Temat: the extended body-mind - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: The Outline of Communal ‘Ars Moriendi’ in Egalitarian Transhumanism
Autorzy:: Polowczyk, Łukasz Paweł
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29433350.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: Transhumanism
ars moriendi
egalitarianism
psychedelics
freedom
happiness
the ideology of dying
the extended body-mind
Opis:: This paper outlines the proposal for an egalitarian, transhumanist, and communal version of ars moriendi that should be coherent and meet the consequentialist criteria of the principle of minimizing anti-values and maximizing values, especially the ethical values of freedom and happiness. Transhuman-ist augmented dying (AD) refers to the extended body-mind, free from harmful religious and political ideologies. At present, a feasible art of dying can be systematically supported by anesthetics and psy-chedelics (entheogens), computer games, virtual reality, and good death machines. Its egalitarian form requires a deeply democratic society, and its progress may need a transition to a type 1 society on the Kardashev scale.
Źródło:: Ethics in Progress; 2022, 13, 2; 25-41
2084-9257
Pojawia się w:: Ethics in Progress
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Framing Neuroethical Praxis: Wojtyła’s Metaphysical Subject and its Modernist Cartesian Variants
Autorzy:: Larrivee, Denis
Echarte, Luis
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/426681.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:: Metaphysical subject
neuroethics
bioethics
humanum suppositum
posthumanism
Wojtyła
Heidegger
extended mind theory
integration
theology of the body
Opis:: Numerous neuroethical quandaries today mark concerns over the normative propriety of corporal intervention in the nervous system. At the center of the debates is the question of how the human subject is understood. Accounts influenced by Cartesian metaphysics separate the subject into his immaterial and material manifestations, yielding ethical approaches that devalue the body and neural architecture. Contemporary neuroscience, on the one hand, proposes that the subject is purely a physiological creation, whereas posthumanism privileges the isolated ego on the other; both, thereby, validate an arbitrary neuroethical praxis. By anchoring neuroethics in the metaphysical subject Wojtyła proposes a fundamental corrective to these metaethical approaches, and the promise of a new praxis for corporal intervention in the brain.
Źródło:: Logos i Ethos; 2018, 47, 1
0867-8308
Pojawia się w:: Logos i Ethos
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Informacja