Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "zabytki i miejsca historyczne" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Czy Wawel można nadbudować?Refleksje na temat klasyfikacji zabytków
    Can Wawel be superstructed? Reflections on the classification of monuments
    Autorzy:
    Dąbrowski, Jacek
    Jankowski, Dariusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113914.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    historic monuments and sites
    categorization
    protection
    zabytki i miejsca historyczne
    kategoryzacja
    ochrona
    Opis:
    None of the legal acts applied in the Polish monument protection system, ranging from the Regency Council Decree of 1918 to the Act of 2003, allows for transforming historic monuments and sites. This provision applies, paradoxically, unless a competent historic preservation officer approves such transformations. In other words, under the aforementioned acts, it is possible to make any modification to the existing historic monument or site, provided that a historic preservation officer issues an appropriate permit. Each of these legal acts provides framework for classifying historic monuments and sites, e.g. by introducing various forms of protection, classifying monuments and sites under various categories – immovable, movable, archaeological, etc. Therefore, classification is real. There are so many different historic monuments and sites falling under a great number of categories that it is impossible to provide them with real, even diversified protection. It is therefore necessary to implement such a classification of historic monuments and sites that would allow state and regional historic preservation officers and representatives of local government administration to carry out actions aimed at protecting properties and places of great historical significance. The recommended classification is a starting point for discussing methods, criteria, and rules governing classification of historic monuments and sites. Additionally, it will ensure appropriate protection.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 15-26
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Znaczenie samorządów w ochronie zabytków. Propozycje zmian
    The importance of local governments in the protection of monuments. Suggestions for changes
    Autorzy:
    Gwiazdowska, Małgorzata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113844.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    change of the political system
    local government subsidies on historic monuments and sites
    cooperation with NGOs
    legal instruments in protection of monuments and sites
    local government historic preservation officers
    scope of duties
    legislative and organisational competences of local government bodies
    selection of competences
    zmiana systemu politycznego
    dotacje samorządowe na zabytki i miejsca historyczne
    współpraca z organizacjami pozarządowymi
    instrumenty prawne w zakresie ochrony zabytków i miejsc
    samorządy
    konserwator zabytków
    zakres obowiązków
    kompetencje legislacyjne i organizacyjne organów samorządu terytorialnego
    dobór kompetencji
    Opis:
    Changes made to the administration system in Poland in the years 1989–1990 were aimed at decentralising state government and increasing the importance of local government bodies. The author of this article reckons that this idea has not been reflected in the Polish body of law yet. There are no legal regulations provided in the provisions of law – not only in terms of the legal situation of historic preservation offices but also with regard to deciding what should fall under the authority of local government bodies. Scope of duties of local government historic preservation officers working in separate offices should be similar to the one that individual departments have. Moreover, authority should no longer be granted on discretionary basis. A principle should be therefore formulated that everything what comes within the competence of historic preservation officers must comply with statutory legislation. If a local government body wants to be delegated either full or partial authority, it should prove that it has both organisational and financial capacity to exercise it. We should therefore work towards a complete solution which would be practical and possible to adopt on both state and regional scale.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 71-76
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Krajobraz kulturowy jako kategoria zabytków i jego specyfika
    Cultural landscape as a category of monuments and its specificity
    Autorzy:
    Klupsz, Lidia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113806.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    historic monuments and sites
    cultural landscape
    culture park
    Polish listed monument
    landscape protection
    landscape valorization
    zabytki i miejsca historyczne
    krajobraz kulturowy
    park kultury
    zabytek z listy polskiej
    ochrona krajobrazu
    waloryzacja krajobrazu
    Opis:
    Cultural landscape is the most recently established category of historic sites. It has been functioning in Poland since 1990 and was mentioned for the first time in UNESCO documents in 1992. Its dual structure distinguishes it from other typology groups. As per the definition provided in the act of law, cultural landscape is an area shaped by natural factors and human activities. This field covers not only natural elements but also products of civilization. Clear and unambiguous criteria for classifying cultural landscapes according to the results of their valorisation have not been implemented into historical preservation yet. This results in difficulties in preserving and protecting cultural landscapes in Poland. Under the provisions of the European Landscape Convention, Polish government is obliged to take actions aimed at assessing landscape values. Therefore, there is a chance to resolve the stalemate.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 41-56
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O początkach klasyfikacji zabytków. O wadach i zaletach polskich systemów wartościowania zabytków
    On the beginning of the classification of monuments. On the advantages and disadvantages of Polish heritage valuation systems
    Autorzy:
    Lewicki, Jakub
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113948.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    classification
    historic monuments and sites in Poland
    historic preservation
    heritage management
    klasyfikacja
    zabytki i miejsca w Polsce
    zachowanie historyczne
    zarządzanie dziedzictwem
    Opis:
    This article discusses practices of classification of historic monuments and sites which have been adopted in Poland so far. The author of this article presents criteria pertaining to categorising and making inventory of historic monuments and sites developed in the first half of the twentieth century by Jan Zachwatowicz, Zdzisław Bieniecki, and Michał Witwicki. Furthermore, what is also presented is classification of materials that are relevant by their use or invention, classification of modernism monuments, and classification of historic monuments and sites which was carried out in the years 19590–1962, at the time when classes 0 and 1–4 were introduced. In future, historic monuments and sites should be classified by members of different expert teams cooperating with each other on different levels (regional and supralocal). The lists must be verified by academic authorities from various communities (art and architecture historians, conservators, etc.) and all works must be carried out in compliance with currently binding regulations. The criteria should be developed in accordance with the regulations set forth in the Polish Act on Protection and Guardianship of Monuments and Sites of 23 July 2003, unless major amendments are made to it. The author of this article suggests the following criteria, compliant with the legal regulations in force: – artistic merit (art. 3.1): the form of a property or a group of properties (quality and scope of their influence – European, supraregional, and local) – scientific and academic merit (art. 3.1): authenticity of the idea, material, function as well as construction, material, and innovation on local and supraregional scale. – historical merit (art. 3.1): the value and significance of the site, people and events - European, supraregional, and local scale It is necessary to define the significance and value of historic monuments and sites of European (supranational), regional, and local importance. Classification of both single historic monuments and sites and their groups should be clear, simple, and include the smallest possible number of valuing criteria. Furthermore, it should be compliant with Polish laws in force. When applied, the classification should result in factual selection of properties and sites - not on creating new groups of properties and sites of great historical importance and new categories of values being difficult to define. It is not possible to have standardised cirtieria matching all requirements and assigning high rank to each historic monument and site.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 91-108
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Programy ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami – niedoceniony element polskiego systemu ochrony zabytków
    Programs for the protection and care of monuments - an underestimated element of the Polish system of monument protection
    Autorzy:
    Siwek, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113900.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    dbałość o zabytki i miejsca historyczne
    opieka nad zabytkami i miejscami
    zarządzanie dziedzictwem
    samorząd
    dokumenty strategiczne
    protection of historic monuments and sites
    care for historic monuments and sites
    guardianship of monuments and sites
    heritage management
    local government
    strategic documents
    Opis:
    Under the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments, a coherent model for caring for historic monuments and sites on both central and local levels was introduced. This concept is intertwined with monitoring and flow of information. The system of managing documents is aimed at optimising actions pertaining to the protection of cultural heritage. As there is a clear hierarchy of these documents, which can also correlate with each other, there are sound reasons behind establishing a coherent protection policy – from municipal/communal level to the central one. National, regional, district, and municipal/communal programmes pertaining to care for historic monuments and sites are strategic tools which shape policy, direct actions towards specific aims, and reflect the will. In a number of cases, however, no programmes have ever been developed. Administrative and legal supervision is still the predominant model in the protection of monuments and sites. The period of 2003 - 2016 was the time to „become familiar” with the new tool applied in heritage protection and management. One should learn from these experiences and promote the idea of devising a coherent strategy aimed at protecting historic monuments and sites by implementing programmes on all administrative levels.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 107-115
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies