Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 10a ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223414.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author provides an analysis of the provisions of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the context of the time period within which it should consider a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm. She points out that the opportunity to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is complicated as compared to the election procedure,. The character of the time limit for consideration of the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is not indicative, but mandatory. From an analysis of the concept of ‘the next sitting of the Sejm, it follows that the consideration of the motion and the putting thereof to a vote at the sitting that is “the first one after 7 days of its submission”.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 71-74
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat zasad zwoływania posiedzenia komisji w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu (problematyka posiedzenia zamkniętego)
Legal opinion on convening a committee sitting pursuant to Article 152 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm (the matter of a in camera sitting)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215728.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
the Standing Orders of the Sejm
committee of the Sejm
Opis:
The Standing Orders of the Sejm imposes a duty on a committee chair, upon a motion, to convene a committee sitting in order to consider a case described in the motion. The sitting should be held within 30 days after the submission of the motion In case the subject of the sitting convened pursuant to Article 152 para. 2 is a discreet issue, it shall be held in camera. The committee chair should undertake actions to organise a sitting in such circumstances.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 3(55); 68-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia art. 152 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu – powiadomienie członków komisji o posiedzeniu komisji
Interpretation of Article 152 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – notification to committee members about a committee sitting
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215773.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
committee of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Notification to committee members about a committee sitting (date and agenda) should take place at least three days before the sitting, unless the meeting was convened as a result of decisions taken at the sitting of the Sejm. The discussed rule allows each member of the committee to plan a calendar of activities taking into account all individual responsibilities. The author emphasizes that with Article 152 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm causes a few interpretation concerns, what indicates a need of its amendment.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 50-55
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Around the Issue of Convening Meetings of the Sejm
Wokół problematyki zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu
Autorzy:
Pastuszko, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/940697.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
convening meetings of the Sejm Marshal of the Sejm
the Sejm
zwoływanie posiedzeń Sejmu Marszałek Sejmu
Sejm
Opis:
This article provides an analysis of selected problems regarding the mechanism for convening sessions of the Sejm by its Marshal. The author criticizes the adopted legal solutions, first of all paying attention to the excessive strengthening of the role of the chair- man of the first chamber of parliament in this respect. In his opinion, doubts must be raised by the fact that under the regulations, the right to convene meetings of the Sejm has got only the Marshal, whereas such entities such like parliamentary factions, as well as the President and the government, are formally deprived of it. In addition, he also shows the dilemmas that may arise in the course of applying those provisions in systemic practice. M. in here, he indicates the problem of setting dates of a sitting of the Sejm, inviting guests and the situation when a sitting cannot be convened for objective reasons.
Niniejszy artykuł zawiera analizę wybranych zagadnień związanych z problematyką zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu przez jego Marszałka. Autor krytykuje w nim przyjęte rozwiązania prawne, zwracając uwagę przede wszystkim na nadmierne wzmocnienie w tym zakresie roli przewodniczącego pierwszej izby parlamentu. Jego zdaniem wątpliwości musi budzić fakt, że na gruncie postanowień regulaminowych prawo do skutecznego zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu ma jedynie Marszałek, a nie dysponują nim podmioty takie jak frakcje parlamentarne, a także Prezydent i rząd. Obok tego wskazuje on również na dylematy jakie mogą się pojawić w toku stosowania rzeczonych przepisów w praktyce ustrojowej. Sygnalizuje on m. in. tutaj problem ustalania terminu posiedzenia Sejmu, zapraszania gości oraz sytuacji, gdy posiedzenie nie może zostać zwołane z przyczyn obiektywnych.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2019, 5 (51); 83-95
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 175 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 175 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the specific questions
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6583387.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm
Deputy
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion concerns the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to expel a Deputy from a sitting, taken pursuant to Article. 175 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, such decision is not final, as the Presidium of the Sejm may quash it, having considered an appeal submitted by the Deputy and – on the other hand – is immediately applicable, because the expelled Deputy is obliged to leave the Chamber and abstain from participating in further deliberations until his/her appeal is considered (or until the end of the session of the Sejm, if the Deputy has not submitted an appeal). Therefore, the expelled member does not have the right to participate in voting. Preventing the Deputy expelled from the sitting from “entering the Chamber with the purpose of voting” is necessary in order to respect Article 176 para. 6 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 206-210
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 184 ust. 3 pkt 9 regulaminu Sejmu
A legal opinion on the interpretation of Article. 184 paragraph. 3 point 9 of the Standing Orders
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6567755.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
voting
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Points of order may be raised only in respect of “technical and organizational” matters being the subject of the orders of the day or the proceedings in a sitting. A exclusive subject of a point of order concerning altering the procedure for voting is to choose one of the methods of the vote, as provided for in Article 188 paras. 2 and 3 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 3(47); 179-183
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena formalna poprawki do protokołu z 1. posiedzenia Sejmu RP
The correctness of the formal amendment to the protocol of the 1st sitting of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215922.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
protocol
sitting of the Sejm
standing orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The subject of the amendment was modification of the content of the protocol. The essence of the amendment is to include in the protocol an information on the remark sent to the Marshal of the Sejm by the Deputy Chief of the Chancellery of the Sejm regarding the resumption of voting. In the author’s opinion, the amendment falls within the general framework of the amendment to the protocol set out in the Standing Orders of the Sejm and should be considered by the Sejm in the manner provided for in those provisions.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 76-83
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko
Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223415.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
Deputy
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 75-82
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych uwarunkowań transmisji internetowych z posiedzeń Sejmu, komisji i podkomisji sejmowych
Legal opinion on normative preconditions of Internet broadcasts from the sittings of the Sejm, Sejm committees and subcommittees
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223427.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
public information
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Provision of information about the activities of the Chamber through the Information System of the Sejm is the primary making accessible public information by the Sejm. The express legal basis is given in Article. 202a of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. This provision is, however, brief – and does not specify what information about the operation of the Sejm will be made available through the System and who is responsible for the published materials and their selection. Shaping the mechanism for making accessible public information by the Chancellery of the Sejm, the Sejm assumed that the website only part of the information specified in the Constitution and the Act as public information, will be published. The scope of the information available is determined by the Chancellery of the Sejm. The Standing Orders of the Sejm, however, do not contain any provision forming the basis for recording the sittings of Sejm committees and sub-committees, which would also provide the basis for placing the recordings in the Information System of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 203-212
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia art. 23 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – odwołanie od uchwały Prezydium Sejmu o obniżeniu uposażenia lub diety parlamentarnej
Interpretation of Article 23 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – an appeal against a resolution of the Presidium of the Sejm on decreasing the salary of a Deputy or parliamentary per diem allowance
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215771.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Deputy
Presidium of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Analysis of the matter of decisions that may be taken by the Presidium of the Sejm, considering an application for reconsideration of the case. In the author’s opinion, the scope of possible decisions of the Presidium of the Sejm, made on the basis of the analyzed provision, includes: sustaining the original resolution, repealing it, as well as changing the amount of deprivation of Deputy’s benefits made in the original resolution (in favour of the appealing Deputy).
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 63-67
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dopuszczalność dokonania przez Marszałka Sejmu ponownej oceny formalnej petycji w sytuacji, gdy wicemarszałek Sejmu upoważniony do wykonywania zadań Marszałka związanych z petycjami odmówił przekazania jej do rozpatrzenia
Admissibility of conducting by the Marshal of the Sejm a formal re‑assessment of a petition in a situation when the Vice-Marshal of the Sejm authorized to perform the tasks of the Marshal related to petitions refused to submit it for consideration
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2193753.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
Marshal of the Sejm
Vice-Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The Vice-Marshal of the Sejm, who has been authorized by the Marshal of the Sejm to take action in matters related to petitions, does not exercise the competence to assess petitions on his own, but does so on behalf of the Marshal. This action should therefore be assessed, as if it were performed personally by the Marshal of the Sejm. The provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm do not provide for the possibility of re-assessment of petitions. Consequently, the petitioner’s request to re-examine the petition in order to possibly amend the decision to leave it unexamined cannot be satisfied.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 1(73); 75-80
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zasady prowadzenia transmisji z posiedzeń Komisji Regulaminowej, Spraw Poselskich i Immunitetowych w Systemie Informacyjnym Sejmu
Rules regarding broadcasting the sittings of the Rules, Deputies’ Affairs and Immunity Committee in the Sejm Information System
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/23352301.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
committee of the Sejm
broadcasting
Opis:
The author notes the existence of a legal loophole in the Standing Orders of the Sejm with regard to the issue of consent for broadcasting committee sittings in the Sejm Information System. The systemic inconsistency between the Standing Orders of the Sejm, the Committee’s Rules of Procedure and the rules set forth in the resolution of the Presidium of the Sejm, on the basis of which broadcasts of committee proceedings are included in the Sejm Information System, makes it fundamentally difficult to resolve the doubts in this regard. By way of interpretation per analogiam, the author assumes that since the chairperson of a committee decides on the presence of media representatives at a committee meeting, it is also up to this body to decide on the broadcasting in the Sejm Information System.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2023, 2(78); 220-230
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evolution of the constitutional and legal position of the Marshal of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland
Ewolucja prawnoustrojowej pozycji Marszałka Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Autorzy:
Koksanowicz, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/942141.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
the Sejm
the internal bodies of the Sejm heading the works of the Sejm
the Parliament
Marszałek Sejmu
Sejm
organy wewnętrzne Sejmu kierowanie pracami Sejmu
parlament
Opis:
The subject of this article is to present the evolution of the constitutional and legal position of the Marshal of the Sejm, which covers the time from regaining independence by Poland to 1997 when the current constitution came into force. Assuming that both the scope of the competences connected with the operating of the Sejm and the powers beyond that area decide on the political position of the Marshal, the constitutional and regulatory solutions concerning that office were analysed. The result of those analyses proves that the position of the chairman of the Polish Sejm changed significantly over the analysed time. The changing political trends were the most important factor determining the constitutional and legal position of the Marshal of the Sejm. In the normative perspective they were reflected in the constitutional acts which were binding successively in Poland. The Marshal has always had the status of the constitutional body; however, this fact has not always determined his strong position in the Sejm.
Przedmiotem artykułu jest ukazanie ewolucji prawnoustrojowej pozycji Marszałka Sejmu, obejmującej okres od odzyskania przez Polskę niepodległości do czasu wejścia w życie obowiązującej obecnie konstytucji z 1997 r. Przyjmując założenie, że o pozycji ustrojowej Marszałka decyduje zarówno zakres jego kompetencji związanych z funkcjonowaniem Sejmu, jak również jego uprawnienia wychodzące poza ten obszar, analizie poddane zostały rozwiązania konstytucyjne i regulaminowe odnoszące się do tego urzędu. Wynik tych analiz wskazuje, że prawnoustrojowa pozycja przewodniczącego polskiego Sejmu, na przestrzeni analizowanego okresu, ulegała istotnym zmianom. Najważniejszym czynnikiem determinującym prawnoustrojowy status Marszałka Sejmu były zmieniające się trendy ustrojowe, które w płaszczyźnie normatywnej, znajdowały odzwierciedlenie w kolejno obowiązujących w Polsce aktach konstytucyjnych. Marszałek zawsze posiadał status organu konstytucyjnego, jednak ten fakt nie zawsze determinował jego silną pozycję w Sejmie.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2018, 6 (46); 105-115
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tryb rozpatrywania przedłożonego przez Radę Języka Polskiego „Sprawozdania o stanie ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017”
Procedure for considering the “Report on the state of protection of the Polish language in 2016–2017” submitted by the Polish Language Council
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215979.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Polish language
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The report, submitted by the Council for the Polish Language, entitled “Language of political information”, contains an analysis of the problem that is narrow in scope. In the light of the current parliamentary practice, the narrow scope of the Council’s reports is typical and this has not been questioned in the course of parliamentary work. The decision of the Culture and Media Committee, resulting in a refusal to consider the document in question, is an expression of negation of the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to recognize this document as a report. Formally, the committee proceedings on the report had not been completed. The Committee should return to examining this document and complete its work, formulating an appropriate opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 69-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie rozpatrzenia przez komisję dwóch wniosków o przeprowadzenie kontroli w trybie art. 161 ust. 1 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the consideration by a committee of two motions to carry out a control pursuant to Article 161 para. 1 of Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215730.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
committee of the Sejm
scrutiny
national defence
Opis:
The subject of the opinion is the admissibility of consideration by a committee of motions to carry out a control in connection with the lack of general principles of carrying it out set out in the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Motions to carry out the control submitted to the National Defence Committee stay within the scope of the subject matter of activities of the committee. The author claims that one of the motions rises some concerns of a legal nature. The subject of the request was defined in a problem way, whereas committee’s control relates to enforcement and executing statutes and Sejm resolutions, what leads to a conclusion that the scope of the control should be related to a given act or resolution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 3(55); 51-56
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 184 regulaminu Sejmu w zakresie zasad dokonywania przez posłów sprostowania
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 184 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm with regard to the principles of the Deputies rectification
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216677.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Deputy
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
rectification
Opis:
Article 184 para. 1 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm obligates the Marshal of the Sejm to give the floor regardless of the orders of the day for the sitting or in respect of the debate to claim rectification. Only the Deputies to the Sejm are entitled to make rectifications. Rectifications can only refer to “statements that has been misunderstood or imprecisely quoted,” and notice of intention to use the remedy of rectification under this procedure is a direct response to the statement of another Deputy or any other participant in the sitting of the Sejm. For assessing the admissibility of rectification request it does not matter whether the author of the rectified statements directly mentioned the specific individuals whose statements he/she quotes giving their names. Presented rectification is not subject to debate or vote. A rectification should take the form of indicative sentence. In a situation where the Deputy’s statement does not satisfy the requirements relating to rectification, the Marshal of the Sejm has the right, and even the obligation, to reproach the Deputy, and to discontinue his/her speech.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 58-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie zgody na wykorzystanie logo Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Legal opinion on the consent to use the logo of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland
Autorzy:
Galińska-Rączy, Irena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215688.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
copyright law
Sejm of the Republic of Poland
trademark
Chancellery of the Sejm
committees of the Sejm
Opis:
The subject of the opinion is the answer to the question whether the consent of the Presidium of the Sejm, the Chancellery of the Sejm or a committee of the Sejm is required to use the logo of the Sejm. It flows from the Rules and Regulations of Chancellery of the Sejm and a contract concerning the transfer of copyright, the right to use the logo depends on the nature of an event. In case the event is organised by an external body, a consent of the Chancellery of the Sejm is necessary. Such consent is not required when the logo is to be used in an undertaking organised by a committee of the Sejm. The consent is granted by the Chief of the Chancellery of the Sejm or a person authorised by him.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 3(55); 187-193
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zgłoszenia wniosku o odwołanie członka prezydium komisji przez posła niebędącego członkiem komisji
Legal opinion on the admissibility of making a motion to recall a member of a committee presidium by a Deputy who is not a member of the committee
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11868274.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Deputy to the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion addresses the question of autonomy of a Sejm committee in the situation when a Deputy who is not its member – exercising his/her right to take part in a committee meeting and making motions – puts a motion to recall a member of the presidium (bureau) of that committee. The author gives her opinion, based on her own interpretation of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, that such motion should be considered admissible, since there is no legal basis that would make that motion illegitimate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 181-184
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geneza i skutki dekonstytucjonalizacji Prezydium Sejmu - próba oceny
Autorzy:
Koksanowicz, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1041675.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Fundacja Niepodległości
Tematy:
sejm
prezydium sejmu
marszałek sejmu
organy kierownicze sejmu
presidium of the sejm
marshal of the sejm
governing bodies of the sejm
Opis:
The entry into force of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 meant the Presidium of the Sejm losing its status of a constitutional body. The justification for adopting such a solution was the conviction of the Constitution creators that there is no need to include in it the contents which lie within the autonomy of the Parliament and which may be regulated in the rules and regulations of the Sejm. However, the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium of the Sejm gave rise to some doubts when it comes to the interpretation of the constitutional provisions regulating the status of the Marshal of the Sejm. It also fundamentally influenced the process of directing the work of the Sejm. Therefore, it was a significant change in relation to the previous legal status; however, the importance of the said change (in my opinion) was not fully noticed. One of the effects of the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium was a change in the model of directing the work of the Sejm. A single-person model was introduced in place of the previous collegial manner of decision-making, and as a result the Marshal of the Sejm became the main governing body of the Chamber. After the lapse of over twenty years of adopting such solutions the author is inclined to make an attempt of the assessment of their functioning in the Polish political realities.
Źródło:
Prawo i Polityka; 2018, 8; 37-45
2080-5799
Pojawia się w:
Prawo i Polityka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat konsekwencji utraty mandatu przez posła popierającego wniosek o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji (art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu)
Legal opinion on the consequences of the loss of the mandate by a Deputy who has supported the motion to convene the sitting (Article 152, para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216101.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Opis:
The author is of the opinion that the loss of the mandate by a Deputy, who has supported the motion to convene a sitting of the committee in accordance with Article 152 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, does not affect the effectiveness of the motion, even if it will result in the number of members supporting the motion (putting their signatures thereupon) being less than 1/3 of the committee membership. An obligation to establish the date and time of the sitting of the committee arises at the time of submission of the properly formulated motion, and should be satisfied immediately. It cannot be accepted that the tardiness in the implementation of the obligation, which arose at the time of submission of the motion, could have an impact on its binding efficiency.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 1(49); 59-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Digital quorum, digital deliberations and digital voting (ECPRD Request No. 5056)
Cyfrowe kworum, cyfrowe obrady i cyfrowe głosowanie (wniosek ECPRD nr 5056)
Autorzy:
Branna, Justyna
Kupis, Daniela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2194725.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm
COVID
voting
sitting of the Sejm
Opis:
The authors present amendments to the acts regulating the functioning of the Polish Sejm, adopted in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. The introduced changes included, among other things, new regulations concerning the organisation of the Sejm’s plenary sittings. The text analyses in particular the issue of conducting sittings and voting with the use of means of remote communication.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 3(75); 173-178
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie art. 30 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu RP
Opinion on Article 30 (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12232901.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine the possibility of referring the recommendation for election or appointment by the Sejm of individual persons to particular State offices specified in Articles 26, 27–29 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, or dismissal therefrom, to more than one Sejm committee for their opinion thereto. In the author’s view, a flexible interpretation of Article 30 (5) is possible, as it is implied by the wording of that article which does not state that the recommendation is to be referred to “one” committee, so it does not preclude referring it to a greater number of committees.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 70-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
INSTYTUCJA MARSZAŁKA SENIORA SEJMU W POLSKIM PORZĄDKU PRAWNYM
THE INSTITUTION OF THE SENIOR MARSHAL OF THE SEJM IN THE POLISH LEGAL ORDER
Autorzy:
MAROŃ, GRZEGORZ
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/513066.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Senior Marshal of the Sejm
Sejm of the Republic of Poland
oath of office
first sitting of the Sejm
Opis:
The Senior Marshal is an honorary and ephemeral post in the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. The given institution dates back to 1919 and the Legislative Sejm in the Sec-ond Polish Republic. The Senior Marshal is appointed by the President from amongst the elder Deputies. There are three main competences of the Senior Marshal. He opens the first sitting of a newly elected Sejm, which is accompanied by the striking of the Mar-shal’s mace three times against the floor. Next he conducts the procedure of taking the oath of office of the Deputies. Finally he conducts the election of the Marshal of the Sejm. The last two functions the Senior Marshal performs with assistance of temporary secretaries appointed by him from amongst the youngest Deputies in such number as may be necessary to discharge such functions. The moment of taking the chair during the first sitting by newly elected Marshal of the Sejm terminates the parliamentary activity of the Senior Marshal in a given term of office of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Polityka i Społeczeństwo; 2014, 12, 2; 5-24 (20)
1732-9639
Pojawia się w:
Polityka i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia pojęcia „ustawa podatkowa” (art. 37 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu)
Interpretation of the term “tax act” (Article 37 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2195375.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
tax
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The term “tax act” is used in the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the substantive sense and refers to a public levy having the features of a tax, i.e. a pecuniary, compulsory, non-returnable and nonequivalent payment imposed by law and constituting budgetary revenue of the State Treasury or local government units of general purpose. The author points out that it is irrelevant for the qualification of a bill as a “tax bill” what name the bill uses to denote a public levy, if it bears the features of a tax. The title of a tax bill also refers to the bill that repeals or modifies the scope of a tax obligation or its elements. The author concludes that any tax act amendment bill meets the characteristics of the term “tax act”, and the scope of the term “tax act” does not include public tributes other than taxes.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 2(70); 85-98
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat trybu rozstrzygania przez Sejm o tajności obrad (art. 172 ust. 3 regulaminu Sejmu)
Legal opinion on the procedure for deciding by the Sejm on secrecy of debate (Article 172 paragraph. 3 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542813.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
secrecy of debate in the Sejm
Opis:
The author indicates what legislation should be taken into account under the security procedure in the event that the subject of secret debate of the Sejm comprises classified information within its statutory meaning. He also points out that these provisions do not apply in a phase in which the Sejm – without the participation of the public and the media – decides whether the debate is to be held in camera. The procedure for exclusion of open nature of debate is specified in Article 172 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm which states that a motion in this respect may be submitted by the Presidium of the Sejm or at least 30 Deputies. The resolution whether to hold a sitting in camera is taken “without admittance to the public and the representatives of the press, radio and television, after hearing the reasons for the request – without debate”. The author concludes that the way of ensuring security (in organizational and technical terms) of resolving by the Sejm secrecy of debate is limited to the exclusion of the public and representatives of the media and does not require the application of measures identical to those associated with the procedure for secrecy of debate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 84-90
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie pojęcia „forma pisemna” w odniesieniu do przepisów zawartych w regulaminie Sejmu
Legal opinion on the meaning of the term “in writing” in relation to the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543114.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
In accordance with Article 193 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, the answer to an interpellation is to be given in writing. The term in question is, in the parliamentary practice, understood explicitly. It considers it as a “paper form” of a document, which is also supported by established practice of the Sejm in this respect.. Even if the Standing Orders do not contain a legal definition of the term “in writing”, the classification allowing – in the analyzed case – for the use of an electronic version would be of a “projective” nature and differ from the current understanding of the rules of the Sejm. The proposal for a relevant amendment of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, explicitly guaranteeing accessibility of an electronic document, is justifiable.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 48-52
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Proceduralne aspekty udziału Sejmu w stanowieniu prawa UE: zakres opiniodawczej działalności sejmowej Komisji do Spraw Unii Europejskiej
Procedural aspects of the Sejm’s participation in making of the EU law: the scope of the consultative activity of the Sejm’s European Union Affairs Committee
Autorzy:
Cieślik, Ziemowit
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206975.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Committee of the Sejm
Law
Sejm
European Union
Opis:
The Sejm’s participation in drafting of the EU law is mainly expressed indirectly, i.e. through the implementation of EU law on a national level. The main role in the process is played by a specialized body of the Sejm: the European Union Affairs Committee. The subject of activity of this Committee is analysing documents drafted by EU institutions. These include, in particular, draft EU legislative acts to be adopted, according to direct treaty basis, directly by the Council and the European Parliament. The Committee uses its competences by means of a legal and factual analysis of documents, both of EU and national origin, related to EU legislation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 4(64); 79-91
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena petycji w sprawie zmiany regulaminu Sejmu RP w zakresie obowiązku prowadzenia konsultacji publicznych w przypadku rządowych projektów ustaw
Assessment of a petition regarding amendments to the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerning the obligation to conduct public consultations in the case of government bills
Autorzy:
Wasil-Rusecka, Wioleta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216001.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
consultations
Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
In the author’s opinion, the petition stands as a part of the postulates regarding legal modifications in the field of public consultations. The author emphasizes that changes in the governmental model of conducting public consultations would remove the need to amend the Standing Orders of the Sejm in this respect.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 3(67); 83-92
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat skutków prawnych głosowania prowadzącego do odrzucenia projektu uchwały komisji sejmowej
Legal opinion on the legal consequences of a vote resulting in the rejection of a committee’s draft resolution
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543265.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
bills
Opis:
The opinion was drawn up in the context of the work of Sejm committees on the Concept for Town and Country Planning 2030 (Paper No. 169). The author finds the occurrence of procedural inconsistency in the conduct of the committee’s procedures and the ineffectiveness of the election of a Deputy‑Rapporteur. She claims that the formal requirements provided in Article 43 (2) of the Standing Orders for the adoption by the committee of a report on a bill (draft resolution) should also be applied to other committee resolutions relating to reports, information or other documents supposed to be discussed by the Sejm, as well as committee desiderata and opinions. The lack of support from the majority of Deputies participating in the vote does not necessarily mean support for the motion to the contrary. Therefore, in the author’s view, the committees have not finished their work on the above‑mentioned draft resolution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 113-120
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności przeprowadzenia wysłuchania publicznego w odniesieniu do części projektu ustawy budżetowej
Legal opinion concerning the admissibility of holding a public hearing with re‑ gard to a part of a budgetary bill
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16539489.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
standing orders of the Sejm
public hearing
State budget
committees of the Sejm
bill
legislative process
Opis:
Committees of the Sejm which, according to Article 106 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, consider respective parts of a budgetary bill, are not entitled to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing. In the course of work on the budgetary bill only the Public Finances Committee may be classified as “the committee to which the bill has been referred for consideration”, i.e. as an entity which, according to Article 70a para. 2 of the Standing Orders, possesses an exclusive right to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing (in the phase of work specified in Article 70a para. 4 of the Standing Orders.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 1(33); 76-78
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 157 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543270.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Sejm oversight
Opis:
The opinion deals with the exercise of parliamentary oversight functions by Sejm committees. It provides an analysis of whether the representatives of State administration might be held responsible for failure to discharge their duties resulting from Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, Sejm committees have at their disposal the means to enforce only political responsibility. Moreover, as concerns suspension of work on a bill in the event of breach of the obligations specified in Article 157 by the representatives of public administration, the author believes that the legitimacy of such action cannot be assessed in abstracto. The author does not rule out that, depending on circumstances and seriousness of the infringements, suspension of work on a bill may be justified.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 121-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat potrzeby przeprowadzania na posiedzeniu Sejmu głosowania w sprawie odwołania ze stanowiska członka Prezydium Sejmu, w wypadku złożenia przez tę osobę rezygnacji z zajmowanego stanowiska
Legal opinion on whether there is need to take a vote, during the sitting of the Sejm, to remove from office of the member of the Presidium of the Sejm in the event of his/her resignation
Autorzy:
Mordwiłko, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855196.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Speaker of parliament
removal from office
Presidium of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion analyses the possibility of removal from office of the Marshal (Speaker) and Vice-Marshals (Deputy Speakers) of the Sejm. In the author’s view, the provision contained in the amendment to the Standing Orders (2008) making possible such a remove is not compatible with Article 110 (1) of the Constitution, which does not relate to appointment of a Marshal or Vice-marshals, but rather deals with the “election” of a Marshal (which would imply his/her irremovability during the term of parliament). He also points to the controversies relating to the possibility of an appropriate application of the provision on resignation from the function of Marshal when the Vice-Marshal has been removed from office. Such an interpretation seems to be abuse of law, since an appropriate application of the provisions in similar situations cannot be assumed, but should rather be expressly formulated in a legal provision. From an analysis of Article 10a (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm it follows that the future regulation should be made more specific, particularly by the inclusion of the case of death and the conditions of resignation of the Vice-Marshal.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 47-51
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wybrane zagadnienia z zakresu lobbingu
Selected problems of lobbying
Autorzy:
Waszczuk-Napiórkowska, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211877.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
committee of the Sejm
lobbying
petition
Opis:
In response to questions from the managing team of the Chancellery of the Sejm’s he author of the opinion claims that an entity which carries out professional lobbying activities and whose representatives are lobbyists registered in the Sejm, has a right to submit petition addressed to the Sejm concerning amendment of an act connected with their actions as the entity who carries out professional lobbying activities. A person who carries out professional lobbying activities and a person who is entitled to represent the entity which carries out such activities may attend sittings of the Committee on Petitions’ sitting upon an invitation of the committee’s presidium’s or a chairperson.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 2(58); 60-64
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wątpliwości interpretacyjnych odnoszących się do art. 193 ust. 1 i 2 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on interpretative doubts on Article 193 paras. 1 and 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543113.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellations
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion provides an assessment of the legal acceptability of limiting the form of submission of interpellation and Deputies’ questions to the format an electronic document. The analysis of Article 193 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm currently precludes such a possibility, as both interpellations and Deputies’ Questions must meet the formal requirements that include, inter alia, the need to be in writing. The Standing Orders of the Sejm do not contain a legal definition of the phrase “in writing”. From literal interpretation it follows that it is a paper document, signed in person by its author. The inability to accept that the meaning of the written form can also include the form of electronic document is proved by an absolute requirement to append two copies to an answer to a Deputies’ question. The imposition of an obligation for interpellations and Deputies’ question to be submitted in the form of an electronic document therefore requires amendment of Article 193 (1) and (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 43-47
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni pojęcia „forma pisemna” występującego w przepisach regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of the term “in writing” appearing in the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szydło, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543116.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The requirement to perform a particular act “in writing”, as provided for in the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should be understood as an obligation to fix on paper the content of a particular act, using in this purpose graphic symbols, as required by the so-called written language, and such a paper document should be signed in person. The requirement to perform a particular act “in writing” cannot be satisfied by making it in an electronic form. Electronic form is a form of making certain acts (separate and autonomous from a written one) which the Standing Orders of the Sejm provides for only in special situations. A written response to a Deputy’s interpellation must therefore be filed in paper, hand-signed by the person giving response to the interpellation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 53-73
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zaproszenia posła na rozmowy kwalifikacyjne
Legal opinion on the admissibility of invitation of a Deputy to the Sejm to recruitment interview
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11866700.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
classified information |
Deputy to the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion deals with the participation of a Deputy to the Sejm in a recruitment interview in the capacity of observer. The author address the issue in the context of an informal activity of a Deputy and claims that his/her attendance during a recruitment interview could only be admissible with consent of those participating in the interview. She also examines the issue of exclusion of public nature of particular information during such interview, stating that an attendance of a Deputy is inadmissible when such information is protected by secrecy under the provisions resulting from statutes other than the Act on the Protection of Classified Information.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 177-180
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Postępowanie z projektami kodeksów jako przykład szczególnego trybu ustawodawczego.
Procedures of codes projects as an example of a particular legislative mode.
Autorzy:
Borski, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/443675.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Humanitas
Tematy:
regulamin Sejmu
tryb ustawodawczy
kodeks
kodyfikacja
Sejm
Komisja Nadzwyczajna
Rules of the Sejm
the legislative mode
code
codification
the Sejm
the Special Committee
Opis:
W grudniu 1995 roku wprowadzono w regulaminie Sejmu szczególny porządek postępowania z projektami kodeksów. Podkreślenia wymaga przy tym fakt, że konstytucja nie przewiduje takiego trybu. Odnosi się on do projektów nowych kodeksów, a także do projektów zmian kodeksów oraz projektów przepisów wprowadzających kodeksy i ich zmian. Chodzi o zapewnienie ochrony spójności uregulowań kodeksowych i wyeliminowanie możliwości przypadkowej nowelizacji kodeksu przy uchwalaniu ustaw szczególnych. Autor dokonuje analizy obowiązujących regulacji w tym zakresie, zwracając szczególną uwagę na główny cel tego szczególnego trybu ustawodawczego, jakim jest konieczność wyraźnie wolniejszego i bardziej kompleksowego podejścia do takich prac ustawodawczych.
In December 1995, order of conduct of projects of codes was introduced to the rules of the Sejm. It should be stressed, that the Constitution does not provide for such a mode. It refers to the design of new codes and to drafting amendments to codes and regulations implementing the codes and their changes. It is about ensuring the protection of statutory regulations and eliminating the possibility of accidental amendments to the Code when adopting specific laws. The author analyzes the existing regulations in this area, paying particular attention to the main objective of this particular legislative mode, which is the need of a clearly slower and more comprehensive approach to such legislative work.
Źródło:
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa; 2013, 13; 17-25
1644-9126
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia na temat procedury „czerwonej kartki” oraz udziału Sejmu we współpracy parlamentów narodowych państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej w ramach tej procedury
Opinion on the procedure for “red card” and on the participation by the Sejm in the cooperation of the national parliaments of EU Member States under this procedure
Autorzy:
Fryźlewicz, Marcin
Olejniczak, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216615.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
European Parliament
subsidiarity
Standing Orders of the Sejm
the Sejm
international agreement
European Union
international cooperation
Opis:
The purpose of this opinion is to explain the legal basis of a “red card” procedure and the legal basis for the cooperation between the national parliaments of EU Member States, including the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, in relation to this procedure. The “red card” procedure involves scrutiny of the compatibility of EU draft legislative acts with the principle of subsidiarity and is operatively associated with the treatybased mechanism for submission by national parliaments of reasoned opinions on the non-compliance of draft legislation with the principle of subsidiarity. The possible concerted action of national parliaments on the “red card” procedure will have the same scope as that applied for “yellow card” and “orange card” procedures. According to the authors, decisions to be taken under “red card” procedure are not inconsistent with the Treaties, do not interfere with the procedures of “yellow card” and “orange card” and would not require changes to the Standing Orders of the Sejm. The legal basis (in both EU law and national law) for cooperation between national parliaments will be the same as the legal basis for their cooperation in the process of submitting reasoned opinions on the non- compliance of EU draft legislative acts with the principle of subsidiarity.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 2(50); 116-120
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości ewentualnego podjęcia przez Prezydium Sejmu uchwały wykładniczej dotyczącej ograniczania liczby interpelacji i zapytań poselskich w tej samej „sprawie”
Legal opinion on possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12236964.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation |
Deputy’s question
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Presidium of the Sejm
parliamentary oversight
Deputy
Opis:
Examining the possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”, the author of the opinion concludes that any restrictions in this regard should be formulated with caution. The rights of Deputies to submit interpellations cannot be only illusory. He also notes that the Standing Orders of the Sejm have already introduced a mechanism for control by the Presidium of the Sejm over interpellations and Deputy’s questions. In order to counter the practice of submitting excessive number of interpellations of similar content to the same body, the author examines the possibility of combining by the Presidium of the Sejm similar interpellations into one interpellation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 73-79
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontynuowanie przez Komisję do Spraw Petycji postępowań w sprawie petycji, które zostały wszczęte w poprzedniej kadencji
The continuation of proceedings by the Committee on Petitions regarding petitions that were submitted in the course of a previous term
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
discontinuation
Opis:
In the opinion of the author, the principle of discontinunity in relation to “petition proceedings” does not apply to acts carried out as part of the work of the Committee on Petitions. This should also apply to those activities of the Commission that follow the choice of how to handle the petition, e.g. to prepare projects or desiderates as part of dealing with a given petition. Petitions that were considered in the previous term of office should be reconsidered, while the Commission in the current term is not bound by the arrangements made in the previous term of the Sejm. It is not permissible to renew the legislative initiative in the event of the draft submitted by the Committee on Petitions of the previous term was discontinued at the end of the term.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 1(65); 57-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia art. 47 ust. 2 pkt 1 regulaminu Sejmu – tryb rozpatrywania poprawek w komisjach
Interpretation of the Article 47 para. 2 subpara. 1 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the procedure for considering amendments in committees
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215774.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
committee of the Sejm
amendment
legislative procedure
Opis:
The analysis concerns the issue of whether a committee considering, based on the indicated provision, amendments submitted during the second reading, should vote on their acceptance or rejection separately for each amendment, or if it is possible, after consideration of the amendment, to automatically (without separate vote) draw a recommendation concerning other amendments, in case it is a logical consequence of acceptance or rejection of the former amendment. The author assessed that there are no obstacles to apply, at this stage of legislative work, per analogiam the institution of the third-reading voting applied in the first instance to the “most far-reaching amendments”, i.e. those whose adoption or rejection determines decision concerning other amendments.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 45-49
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sposób obliczania terminu pierwszego posiedzenia Sejmu
Method of calculating the date of the first sitting of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206972.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
term of office
constitution
sitting of the Sejm
Sejm
Opis:
The author presents three different, legally permissible positions concerning the date of the first sitting of the Sejm. The first of them is based on a strict interpretation of the four-year term of office of the Sejm. The second allows it to be extended because of certain constitutional provisions. The third points out, that a four-year term of office does not imply a rigid definition of the starting and ending dates of powers of the Sejm of a current term. In the author’s opinion, tordering of the elections to the Sejm and Senate to be held on 13th October 2019 implies the application of the last concept.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 4(64); 63-68
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wsparcie posłów przez służbę prawną Kancelarii Sejmu w zakresie przygotowywania technicznego projektów ustaw i poprawek do projektów ustaw
Supporting Deputies by the legal service of the Chancellery of the Sejm in the field of technical preparation of bills and amendments
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2207008.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Chancellery of the Sejm
Deputy
legislative process
Opis:
The legal solutions in force indicate that the scope of substantive support provided by the Chancellery of the Sejm does not cover legislative activities, i.e. drafting bills and amendments to bills on behalf of Deputies. However, a Deputy may indirectly benefit from the support of the legal service of the Chancellery of the Sejm by commissioning the Bureau of Research to prepare an expert opinion, the subject of which would correspond to the planned legislative activities.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 4(64); 203-207
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu w świetle wątpliwości przedstawionych przez przewodniczącego Komisji Ochrony Środowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Leśnictwa
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 152. para 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the light of the doubts expressed by the Chairman of the Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry Committee
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543060.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Poland;
committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
As determined by analysis, a committee sitting convened under Article 152. para. 2 at the request of a defined group of Deputies should concern matters falling within the scope of activities of a Sejm committee. In contrast, a supervisory measure established in Article 167 consists in inspecting and examining by committees of the activities of the entities specifically mentioned in that provision (enterprises, firms or government institutions; basic criterion for the designation of controlled entities is a form of property – the property of the Treasury). Moreover, there are no legal obstacles for the committee (or the committee’s presidium) convened in accordance with Article 152 para. 2 to decide on the visit of the committee members, to inspect the entity meeting the requirements specified in Article 167. The author stresses, however, that such a visit, or examination of activities, should take into account the aim expressed in Article 167, which is the assessment of the mode of action of specific entities managing the property belonging to the State Treasury.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 3(43); 73-78
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat podstaw prawnych umieszczania flagi Unii Europejskiej na terenie Sejmu
Legal opinion on the legal basis for displaying of the European Union flag in the precincts of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Czarny, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12292948.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
flag
European Union
Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
According to the author, in the Polish legal system there is no regulation concerning the flag protocol. Therefore, the rules of diplomatic protocol as well as heraldry and vexillology customs are applied which allow for flying, apart from the national flag, also other symbols of states or international organizations. The author claims that, due to lack of provisions governing competence to determine which authority is an appropriate body for adopting flag protocols for particular public administration buildings, this should be the power of the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm, who – according to the Standing Orders of the Sejm – ensures order and decorum within the precincts of the Chamber.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 252-260
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni niektórych przepisów ustawy o wykonywaniu inicjatywy ustawodawczej przez obywateli
Legal opinion on interpretation of certain provisions of the Act on Exercise of the Legislative Initiative by Citizens
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16539487.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
legislative initiative
bill
Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The Marshal of the Sejm is not allowed to verify, whether an explanatory statement to a bill submitted by a group of citizens meets requirements specified in Articles 34 paras. 2 and 3 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. Besides, demanding enclosure – to the notification of the establishment of the Committee – of statements on accession to the legislative initiative committee and of a statement on selection of committee’s agent, is not based on rules of the Act of 24th June 1999 on Exercise of the Legislative Initiative by Citizens. Therefore the current practice of demanding the enclosure of the above documents cannot be continued in future.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 1(33); 65-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosowanie przepisów Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego przez Sejm i jego organy
Application of provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure by the Sejm and its organs
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215772.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Code of Administrative Procedure
committee of the Sejm
Sejm
Opis:
The Sejm, as a body of legislative power, is not a public administration body within the meaning of the Code of Administrative Procedure. Thus there is no obligation to apply the provisions of this act. The Sejm committees, which are internal organs of the chamber, also have no obligation to do so. They cannot be a party to proceedings before an administrative court. The Code of Administrative Procedure provides for the possibility of referring a complaint to the Sejm or its internal body (committee), but there are no legal provisions regulating the procedure of examining complaints against state authorities other than executive organs.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 56-62
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szczegółowe rozpatrywanie projektu ustawy przez komisję (tryb modyfikacji tekstu rozpatrywanego projektu)
Detailed consideration of a bill by a committee (manner of modifying the text of the bill under consideration)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206396.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
parliamentary committee
bill
Opis:
In the author’s opinion, the following provisions (sections) of a bill project referred to committee should not become subjects of voting by the committee, but the committee should vote only on motions aimed at their modification (substantive and editorial amendments and motions for deletion of a provision). A different manner of work of the committee may lead to the deletion of a given provision, if the provision is not approved in voting, even in case of the lack of motion to delete it. The Sejm should decide upon legislative motions and legislative postulates included in the committee’s report on the bill, prepared in the form of a consolidated text.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 1(65); 64-69
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Podjęcie przez Marszałka Sejmu interwencji w ramach realizacji funkcji kontrolnych Sejmu
Intervention by the Marshal of the Sejm within the framework of the implementation of the control functions of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215810.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary oversight
Marshal of the Sejm
state prosecution
Opis:
In the light of the binding provisions of law, the General Prosecutor is included in the subject matter of the oversight function of the Sejm. The statutory request for information and explanations may been perceived as the main instrument of parliamentary oversight serving to obtain information on specific proceedings conducted by the state prosecution.. The Marshal of the Sejm may refer a matter to the Committee on Justice and Human Rights, since the subject matter of activity of this committee includes matters related to the activities of the state prosecution, in order to obtain relevant information and express an opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 55-60
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies