Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "the Tarnogród Confederation" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Bitwa pod Kowalewem (5 X 1716) – geneza, przebieg, konsekwencje
Battle of Kowalewo (5 October 1716) – Origin, Course, Consequences
Autorzy:
Ciesielski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1157713.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-30
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
the Tarnogród Confederation
Saxon army
Polish-Lithuanian army
battle of Kowalewo
Opis:
The article, which refers to the research on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth’s military history in the 18th century and the crisis of Old Polish war art, presents the genesis, course and effects of the battle of Kowalewo of 5 October 1716. Epistolographic material, press and chronicle accounts along with plans of two battles constitute the source base. These primary sources were given a critical analysis, the acquired information being collated and verified in order to obtain a reasonably precise picture of the causes, course and consequences of the battle. The armed forces participating in the battle consisted of the military forces of the Tarnogród Confederation and the royal corps formed from Saxon and Polish regiments and banners, which made the battle fratricidal. About 9–10 thousand soldiers with 6 cannons fought on the side of the Confederation, whilst the royal army had 6,000–6,500 royal soldiers with 4–7 cannons. The confederates had numerical superiority, which was compensated by the advantage in artillery, firearms and better training of royal soldiers. It turned out that these factors were decisive, because the Confederate forces suffered a devastating defeat. After the battle, the group of Chrysostom Gniazdowski actually ceased to exist, and the second military unit commanded by Stefan Potocki withdrew to Mazovia. At least 1,500 or even over 2,000 confederates were killed or wounded in the battle. Another 610 were captured. The royal army also won six cannons and many military characters. The royal forces paid for their success with minor losses – probably only 132 killed and wounded soldiers. Although this battle should not have taken place due to the current ceasefire, its military and political effects were significant. As a result of the battle, the royal army regained full control over Kuyavia and Pomerania, securing the facilities of the troops protecting Warsaw. With the beginning of the Russian armed intervention, this led to the weakening of the confederates’ position in the ongoing peace negotiations, and, as a consequence, to the conclusion of a compromise agreement on 3 November 1716, which did not meet many of the demands of the Warsaw treaty.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2019, 84, 3; 31-56
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Ta konfederacyja nie stała się contra Maiestatem…”. Postawa Jakuba Zygmunta Rybińskiego, wojewody chełmińskiego, w czasie konfederacji tarnogrodzkiej (1715–1717)
‘Ta konfederacyja nie stała się contra Maiestatem…’: The Attitude of Jakub Zygmunt Rybiński, Voivode of Chełmno, during the Tarnogród Confederation (1715–1717)
Autorzy:
Perłakowski, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1059226.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-30
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
jakub zygmunt rybiński
tarnogród confederation
nobility
augustus ii the strong
house of wettin
polish-lithuanian commonwealth
eighteenth century
Opis:
The article aims to present the activity of the Voivode of Chełmno, Jakub Zygmunt Rybiński (d. 1725) during the Tarnogród Confederation (1715–1717). In the period when the movement of the nobility rebelled against the rule of the Saxon dynasty in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Rybiński commanded some of the troops that remained loyal to the king, and was involved in hit-and-run tactics against the Confederation’s forces. He did not show any remarkable military talents, as he suffered a defeat in the Battle of Wąchock on 30 November 1715. However, if the situation required it, he was able to oppose the Confederation using various political means, e.g. in the matter of suspending the judiciary. When analysing the collected primary sources, it can be concluded that among noblemen he enjoyed the reputation of a loyal servant to the king. At times this reputation proved to be a burden, when, for example, he received threats from radically anti-royal noblemen. However, in the most difficult period of the struggle between the nobility and the royal court, Jakub Zygmunt Rybiński did not abandon Augustus II, which did not mean that he fully and uncritically supported his political programme. He considered the king’s idea of radically strengthening the monarch’s power with the help of Saxon troops to be a mistake. He rightly predicted that it would cause indignation among noblemen. This was particularly evident in the period immediately preceding the outbreak of discontent in 1714 and early 1715. His attitude towards the Tarnogród Confederation evolved. Initially, he was a supporter of the armed suppression of the rebellion, but later he was increasingly inclined to resolve the conflict through negotiations.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2020, 85, 2; 33-65
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nie wszystko złe, co z epoki saskiej. Refleksje na temat ocen historiografii polskiej na przykładzie konfederacji tarnogrodzkiej
Autorzy:
Kierys, Arkadiusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2040986.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Confederation of Tarnogród
Polish-Saxon Union
August II the Strong
Stanisław Ledóchowski
Silent Sejm
konfederacja tarnogrodzka
unia polsko-saska
August II Mocny
Sejm niemy
Opis:
Critical evaluation of the reign of the Wettin dynasty in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth dominated Polish historiography until the mid-20th century. August II the Strong was blamed for bringing the monarchy under the control of Peter I the Great, and the nobility for anarchizing political life – in a word, for the beginning of the collapse of the state. The study of the course of the Confederation of Tarnogród and the analysis of pacification talks between the Confederates and the King's plenipotentiaries, based on Diariusz Konfederowanych na Kongresie Lubelskie de Anno 1716 (Diary of the Confederates at the Congress of Lublin, 1716), allowed for a revision of the previous views. The nobility of the day were not only aware of the need to repair the system and describe the offices (mainly those of the Hetman), but also saw the need to curb the increasing role of Russia in the mediation. The most intriguing issue related to the Tarnogród Confederation seems to be the attitude of the nobility towards religious dissidents – they stood up for their rights, opposing the Catholic hierarchy as well as the king himself.
Krytyczna ocena panowania dynastii Wettinów w Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów dominowała w polskiej historiografii aż do połowy XX w. Augusta II Mocnego obarczano odpowiedzialnością za oddanie monarchii pod kontrolę Piotra I Wielkiego, a szlachtę za anarchizowanie życia politycznego – słowem początek upadku państwa. Badania przebiegu konfederacji tarnogrodzkiej oraz analiza rozmów pacyfikacyjnych między skonfederowanymi a plenipotentami króla – w oparciu o Diariusz skonfederowanych na Kongresie Lubelskim de Anno 1716 – pozwoliły na rewizję dotychczasowych poglądów. Szlachta ówczesna była nie tylko świadoma potrzeb naprawy ustroju i opisania urzędów (głównie hetmańskiego), ale także dostrzegała konieczność ukrócenia zwiększającej się roli mediacyjnej Rosji. Najbardziej intrygującą kwestią związaną z konfederacją tarnogrodzką wydaje się postawa szlachty wobec dysydentów religijnych – stanęli oni w obronie ich praw, sprzeciwiając się tym samym hierarchii katolickiej, jak i samego króla.
Źródło:
Res Historica; 2021, 51; 221-251
2082-6060
Pojawia się w:
Res Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies