Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "union of Lublin" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 34
Tytuł:
Wyciszana klęska unii lubelskiej: litewska odsiecz wiedeńska
Autorzy:
Obremski, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031020.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Union of Lublin
John III Sobieski
Vienna
school theatre
Unia lubelska
Jan III Sobieski
Wiedeń
teatr szkolny
Opis:
Did the Union of Lublin pass the test of time in 1683 in perhaps in the most difficult period for it? The Lithuanian relief of Vienna was only simulated, but if everything was calmed down, it was because the anti-Royal opposition was strong and John III was weak. At the same time, a problem arose of how to proclaim the glory of the Viennese triumph without humiliating the late and infamous Lithuania? The answer is a school Jesuit theatre and a performance entitled Picture of Victory [...].
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 267-276
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wincentego Skrzetuskiego litewskie rozdwojenie jaźni. Litwa wobec Korony w Rzeczypospolitej XVI–XVIII wieku
Lithuanian split personality of Wincenty Skrzetuski. Lithuania versus the Crown in the Commonwealth of the 16th–18th century
Autorzy:
Zakrzewski, Andrzej
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647388.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Wincenty Skrzetuski
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Litwa
Korona Polska
Polska
Rzeczpospolita
szlachta polska
Lithuania
Crown
Union of Lublin
Commonwealth
Opis:
Piarist Wincenty Skrzetuski, author of the most popular, at the end of the 18th century, compendium of knowledge about the system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, noted that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was one of its three provinces, alongside Małopolska and Wielkopolska. At the same time, he treated Lithuania, due to its separate treasury, army, law and system of courts and ministers, as an equal part of the Commonwealth. The Grand Duchy has indeed evolved significantly from the 16th century onwards. Not only its elites, but gradually the nobility too were acquiring a sense of belonging to the Commonwealth. Similar processes can be observed with regard to the Crown nobility. Thus, a single political nation of the Commonwealth was being formed. During the reign of King Stanisław August Poniatowski, an accelerated modernization took place, accompanied by a cautious – unfinished – unification of both parts of the Polish-Lithuanian state. For the purposes of political tactics, the Lithuanians and the Crowners used the term “province” very flexibly; both as a state and its province (part of it). From the legal point of view, both of these concepts could be justified. Wincenty Skrzetuski thus reproduced in his compendium the reality of political practice.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 259-272
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia polsko-rosyjska z 1815 r. na tle unii lubelskiej i projektów unii Rzeczypospolitej i Rosji z XVI i XVII w.
The Polish-Russian Union of 1815 against the background of the Lublin Union and drafts of other unions between the Republic of Poland and the Russian Empire of the 16th and 17th centuries
Autorzy:
Wojas, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927086.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Polish-Russian Union
Union of Lublin
Polish-Muscovite Union
Kingdom of Poland
Opis:
The lifetime of the Kingdom of Poland – a state connected with the Russian Empire by a union – has not been unequivocally assessed in Polish historiography. On the one hand, the Kingdom had its own army, administration and a very liberal constitution, and had quickly achieved economic prosperity. On the other hand, within a few years of its creation, there occurred the fi rst violations of the Constitution and the persecutions of those who opposed these infringements. A significant event was the revolt of the Cadets of 29 November 1830, which turned into a uprising, today referred to as the November Uprising. This article is the analysis of the legal aspects of the Polish-Russian union created in 1815. It is then compared with the Union of Lublin and the drafts of planned unions between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Tsardom of Russia in the 16th and 17th centuries. The circumstances which led to the creation of the Kingdom of Poland and its union with the Russian Empire, as well as the earlier attempts to create one state of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Russian Empire, as well as the principles of a union of the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania are presented. The principles upon which these unions were to be based are subsequently compared and analysed. A particular emphasis has been placed on the issues related to the international legal status of the Kingdom of Poland. In this context questions such as: the treaty-making power and jus legationis have also been asked. Another important issue discussed in the paper is also the role of the king in matters concerning foreign policy and a possible role of Russia in these matters. The results of this analysis allow to formulate a more objective assessment of the period of the Kingdom of Poland, focusing on its legal status and position, and in particular on the relation with the Russian Empire.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2017, 1 (17); 123-141
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska we współczesnej ukraińskiej historiografii i dydaktyce
The Union of Lublin in contemporary Ukrainian historiography and didactics
Autorzy:
Biłous, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
historiografia ukraińska
dydaktyka
nauczanie historii
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Ukraine
historiography
history textbooks
Opis:
In Ukrainian historiography, treatment of the significance and aftermath of the Union of Lublin depended on ideological priorities of the time. In the 19 th and 20 th century historians were united by a sustained anti-Polish attitude. As early as in the 19th century, the scholars built an image of Poland as the main “stranger” in Ukrainian history. This negative image survived throughout the 20th century and passed into the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to examine various historiographic problems and stereotypes related to the Union of Lublin in the last 25 years and evolution, i.e. transformation, of the views of Ukrainian historians and textbook authors regarding this landmark event. Soviet historiography borrowed the negative assessment of the Union of Lublin and its consequences for Ukraine from the “national” concept of Mykhailo Hrushevsky and, going further, added new stereotypes to it. In the mid-1990s we observe a departure from the model introduced by Hrushevsky and the Soviet model of writing about history. As a result of the new political realities, some emphases in historiography have shifted, the evaluations of events have changed slightly, and historians have outlined new, neutral evaluations of the union. Over the past ten years, a number of modern works by Ukrainian researchers have emerged, appreciating the common heritage of Poland and Ukraine, especially from the history of parliamentarianism, ideology, identity and culture, the history of the nobility, the bourgeoisie and the Cossacks, which have their roots in the Union of Lublin, when the Ukrainian lands became part of the former Commonwealth. In 2019, in connection with the 450th anniversary of the Union of Lublin, interest in this event among the Ukrainian public has increased. A scholarly conference was held with the support of the Polish Institute in Kiev. Unfortunately, new views of historians have not affected the content of most textbooks for secondary and tertiary schools. They still describe the Union of Lublin along the lines of the “best” Soviet models. In recent years, state policy in Ukraine has been aimed primarily at overcoming myths about the 20th century. Therefore, much attention is paid to the content of the recent history books, while the events of the 16th–17th century remain in its “shadow”. Although ideological formulas and stereotypes of national and Soviet historiography have been partly incorporated into contemporary textbooks, some positive changes in the assessment of the consequences of the Union of Lublin are already visible. The topic of the Union of Lublin is well suited for developing critical thinking among pupils and students. It allows them to form their own assessment, based on facts, sources and the latest research by historians.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 273-291
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska aktem założycielskim Rzeczypospolitej
The Union of Lublin as a founding act of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647667.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
unia lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
unie polsko-litewskie
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Central Archive of Historical Records
AGAD
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 13-64
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska a problem rywalizacji o przywództwo w elicie politycznej Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
The Union of Lublin and the problem of competition for leadership within the political elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Autorzy:
Kempa, Tomasz
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648085.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Union of Lublin
magnates
elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Sigismund II Augustus
Unia lubelska
magnateria
elita Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
Zygmunt II August
Opis:
The paper presents the problem of power struggle among the leading Lithuanian magnates in the context of the preparation and conclusion of the Union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania with the Crown of Poland in 1569. Three centres contended to play a major role in Lithuanian policy before the Union of Lublin: The Radziwiłłs, with their undisputed leader – Chancellor, and Voivode of Vilnius, Mikołaj known as “the Red”; the Chodkiewicz family, among whom the starost of Samogitia, Jan Chodkiewicz, grew to be the most active figure even before the Sejm in Lublin; and a representative of Orthodox Church adherents, Knyaz [prince] Jerzy Olelkowicz Słucki, who did not hold any prestigious offices. The aspirations of Prince Słucki stemmed from the fact that he was the closest relative of Sigismund II Augustus, the last representative of Jagiellonian dynasty on the Polish-Lithuanian throne. While Radziwiłł “the Red” was against the new, stricter union with Poland, the other two magnates opposed him, supporting the idea of a new union. Since the King supported the project of further political rapprochement between Poland and Lithuania since the Sejm of 1562/63, the support for the union brought Chodkiewicz a number of promotions and royal endowments in the 1560s (all the more so as the monarch wanted to pit the Chodkiewicz family against the Radziwiłłs, who were all-powerful in Lithuania at that time). Jan Chodkiewicz was also able to take advantage of the obstruction that “Red” used during the Lublin Sejm (when he forced the Lithuanians to secretly leave Lublin), and it was ultimately he who played a major role in completing negotiations on the union and signing the new union in 1569. Although “Red” did not return to Lublin to finalise the union deliberations, he quickly regained the King’s trust. He was supported by the younger generation of the Radziwiłłs, including his son Krzysztof and his nephew Mikołaj Krzysztof, who had sworn an oath of union in Lublin. Prince Słucki’s plan, on the other hand, failed completely. Słucki, as a result of his absence from the Sejm in Lublin due to illness, lost his chance to gain an exceptional position in the new Senate (as the king’s closest relative). The Union of Lublin did not change the balance of power in Lithuania. Mikołaj “the Red” Radziwiłł and Jan Chodkiewicz remained the most influential Lithuanian magnates in the following years.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 140-161
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia kalmarska a unie polsko-litewskie – kilka uwag na temat ich początków i potrzeby kontynuacji badań porównawczych obu związków państwowych
The Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian Unions – Some Remarks on Their Beginnings and the Need for Continued Comparative Research on the Both State Unions
Autorzy:
Gaca, Andrzej
Bąk, Hubert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131654.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
unia kalmarska
unie polsko-litewskie
układ w Krewie
królowa Jadwiga
król Władysław Jagiełło
unionsbrevet
kroningsbrevet
Małgorzata – królowa Danii
Norwegii i Szwecji
Eryk Pomorski
unia lubelska
Kalmar Union
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Act of Krewo
Queen Jadwiga
King Władysław Jagiełło
Queen Margaret of Denmark
Norway and Sweden
Erik of Pomerania
Lublin Union
Opis:
Artykuł prezentuje dotychczasowy stan badań komparatystycznych nad unią kalmarską i uniami polsko-litewskimi. Na wstępie przedstawiono genezę obu unii: przyczyny ich zawarcia, scharakteryzowano i porównano dokumenty obu układów: w Krewie (1385 r.) i unii kalmarskej (unionsbrevet) (1397 r.). Wskazano również podobieństwa obu związków na płaszczyźnie rywalizacji o przywództwo, a także rolę królowej Małgorzaty w zawarciu unii oraz samodzielne rządy Eryka Pomorskiego i ich skutki. Następnie przybliżono transformację unii kalmarskiej, jej poszczególne etapy i przyczyny upadku oraz losy obu związków unijnych po ich formalnym ustaniu i ich wpływ na dalszy rozwój państw członkowskich. Na zakończenie podjęto próbę wytyczenia kierunków dalszych badań porównawczych nad obydwoma uniami, stawiając postulat o konieczności ich kontynuowania i rozwijania.
The article presents the current state of comparative research into the Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian unions, contributing to the postulate of the need for further detailed comparative studies in this field. It outlines a genesis of the unions (their causes, the 1385 Act of Krewo and the 1397 Kalmar Union [unionsbrevet]), then characterises the both documents and conducts a comparative analysis; indicates the similarities between the unions as regards rivalry for the leadership; emphasises the role played by Queen Margaret in the conclusion of the union, and describes the independent rule of Erik of Pomerania with its results. Next, it analyses the transformation of the Kalmar Union together with its successive stages and the causes of its collapse; the fate of the two unions after they formally ended and their impact on the historical development of the member states. Finally, it attempts to indicate lines of further comparative research into the both unions.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 135-166
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Deputies of Vitebsk District to the Sejm of Lublin in 1569: The Social Biography of Piotr Kisiel and Tymofiej Hurko
Autorzy:
Padalinski, Uladzimir A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178396.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
Union of Lublin
biography
nobles
social activity
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Vitebsk district
Sejm
Opis:
The aim of the article is to examine the most important forms of social activity of the petty and middle nobility of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the second half of the 16th century on the example of the unique life stories of two Vitebsk noblemen. The article discusses biographies of Piotr Kisiel and Tymofiej Hurka, who represented the Vitebsk district at the Sejm in 1569 and directly participated in the conclusion of the Union of Lublin. For a long time, the historiography discussed only the most influential participants of the sessions of this Sejm. However, ‘ordinary’ representatives of the wide group of nobles from the districts of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania also played their part in negotiations regarding the conclusion of the union. The aims, ideas, worldview, and values along with the personal experiences of those people directly affected their social and political position, and thus, to some extent, shaped the entire state. The author shows the influence of military and political events of the 1560s on the political activities of Piotr Kisiel and Tymofiej Hurka. The experience gained from the Livonian War influenced their attitude towards the union between the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish Crown in 1569. The investigations presented by the author show that significant transformations of the 1560s (reforms of the political system of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the creation of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth) gave the Kisiel and Hurka families the opportunity to actively participate in public life and allowed them to occupy a permanent place among the political elites of the Vitebsk district. The research results are based on various types of documentary sources, both published ones and manuscripts. The methodological basis of the analysis is the biographical method. The article emphasizes that detailed investigations of the biographies of ‘ordinary’ nobles opened new research perspectives in regard to the history of the noblemen of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the entire Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2019, 84, 4; 73-96
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Attitude of Ruthenian Magnates and Nobles toward the Union of Lublin (1569) and the Problem of the Autonomy of Ukrainian Lands within the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Autorzy:
Kempa, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178408.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
magnates
nobles
Ruthenia
Ukraine
Union of Lublin
law
Orthodoxy
Polonization
Catholicization
Opis:
For a long time, historiography was dominated by a dualistic view on what had happened at the Sejm of Lublin in 1569. Thus, when describing the conclusion of the Union of Lublin, scholars focused on the Polish-Lithuanian dispute and the decisive role of King Sigismund Augustus in signing the agreement in Lublin. Recently, however, there have appeared publications highlighting the important role in the conclusion of the Lublin Union played by the Ruthenian nobility and noble representatives of the lands incorporated into the Polish Crown in 1569, that is Volhynia, eastern Podolia (Bracław Land) and the region of Kiev. The article sums up the existing knowledge on this subject, stressing the fact of the separate interests of the Ruthenian magnates, especially from Volhynia – where many well-known princely families had their family nests – in comparison to the Lithuanian magnates on the eve of the conclusion of the Union of Lublin. It facilitated the decision of the Ruthenian nobles to support not only the union itself, but also the incorporation of the above-mentioned provinces into the Polish Crown. Also thanks to this attitude of the princes and noblemen of Volhynia, Bracław Land and the region of Kiev, these areas gained relatively broad autonomy allowing them to preserve their cultural identity. There is no doubt, however, that the Union of Lublin accelerated the process of Polonization of these lands to some extent, although the process had begun well before 1569. Another important event from the point of view of maintaining the cultural identity of these provinces was the conclusion of the Union of Brest (1595–1596), as a result of which – upon the decision of most Orthodox bishops of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – the Kiev metropolitanate became subordinated to the Holy See. On the one hand, the majority of Ruthenian nobility from the aforementioned provinces reacted in defense of the Orthodox faith, and to some extent also of the Ruthenian region, which stimulated them to strengthen their identity. In this context, noble tribunes of Ruthenian origin, such as Adam Kisiel, and Orthodox polemic writers, such as Melecjusz Smotrycki (who later became a member of the Uniate Church), began to indicate the existence of a separate Ruthenian nation, also pointing to its different features and de facto forming the foundations of its historical tradition. Zaporizhian Cossacks, who consistently defended the Orthodox faith, also joined the process to some extent. On the other hand, in the long run, the Union of Brest led to the Catholicization of local noblemen. Most of Ruthenian nobles eventually converted to the Roman Catholic denomination. However, the fact that the Uniate Church existed might have led to the situation that at least some of the Ruthenian nobles remained in the Ruthenian cultural circle even in the 18th and 19th centuries. Meanwhile, in the 17th century the role of the Ruthenian language tended to decrease in the above-mentioned territories, as it was the case in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In the second half of the 17th century the Ruthenian language ceased to be the official language for the benefit of the Polish language.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2019, 84, 4; 41-72
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tekst Unii lubelskiej jako dokument epoki
The text of Unia lubelska (The Union of Lublin) as a document of the period
Autorzy:
Dubisz, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2083649.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Kultury Języka
Tematy:
the Union of Lublin
text
composition
stylistics
rhetoric
informative and persuasive functions
Opis:
The union concluded at the Sejm meeting held in Lublin in 1569 established common institutions of the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, thus creating the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which survived until 1795. Apart from the ruler elected jointly by the nobility of both countries, it established the common Sejm, foreign and defence policies, and the common coin. The army, treasury, legal systems, administration, and judiciary remained separate. From the philological point of view, the following markers are substantial for characterising the Union of Lublin act: the Polish language of the text and its stylistic affi nity, diversity of the forms of the names of the document signatories, text composition and its offi cial and rhetoric style markers determining its informative and persuasive functions.
Źródło:
Poradnik Językowy; 2020, 779, 10; 31-43
0551-5343
Pojawia się w:
Poradnik Językowy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szkice do portretu szlachcianki w dawnej Rzeczypospolitej: dokumenty dotyczące Rainy Gniewoszówny Strzyżewskiej w zbiorach Wojewódzkiej Biblioteki Publicznej im. Hieronima Łopacińskiego w Lublinie
Sketches for a portrait of a noblewoman in the former Polish Republic: documents concerning Raina Gniewoszówna Strzyżewska in the collection of the Hieronim Łopaciński Regional Public Library in Lublin
Штрихи к портрету шляхтянки в старой Речи Посполитой: документы о Раине Гневошовне Стрижевской в фондах Люблинской Воеводской Публичной Библиотеки им. Иеронима Лопацинского
Autorzy:
Baran, Aleksander
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1070665.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna im. Hieronima Łopacińskiego w Lublinie
Tematy:
Raina Gniewoszówna Strzyżewska
Gniewosz Dmitrowicz Strzyżewski
Iwan Hrehorewicz Hulewicz Poddubiński
Jakub Stradomski (Stradowski)
Łuck
Winnica
Unia Lubelska, Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów
Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna im. H. Łopacińskiego w Lublinie
Jakub Stradomski (Stradowski) Łuck
the Union of Lublin
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
H. Łopaciński Regional Public Library in Lublin
Раина Гневошовна Стрижевская
Гневош Дмитриевич Стрижевский
Иван Грегорович Гулевич Поддубинский
Якуб Страдомский (Страдовский)
Луцк
Винница
Люблинская Уния
Речь Посполитая Обеих Наций
Люблинская Воеводская Публичная Библиотека им. Иеронима Лопацинского
Opis:
Artykuł poświęcony jest szlachciance Rainie Gniewoszównie Strzyżewskiej – postaci mało znanej w historiografii. W okresie swej samodzielnej aktywności gospodarczej skupiała ona w swych rękach znaczne posiadłości ziemskie w Łucku i na przedmieściach. Analiza źródeł dotyczących tej kobiety pozwała odsłonić mało lub wręcz nieznane karty historii Łucka w XVI w.
This article is devoted to the noblewoman Raina Gniewoszówna Strzyżewska – a figure little known in historiography. During the period of her independent economic activities, she gathered into her possession substantial estates in Lutsk and the suburbs. The analysis of the sources concerning this woman made it possible to reveal little-known or even unknown pages of Lutsk's history of the 16th century.
Статья посвящена шляхтянке Раине Гневошовне Стрижевской – персоне, мало известной в историографии. В период самостоятельной хозяйственной активности она сосредотачивала в своих руках значительные земельные владения в Луцке и его пригородах. Анализ источников, касающихся этой женщины, позволил раскрыть малоизвестные или, даже, неизвестные страницы истории Луцка XVI века.
Źródło:
Bibliotekarz Lubelski; 2019, 62; 71-94
0137-9895
Pojawia się w:
Bibliotekarz Lubelski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Świadectwa o dawnej Polsce w źródłach ormiańskich. Współczesna wzmianka o Unii Lubelskiej
Mentions of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Kingdom of Poland in Armenian sources. Contemporary mention of Union of Lublin
Autorzy:
Mnatsakanyan, Piruz
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647999.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
Ormianie
Ormianie polscy
Armenian sources for history of Old Poland
Kamyanets
Chronicle
Armenian community in Old Poland
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 235-258
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przywileje lubelskie i koncepcja „narodu ruskiego” w polemice prawosławnej (od końca XVI do lat dwudziestych XVII wieku)
The Lublin Privileges and the Notion of the “Ruthenian Nation” in Polemic Orthodox Narratives (the Late 16th century through the 1620s)
Autorzy:
Starczenko, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Kotyńska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648017.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
polemika prawosławna
Cerkiew prawosławna
naród ruski
przywilej lubelski
Unia Lubelska
Religious polemics
privileges granted with the Union of Lublin
the Volhynian Voivodeship
the Principality of Kyiv
princes
law
identity
Opis:
In the article, the author analyzes the Lublin privileges for the Volhynian lands and the Kiev Principality as an important resource for constructing “the Ruthenian nation” as a political subject in polemical texts created after the Union of Brest (1596). Based on Apokrisis Christophora Philaletha and Palinodiа by Zachariasz Kopystenski and Melecjusz Smotrycki’s works of the early 1620s, the article tracks the meanings with which the polemists imbued the notion of “the Ruthenian nation,” and how they carved the space for the third member on the already established map of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of Two Nations based on the “ancient rights” and the privileges received with the Union of Lublin. The reading of the polemical narratives from this perspective allows to significantly undermine the popular scholarly notion that the Orthodox authors identified “the Ruthenian nation” almost exclusively with the Orthodox population, and its territory with the Kiev Metropolis. The author draws the conclusion that the notion of “the Ruthenian nation” as an amorphous confessional unity of the believers of the “ancient Greek Orthodox faith” was ceding to the political model of “Rus”, based on “its own” laws, “its own” territory, and the virtual authority of its princes. In essence, it was the polemists’ reliance on the Lublin privileges as the legal basis for the existence of the Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth that encouraged them to construct the territorial and legal model of the Ruthenian nation.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 196-221
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Posłowie ruskich województw Korony na sejmie lubelskim w styczniu–lutym 1569 roku
Envoys of the Ruthenian Voivodeships of the Crown to the Lublin Sejm in January and February 1569
Autorzy:
Michałowski, Witalij
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131657.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
unia lubelska
sejm lubelskie 1569 r.
województwa ruskie Korony
województwo ruskie
województwo podolskie
województwo bełskie
Union of Lublin
Lublin Sejm of 1569
Ruthenian voivodeships of the Polish Crown
Ruthenian voivodeship
Podolian voivodeship
Belz voivodeship
Opis:
W artykule omówiono stosunek szlachty z ruskich województw Korony Polskiej (ruskiego, podolskiego i bełskiego) na sejmie lubelskim w styczniu–lutym 1569 r. wobec planów unii, przed podjęciem decyzji o inkorporacji Podlasia i Wołynia.
This article presents the stance taken by the representatives of the Ruthenian voievodeships of the Polish Crown (Ruthenian, Podolian, and Belz voivodeships) at the Sejm session in Lublin in 1569 before the incorporation of Podlasie and Volhynia.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 95-119
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ośrodek tajnego nauczania przy Państwowym Gimnazjum i Liceum im. Unii Lubelskiej w Lublinie
The Underground Education Center at the Union of Lublin State Middle and Secondary School in Lublin
Autorzy:
Szady, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48526049.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii Nauki im. Ludwika i Aleksandra Birkenmajerów
Tematy:
tajne nauczanie
Państwowe Gimnazjum i Liceum im. Unii Lubelskiej
underground education
Union of Lublin State Middle and Secondary School in Lublin
Opis:
The article describes the activity of one of the three main underground education centres at the level of general secondary school operating in Lublin from 1939 to 1944. The functioning of the centre is shown taking account of the elements of educational policy and the realities of the local occupation situation. The text attempts to comprehensively describe the issue of secret teaching conducted in the discussed environment, which has so far been presented mainly in publications dealing with the participation of teachers in the underground education movement in the Lublin region or in memoirs. The article discusses the circumstances in which the underground education centre was established, the conditions under which it functioned, the participation of teachers and students in conspiratorial educational work, the didactic methods applied and the outcome of students’ involvement in secret teaching. The results of the quantitative balance have been obtained based on the analysis of various statistical data, including previously unknown materials stored in the Central Archives of Modern Records. To make a full picture of the activities of the ‘Union’ Centre, archival materials have also been used from the resources of the State Archives in Lublin, the Archives of the 3rd Union of Lublin Secondary School in Lublin, handwritten materials from the resources of Lublin libraries as well as published reports and memories of former teachers and students of the school. By compiling data from source materials and thematic publications, a list of 36 underground teachers cooperating with the ‘Union’ Centre has been made.
Źródło:
Rozprawy z Dziejów Oświaty; 2022, 59; 223-244
0080-4754
Pojawia się w:
Rozprawy z Dziejów Oświaty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 34

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies