Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "wartości dziedzictwa kultury" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Fenomeny społecznej roli sztuki a demokratyzacja - od zarania kultury do sztuki Kantora i Abakanowicz. Percepcja, ochrona i zachowanie
Phenomena of the social role of art and democratization - from the dawn of culture to Kantor and Abakanowicz. Perception, care and protection
Autorzy:
Szmelter, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/424616.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Gdańsku
Tematy:
społeczna rola sztuki
sztuka wizualna
wartości dziedzictwa kultury
konserwacja sztuki współczesnej
wspólnotowe działania artystyczne
paleolityczna sztuka jaskiniowa
Multipart
Tadeusz Kantor
Opis:
Art is not a collection of objects but a form of human activity with great social impact. It is in constant process with the next audiences and their successive generations. Based on Gadamer’s hermeneutic circle it can be interpreted as an action in the democratic sense, a kind of game. The following principal case study is analyzed: Tadeusz Kantor (1915-1990), an excellent painter and interdisciplinary creator organized a programme of conceptual art called Multipart (multiplication and participation). The first exhibition in the series was held in the Foksal Gallery in Warsaw on February 21st 1970 as an "exhibition of one image in 40 copies". Numbered copies of a single picture, entitled Parapluie-emballage, were made according to the artist's instructions. A big broken umbrella, (at that time an symbol associated with the art of Kantor) was glued onto canvas on a stretcher measuring 110cm × 120cm and everything was painted white. At the launch of the exhibition, all the pictures were sold for a symbolic price. Buyers had to sign a contract with Kantor, according to which they could add to the image: "Insults, expressions of approval, praise, sympathy, swear words, (...) erasures, deletions, drawings (...) changes to the image according to their own tastes (...) pierce it, burn it (...) sell, buy, speculate, steal it". The important thing was that the buyers were obliged to re-exhibit the works in the Foksal Gallery after a year of such treatment. Thus, on 20 February 1971, a second exhibition of works by Kantor was held, Multipart 2. This presented the year-old participatory works parapluie-emballage and there were surprising forms of ‘participation’. One unique form of ‘participation-democratisation’ included in the programme Multipart, was the picture which was bought by the “Zuzanna group”. They sowed cress seeds on the image, then treated it as a dish at banquets. Moreover the picture that they had bought was used as a banner in the May 1st communist parade in 1970, where students chanted ‘Kantor’ instead of ‘Lenin’, which was then risky. The event was immortalized in the artistic film Multipart by Christopher Kubicki and Mark Młodecki, which was shown during the exhibition at the Foksal Gallery in 1971. Kantor was positively surprised by the democratisation of his project. This was not the end of the participation of owners. After the exhibition the picture was officially buried in the earth along with a ‘procession’ to the accompaniment of string instruments. After 44 years, at the request of a group of architect-owners, on the 18th of May 2015 conservators undertook the careful exhumation of the object under the title Multipart in process. The remains were removed from the ground and conserved, making reference to documentation of its state before burial and was reassembled on a mount. Very important is the sense of Multipart. Kantor, by departing from his personal creation of the works, questioned and redefined the very concept of a work of art, traditionally treated as the creation of specific authors, the effect of the artist's work. In this case, the idea of these works was his and he created and presented their concept and their technical description. Denying the uniqueness of works of art, at the same time Kantor challenged the position of museums, galleries and collectors – directly to democracy in art. The action Multipart is one of the best-known projects organized by Kantor. It opened a new chapter in thinking about art in the world and in Poland. Paradoxically the Multipart continues (!) as does interest in it among collectors and museums. Due to the unusual character of the work and the need of dissemination, the arrangement of the 'learning zone' explains the conceptual design of Kantor and presents his ideas and their consequences in terms of the fate of an object called Multipart in process. Other case studies are devoted to the spectrum of time, starting from a democratic sense of paleolithic art as well as from the contemporary sense of Magdalena Abakanowicz’s art in public space. The phenomena of art, which consists in its constant inclusion and conservation, allows various forms of social roles to be presented and preserved. Finally, the idea of democracy is based on a paradoxical antinomy: ‘art in process - process in art’. It also requires maintenance for subsequent generations, protection, conservation and sometimes reconstruction.
Źródło:
Sztuka i Dokumentacja; 2017, 16; 49-61
2080-413X
Pojawia się w:
Sztuka i Dokumentacja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Barbarzyńca w ogrodzie? Dziedzictwo kulturowe widziane z perspektywy ekonomii
A Barbarian in the Garden? Cultural Heritage Seen from the Perspective of Economics
Autorzy:
Murzyn-Kupisz, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903807.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
ekonomika kultury
ekonomika dziedzictwa kulturowego
dobro publiczne
wartości ekonomiczne i pozaekonomiczne
cultural heritage
cultural economics
public goods
economic values
cultural values
Opis:
Do niedawna dziedzictwo kulturowe pozostawało niekwestionowaną domeną badań nauk humanistycznych. Rozwój rynku dziedzictwa, jak też rozpatrywanie korzyści, jakie przynosi zachowanie i współczesne wykorzystanie go z różnych punktów widzenia, tj. nie tylko artystycznego i historycznego, lecz także z perspektywy tworzenia i wdrażania publicznych polityk i strategii oraz w kontekście ogólnego rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego, wyraźnie przemawiają za zaangażowaniem nauk ekonomicznych w analizę dziedzictwa kulturowego jako specyficznego dobra na rynku. W artykule rozpatrzono dwie kwestie niezwykle istotne dla teoretycznej debaty o dziedzictwie kulturowym: wartości dziedzictwa widzianych z perspektywy teorii konserwatorskiej i z perspektywy ekonomiki kultury oraz cech dóbr publicznych, jakimi odznacza się wiele składników dziedzictwa, i związanych z nimi problemów niedostatecznej "produkcji" dziedzictwa przez podmioty prywatne.
Until recently, research on cultural heritage seemed to be the unquestioned realm of the humanities. However, the development of the heritage market and the need to consider the benefits of its preservation and contemporary usage from many different viewpoints - not only artistic and historical, but also taking into account the perspective of creation and implementation of public policies and strategies, and the overall context of socio-economic development - calls for an active engagement of economics in its analysis as a specific product in the market. The author considers two very important issues with respect to theoretical approaches to cultural heritage seen from the perspective of cultural economics and its specific sub-field of heritage economics: the question of heritage values and public goods characteristics of many heritage products.
Źródło:
Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance; 2010, 3(13); 19-32
1898-3529
2658-1116
Pojawia się w:
Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
DZIEDZICTWO TECHNIKI JAKO CZĄSTKA KULTURY Część II. W stronę dziedzictwa zrównoważonego
THE HERITAgE Of TECHNOLOgY AS A PARTICLE Of CULTURE Part II. Towards Sustainable Heritage
Autorzy:
Affelt, Waldemar J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537372.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dziedzictwo techniki
dziedzictwo historyczne Europy
tożsamość europejska
zrównoważone zarządzanie dziedzictwem
niematerialne dziedzictwo techniki
dziedzictwo przemysłu
wartościowanie dóbr kultury
wartości dziedzictwa kultury
wartości kulturalne (retrospektywne)
wartości społeczno-ekonomiczne (prospektywne)
korzyści ochrony dziedzictwa techniki
idea zrównoważonego rozwoju
wskaźniki zrównoważenia projektów konserwatorskich
stopień zrównoważenia projektu konserwatorskiego
cele strategiczne Komitetu Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO
Opis:
The article is a continuation of the author’s Dziedzictwo techniki jako cząstka kultury. Część I. W nurcie rozwoju zrównoważonego (The Heritage of Technology as a Particle of Culture. Part I. Within the Sustainable Development Current, ”Ochrona Zabytków”, no. 4/2008, pp. 60-84). Mention is made of the transformation inaugurated in Poland at the beginning of the 1990s and resulting in the emergence of useless post-industrial resources, the liquidation of state agricultural enterprises (PGR) as well as the appearance of vacant buildings due to the restructuralisation of the Armed Forces of the Polish Republic and the Polish State Rail, often encompassing monuments and sites listed in the register of historical monuments. The prime part of the article is a presentation of a monument-related analysis assessing historical monuments of technology, especially the immovable variant, based on a canon of 12 defined values comprising a set of cultural values (social identity, authenticity, integrity, uniqueness, historical and artistic value) pertaining to the past of the given heritage resource, and a collection of socioeconomic values (social usefulness, functional sustainability, economical, educational, aesthetic and political value) expressing contemporary reality as well as anticipating the requirements of future generations. Special attention has been devoted to questions that up to now have been appearing incidentally in the Polish valorisation of technological culture, such as the assorted aspects of social identity, aesthetics and politics. Moreover, the author proposed an additional value of special importance (e.g. the world of creative ingenuity; an illustration of important transformations in the development of technology, industry and engineering; exceptional evidence of technical artisan tradition, existing in present-day or past socioeconomic formations; an outstanding instance of a complex of technical objects or an industrial landscape, illustrating a meaningful stage in local or regional economic history; an essential component of the cultural diversity of a location or a landscape; a special example of the utilisation of natural resources, typical for a given site threatened with irreversible changes), in this way guaranteeing the open character of the proposed methods in contrast to a certain limited arbitrariness of specialist assessments, based on only three values mentioned in the Polish statute on the protection of historical monuments, i.e. historical, artistic and scientific. The article contains numerous interpretation examples from the Polish resources of historical buildings and complexes. The author introduced the concept of the stakeholders of technological heritage and discussed their potential interest in conservation as part of projects for revitalisation, renovation and revalorisation. While doing so, he indicated the crucial factors of impact upon attitudes or views concerning heritage resources, such as the perception of the values of cultural property, pertinent knowledge, a willingness to become acquainted with them or, on the contrary, a dislike of the past and a tendency to ignore its various issues. Mention has been made of fundamental international documents concerning stands in relation to the preservation of the technological heritage. An interpretation of the values of such heritage resources has been referred to the so-called three pillars of sustainable development, adding a fourth one, namely, culture. The author also suggested a list of twenty indicators of the evaluation of a sustainable conservation project. Upon the basis of the strategic targets of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee (the so-called ”5Cs” conception) the article ends with the formulation of five postulates for rendering the Polish system of the protection of technological monuments more efficient.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 1; 53-82
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies