Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Ochrona dóbr kultury" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 22
Tytuł:
„BEZPIECZEŃSTWO – WSPÓLNA SPRAWA” IX Międzynarodowa Konferencja, Wrocław, 25 września 2008 r.
“SECURITY – A COMMON CAUSE” IX International Conference, Wrocław, 25 September 2008
Autorzy:
Sabaciński, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537424.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Policja a ochrona dóbr kultury
rola policji w ochronie dziedzictwa
zwalczanie przestępczości przeciwko zabytkom
prawnokarna ochrona dóbr kultury
kontrola przepływu antyków w Internecie
Opis:
The IX International Conference “Security – a Common Cause” was held in Wrocław on 25 September 2008 under the slogan of ”The police and the protection of cultural property in a new European reality”; the organiser was the Marshal’s Office of the Voivodeship of Lower Silesia and the Voivodeship Police Headquarters in Wrocław. The topic of the conference was the cooperation of the police force and the conservation office, the role of the administration of the Catholic Church in the protection of sacral monuments, the tasks and activity of the Centre for the Protection of Public Collections, the assorted parts played by the legal-penal protection of cultural property, and questions associated with the interpretation of legal regulations and definitions concerning the protection of historical monuments. One of the papers dealt with the cooperation between the National Heritage Board of Poland and the police force as regards the protection of archaeological heritage. The foreign guests acquainted the conference participants with various forms of activity relating to the protection of the cultural heritage in Italy, France and the German lands: Saxony, Hessen and Lower Saxony. The papers drew attention to the need for the education of society and improving its awareness about the protection of the cultural heritage as well as the necessity of furthering the close cooperation between the police force and the services dealing with the protection of historical monuments in countries represented at the meeting.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 1; 8-9
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gdański Ośrodek Ochrony Dóbr Kultury - geneza koncepcji, założenia programowe
THE GDAŃSK CENTRE FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL VALUES — THE ORIGINS OF THE IDEA, PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS
Autorzy:
Domańska, Hanna
Kruszelnicki, Zygmunt
Wolska, Ewa
Wolski, Jerzy
Zeidler, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536157.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona dóbr kultury
dobro kultury
dziedzictwo kulturowe
środowisko kulturowe
Gdański Ośrodek Ochrony Dóbr Kultury
Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Opis:
A guideline for activities in the field of the protection and schaping of cultural life in Gdańsk voivodship was provided by the resolution o f the plenary session o f the Voivodship Committee of the P.Z.P.R. (the Polish United Workers’ Party). The session was held in 1972 and it concerned the main trends for the development of culture in Gdańsk voivodship until the year o f 1980. When executing a work program adopted at the session there arose a conception to set up the Gdańsk Centre for the Protection of Cultural Values as a conservation body o f scientific and research nature. The idea was brought into life in June 1975 on the foundations of the Office for the Research and Documentation o f Historic Monuments in Gdańsk voivodship, in existence since 1970. The newly-opened Centre found its seat in a historic Turret of Anchorers’ (Baszta Kotwiczników). In future the seat will be moved to the granary of „Mały and Duży Groddeck” at Chmielna street. As the guidelines for its work the Gdańsk Centre for the Protection o f Cultural Values has adopted two programs. The program minimum assumes a full recording of monuments in Gdańsk voivodship. A starting point for this program was a very long experience and output o f the people and organizations involved in the problem. The program maximum envisaged the expansion of the earlier program with research and experimental studies aimed at an overall elaboration of historic monuments conceived, in the broad sense, as „cultural values”. According to the definition adopted temporarily by the research team o f the Centre, a cultural value is a set of objects that have a definite value, function, date o f the origin, style and that are the product o f human wilful activities in a creative process. The cultural value is an integral part of both universal culture and of the culture of a specific community and proves its development at a given historical stage. The „value” conceived in that sense is a testimony to the history o f the nation and has a great cognitive value for present generations. Being a genuine reflection o f the social existence, its civilisation and ideology, the cultural value is a factor affecting, i.a., the awareness o f a contemporary man, for whom the knowledge of manifestations o f culture in the past helps to get to know and to comprehend the present age. The notion of „cultural value” is inseparably linked with two other concepts, namely „cultural heritage” (i.e. cultural legacy of the bygone society) and „cultural environment”. The latter concept denotes groups o f people producing cultural values and also places in which the value is created and with which it is inseparably connected. And it is that second aspect o f the problem, conceived in the broadest sense, that makes the focus o f interests and research works carried out by the Gdańsk Centre for the Protection of Cultural Values. Hence, the term „cultural environment” covered landscape including all natural and man-made elements. The following sections have already been set up for the full execution of the adopted programs: the Team of the Monuments Research and Documentation Workshop, the Team o f the Conservation Workshop for Works o f Art, Documentation Department, Servicing Workshops, Independent Post for Building and Investment, Independent Post for Defence and Protection of Historic Monuments as well as Finance and Administration and Economic Department. The departments group experts in different fields, to mention only architects, art and architecture historians, engineers. They also maintain a close contact with research workers and cultural organizations in the Baltic Coast and in the country.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 3; 161-167
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zakaz wywozu dóbr kultury i jego praktyczne konsekwencje
THE PROHIBITION OF EXPORTING CULTURAL PROPERTY AND ITS PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES
Autorzy:
Zeidler, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538739.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zakaz wywozu dóbr kultury
wywóz dóbr kultury
ochrona dóbr kultury
nielegalny wywóz dóbr kultury
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
nowe projekty ustaw o ochronie dziedzictwa narodowego
Opis:
Among assorted legal institutions foreseen in the statute of 15 February 1962 on the protection of cultural property an extremely prominent role is played by a prohibition relating to the export of cultural goods. This is by no means a new regulation, since it had been enforced already upon the basis of a decree from 1946 on the registration and prohibition of the export of works of art and objects of artistic, historical or cultural value. The protected cultural property encompasses portable or stationary objects, old or contemporary, and of significance for cultural heritage and development owing to their historical, scientific or artistic value. The prohibition was established by the legislator primarily owing to the immense devastation of Polish cultural legacy during the second world war. Doubts concerning the retention of the prohibition in its present-day form are voiced mainly in view of the regulation of this problem by the law of the European Communities. On the other hand, it remains indubitable that owing to obligatory international agreements prohibition of this sort must pertain to cultural goods obtained by means of crime (theft, fencing). This issue is regulated by two international conventions: the convention signed on in Paris on 17 November 1970, and dealing with measures intent on banning and preventing the illegal export, import and transference of the ownership of cultural goods, and the convention on co-operation and mutual assistance in intercepting and returning cultural property illegally transported across state frontiers, signed in Plovdiv on 22 April 1986. The legal situation of the import of cultural property is different, since such transportation is supported by the legislator. At present, the Parliament of the Republic of Poland is examining two competing projects of statutes (on the protection of national legacy and on the protection of historical monuments), both regulating the titular subject.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 3-4; 410-412
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona dóbr kultury we Włoszech, Umbria i Wenecja - wystawa w Warszawie
Autorzy:
Krzyżanowski, Lech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536601.pdf
Data publikacji:
1981
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ochrona dóbr kultury we Włoszech, Umbria i Wenecja
wystawa konserwatorska
Konserwacja zabytków we Włoszech
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1981, 3-4; 230
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Współpraca polsko-wietnamska w zakresie ochrony dóbr kultury
Autorzy:
Wawrzeńczak, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536213.pdf
Data publikacji:
1981
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona dóbr kultury w Wietnamie
współpraca polsko-wietnamska w zakresie ochrony dóbr kultury
kultura plemienia Czamów
wietnamskie wieże z XII w.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1981, 1-2; 109
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i o muzeach dojrzała do nowelizacji : artykuł dyskusyjny
IS THE REVISION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AND MUSEUM ACT NECESSARY?
Autorzy:
Sieroszewski, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537878.pdf
Data publikacji:
1971
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o opiece nad zabytkami
nowelizacja ustawy
ochrona dóbr kultury
pomnik historii
uprawnienia WKZ
pojęcie zabytku
Opis:
Analysing the Act of February 15, 1962 covering the problems of cultural property protection and museums in view of experiences gathered during nine years elapsed from the date of its coming into force the author expresses an opinion that, considering the problem from a general viewpoint, though it has satisfactorily wiithstood the test of practical application and considerably contributed to stabilization and to making the protection of cultural property in this country more efficient some of its detailed provisions, no doubt, require corrections and amendments. Remarks made by the author to particular articles of the Act in question are listed below. Above all the article 4 seems to him to be inconsistent and even conflicting with some others elsewhere in the text (e.g. articles 18 and 4*1). He also advances c ritical opinions as to the definition of „an evident historical monument” considering it as being not precise enough and thus causing misunderstandings and controversial interpretations. Furthermore, commenting the article 6 concerning the „monuments of history”, the author suggests the abolition of their compulsory inscription in the International Register of Cultural Property under Special Care in accordance with provisions of the Hague Convention of 1954 since the stipulations accompanying this particular provision practically make it impossible ,at all to declare a monument as „a monument of history”. The author also suggests the need to define more precisely in the Act itself or in regulations issued on its basis by the Minister of Culture and Art the responsibilities of historical monument conservators at the district and town levels (article 8) and, in addition, to include to th e Act provisions with respect to voivodship offices of historical monument documentation which, although already put into being, have not up to now been provided with ,an unquestionably legal basis for the ir activities (proposed article 8 a). It also seems to the author to be necessary to call a new advisory body assisting the Minister of Culture and Art able to replace the freshly abolished Council of Culture and Art (article 10). To protect the sites of archaeological interest the author proposes to include them provisionally to the Register of Historical Monuments. On completion of excavations and examination of cultural s tra ta and with the relics found transferred to a respective museum such a reg istration should automatically be cancelled (article 1/6). Other proposals regard the augmenting the au th o rities of conservators to enable them to make examinations of alleged cultural property at any place it can be found which th e procedure has been made difficult according to existing provisions requiring from conservator to agree previously this examination with the owner of cu ltu ral property (article 18). At the isame time, however, th e author declares himself for confining the number of cases and reducing the time of temporary requisition of cultural property endangered by destruction, damage or illicit exportation. This temporary requisition could, for instance, last three years and a fte r th a t period the cultural property should be alienated or returned to its owner or user (article 37). With regard to collections (article 55 and the next ones) the author proposes to reserve to the Minister of Culture and Art the right tp define precisely what requirements should be fulfilled by a collection th a t it could be considered as one in accordance with provisions of the Act, and also how it can be augmented and managed by the owner. In addition to 'the above, the author puts forward a number of proposals aimed a t harmonizing the Act’s provisions with Other acts published a fte r its coming into force and particularly with an uniform te x t of th e Building Repair and Reconstruction Act in its version from il968 (article 32), the Code of Civil Laws from 1964: (article 24) and the Code of Criminal Laws from 1969 (articles 73—> 79) and also at enabling to adapt to provisions of the Convention of 1969 referring to measures that should be undertaken to prevent the illicite imports, exports and tran sfe rs of cultural property (new articles 76 a, b, and c).
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1971, 3; 163-172
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bośnia i Hercegowina - dobra kultury w czasie wojny i pokoju
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - CULTURAL PROPERTY DURING WAR AND PEACE
Autorzy:
Długozima, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539457.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dobra kultury Bośni i Hercegowiny
Bośniacka Biblioteka Narodowa
bośniackie zabytki
ochrona dóbr kultury w Bośni i Hercegowinie
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego Bośni i Hercegowiny
Sarajewski Instytut Studiów Orientalnych
konwencja haska
Stary Most w Mostarze
Mostar
Opis:
The state of Bosnia and I lerzegovina came into being as a result of the disintegration of Yugoslavia; at the same time, it remained one of the conflict-prone spots on the map of twentieth-century Europe. Up to the early 1990s Yugoslavia was a federation of states (Serbia, Macedonia, Croatia, Montenegro, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina), and thus comprised a cultural, religious and national melting pot. The awakening of national consciousness in Bosnia and Herzegovina led to a referendum, due to which in 1992 the republic proclaimed its independence and turned into an arena of armed conflicts. In 1992-1995 the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina witnessed a war, whose victims included local cultural property. Despite a system of the protection of cultural property, constructed since the end of the Second World War (i.a. international conventions signed in 1954, 1970 and 1973, the establishment of subjects associated with the protection, registration and assessment of the state of the cultural heritage as well as the codification of national law), the war disclosed all its failings. The article analyses the damage suffered by Bosnian immobile monuments of culture (especially sacral architecture) and mobile monuments (archives, institutes, libraries storing old books, manuscripts, documents, etc.), and seeks the reasons for the losses suffered by cultural property and the unsatisfactory functioning of the mechanisms of the protection of cultural property during armed conflicts. Furthermore, the author outlined activity intent on the protection of cultural property in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 3; 59-66
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O polskiej szkole odbudowy i konserwacji zabytków
ON THE POLISH SCHOOL OF THE CONSERVATION AND OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
Autorzy:
Zachwatowicz, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538808.pdf
Data publikacji:
1981
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
polska szkoła odbudowy i konserwacji zabytków
ochrona dóbr kultury w Polsce
przykłady zniszczeń i deprecjacji zabytków kultury polskiej
Viollet-le-Duc
konserwacja zabytków w krajach Europy
Alois Riegl
teoria Riegla
zasada „konserwować - nie restaurować”
Alfred Lauterbach
Opis:
The author considers a substantiation of the term „Polish conservation school” and describes stages of the development of the concept of conservation in Poland from the 18th century. He gives examples o f intentional damages and depreciation o f Polish historic monuments during annexations and also o f initiatives taken by conservators and historians. At that time one could see various trends to emerge in conservation methods displaying features of school, to mention only Viollet-le-Duc in France and A. Riegel in Austria. The methods met also a vivid response in Poland, which can be seen in the reconstruction o f the cathedral at Włocławek and of the Cloth Hall in Cracow. Of particular importance were the ideas o f A. Riegel, who showed moderation and tried to find compromise solutions. Such a rational restraint in establishing the direction of monuments conservation adjusted to the conditions and fate of historic monuments in Poland displayed, already at that time, features o f the Polish school favouring, first and foremost, care for a proper form and durability o f monuments o f the national culture and not ambitions o f architectural creativity. In 1918, after the regaining o f independence by Poland conservation services were established and the law on the protection of monuments was enforced in 1928. The definition o f a monument covered all kinds o f human activity and was not time-restricted. It was also then that works on the rebuilding o f monuments destroyed during the war were undertaken, with the main emphasis put to restore the splendour o f royal castles in Warsaw and in Cracow. The operative principle was „to preserve and not to restore” , although the majority o f European projects consisted in restoration. The Conservation Congress in Athens (1931) recommended to avoid the reproduction of destroyed monuments but it did not repudiate the process totally in view o f some inevitable events. The period of People’s Poland II came to an end in 1938 with the statement made by A. Lauterbach, a Polish art historian, who said that the fate o f Polish monuments during the war of 1914—1918 made it impossible to apply the principle „to preserve and not to restore” in its pure form and that restoration and even reproduction o f monuments was a must. After the World War II this statement assumed the form of a concrete work programme (the execution o f old town complexes in, i.a., Warsaw, Gdańsk, Poznań). In the opinion of renowned historians o f architecture (R. Pane) and theoreticians of conservation (W. Frodl) the rebuilding o f monuments in Poland after 1945 was an exceptional and political task. According to the author o f this article, because o f its exceptionality and particular conditions in which monuments were rebuilt, one can hardly talk about „the Polish school o f conservation” , as this is not a doctrine but an exception. A similar method was also used by the French to reconstruct the destroyed town o f Saint Malo. Polish monuments conservation boasts a long tradition of great efforts put into their protection, restoration and reconstruction. One could mention at this point (1) comprehensive studies accompanied by broad inventory works and monographic elaborations, (2) training o f personnel in various fields o f monuments conservation, (3) works on the revival of historic town centres, (4) the establishment in 1950 of the State Enterprise for Conservation of Art, and (5) permanent and active participation o f Polish representatives in international works (e.g. in ICOMOS). The author concludes that each school is linked with a definite philosophical doctrine which the Poles have not created but only applied the methods o f monuments conservation necessary in a given situation.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1981, 1-2; 4-10
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Działalność UNESCO w dziedzinie ochrony dóbr kultury
ACTIVITÉ DE L’UNESCO DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA PROTECTION DES BIENS CULTURELS
Autorzy:
Ptaśnik, Mieczysław
Sieroszewski, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536507.pdf
Data publikacji:
1969
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Międzynarodowa konwencja o ochronie dóbr kultury w wypadku konfliktu zbrojnego
ochrona zabytków w czasie wojny
Konwencja Haga 1954
UNESCO
Protokół haski
Międzynarodowy Rejestr Dóbr Kultury objętych Ochroną Specjalną
roboty inwestycyjne zagrożeniem dla zabytków
„dobra kultury”
ratowanie zabytków w Nubii
Opis:
L ’UNESCO ex e rc e son a c tiv ité dans le domaine de la p ro te c tio n des b ien s c u ltu re ls sous fo rm e d ’une n o rm a lis a tio n des p ro b lème s ju rid iq u e s su r l ’a rè n e in te r n a tio n a le , de l ’o rg an isa tio n de la s au v e g a rd e im m é d ia te des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s menac és, d ’un e coo rd in a tio n des ré a lis a tio n s s c ie n tifiq u e s e t te ch n iq u e s de la co n s e rv a tio n e t de la re s ta u ra tio n . La „Conventio n in te rn a tio n a le su r la p ro te c tio n d e s b ie n s c u ltu re ls en cas d ’u n co n flit a rm é ” a d ap té e en 1954, c o n s titu e le d o cum en t fo n d am e n ta l ju r id iq u e d ans ce d omaine. Elle a p o u r b u t, en cas d ’u n co n flit armé, d e m e ttr e à l ’a b ri les m o n um e n ts de la c u ltu re de fa ço n q u ’ils ne p u is sen t s e rv ir d ’o b je c tifs d ’o p é ra tio n s de g u e rre . D’a u tr e s o rd o n n an c e s ju rid iq u e s p u b lié e s p a r l ’UlNESOO, non encore comp rises d ans la Conv e n tio n , so n t p u b lié e s sous fo rm e d e re com m an d a tio n s, e lle s c o n c e rn e n t l ’in te rd ic tio n de l ’e x p o rta tio n illic ite des o eu v re s d ’a r t de leu rs pays re sp e c tifs e t la po ssib ilité de le u r échange légal, a in si q u e la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s men a c é s p a r la cons tru c tio n de n o u v e a u x o b je c tifs in d u s trie ls ou p a r la ré u rb a n is a tio n . O u tre l ’a c tiv ité ju rid iq u e , l ’in té rê t q u e l ’UNESCO ■porte au x p ro b lèm e s de la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s se m a n ife s te dans l ’o rg an is a tio n d’une a id e p o u r les p ay s, d o n t les en sembles de m o n um en ts, p a r su ite de cata clysme, ont é té d é tru its . In s titu é sous le p a tro n ag e de l ’UNESCO à Rome, le C e n tre In te rn a tio n a l d ’E tu d e s p o u r la C o n se rv a tio n e t la R e s ta u ra tio n des Biens C u ltu re ls e s t ch a rg é de la d o c um en ta tio n des re ch e rch e s s u r les p ro b lèm e s sc ie n tifiq u e s e t te ch n iq u e s liés à la c o n se rv a tio n et la re c o n s tru c tio n . L e C e n tre v e ille à la co o rd in a tio n e t donne l ’essor a u x tr a v a u x de ce g en re , e t l ’ICOMQS, c réé en 1965, te n d au re n fo rc em e n t de la coopéra tio n e n tre les sp é c ia liste s de d iv e rs p ays. Bien que de n omb reu se s ré a lis a tio n s a ie n t é té accomp lie s dans le d omaine de la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s, il c o n v ie n d ra it, d ans u n e p lu s la rg e m e su re , de d év e lo p p e r la fo rm a tio n de sp é c ia liste s -c o n - s e rv a te u rs e t r e s ta u r a te u r s a in si qu e le u r co lla b o ra tio n in te rn a tio n a le en ce q u i concerne la p ra tiq u e d ire c te de la co n se rv a tio n .
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1969, 4; 249-256
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
PRAWNOKARNE ASPEKTY OCHRONY DÓBR KULTURY REFLEKSJE NA TLE ZMIANY STANU PRAWNEGO
PENAL LAW ASPECTS OF THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY. REFLECTIONS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF AN ALTERED LEGAL STATE
Autorzy:
Chlebowicz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536091.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona zabytków
pojęcie zabytku
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
Opis:
Despite the fact that the legal aspects of the protection of historical monuments comprise a separate and interesting domain, they remain on the peripheries of Polish legal sciences. The presented sketch deals with assorted problems of the protection of historical monuments perceived from the perspective of penal law. Apparently, the implementation of the statute of 23 July 2003 on the protection of, and care for historical monuments constitutes a convenient pretext for a survey of penal law institutions. The “new” statute appears to be better than its predecessor, i. e. the statute on the protection of cultural property; the same holds true for its penal elements, and the clarity of legal language deserves particular attention. The copious article 3 of the statute, which contains as many as 15 legal definitions, should considerably facilitate the application of the regulations of this normative act which, after al,l is a basic source of the rights and duties of the owners of historical monuments. An indubitable novelty is article 108 of the statute which re-introduces the misdemeanour of destroying or damaging a historical monument. It should be kept in mind that up to now the conservation services applied a legal foundation composed of article 288 paragraph 1 of the penal code, in connection with article 294 paragraph 3 of the penal code. The mentioned foundation of the charge produced numerous problems associated with its interpretation. After all, not every historical monument constitutes property of particular significance for culture. Moreover, penal cases concerning historical monuments are rather rarely encountered. The described construction was successfully applied in cases of the devastation of archaeological sites in the voivodeship of Warmia- Mazuria. A penal-legal analysis of the protection of cultural property should draw attention to the statutory symptoms of misdemeanours which occur in great numbers in the penal regulations of the statute. Taking into consideration the subjective criteria, the misdeeds are divided into two groups : the first encompasses regulations concerning everyone, and thus each person may become a subject of the misdemeanour, while the second deals only with the owners of historical objects. Essential significance is ascribed to the norms expressed in article 109 of the statute penalising the behaviour of the owner who has ignored securing the object. Finally, it is also worth indicating the executive regulations which define the manner of protecting the historical object. The sociological premise of the effectiveness of the regulations is the legal awareness of the addressees of the norms. Unfortunately, the level of the legal culture of Polish society is far from desired. This question remains particularly topical within the realm of the protection of national heritage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 3-4; 122-126
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
PRAWNA OCHRONA ZABYTKÓW NA WYPADEK WOJNY
THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN CASE OF WAR
Autorzy:
Zajadło, Jerzy
Zeidler, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535518.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
prawna ochrona zabytków
działania wojenne
konwencja o ochronie dóbr kulturalnych
dziedzictwo kultury
kultura
dobra kultury
Konwencja Haska
Międzynarodowy Rejestr Dóbr Kulturalnych Objętych Ochroną Specjalną
ochrona specjalna
Opis:
The protection of cultural property at the time of an armed conflict comprises an extremely essential problem. International law foresees detailed guidelines concerning this issue in its Convention on the protection of cultural property in the case of an armed conflict, the Executive rules to this convention and the Protocol on the protection of cultural property in case of an armed conflict, signed at The Hague on 14 May 1954. These documents list the instruments and legal institutions protecting historical monuments during this particularly dangerous time. From the practical viewpoint, particular importance is attached primarily to a detailed definition of the object of protection. The instruments of protection include the specially noteworthy special protection, the International Register of Cultural Property under Special Protection, as well as the storage and transport of cultural property. Apart from the above mentioned detailed rules, which have not as yet been accepted by all countries, cultural property is protected according to assorted general principles. International law indubitably exerts direct impact on the contents of domestic law. Nonetheless, importance should be attached not only to law, but also to suitable social policies which ought to focus universal awareness on the necessity of preserving material cultural heritage for successive generations.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 1-2; 116-121
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturowego i jego znaczenie dla działań polskiej administracji publicznej wobec integracji europekskiej
The Concept of Cultural Heritage and Its Significance for Polish Public Administration in View of European Integration
Autorzy:
Dobosz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535342.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturowego
dziedzictwo kulturowe
dziedzictwo kulturalne
dziedzictwo narodowe
ochrona dóbr kultury
aspekt prawny ochrony dóbr kultury / dziedzictwa kulturalnego
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego w Unii Europejskiej
„Wspólne dziedzictwo kulturowe"
system prawny Rady Europy
Europejska konwencja kulturalna
Europejska konwencja o ochronie dziedzictwa archeologicznego
Konwencja o ochronie dziedzictwa architektonicznego
traktat między Rzecząpospolitą Polską a Republiką Federalną Niemiec
traktat o dobrym sąsiedztwie i przyjaznej współpracy
prawodawstwo UNESCO
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego
Konferencja Generalna Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych dla Wychowania, Nauki i Kultury
Komitet Dziedzictwa Światowego
Opis:
In his reflections on international and European legal norms referring to the protection of cultural heritage in Poland the author presented select international bilateral conventions (involving the Republic of Poland and West Germany) as well as international European Council conventions which unfortunately do not encompass Poland; they include the Convention about the protection of architectural heritage (1985) which Poland did not ratify. European Community legislation is discussed against the background of the Treaty on the establishment of the European Community and the “Association Convention” embracing Poland and the European Community together with its member states. The proposed analysis pertains to UNESCO legislation whose norms are binding for Poland upon the basis of signed and ratified international conventions. The author outlined the backdrop of constitutional expressions pertaining to the protection of cultural heritage, and examined the relations between the concepts of “national” and “European (joint) cultural heritage” .
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 121-141
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Problemy prawnej ochrony zabytków ruchomych sztuki sakralnej
LEGAL PROBLEMS INVOLVED IN THE PROTECTION OF MOVABLE MONUMENTS OF SACRAL ART
Autorzy:
Pruszyński, Jan Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535635.pdf
Data publikacji:
1982
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
prawna ochrony zabytków ruchomych sztuki sakralnej
zabytki ruchome sztuki sakralnej
ochrona dzieł sztuki sakralnej
podstawy prawne ochrony dóbr kultury
Ochrona zabytków sztuki kościelnej
Opis:
During the 2nd World War Polish churches suffered great damage due to regular plunder by the Nazists. The author discusses regulations of the Penalty Code and Law on the protection of the cultural property and on museums with regard to robberies of works of art in the recent years. He quotes and compares recommendations of the Instruction of the Polish Episcopate on the protection of monuments of art and trends of the development of sacral art since 1966. Attention is paid to the fact that according to the Instruction, church administrators are not owners but only guardians and patrons of works of art found in the buildings that are under their care. Post-consiliar liturgy, i.e. turning the altar round to the congregation, has resulted in an extreme desire to modernize church interiors, which quite often was, against the idea of monuments protection. This, in the author’s opinion, is a misunderstanding, as the church law clearly opposes the introduction of any shoddy things into the decor of sacral interiors. Museum-like church interiors offer much temptation for thieves. Therefore, it is an urgent task to draw detailed inventories describing particular works of art in such a way that the church administrator could know what he possesses and what he is to protect on the one part, and on the other, to facilitate for himself and prosecution bodies to recognize and to recover robbed works of art. All works of art in sacral buildings should be put into a register of voivodship monuments conservator, which ensures their legal protection and — in the case of outstanding artifacts — financial aid of the state for their conservation. The author emphasizes the fact that the clergymen should be made aware of high cultural values of works of art when they are still students at seminars. The full knowledge of the cultural value of monuments and, consequently, care and their protection, are the best guarantee of its safe-guarding against robbery and destruction.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 3-4; 217-219
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Co wnosi nowego ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i o muzeach?
Autorzy:
Malinowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536235.pdf
Data publikacji:
1962
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury o muzeach
radziecka uchwała o ochronie zabytków
czechosłowacka ustawa o zabytkach kultury
ochrona zabytków w Niemieckiej Republice Demokratycznej
użytkownictwo zabytków
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1962, 2; 3-10
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 22

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies