Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "the politics of history" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29
Tytuł:
TRZY ŹRÓDŁA WSPÓŁCZESNEJ HISTORIOGRAFII PAŃSTWOWEJ
THREE SOURCES OF THE CONTEMPORARY STATE HISTORIOGRAPHY
Autorzy:
MAZUR, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909938.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-04-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Contemporary historiography
a revolt of the masses
authoritarian mentality
the politiciza tion of history
the politics of history
Opis:
The present state historiography in Poland is dominated by the chronicling of events. But its politicization (even particization), mythologization and tabloidization neglecting methodological rules of the scientific research, implicate the misconception of the history and the incomprehension of the past, revealing in the different public contexts. Regarding current cultural processes, the effects for the contemporary historiography are massively destructive and no change for better is observed in this moment.
Źródło:
Historia@Teoria; 2017, 4, 6; 73-85
2450-8047
Pojawia się w:
Historia@Teoria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konfederacja barska w myśli historycznej szkoły krakowskiej: Michał Bobrzyński i Anatol Lewicki
Autorzy:
Maternicki, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2042747.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-09
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
historical thought
the Kraków school of history
Michał Bobrzyński
Anatol Lewicki
the Bar Confederation
liberum conspiro
the Kraków conservatives’ politics of history
myśl historyczna
szkoła historyczna krakowska
konfederacja barska
polityka historyczna konserwatystów krakowskich
Opis:
Artykuł jest kontynuacją rozprawki autora pt. Joachim Lelewel i Józef Szujski: wizje konfederacji barskiej. Szczegółowej analizie poddano poglądy Michała Bobrzyńskiego i Anatola Lewickiego na konfederację barską, zaprezentowane w ich całościowych ujęciach dziejów Polski. Zwrócono uwagę na występujące pomiędzy nimi podobieństwa i różnice, a także relacje z wizjami Józefa Szujskiego oraz związki z polityką historyczną konserwatystów krakowskich.
In this article, the author continues to discuss the topic with which he first dealt in an essay entitled Joachim Lelewel i Józef Szujski: wizje konfederacji barskiej. The article provides a detailed analysis of the views of the Bar Confederation as advanced by M. Bobrzyński and A. Lewicki in their interpretations of Polish history. In addition to showing both differences and similarities existing between the two accounts of the political movement in question. The author also aims to establish how the analysed views related to those held by J. Szujski and how they connected to the politics of history pursued by the Kraków conservatives.
Źródło:
Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej; 2020, 12; 9-23
2450-8381
2450-8373
Pojawia się w:
Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests (2009–12)
Autorzy:
Darczewska, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108331.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests
politics of history
politics of memory
historical propaganda
active measures in the field of history
information warfare
Dmitri Medvedev
Sergey Naryshkin
Opis:
Abstract: The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests (Комиссия при президенте Российской Федерации по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России), established in 2009, was intended to serve as Russia’s response to similar attempts at institutionalisation in the Central and Eastern Europe region (such as the historical commissions in the Baltic states, and the Institutes of National Remembrance in Poland and Ukraine). At the same time, its activities showed a multidimensional approach, combining elements of security policy with education, culture and media, public and non-public memory policy, and formal and informal activities. Although the official emphasis was mainly on the external (foreign) determinants of the Commission’s genesis, it also became an important element of domestic policy. The Commission only operated for three years (2009–2012), but its importance as a tool of Kremlin policy cannot be overestimated. It turned difficult historical issues into “historical weapons”; introduced international public discourse to the Russian narrative, which was constructed in a spirit of confrontation with the memories of its neighbours; coordinated the activities of formal state organisations, as well as those which operated as nominally non-state bodies but were financed by the state; expanded the community of expert research which argued the Russian narrative while undermining others from abroad; and examined the options for transmitting the desired attitudes and opinions to wider audiences, creating systemic mechanisms of what has been called “counteracting the falsification of history.” The aim of this article is to show the institutional and organisational aspect of this phenomenon.
Źródło:
Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2021-2022, 3; 127-176
2658-1566
Pojawia się w:
Institute of National Remembrance Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Religion of Victory, the Cult of a Superpower. The Myth of the Great Patriotic War in the Contemporary Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation
Autorzy:
Domańska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108332.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
Russia
the Great Patriotic War
the Victory of 1945
politics of history
the great power politics
authoritarianism
World War II
propaganda
Russian foreign policy
Opis:
The glorification of the Soviet victory over Nazism is the focal point of Russia’s politics of history and an element of the ideological offensive that aims to legitimise Russian great-power ambitions. The narrative centred on the victory has a strong religious, not to say, messianic dimension. It aims to whitewash the dark chapters of Soviet history and legitimise the wars Moscow waged after 1945. According to the contemporary neo-Soviet interpretations, these wars were always defensive and justified by external circumstances. At the same time, distinctly anti-Western rhetoric is becoming more and more perceptible in Russian propaganda. The repeated accusations of “eternal” attempts by the West to destroy Russia and destabilise the global order are intensifying. The official discourse is marked by the nostalgia for the lost empire and the “concert of powers” that was established at the Yalta conference; it also seeks to justify violence as a tool of foreign policy. Its overriding aim is to legitimise the authoritarian regime and Moscow’s contemporary strategic goals, such as the hegemony in the post-Soviet area and the reshaping of the European security architecture. The official narrative is promoted by the state institutions, the educational system, the Kremlin-controlled media outlets and a network of social organisations subsidised by the state. It is also safeguarded by the administrative and criminal law and the apparatus of repression.
Źródło:
Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2021-2022, 3; 77-125
2658-1566
Pojawia się w:
Institute of National Remembrance Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The History and Politics of the Russian Federation: a War for Memory, or a War against Memory?
Autorzy:
Darczewska, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956254.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
politics of history
politics of memory
the Russian Historical Society
Rosarkhiv
information warfare
culture wars
historical-cultural standard
Opis:
The term ‘wars of memory’ refers to the Russian specificity of the issues described in the West as ‘politics of history’ or the ‘politics of memory’. The historical arguments which are employed in the Russian Federation in the context of information and cultural warfare, and are identified with the war over the interpretation of history, are being used to achieve the Kremlin’s political objectives in both its domestic and external arenas: any visions which conflict with the official one are discredited as anti-Russian and falsifications of the history of Russia. This text consists of three parts. The first discusses the evolution of the problem in Russian public discourse since the collapse of the USSR; the second describes the historical-cultural standard currently operative in Russia (its pattern of assessments and historical interpretations); and the third, outlines the manifestations of the state’s involvement in implementing its specifically understood politics of memory, with particular emphasis on the role of the Russian Historical Society and Rosarkhiv. The ‘wars’ discussed in this article have become one of the systemic mechanisms for Russia’s confrontation with both the external environment and its internal opposition. The memory and historical-cultural identity as disseminated now are leading to a secondary Sovietisation of society and the mobilisation of imperial and nationalist (ethnocentric, ethnically Russian) resentments within the Russian Federation.
Źródło:
Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 351-376
2658-1566
Pojawia się w:
Institute of National Remembrance Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
(NIE-)POWROTY. ESEJ O DOŚWIADCZENIU I PAMIĘCI ROKU 1945
(NON-)RETURNS. ESSAY ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE AND MEMORY OF THE 1945
Autorzy:
TRABA, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909925.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-04-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
(non-)returns
war trauma
public history
commemorative landscape
politics of history
the memory of 1945
new myths
shortened perspectiven
Opis:
The study brings up sensitive problems of the contemporary Polish history, revealing some mechanisms of historical discourse in the public space. Refl ection on the historical memory, the war trauma and the problem of shortened perspective puts emphasis on the absence of alternative narrations around such categories as: nation, Catholic Church, patriotism, the left, polish Jews. Th is issue is associated with the question of contemporary historical research and the politics of history shaping collective memory in Poland.
Źródło:
Historia@Teoria; 2017, 4, 6; 99-118
2450-8047
Pojawia się w:
Historia@Teoria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Biography and the 20th Century Tony Judt’s Project of a Political Death
Autorzy:
Błesznowski, Bartłomiej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22858135.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-07
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne
Tematy:
intellectual biography
political biography
history of the 20th century
politics
social memory
death
Opis:
The aim of this article is to analyse the political and mnemonic programme to be found in the last books of the British historian and thinker Tony Judt. The author of this article assumes that the final period of Judt’s writing, in which he produced Ill Fares the Land, The Memory Chalet, and the posthumously published discussion with Timothy Snyder entitled Thinking the Twentieth Century, is dependent on a kind of ‘art of memory’. For Judt, being terminally ill with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and thus condemned to immobility, this method became not so much—as in the case of its classic varieties—a technology of remembering, as a manner of recognizing and analyzing the contemporary world by turning to his own biography. The purpose was to construct a ’political testament’ for the Western world in a time of crisis whose roots, according to Judt, can be found in the supremacy that ‘economic’ thinking has achieved over traditional political thought. In a gesture reminiscent of the Stoic ‘techniques of the self’ described by Michel Foucault, Judt, by exploiting his own no less complicated biography and identity, tries to throw light on the complicated history of the 20th century, containing the sources of ‘our contemporary ills’. Biography and history thus meet here in a ’work of memory’ whose horizon and catalyzer is the perspective of death, and whose stake is the idea of a political community experiencing, according to Judt, a period of inertia.
Źródło:
Polish Sociological Review; 2014, 186, 2; 195-212
1231-1413
2657-4276
Pojawia się w:
Polish Sociological Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Third War of Independence? The Anti-Colonial Dynamics of Ukraine’s Politics of Memory after 2014 on the Example of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv
Autorzy:
Stryjek, Tomasz
Markowska-Marczak, Barbara
Konieczna-Sałamatin, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28708031.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
historiography
Ukrainian politics of memory
anti-colonialism
National Museum of History of Ukraine in the Second World War
Opis:
The article discusses the transformation of Ukraine from a peripheral colony to a European nation-state. It examines changes in the interpretation of UkrainianRussian relations in historiography, public perceptions, and museum exhibitions related to the ongoing war. It demonstrates that since 24 February 2022, Ukraine’s politics of memory has exclusively followed a continuously expanding anti-colonial perspective. The article highlights a shift in Ukrainian society’s view of its past, with growing interest in the country’s history and a move away from the Soviet perspective. Museums are crucial in shaping these narrative changes and fostering Ukrainian national identity. The article also explores societal transformations since 1991, showing an increased identification with the state and a gradual distancing from Russia. This is accompanied by a westward turn in geopolitical orientation and a desire to join the European Union. The National Museum of History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv serves as an example of these processes, reflecting a nuanced portrayal of the war and of its human dimension. The museum’s commitment can be seen as a pillar of a nation-state building project, with symbolic identification shifting from the East to the West, towards the EU and NATO.
Źródło:
Acta Poloniae Historica; 2023, 128; 151-179
0001-6829
Pojawia się w:
Acta Poloniae Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“1945” as a Turning Point in German Art History? Challenging the Paradigm of Rupture and Discontinuity
Autorzy:
Fuhrmeister, Christian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909534.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Coming to terms with the Nazi past
historiography
history of art history (in Germa-ny)
issues of post-totalitarian academia
art and politics
Opis:
The historiographical article looks at “1945” as a turning point, inquiring whether the end of both the Second World War and National Socialism also implied a radical break for art history in Germany. In evaluating both contemporary perspectives (like Herbert von Einem’s opening lecture of the First German Art Historians Meeting in 1948) and recent historiographical studies, the paper questions the concept of “Stunde Null” or “hour zero,” and intends to challenge the established paradigm of rupture and discontinuity. Arguing for a more nuanced and holistic understanding of the transformation processes in the postwar situation, three major reasons are identified why simplistic categorizations often prevail: (1) a very narrow definition of the art historian in the history of art history, (2) the disjunction between the humanities and the larger political context, which allow the individual to imagine himself/herself untainted and uncompromised by ideology, and (3) the high degree of continuity, in particular if compared to the radical changes that took place in 1933. The article thus resumes that the idea of “turning points” deserves further differentiation, and calls for the integration of the political dimension into historiography. Essentially, the challenge remains to distinguish between factual processes, false or fraudulent labelling, and symbolic gestures.
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 123-135
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Między endo- a egzogenezą państwa polskiego. Polemiki historyków polskich z historiografią niemiecką w czasach II Rzeczypospolitej
Autorzy:
Wierzbicki, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690002.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
history and politics
the rise of the Polish state
Deutschland und Polen
ideologisation of history
axiological hypothesis and dilemmas
historia i polityka
powstanie państwa polskiego
ideologizacja historii
aksjologiczne hipotezy i rozterki
Opis:
The concept of the Norman origin of the Polish state, in different versions that were given varying political and ideological forms, was formulated by Polish historians in the nineteenth century. However, it was only after Hitler’s rise to power – when some German historians attempted to prove that Mieszko the First was a Norman warrior known by the name Dago and, consequently, that the members of the Piast dynasty were not descended from indigenous Slavic people – that it became the focus of some controversy in Polish historiography. This article presents the Polish-German polemic regarding this topic. Neither the political aspects of the hypothesis in question nor the way in which it was dealt with by German scholars can be given a clear-cut interpretation. The question is still unanswered of why “the historical science in ruin” – as Henryk Olszewski characterised the state of German historiography at the time – did not altogether yield to the pressure (to which the total war was only adding fuel) to use the hypothesis of the Norman founder of the Polish state to its fullest “ideological potential”. The answer to this question and a number of others lies outside this author’s field of expertise; the examination of these issues needs to be left to scholars interested specifically in the history of German historical and political thought. Should the facts referred to in the article be regarded as evidence that, even when in ruin, historiography was able to preserve some enclaves of freedom where it was subjected to no interference by the totalitarian state? Or, perhaps should one link these facts to the ideological ambiguity present in the theory of Prince Dago and his Norman warriors, who were to give rise to the Polish nobility and who, by establishing blood ties with Slavic autochthons, deserved credit for making an organisational and racial contribution to the rise of the Polish state and the Polish nation? How deep were the genetic bonds uniting the Germans and this Slavic nation? Didn’t one, in accepting such a hypothesis, seem to support the view that the German invasion of Poland in 1939 – and the country’s occupation which followed and that involved fighting against the Polish underground movement – was simply an example of fratricidal war?
Jakkolwiek sformułowanej wcześniej, normanistycznej koncepcji genezy państwa polskiego nadawano różne oblicza polityczno-ideowe, to jednak dopiero w okresie międzywojennym poczęła ona budzić zwiększoną czujność polskiej historiografii. Stało się bowiem tak, że właśnie wówczas wśród historyków niemieckich znaleźli się zwolennicy hipotezy, że Mieszko I nie był Słowianinem, lecz wodzem normańskim o imieniu Dago, w związku z czym państwo Piastów przestawało być dziełem słowiańskich autochtonów, a stawało się dziełem germańskich przybyszy z zewnątrz (allochtonów). Artykuł przybliża polsko-niemieckie polemiki na ten temat, zwracając zarazem uwagę, że ideologiczno-polityczne aspekty tezy o germańskich początkach polskiego państwa, podobnie jak i postawa, jaką wobec tych tez zajęła historiografia niemiecka, nie mają jednoznacznej wykładni aksjologicznej.
Źródło:
Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej; 2016, 8
2450-8381
2450-8373
Pojawia się w:
Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Lithuanian Politics of History in 1990–2018. Legal Solutions
Autorzy:
Volkonovski, Jaroslav
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956258.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
Lithuanian politics of history
historical memory
public holidays
days of remembrance
nation’s historical memory
Commission for the National Historical Memory
Opis:
The following article provides an insight into Lithuanian public holidays and days of remembrance in the period 1990–2018, established on the basis of national legislative acts, including legal acts and stenographic records drafted up during the sittings of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. Both the Seimas and the president of Lithuania have made subsequent decisions on drafting the list of public holidays and days of remembrance, enabling to determine the most important dates and events that have laid the groundwork for Lithuania’s historical memory. The list of public holidays displays a clear pro-state and religious tendency while that of days of remembrance seems to be marked by clear anti-Soviet sentiment, tilting towards promoting a pro-Western system of values. Before adopting the relevant legal acts, members of the Lithuanian parliament held a discussion, under which two additional holidays commemorating the Constitution of May 3, 1791 and the Mutual Pledge of the Two Nations of October 20, 1791 were officially put on the list. Also, attention should be drawn both to the relevance and consistency of the list of public holidays and days of remembrance as the document is subject to constant updates. Endeavours to adopt legislation to commemorate the nation’s historical memory appeared unsuccessful while, given the 100th anniversary of Lithuania’s independence on February 16, 2018, all related efforts were forwarded to the relevant institutions; in consequence, a parliamentary committee was eventually convened on June 20, 2017. Nonetheless, too little time has passed since then to properly evaluate the works performed by the aforementioned body and the validity of all its decisions taken so far.
Źródło:
Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 165-217
2658-1566
Pojawia się w:
Institute of National Remembrance Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dwa spojrzenia na historię Polski. Polemika demokratów lwowskich Henryka Schmitta i Ludwika Wolskiego z przedstawicielem krakowskiej „nowej szkoły historycznej” Józefem Szujskim w latach 70. XIX wieku
Autorzy:
Wardzińska, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690032.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
Polish historiography
the Lelevel school of history
the Kraków school of history
dispute over the January Uprising
politics of Stnczyks
Józef Szujski
Henryk Schmitt
Ludwik Wolski
historiografia polska
szkoła lelewelowska
szkoła krakowska
spór o powstanie styczniowe
polityka stańczyków
Opis:
The purpose of the article is to present the polemic between Henryk Schmitt and Ludwik Wolski, the advocates of what is known as a democratic view of Polish history, on the one hand, and one of the main representatives of the Kraków school of history, Józef Szujski, on the other. In recounting the polemic, I seek to answer the question of whether it was simply a matter of historiographical controversy, or whether Galicia’s political circumstances and the situation of the subjects of this article affected the views they expressed.
Celem artykułu jest omówienie polemiki, do której doszło w latach 70. XIX w. między reprezentantami demokratycznych poglądów na dzieje Polski Henrykiem Schmittem i adwokatem Ludwikiem Wolskim a głównym przedstawicielem „nowej szkoły historycznej” Józefem Szujskim. Charakteryzując przebieg i okoliczności owej polemiki, staram się odpowiedzieć na pytanie, czy była ona jedynie sporem historiograficznym oraz czy położenie polityczne Galicji i sytuacja osobista każdego z autorów miała wpływ na ich poglądy?
Źródło:
Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej; 2017, 9
2450-8381
2450-8373
Pojawia się w:
Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sakralizacja dyskursu politycznego w okresie polsko-niemieckiej rywalizacji o Górny Śląsk po I wojnie światowej (1918–1922)
Sacralisation of Political Discourse During the Polish–german Struggle for Upper Silesia After World War I (1918–1922)
Autorzy:
Trąba, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2185193.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych. Instytut Historyczny
Tematy:
Upper Silesia
Silesian Uprisings
Upper Silesian plebiscite 1920
sacralisation
Polska
20th century
history of the Catholic Church
religion
politics
Opis:
A salient feature of the cultural space of Upper Silesia has always been the religion and faith of its inhabitants. During the Silesian Uprisings and the Upper Silesian plebiscite, all parties to the conflict invoked religious values in various ways. Political arguments were often presented in the form of notions, ideas or symbols derived from religious tradition. This phenomenon, called the sacralisation of political discourse, was an abundant one. This was because the participants of the political dispute in Upper Silesia in the period 1918–1922 referred to highly diverse elements of the Christian religious tradition.
Źródło:
Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka; 2018, 73, 4; 43-76
0037-7511
2658-2082
Pojawia się w:
Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czech Politics of History
Autorzy:
Ruczaj, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956404.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
Czech Republic
Czechoslovakia
politics of history
Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes
ÚSTR
Military History Institute
VHÚ
Pamět’ národa
1968
Hussites
House of Habsburg
communism
anti-communist opposition
lustration
Act on the period of lack of freedom
Opis:
The following paper reviews the schemes of memory behind the shaping of the contemporary vision of the Czech’s own history and the forms they take while materialising in the contemporary Czech Republic. Among the “great narratives” to have built up the picture of Czech history, a leading role was assumed by a traditional model, that sees the Czechs as a nation on the border of Slavic and Germanic superethnoses. Simultaneously, attention was drawn to its reformation and modernisation potential and Slavic character, the latter of which intensified after having confronted the Germanic world. The Czech post-1989 settlement with its communist past has only slightly impaired this idiom of memory; Soviet domination, especially the Warsaw Pact intervention in 1968, has to a great extent depreciated the value of “Slavicness” as an element of identification of the Czechs. Also, a Czech sense of nationality has faded to the benefit of a sense of “citizenship”—with the latter understood in a broad sense. Czech state institutions have only to a limited extent been committed to researching some details of the politics of history. Among these organisations have been, for example, the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes (Ústav pro studium totalitních režimů, ÚSTR), the Military History Institute (Vojenský historický ústav, VHÚ) and some other bodies, including the Czech National Museum (Národní muzeum). When analysing the responsibilities shouldered by the above institutions, one may observe an influential yet financially inadequate role of some NGOs, such as Pamět národa (The Memory of Nation) whereas a typical narrative pattern of Czechness has found its place in the educational system. As for the legal perspective, the Czech Republic managed to settle accounts with its communist past by passing both the Lustration Act and the Act on the Period of Lack of Freedom.
Źródło:
Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2020, 2; 177-198
2658-1566
Pojawia się w:
Institute of National Remembrance Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Hypertrophy of Polish Remembrance Policy after 2015: Trends and Outcomes
Autorzy:
Stryjek, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/561472.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-31
Wydawca:
Collegium Civitas
Tematy:
remembrance policy
politics of memory
identity policy
historiography of the history of Poland in the 20th century
Institute of National Remembrance
museums
public holidays and memorial days
Central and Eastern Europe
Opis:
Polish authorities have placed so much importance on remembrance policy since the end of 2015 that it has led to the hypertrophy of the phenomenon. From the 1990s, Poland has been at the forefront of shaping the infrastructure of this form of politics in Europe. Admittedly, even before 2015, national remembrance policy referred mainly to martyrologic and heroic experiences from the period 1939-1956, but it was the victory of Law and Justice in the elections in 2015 and the creation of a oneparty government that resulted in the repeated official declarations of the necessity to defend national “dignity”. This has been accompanied by wiping from national memory past crimes committed by Poles, particularly against Jews.
Źródło:
Zoon Politikon; 2018, 9 Special Issue; 43-66
2543-408X
Pojawia się w:
Zoon Politikon
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies