Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "zachowanie historyczne" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Wartość zabytkowa mierzona w metrach. Ochrona zabytków w kontekście ustawy o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami oraz prawa budowlanego
    Historic value measured in meters. Protection of monuments in the context of the Act on the Protection of Monuments and Protection of Monuments and the Construction Law
    Autorzy:
    Jadwiszczok-Molencka, Helena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113951.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    historic preservation
    investment process
    record of historic monuments and sites
    zachowanie historyczne
    proces inwestycyjny
    zapis zabytków i miejsc
    Opis:
    This article explores the relations between the provisions of the Act on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments and Sites and the Construction Law from the perspective of modern historic preservation. Particular emphasis is placed on the forms of direct historic preservation in the context of the record of historic monuments and sites, which, in spite of being mentioned in the said Act, is not referred to as a form of ‘preservation’. What is also highlighted in this article is the necessity to make amendments to legal acts pertaining to classification and categorisation of historic monuments and sites. The author of this article is of the opinion that this can be achieved only by standardizing administrative regulations and deleting contradictory regulations from legal acts.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 27-40
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O początkach klasyfikacji zabytków. O wadach i zaletach polskich systemów wartościowania zabytków
    On the beginning of the classification of monuments. On the advantages and disadvantages of Polish heritage valuation systems
    Autorzy:
    Lewicki, Jakub
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113948.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    classification
    historic monuments and sites in Poland
    historic preservation
    heritage management
    klasyfikacja
    zabytki i miejsca w Polsce
    zachowanie historyczne
    zarządzanie dziedzictwem
    Opis:
    This article discusses practices of classification of historic monuments and sites which have been adopted in Poland so far. The author of this article presents criteria pertaining to categorising and making inventory of historic monuments and sites developed in the first half of the twentieth century by Jan Zachwatowicz, Zdzisław Bieniecki, and Michał Witwicki. Furthermore, what is also presented is classification of materials that are relevant by their use or invention, classification of modernism monuments, and classification of historic monuments and sites which was carried out in the years 19590–1962, at the time when classes 0 and 1–4 were introduced. In future, historic monuments and sites should be classified by members of different expert teams cooperating with each other on different levels (regional and supralocal). The lists must be verified by academic authorities from various communities (art and architecture historians, conservators, etc.) and all works must be carried out in compliance with currently binding regulations. The criteria should be developed in accordance with the regulations set forth in the Polish Act on Protection and Guardianship of Monuments and Sites of 23 July 2003, unless major amendments are made to it. The author of this article suggests the following criteria, compliant with the legal regulations in force: – artistic merit (art. 3.1): the form of a property or a group of properties (quality and scope of their influence – European, supraregional, and local) – scientific and academic merit (art. 3.1): authenticity of the idea, material, function as well as construction, material, and innovation on local and supraregional scale. – historical merit (art. 3.1): the value and significance of the site, people and events - European, supraregional, and local scale It is necessary to define the significance and value of historic monuments and sites of European (supranational), regional, and local importance. Classification of both single historic monuments and sites and their groups should be clear, simple, and include the smallest possible number of valuing criteria. Furthermore, it should be compliant with Polish laws in force. When applied, the classification should result in factual selection of properties and sites - not on creating new groups of properties and sites of great historical importance and new categories of values being difficult to define. It is not possible to have standardised cirtieria matching all requirements and assigning high rank to each historic monument and site.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 91-108
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Klasyfikacja zabytków w czeskim ustawodawstwie
    Classification of monuments in Czech legislation
    Autorzy:
    Dąbkowska, Monika
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/114028.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    Czech legislation
    historic preservation in Czechia
    classification of historic monuments and sites in Czechia
    ustawodawstwo czeskie
    zachowanie historyczne w Czechach
    klasyfikacja zabytków i miejsc w Czechach
    Opis:
    In Czechia, provisions of law pertaining to historic preservation were established in 1958, during Stalinism. The regulations were provided in Czechoslovakian Act on Cultural Monuments. It was superseded by the Act on State Care for Historic Monuments and Sites being currently in force, which was adopted in the former political system in 1987. Due to dynamic economic, political, and ownership-related transformations taking place at that time, it was necessary to amend it. Consequently, for several years, the legislators have been working on a new act referred to as “The Act on Protection of Resources of Historic Monuments and Sites.” This article pertains to legislative solutions and classification of historic monuments and sites in the light of the Act being developed. In this document, historic monuments and sites are not grouped into specific categories. Instead, they are all considered material elements of cultural heritage. On the other hand, assets of historical significance are classified into cultural monuments, monument ensembles, and national culture monuments and sites of the most outstanding significance. Additionally, two temporary forms of historic preservation have been developed: areas and reserves of historical significance. Archaeological monuments and properties considered as having outstanding historical values under certain international agreements are treated separately. This classification allows for assigning tasks to appropriate administrative bodies and, at the same time, encouraging institutions responsible for historic preservation of monuments and sites on the national level to become advisory bodies of regional administration institutions. What is worth mentioning in the field of historic preservation in Czechia are government’s attempts at making historic monuments and sites more available to citizens by introducing certain legal regulations, i.e. providing the government with pre-emptive right to purchase a property of historical significance from a private owner. This approach results in increasing government’s profits from tourism and culture-related products.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 7-13
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Rola „Karty ewidencji obiektu nieruchomego” w systemie ochrony konserwatorskiej dziedzictwa architektonicznego 2 połowy XX wieku
    The role of the “Records card of immovable propertis” in the protection and conservation of architectural heritage 2nd half of the 20th century
    Autorzy:
    Włodarczyk, Małgorzata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113885.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    record cards of immovable properties
    historic preservation
    architecture of the second half of the 20th century
    contemporary cultural properties
    karty ewidencyjne nieruchomości
    zachowanie historyczne
    architektura drugiej połowy XX w.
    współczesne dobra kultury
    Opis:
    „Record cards of immovable properties” may be used for holding information about specific assets. This tool is of utmost importance for protecting and preserving architectural heritage assets built after the second World War in the second half of the 20th century. It allows for recognising a property in advance, defining the scope of protection (whether the entire property should be protected or only its particular elements), and specifying types of works which can be carried out to the property in question. This tool turns out to be particularly important in the event of changing ownership, carrying out renovation works or any other works pertaining to redevelopment, development, adaptation, etc. Additionally, it may be used for developing historic preservation guidelines for architectural designs and the areas they affect and, at the same time, preserving their initial form. Moreover, the tool in question allows historic preservation services to carry out such works to historic monuments and sites that will not only respect their cultural values but also „give them a new lease of life.” Furthermore, it may be used not only in scientific or academic works but also in works aimed at general public. In the current body of law, there are two types of „record cards of immovable properties.” The first one contains information on assets listed in the national register of historic monuments and sites. The second one provides data on assets not listed in this register - in this case, specific merit-related and graphical information is required. Its broader use by historic preservation service may result in increased effectiveness in preserving architectural heritage of the second half of the 20th century.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 129-133
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies