Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "criteria" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 1795
Tytuł:
The extention rank ordering criteria weighting methods in fuzzy enviroment
Autorzy:
Roszkowska, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/406326.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
Tematy:
multi-criteria decision analysis
criteria weights
criteria ranking
fuzzy criteria ranking
fuzzy criteria weights
Opis:
Weight elicitation is an important part of multi-criteria decision analysis. In real-life decisionmaking problems precise information is seldom available, and providing weights is often cognitively demanding as well as very time- and effort-consuming. The judgment of decision-makers (DMs) depends on their knowledge, skills, experience, personality, and available information. One of the weights determination approaches is ranking the criteria and converting the resulting ranking into numerical values. The best known and most widely used are rank sum, rank reciprocal and centroid weights techniques. The goal of this paper is to extend rank ordering criteria weighting methods for imprecise data, especially fuzzy data. Since human judgments, including preferences, are often vague and cannot be expressed by exact numerical values, the application of fuzzy concepts in elicitation weights is deemed relevant. The methods built on the ideas of rank order techniques take into account imprecise information about rank. The fuzzy rank sum, fuzzy rank reciprocal, and fuzzy centroid weights techniques are proposed. The weights obtained for each criterion are triangular fuzzy numbers. The proposed fuzzy rank ordering criteria weighting methods can be easily implemented into decision support systems. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the practicality and validity of the proposed methods.
Źródło:
Operations Research and Decisions; 2020, 30, 2; 91-114
2081-8858
2391-6060
Pojawia się w:
Operations Research and Decisions
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Decision Rule for Uncertain Multi-Criteria Pure Decision Making and Independent Criteria
Autorzy:
Gaspars-Wieloch, Helena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/429875.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
uncertainty
multi-criteria decision-making
pure strategies
one-shot decisions
independent criteria
two-stage models
Opis:
The paper is concerned with multi-criteria decision-making under uncertainty with scenario planning. This topic has been explored by many researchers since almost all real-world decision problems contain multiple conflicting criteria and a deterministic evaluation of criteria is often impossible. We propose a procedure for uncertain multi-objective optimization which can be applied when seeking a pure strategy. A pure strategy, as opposed to a mixed strategy, allows the decision-maker to select and perform only one accessible alternative. The new approach takes into account the decision-maker’s preference structure (importance of particular goals) and nature (pessimistic, moderate or optimistic attitude towards a given problem). It is designed for one-shot decisions made under uncertainty with unknown probabilities (frequencies), see decision-making under complete uncertainty or decision-making under strategic uncertainty. The novel approach can be used in the case of totally independent payoff matrices for particular targets.
Źródło:
Optimum. Economic Studies; 2017, 3(87)
1506-7637
Pojawia się w:
Optimum. Economic Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Znaczenie informacji międzykryterialnej we wspomaganiu podejmowania wielokryterialnych decyzji
Importance of inter-criteria information in the multiple criteria decision making
Autorzy:
Wolny, M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/326452.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Politechnika Śląska. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
Tematy:
informacja międzykryterialna
decyzja wielokryterialna
inter-criteria information
multiple criteria decision making
Opis:
W artykule w sposób opisowy przedstawiono znaczenie informacji międzykryterialnej w procesie rozwiązywania wielokryterialnych problemów decyzyjnych. Skupiono się na wpływie tej informacji na wybór metody analizy wspomagania decyzji oraz precyzji otrzymanego rozwiązania problemu decyzyjnego.
The article presents description of inter-criteria information importance in the process of multiple criteria decision making problem. The focus is on the information impact on the choice of the decision support method and the precision of the obtained solution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska; 2015, 86; 411-421
1641-3466
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multiple criteria ranking decision support
Autorzy:
Chmielewski, M.
Kaliszewski, I.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/206087.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Badań Systemowych PAN
Tematy:
multiple criteria ranking
interactive multiple criteria decision making
holistic preferences
atomistic preferences
model building
Opis:
We propose a methodology to support decisions on how to construct rankings of objects which account for decision makers' preferences. As it is not always so that objects to be ranked are known upfront, the methodology is focused on constructing ranking algorithms rather than rankings themselves. The methodology builds on Multiple Criteria Decision Making paradigms. To operationalize it we provide a consistent interactive framework which allows the decision maker to express his preferences with respect to objects directly, with respect to the criteria selection process (multiple criteria model building), and with respect to attributes resulting from the selected criteria. The methodology is illustrated by a numerical example of municipality rankings.
Źródło:
Control and Cybernetics; 2011, 40, 4; 1161-1187
0324-8569
Pojawia się w:
Control and Cybernetics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Internal suffosion of soils criteria
Autorzy:
Zlatinská, L.
Škvarka, J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/131562.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Komisja Inżynierii Budowlanej PAN Oddział w Katowicach
Tematy:
soil
environment
internal suffosion
geometric criteria
hydraulic criteria
gleba
środowisko
sufozja
kryteria geometryczne
kryteria hydrauliczne
Opis:
Stress of soil medium by seepage force causes leaching of fine particles from soil skeleton, resulting in internal instability – internal suffosion. The paper is focused on search of internal suffosion criteria of soils and on the possibilities of interpreting the results of assesments according to several geometric and hydraulic criteria.
Źródło:
Roczniki Inżynierii Budowlanej; 2016, 16; 17-23
1505-8425
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Inżynierii Budowlanej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Критерии демократизации языка
Criteria of the democratization of language
Autorzy:
Лабащук, Михаил
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/444309.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Tematy:
criteria
democratization
language
Opis:
In the present paper aspects of lexical meaning of the term ‘democratization of language’ are analyzed - positive and negative peculiarity of the meaning of that term. The methodological problem of ontology of language is discussed with the special attention to forms of individual and social language as well as the category of censorship (from the perspective of necessity of differentiation between the aspects of censorship: individual and social).
Źródło:
Acta Neophilologica; 2006, VIII; 139-146
1509-1619
Pojawia się w:
Acta Neophilologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tender evaluation criteria in the public procurement of works
Autorzy:
Kozik, R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/348199.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Akademia Wojsk Lądowych imienia generała Tadeusza Kościuszki
Tematy:
evaluation criteria
public procurement
works
Opis:
The amendment to the Public Procurement Law (PPL) [7], which came into effect on 19 October 2014, introduced new principles of tender evaluation. The price may no longer be the sole criterion, unless the conditions listed in the PPL occur. The purpose of the article is to analyze the tender evaluation process in the public procurement of works in the situation where contracting authorities are obliged to apply also other criteria apart from price. Undoubtedly, it will result in a reduced number of procedures where price is the only criterion. The paper presents the results of the research illustrating the scale of this phenomenon and the way of using the new regulations by contracting authorities. The paper contains a brief description of legal bases, new principles of applying tender evaluation criteria and the present practice in this area. The article presents the results of the analysis of notices of contracts on works, published in the Public Procurement Bulletin (PPB) [2] after the amendment to the PPL. The analysis focused on the type, number and frequency of applying the criteria and on their weightings in contracts on works concerning different types of building structures. The conducted research shows that the type of the subject matter of the contract does not influence the choice of criteria. The main criteria, apart from price, include guarantee (period and conditions) and time limit for completion. The number of procedures in which price is the only criterion has decreased significantly. The research reveals that in the tender evaluation process regarding contracts on works contracting authorities take practically no account of life cycle costs and do not apply the so-called environmental criteria.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Naukowe / Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki; 2016, 4; 135-145
1731-8157
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Naukowe / Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Application of Multi-Criterial Analytical Methods for Ranking Environmental Criteria in an Assessment of a Development Project
Autorzy:
Szafranko, E.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/123454.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Tematy:
building investment
environmental impact
assessment criteria
multi-criteria analysis
Opis:
Building investment projects, both during the construction work and afterwards, have a certain impact on the natural environment when a raised structure is used. Depending on the character, size and location of a planned structure, such influences will vary. At the stage of planning a new development, investors are obliged to execute several procedures connected with the preservation of nature, for example they prepare several variants of the planned investment and evaluate which one will have the weakest effect on the environment. Assessment of variants is based on a series of criteria, and the final outcome is not always unambiguous. Hence, when trying to establish the importance of each criterion, it is advisable to apply efficient decision support methods. One option is to use multi-criteria analytical methods. However, for such methods to be applicable, an investor must prepare a wealth of information. The first stage preceding the actual analysis of variants is to define the assessment criteria and assign to them appropriate weights (importance). This stage requires the participation of experts, who – through questionnaires and interviews – express their opinions on the criteria that must be included and on their importance. This article contains a model procedure implemented for the sake of determination of the importance of parameters, which includes the methodology used for assessment and ranking of parameters. The approach presented in this paper demonstrates the usefulness of multi-criteria analytical methods when making an evaluation pertaining to the impact of a building investment on the environment.
Źródło:
Journal of Ecological Engineering; 2017, 18, 5; 151-159
2299-8993
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Ecological Engineering
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Examples of Objectified Multiple Criteria Ranking in the Selection of Infrastructural Projects
Autorzy:
Klimasara, E.
Wierzbicki, A. P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/308171.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Tematy:
multiple criteria ranking
objectified multiple criteria ranking
objectified ranking method
subjective ranking
Opis:
The paper addresses the issue of multiple criteria rankings of infrastructural projects (buildings, roads, etc.). Although the amount of literature devoted to this subject is considerable, all methods proposed produce subjective rankings, dependent on a direct or indirect definition of weighting coefficients applicable to subsequent evaluation criteria. Infrastructural projects are usually selected and approved collegially, however, by a group of decision makers with preferences that may potentially differ significantly. Therefore, an objectified ranking, independent from subjectively defined weighting coefficients, is needed for infrastructural projects. Such a ranking is proposed, analyzed and applied by the authors of this paper. This ranking depends originally only on the multiple objective evaluation data, i.e. the values of evaluation criteria related to decision scenarios or alternatives. Such an approach does not render a fully objective ranking, since one of this kind does not exist at all. Even the choice of the ranking method is a subjective decision, but it is objectified to the extent possible. The paper presents several examples of multiple criteria evaluation of infrastructural projects, derived from literature, and compares subjective rankings published in literature with objectified rankings that are independent of weighting coefficients.
Źródło:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology; 2018, 4; 18-25
1509-4553
1899-8852
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Identification and analysis of transport systems operation quality assessment criteria
Autorzy:
Muślewski, Ł.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/247398.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Instytut Techniczny Wojsk Lotniczych
Tematy:
transport system
operation quality
criteria
Opis:
The study deals with operation quality assessment of operating complex systems especially transport ones. It has been established that assessment of their operation quality depends on fulfilment level of specified criteria. Thus, determination of a set of criteria in terms of their quantity and significance is of great importance. Since the considerations refer to socio-technical systems of the type: human machine and environment , and especially municipal transport systems, these criteria account for human actions, machine operation (transport means) and the impact of factors coming from the environment. The basis of their operation quality is provided by a set of significant, variable in time, measurable and independent features whose values, in a given time period, determine the fulfilment degree of the specified criteria. .On the basis of fulfilment degree of the distinguished criteria, an assessment of operation quality and classification of the considered transport systems are made. In this study, one way of choosing the criteria has been proposed. This method is based on square matrixes and questionnaire survey, which are usedfor establishing their influence on the transport system operation quality, for selected transport means, used in urban complexes.
Źródło:
Journal of KONES; 2010, 17, 3; 313-320
1231-4005
2354-0133
Pojawia się w:
Journal of KONES
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multi-Criteria Assessment of Ergonomic Conditions of Work. Case Study
Autorzy:
Korban, Zygmunt
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2064667.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
STE GROUP
Tematy:
discrete multi-criteria decision
OHS
Opis:
The supervision of OHS conditions (working conditions and the realization of work tasks) is one of the basic obligations of the employer. The number and variety of describing elements (and thus being subject to assessment) means that synthetic measures (measures that are one-dimensional images of complex phenomena) are more and more frequently applied to solve problems of that type. Although the methods of multivariate statistics used for this purpose differ in the way they treat assessment criteria (defining mutual dependency thresholds, unifying the field of compared criteria), the final effect of their application always offers the option to replace the entire set of features describing a given object with one variable (aggregate). The article presents a potential applicability of one of the so-called discrete multi-criteria decision-making methods (Simple Additive Weighting), which allows to determine a linear combination of normalized elements of the decision matrix and the elements of weight vector. As part of the article, the working conditions at 5 workstations were assessed (a miner’s workstation in 5 underground mine workings being excavated), taking into account 8 assessment criteria (6 were cost criteria and 2 – criteria of qualitative character). In effect of the application of the Simple Additive Weighting method, we could determine the ranking vector R, which allowed to order the examined objects and to carry out a comprehensive assessment of OSH conditions occurring in them.
Źródło:
Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering; 2021, 4, 1; 14--22
2545-2827
Pojawia się w:
Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A new approach for criteria weight elicitation of the ARAS-H method
Autorzy:
Ghram, Maroua
Moalla Frikha, Hela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2027997.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
ARAS-H
Criteria weights
Mathematical programming
Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding
Preference disaggregation
Opis:
Criteria weight inference is a crucial step for most of multi-criteria methods. However, criteria weights are often determined directly by the decision-maker (DM) which makes the results unreliable. Therefore, to overcome the imprecise weighting, we suggest the use of the preference programming technique. Instead of obtaining criteria weights directly from the DM, we infer them in a more objective manner to avoid the subjectivity and the unreliability of the results. Our aim is to elicit the ARAS-H criteria weights at each level of the hierarchy tree via mathematical programming, taking into account the DM’s preferences. To put it differently, starting from preference information provided by the DM, we proceed to model our constraints. The ARAS-H method is an extension of the classical ARAS method for the case of hierarchically structured criteria. We adopt a bottom-up approach in order to elicit ARAS-H criteria weights, that is, we start by determining the elementary criteria weights (i.e. the criteria at the lowest level of the hierarchy tree). The solution of the linear programs is obtained using LINGO software. The main contribution of our criteria weight elicitation procedure is in overcoming imprecise weighting without excluding the DM from the decision making process.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2021, 16; 89-109
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evaluating criteria for DP vessels
Autorzy:
Herdzik, J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/246077.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Instytut Techniczny Wojsk Lotniczych
Tematy:
DP systems
station keeping
evaluating criteria
estimation of DP systems
Opis:
The paper presents the evaluating criteria for DP vessels. A few persons tried to give a simple tool for comparing the station keeping capability between different ships. It was started in the seventies when most vessels claiming to have a DP system would be carried away by the current only (the limit was 1.5 up to 2 knots). Mainly DNV and ABS, next IMO prepared the calculating methods for DP system evaluation during the design process to receive the DP class 1, 2 or 3. The regulations may help but it’s still only rough estimate. One of them is the most popular. It is the capability plot presenting at preliminary the polar diagram with number envelops, showing the vessel’s capability to keep position or heading with a certain combination of thrusters in operation. The number, type, total power (or thrust) and location of thrusters are vital for estimating the DP capability from the propulsion system. The other equipment is only accessories assisting the DP system. At the end the sea trial may check and confirm the DP class of the vessel. The real capability for station keeping will be verified during normal operation, essentially during emergency situations like electric network faults, propulsion system failure up to damages and fire. It is needed some indexes or parameters during the design process to avoid serious faults. The paper is a probe of becoming familiar with chosen criteria.
Źródło:
Journal of KONES; 2013, 20, 4; 117-122
1231-4005
2354-0133
Pojawia się w:
Journal of KONES
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Let’s discuss the Criteria of Bradford Hill (1965)
Autorzy:
Ulmer, Hans-Volkhart
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/13108041.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-06-18
Wydawca:
Akademia Tarnowska
Tematy:
epidemiology
Bradford-Hill-criteria
health
Opis:
On 10th October 2020, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment had responded to an inquiry concerning causality, as follows: The nine criteria of Hill [1] are a “central pillar for the determination of causality in epidemiology.” The reason of the inquiry was the dramatic press release: “Air pollution is responsible for more than 400,000 premature deaths/year in Europe.” Among others, the “central pillar” agrees e. g. with reference [2]. Applying to expert discussions, a colleague had commented on this matter: “All our environmental epidemiologists refer to the Bradford Hill criteria”. Is this also the case in publications?Whilst reading through numerous epidemiological publications on sport & health respectively environment & health, the author had never come across these criteria – the reason for this letter to the editor.In 1965, HILL had given detailed considerations to the conditions that would have to be fulfilled in the case of epidemiological associations found before they could be used as a reason to “cry causation”.Extensive annually published reports of the EEA (European Environment Agency) deal with air pollution and human health. In 2019 as key message ([3] p. 63): “Air pollution is the single largest environmental health risk in Europe, with around 400 000 premature deaths attributed to air pollution¼ in 2018” ([3] p. 63) and again in 2020: “Air pollution is a major cause of premature death ¼, responsible for around 400 000 premature deaths per year” ([4] p. 10).The corresponding EEA studies are based on epidemiological surveys, collected in the categories urban – suburban – rural ([4] p. 11). The results, often calculated using the DPSEEAModel ([5] to Healthcare Waste Management), are correctly described from a statistical point of view as: “Deaths attributed to” ([2] p. 63), “associated with” ([1] p. 10), “relationship (between exposure to ambient pollutant concentrations and health outcome” [1] p. 106), “Estimates are produced” or: “the impacts attributable to exposure” ([4] p. 106). But then there is a mind jump to causality by complaining: “Air pollution is a major cause of premature death” ([4] p.10) and implicite with “air pollution is currently the most important environmental risk to human health” ([4] p.9): A typical case of “cry causation”, but without prior examination of the Bradford-Hill-criteria. These are neither mentioned in the text nor in the reference list, nor are alternative criteria (e.g. [6]). However, the published conclusions claiming causality led to serious environmental policy consequences. Yet the question of causality should be decisive for avoiding a so-called stork statistic.Therefore: Let’s discuss the Bradford-Hill-criteria! I am interested to find environmental epidemiological studies in which all of the 9 criteria have been thoroughly discussed rather than having to endure serious environmental policy consequences triggered as “cry causation”. An orienting PubMed analysis did not reveal any reference to environmental epidemiology among 79 hits, but in other research fields associations were often evaluated using all 9 Bradford-Hill-criteria, in two cases even resulting in the rejection of a hypothesis.Therefore, if anyone knows of an environmental health epidemiological study in which the 9 Bradford-Hill criteria were discussed individually prior to “cry causation”: Please provide the author with the bibliographical details: ulmer@uni-mainz.de.The Editor in Chief has agreed to publish a corresponding list of entries in issue 3/2021.
Źródło:
Health Promotion & Physical Activity; 2021, 15, 2; 56-57
2544-9117
Pojawia się w:
Health Promotion & Physical Activity
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evaluating a computer application that aids multi-criteria decision making
Autorzy:
Rajiansyah
Filcek, Grzegorz
Ramsey, David M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/33922499.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
multi-criteria analysis
SMART
AHP
ANP
system usability
Opis:
In this article, we describe and assess the implementation of several methods of multi-criteria decision-making using a web-based computer application. Such an application makes it easier to determine the effectiveness of decisions. The methods adopted in this application are SMART (Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique), AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), and ANP (Analytic Network Process). Each of these methods has distinctive characteristics in determining the best alternative for the user. This study assesses the feasibility of each method in the application. The application is assessed based on functionality, reliability, efficiency, and usability. (1) Functionality is tested according to the appropriateness of the decisions made, (2) Reliability is assessed using stress testing, (3) Efficiency is assessed according to the computational effort, and (4) System usability is tested according to the user's answers to the Computer System Usability Questionnaire authored by J.R. Lewis. This research results in a decision support system based on SMART that has been appropriately tested and is ready for use.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2023, 18; 47-76
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 1795

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies