. W tym kontekście na podstawie analizy artykułów prasowych oraz wystąpień polityków omówiona zostanie prawdopodobna strategia Ankary. Teza, którą postawiliśmy, zakłada, że wraz z Brexitem Turcja straciła jedyne poparcie na drodze wejścia do Unii Europejskiej. Turcja zaczyna nowy etap w stosunkach między UE i Wielką Brytanią. Należy się również zastanowić, jak Turcja postrzega i ocenia prowadzoną obecnie politykę zewnętrzną, zredefiniowaną przez trwający konflikt w Syrii, walkę z ISIS i problem imigracyjny, oraz bezcelowość procesu prowadzącego do opuszczenia Unii Europejskiej przez Wielką Brytanię. Jaki będzie kierunek tureckiej polityki zagranicznej w relacjach z Zachodem? Czy Turcja odejdzie od statusu kandydata unijnego (tzw. Turexit)?
On 29 March 2017, President of the European Council Donald Tusk received a note from UK Ambassador Tim Barrow. Under the document, the procedure of UK’s leaving of the European Union was initiated.1 Gideon Rachman from “Financial Times” compared Brexit to a divorce, stating that the representative of the British government “granted the divorce papers”, thus beginning a “long (planned for two years) attempt to redefine mutual relations” (Rozpoczyna się Brexit…, 2017). In his announcement for the press, Donald Tusk commented: “There is no reason to pretend that this is a lucky day, both in Brussels and in London […] Most Europeans, including almost a half of British voters, would prefer us to be still together” (Wielka Brytania rozpoczyna…, 2017). The stance of the European Council clearly mirrors the moods caused by the decision on Brexit, which are prevailing among all EU member states. It should be noted, however, that leaving the EU by the Brits not only has an impact on their political situation, but it also determines the actions of states aspiring to become members of the Community. The aim of this paper is to discuss the reasons for Brexit and to present the position of the Turkish government on this issue on the basis of the analysis of press articles and politicians’ speeches. The hypothesis we posed assumes that Brexit meant Turkey losing its most important advocate in the Union. Thus, the future of accession negotiations between Turkey and the European Union has been called into question. One should also wonder to what degree Turkey’s foreign policy priorities, which have already been redefined under the influence of the war in Syria, the battle with ISIS, the immigration crisis and the futile accession process so far, will be affected by the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union. Will Turkey choose to follow the so-called Trexit route, giving up its membership in the EU?  
Źródło:
Przegląd Politologiczny; 2017, 3; 117-126
1426-8876
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Politologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brexit: a political and economic case study
Autorzy:
Moscardini, Alfredo
Pavlenko, Iryna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2156605.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-08
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
European Union
EU
United Kingdom
Brexit
federation
confederation
political systems
economics
Opis:
No economic policy can be implemented without political influence, and politics is deeply affected by economic consequences. This braiding of political and economic sciences is clearly illustrated in a case study of the decision-making process by the United Kingdom to leave the European Union in 2016. This article reveals the role of political and economic factors instrumental in this decision and concludes with appeal for understanding and future built on mutual respect and trust.
Źródło:
Przegląd Europejski; 2021, 4; 141-162
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brexit: Risks and Opportunities of Disintegration
Brexit: Zagrożenia i szanse
Autorzy:
Somai, Miklos
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/454580.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny
Tematy:
United Kingdom
European Union
Brexit
disintegration
Wielka Brytania
Unia Europejska
dezintegracja
Opis:
Brexit is the result of long-maturing processes of economic and social development reinforcing each other. The referendum on EU membership was far from the mere technical issue of whether staying or leaving the integration – to most British citizens it was a desperate and legitimate answer to British and European (especially Brussels) elite politics that had discredited themselves. Will the elite learn from the result, will they reach a reasonable conclusion? European disintegration can take several forms ranging from allowing governments to ignore EU rules with impunity being the mildest, to letting member states to exit being the wildest. Apart exploring the origins of the current disintegration tendencies, with a special regard to those of Brexit, the purpose of this paper is to map both the risks and the opportunities associated with these disintegrative tendencies in Europe. For, as a hypothesis of this study, the author presumes that in such difficult times, perceived by many as crisis, it is not only a possibility to overcome the problems, but also a must to find out new ways of thinking, and proposing new paths of development in order to minimise the risks and turn challenges into opportunities.
Brexit jest wynikiem długo dojrzewających procesów rozwoju gospodarczego i społecznego, które wzajemnie się wspierają. Referendum w sprawie członkostwa w UE nie było jedynie sprawą techniczną – zostać czy opuścić ugrupowanie integracyjne; dla większości obywateli brytyjskich była to zdesperowana i oficjalna odpowiedź dana brytyjskiej i europejskiej (a zwłaszcza brukselskiej) elicie politycznej, która sama się zdyskredytowała. Czy elita wyciągnie wnioski z tego wyniku, czy będzie w stanie osiągnąć rozsądne zakończenie? Rozpad UE może przybierać różne formy, począwszy od pozwalających rządom ignorować bezkarnie unijne przepisy, pozwalające państwom członkowskim na opuszczenie UE. Celem artykułu, oprócz badania początków obecnych tendencji rozpadowych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem brexitu, jest pokazanie zarówno zagrożeń, jak i możliwości związanych z tendencjami dezintegracyjnymi w Europie. Jako hipotezę autor przyjął, że w tych trudnych czasach, postrzeganych przez wielu jako kryzys, to nie tylko możliwość przezwyciężenia problemów, ale również konieczność znalezienia nowych sposobów myślenia i zaproponowania nowych ścieżek rozwoju, aby zminimalizować ryzyko i przekształcić wyzwania w szanse.
Źródło:
Unia Europejska.pl; 2017, 2; 9-19
2084-2694
Pojawia się w:
Unia Europejska.pl
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
BRITAIN’S MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
Autorzy:
Ronek, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/594845.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
European Communities
European Union
United Kingdom
Great Britain
UK in the EU
Opis:
One of the most important factors affecting British politics is its membership to the European Communities (EC) and later the European Union (EU), which has already had massive implications for this country. The relationship between Britain and Europe has always been problematic. In Britain there has been little enthusiasm for European integration per se, and equally little understanding of the enthusiasm felt on the continent. Europe has been seen as a menace rather than an opportunity and very few British politicians have attempted to argue (as is commonplace on the continent) about monetary union, for instance, it is the only way of regaining control over financial policy. The European idea of pursuing economic integration as a means to political union has also been met with blank incomprehension, if not outright hostility. Britain has always been attempting to slow down the process of integration and, consequently, has often fallen behind and had no choice but to catch up. However, the portrayal of Britain as a “difficult partner” or “laggard leader” in European affairs is only partly justified. Based on its specific understanding of national sovereignty, Britain has developed a much more pragmatic and instrumental approach towards Europe than most of its partners on the continent.3Nevertheless, the country was a strong driving force in favor of integration in many crucial policy fields like the single market or trade policy. According to Alan Milward, the process of European integration entails “pooling” the sovereignty in order to protect national interests and extend national governments’ control of their own destinies. In Britain, contrary to the continent, national interests dictated a different line and it was only when exclusion from the Communities appeared to threaten them that the then British government began to accept the need for membership. The very different motivation behind British entry ensured that the British aims inside the Communities would be limited or “defensive”. The most controversial aspect of Britain’s membership of the EC has always related to “erosion” of its sovereignty.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2013, 42; 218-243
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Where Does the Buck Stop with the Backstop? The Irish-UK Border in Brexit Negotiations: June 2016-January 2019
Autorzy:
McNamara, Paul
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2014398.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Brexit
United Kingdom
Northern Ireland
Republic of Ireland
negotiations
border
backstop
European Union
Opis:
The abject failure of British Prime Minister Theresa May to get the United Kingdom’s (UK) Withdrawal Agreement from the European Union (EU) through Parliament on 15 January 2019, with MPs overwhelmingly rejecting it by 432 votes to 202, has been put down to a variety of reasons. Primary among them has been the question of the post-Brexit status of the land border between the Republic of Ireland and the UK’s province of Northern Ireland. Although an issue which was initially seen as of minor importance, the significance of the Irish border steadily grew over time until it became the main stumbling block in UKEU Brexit negotiations brought about by the decision of the British people to leave the EU in a referendum held on 23 June 2016. Indeed, the key term of the ensuing debate, namely ‘the Irish backstop’, produced such confusion among politicians, political pundits and the general public that the House of Commons, split between so-called Brexiteers and Remainers, decided to reject May’s deal out of hand. This article seeks to argue that, from June 2016 (the time of the referendum) up to January 2019 (the time of the first vote on May’s Brexit deal in Parliament), the issue of the Irish backstop was seriously underestimated before suddenly taking centre stage and ultimately sabotaging the Withdrawal Agreement from within.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2020, 2 (49); 92-126
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 26

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies