Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "wykonanie kary" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 15
    Tytuł:
    The Issue of the Execution of the Penalty of Restriction of Liberty in the Form of Deduction of Part of the Remuneration
    Z problematyki wykonywania kary ograniczenia wolności w postaci potrącenia części wynagrodzenia
    Autorzy:
    Baran-Wesołowska, Beata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/3200756.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-04-03
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Humanitas
    Tematy:
    execution of the sentence
    restriction of liberty
    deduction
    convicted
    wykonanie kary
    ograniczenie wolności
    potrącenie
    skazany
    Opis:
    The article presents the issues related to the execution of the penalty of restriction of liberty in the form of a deduction from the remuneration. The publication analyses the notional and subjective aspects, as well as selected procedural issues.
    Artykuł przedstawia problematykę związaną z wykonaniem kary ograniczenia wolności w formie potrącenia z wynagrodzenia. Analizie został poddany aspekt pojęciowy, podmiotowy, a także problematyka wybranych zagadnień proceduralnych.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Administracji i Prawa; 2022, 4(XXII); 195-207
    1644-9126
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Szacunek i uznanie dla służb penitencjarnych jako warunek efektywnego wykonywania kary pozbawienia wolności
    Respect and Recognition for the Prison Service as a Condition for Effective Execution of Incarceration
    Autorzy:
    Miłek, Krzysztof
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38941293.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2009
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    kara pozbawienia wolności
    wykonanie kary kryminalnej
    służby penitencjarne
    incarceration
    execution of punishment for crime
    Prison Service
    Opis:
    The article is devoted to the problem of execution of incarceration and the organs responsible for it. The author points to differences in views of punishment for crime and to the question of inflicting it; he also stresses that one of the most important conditions for effective execution of incarceration is respect and recognition for the work of the Prison Service. The low pay that prison officers receive, shortage of personnel in penitentiaries, shortcomings and faults of the prison infrastructure that in many cases is obsolete and does not meet modern standards, are some of the many problems that the Polish prison system has to tackle. All these negative facts, in consequence, very unfavorably influence rehabilitation effects in the prisoners.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL; 2009, 5, 1; 69-83
    1896-6365
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zakład karny i wykonanie kary pozbawienia wolności w opinii społeczności lokalnej
    Prison and Imprisonment in the Opinion of Local Community
    Autorzy:
    Mościskier, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699182.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1984
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    zakład karny
    wykonanie kary
    kara
    pozbawienie wolności
    opinia społeczna
    społeczność lokalna
    penitentiary
    execution of a sentence
    imprisonment
    public opinion
    local community
    Opis:
    Basically, the study concers three  problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment.       Secondly  the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected.       Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an  the citizens’  feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend  to differentiate their answers.       The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other.      In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons.        In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons.        The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information.       As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over  50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while  as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention.        However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied  towards  prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant  attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person,  provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed.       Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most  general  statement that  „in prison, strict discipline should reign”.  When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated,  if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict  those given  to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons.       Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined  persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy.       Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals.       The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
         Basically, the study concers three  problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment.       Secondly  the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected.       Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an  the citizens’  feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend  to differentiate their answers.       The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other.      In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons.        In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons.        The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information.       As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over  50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while  as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention.        However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied  towards  prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant  attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person,  provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed.       Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most  general  statement that  „in prison, strict discipline should reign”.  When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated,  if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict  those given  to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons.       Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined  persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy.       Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals.       The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 1984, XI; 245-267
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Akcje likwidacyjne Ruchu Oporu Armii Krajowej
    Autorzy:
    Panek, Grzegorz (1982- ).
    Powiązania:
    Wyklęci. Ogólnopolski Kwartalnik Poświęcony Żołnierzom Wyklętym 2019, nr 4, s. 88-92
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Tematy:
    Ruch Oporu Armii Krajowej
    Podziemie polityczne i zbrojne (1944-1956)
    Wykonanie kary śmierci
    Służba bezpieczeństwa
    Artykuł z czasopisma historycznego
    Opis:
    Bibliografia na stronie 92.
    Dostawca treści:
    Bibliografia CBW
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zamachy na kierowników Powiatowych Urzędów Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego na Rzeszowszczyźnie
    Autorzy:
    Surdej, Mirosław.
    Powiązania:
    Wyklęci. Ogólnopolski Kwartalnik Poświęcony Żołnierzom Wyklętym 2019, nr 4, s. 115-126
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Tematy:
    Powiatowy Urząd Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego (Lubaczów)
    Podziemie polityczne i zbrojne (1944-1956)
    Wykonanie kary śmierci
    Służba bezpieczeństwa
    Artykuł z czasopisma historycznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Bibliografia CBW
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    "... z ludzi tych pożytku dla przyszłej Polski chrześcijańskiej nie będzie"
    Autorzy:
    Łukaszewski, Wojciech (1977- ).
    Powiązania:
    Wyklęci. Ogólnopolski Kwartalnik Poświęcony Żołnierzom Wyklętym 2019, nr 4, s. 93-100
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Tematy:
    Narodowe Zjednoczenie Wojskowe
    Okręg Mazowsze (Narodowe Zjednoczenie Wojskowe)
    Podziemie polityczne i zbrojne (1944-1956)
    Wykonanie kary śmierci
    Służba bezpieczeństwa
    Artykuł z czasopisma historycznego
    Opis:
    Bibliografia na stronie 100.
    Dostawca treści:
    Bibliografia CBW
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ostatnie chwile „Łupaszki”
    Autorzy:
    Kowalski, Waldemar (dziennikarz).
    Powiązania:
    Kombatant 2021, nr 2, s. 10-15
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Tematy:
    Szendzielarz, Zygmunt (1910-1951)
    5 Brygada Wileńska (Armia Krajowa)
    Areszt Śledczy Warszawa-Mokotów
    Prześladowania polityczne
    Podziemie polityczne i zbrojne (1944-1956)
    Więźniowie polityczni
    Żołnierze wyklęci
    Kara śmierci
    Wykonanie kary śmierci
    Artykuł z czasopisma kombatanckiego
    Opis:
    W artykule opisano egzekucję Zygmunta Szendzielarza „Łupaszki”. Był majorem kawalerii Wojska Polskiego i Armii Krajowej i dowódcą 5 Wileńskiej Brygady AK, w konspiracji w ramach ZWZ-AK. Po aresztowaniu „Łupaszko” został osadzony w więzieniu mokotowskim przy ul. Rakowieckiej. W czasie 2,5 roku więzienia był brutalnie przesłuchiwany i torturowany. Został skazany na karę śmierci, którą wykonano 8 lutego 1951 roku. Autor szczegółowo opisuje mechanizm działania mokotowskiego więzienia i proces przeprowadzania egzekucji przez komunistycznych katów. Wyrok na majorze Szendzielarzu wykonał sierżant Aleksander Drej. Nigdy nie odpowiedział za swoje zbrodnie.
    Dostawca treści:
    Bibliografia CBW
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Rzeszowski „sąd na kółkach”
    Autorzy:
    Surdej, Mirosław.
    Powiązania:
    Wyklęci. Ogólnopolski Kwartalnik Poświęcony Żołnierzom Wyklętym 2020, nr 2, s. 61-70
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Tematy:
    Urząd Bezpieczeństwa (UB)
    Zrzeszenie "Wolność i Niezawisłość" (1945-1947)
    Prześladowania polityczne
    Służba więzienna
    Tortury
    Więziennictwo
    Żołnierze wyklęci
    Podziemie polityczne i zbrojne (1944-1956)
    Masowe egzekucje
    Wykonanie kary śmierci
    Artykuł z czasopisma historycznego
    Opis:
    Artykuł przestawia działalność Sądów Doraźnych na terenie województwa rzeszowskiego. Tylko w miesiącach maj-lipiec 1946 roku zgodnie z wyrokami sądu wykonano cztery publiczne egzekucje na ośmiu żołnierzach podziemia niepodległościowego. Autor omawia utworzenie Sądu Doraźnego przy Sądzie Okręgowym w Rzeszowie oraz sylwetki oficerów oddelegowanych do Sądu Okręgowego z Ministerstwa Sprawiedliwości – Norberta Ołyńskiego i Mariana Stokłosy. Informacje pozyskano z raportów Zrzeszenia Wolność i Niezawisłość, które przytoczono wraz z oryginalną pisownią. Przybliża także przebieg poszczególnych rozpraw sądowych oraz przeprowadzonych egzekucji.
    Dostawca treści:
    Bibliografia CBW
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przerwanie biegu przedawnienia skargi kryminalnej w kanonicznym procesie karnym
    The interruption of the course of prescription of a criminal complaint in a canon criminal action
    Autorzy:
    Borek, Dariusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2085947.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-09-20
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
    Tematy:
    przedawnienie
    przerwa przedawnienia
    kanoniczne prawo karne
    kanoniczny proces karny
    skarga kryminalna
    skarga o wykonanie kary
    dekret karny
    wyrok
    prescription
    interruption of prescription
    penal canon law
    penal canon process
    criminal action
    action to execute a penalty
    extrajudicial decree
    sentence
    Opis:
    Przedawnienia należy do tych zagadnień, którym kanonistyka, do pewnego czasu, poświęcała stosunkowo niewiele miejsce. Taki stan rzeczy dotyczy również przerwania biegu przedawnienia. Należy zauważyć, że przerwanie (i tym bardziej zawieszenie) biegu przedawnienia to zagadnienia raczej mało wyeksponowane, zarówno na płaszczyźnie kanonicznego prawa karnego materialnego jak i formalnego. W kontekście stosunkowo krótkich terminów przewidzianych aktualnie dla przedawnienia actio criminalis, istotnego znaczenia nabiera kwestia dotycząca ewentualnego przerwania i/lub zawieszenia biegu przedawnienia Należy zauważyć, że w dotychczasowej kanonistyce możemy znaleźć różne opinie dotyczące tego, kiedy właściwie następuje przerwanie biegu przedawnienia. Taki brak spójności w opiniach doktryny kanonistycznej zmusza do podjęcia próby udzielenia odpowiedzi na następujące pytania: czy w kanonicznym prawie karnym materialnym i formalnym przewidziane jest przerwanie i/lub zawieszenie biegu przedawnienia, a jeśli tak, to w jakim dokładnie momencie ono następuje i jakie z tego wynikają skutki. Próbując udzielić odpowiedzi na wyżej postawione pytanie, niezbędne wydaje się skoncentrowanie uwagi na następujących głównych zagadnieniach: przerwanie i zawieszenie - uwagi ogólne; różne stanowiska dotyczące momentu, w którym następuje przerwanie biegu przedawnienia; dekret/wyrok skazujący jako moment przerwania biegu przedawnienia  
    The institution of prescription belongs to the field of issues rarely discussed by canon law. It is especially true about the interruption (suspension in particular) of the course of prescription. It should be noticed that the institution of interruption, and especially suspension, is weakly emphasised in both material and formal aspects of canon criminal law. In the context of relatively short terms projected currently for the prescription of actio criminalis, the issue of presumptive interruption (and/or suspension) of prescription becomes substantial. It should be stressed that the existing canon doctrine presents various opinions on when the proper interruption takes place. Such a lack of cohesion in the opinions forces the author of this article to answer the following questions: Is there any place in the canon law, both material and formal, for the institution of the interruption and/or suspension of prescription? If so, when exactly does it take place? And what effects does it have?
    Źródło:
    Prawo Kanoniczne; 2020, 63, 3; 61-86
    2353-8104
    Pojawia się w:
    Prawo Kanoniczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 15

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies