Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "treaty interpretation" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
WYKŁADNIA EWOLUCYJNA EUROPEJSKIEJ KONWENCJI PRAW CZŁOWIEKA A ZASADA KONSENSUSU. PRÓBA ANALIZY
Autorzy:
Soloch, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/664150.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
evolutive interpretation
European Convention on Human Rights
treaty interpretation
judicial law-making
European Court of Human Rights
multi-level constitutionalism
wykładnia ewolucyjna
Europejska konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności
wykładnia traktatów
sądowe prawotwórstwo
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, konstytucjonalizm wielopoziomowy
Opis:
Evolutive interpretation is one of the most important interpretative tools of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). It seems quite obvious that it is at least potentially in conflict with one of the most important principles of international law, namely the Principle of Consent (Konsensprinzip). The aim of this article is to shed some light on the question how the Court in Strasbourg tries to reconcile those two principles. It seems that the function of the concept of evolutive interpretation is to set the goal for the interpretation process (i.e. to ensure that the Convention is interpreted accordingly to the requirements of the “present-day conditions”) rather than to govern the technical details of argumentation. The Principle of Consent comes into play in the form of a limitation to the process of evolutive interpretation and may take many forms. The most remarkable of them is the construct of European or international “consensus”, determined mainly with the help of comparative interpretation. It seems that the quality of the comparative method is of essential importance to ensure that evolutive interpretation should not devolve into judicial law-making and, therefore, to secure the legitimation for the rulings of the ECHR.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze; 2015, 15, 4
2353-8139
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Terminological definition of the category “Interpretation in international law”: historical transformations of the definitions and new approaches
Autorzy:
Karvatska, Svitlana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621477.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-04-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
interpretation in international law
correlation of interpretation and hermeneutics
an international treaty
Opis:
The problem of transformations of the definition “Interpretation in international law” is analyzed in the article. Particularly acute and ambiguous is the question of differentiation of the concepts “interpretation” and “explanation”, which are used n the domestic theory of international law. In Western literature, mostly, the term “interpretation” is used (from the Latin interpretatio). It is determined that two concepts, which Ukrainian lawyers often see as identical or synonymous, the national experts in international law often consider to be rather problematic. From the point of view of the Ukrainian legislation, the concept of “interpretation” is legal, and lawyers use in legal practice and theory such terms as interpretation of the law, interpretation of the legal act, legal interpretation, interpretation of the rules of law, interpretation of the norms of international law. The author notes that this not only does not introduce categorical unambiguity and clarity, but rather complicates the integration of Ukrainian legal science and the science of the theory of international law in the European scientific system.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2019, 18, 1; 133-152
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Budapest Memorandum of 5 December 1994: Political Engagement or Legal Obligation?
Autorzy:
Grant, Thomas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706607.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
treaties
legal obligations
political commitments
use of force
international security non-proliferation and disarmament
general rule of interpretation supplementary means of interpretation
subsequent practice
treaty text
treaty context
object and purpose
Budapest Memorandum
Russian Federation
Ukraine
United States
United Kingdom
Opis:
Ukraine, upon giving up the nuclear arsenal left on its territory by the USSR, entered in 1994 into a Memorandum on Security Assurances with the United Kingdom, United States and Russian Federation (Budapest Memorandum). Since the crisis began between the Russian Federation and Ukraine in February 2014, a number of States have invoked the Budapest Memorandum. Unclear, however, is whether this instrument constituted legal obligations among its Parties or, instead, is a political declaration having no legal effect. The distinction between political instruments and legal instruments is a recurring question in inter-State relations and claims practice. The present article considers the Budapest Memorandum in light of the question of general legal interest – namely, how do we distinguish between the legal and the political instrument?
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 89-114
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Interpretation of Secondary Instruments in International Law
Autorzy:
Costelloe, Daniel
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706729.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
conference of the parties
International Maritime Organization
International Seabed Authority
International Whaling Commission
interpretation
multilateral environmental treaty
secondary instrument
Security Council
VCLT
Opis:
This article explores the legal principles that govern the interpretation of “secondary instruments” in international law. A “secondary instrument” under international law is, for the purposes of this article, a written document adopted by a body empowered by a treaty to take action with respect to the treaty, but which is not itself a treaty. Such instruments find increasing application in international law. The article specifically examines the interpretation of secondary instruments arising in five settings in international practice: the United Nations Security Council, the International Maritime Organization, the International Seabed Authority, the International Whaling Commission, and conferences/meetings of the parties under multilateral treaties. This selection of practice will serve to illustrate principles of interpretation across a range of international institutional settings for the purpose of determining the rights and obligations of state-parties to a treaty regime.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 47-82
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies