Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "the Constitution of the Third Republic" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Constitutional recognition of rights and freedoms in France in the late nineteenth century
    Reconnaissance constitutionnelle des droits et libertés en France à la fin du XVIIIème et XIXème siècles
    Autorzy:
    Bochkarev, Sergey
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684701.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    constitutionalism
    the Constitution of the Third Republic
    form of government
    political and legal views
    Opis:
    The article deals with the ideological and theoretical foundations of the French constitutionalism of the Third Republic. The author notes that the Constitution of the Third Republic was a result of the continuous struggle between the supporters of the republican form of government and monarchists in the National Assembly. A compromise, reached by legislators in 1875, led to the uniting of different approaches to the organization of French governmental power in the Constitution. The views of Duke V. de Broglie, E. Laboulaye and L.-A. Prévost-Paradol were reflected in the Constitutional Law of the Third Republic. As a consequence, there was an acceptance of the institutions and authorities of public law specific to a dual monarchy. However, those public and legal institutions turned out to be indifferent to the form of government, that, in its turn, determined the longevity of the main constitutional and legal institutions, established in the last quarter of the nineteenth century.
    Źródło:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2015, 5; 235-242
    2450-0976
    Pojawia się w:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The principle of separation and balance of powers in Polish constitutional law: A historical view
    Zasada separacji i równowagi władz w polskim prawie konstytucyjnym: spojrzenie historyczne
    Autorzy:
    Wiśniewski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38697120.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    separacja i równowaga władz
    Montesquieu
    Druga Republika Polska
    Konstytucja Trzeciego Maja
    separation and balance of powers
    Second Republic of Poland
    the Third of May Constitution
    Opis:
    W XVIII w. doktryna separacji władz została wprowadzona jako środek przeciw tyranii. Recepcja zasady separacji i równowagi władz dokonała się w Polsce bardzo szybko, tak jak jej sformułowanie. Stało się to wraz z uchwaleniem Konstytucji Trzeciego Maja. Druga Republika Polska miała dwie konstytucje, nie licząc tymczasowych aktów o randze konstytucji. Pierwsza, Konstytucja Marcowa, wprost odnosiła się do zasady separacji władz. Druga, Konstytucja Kwietniowa, była zaprzeczeniem poprzedniej. Ustrój polityczny PRL był niewątpliwie ustrojem totalitarnym. Trzecia Republika Polska powróciła do systemu opartego na separacji władz, zwłaszcza w okresie, kiedy odzyskała ona pełną suwerenność i szybko powróciła do budowania swego ustroju politycznego w oparciu o tę zasadę.
    In the 18th century, the doctrine of separation of powers was established as a remedy for tyranny. The reception of the principle of separation and balance of powers in Poland was very fast, relative to its formulation. This happened together with the establishment of the Third of May Constitution. The Second Republic of Poland had two constitutions, apart from provisional acts of constitutional rank. The first, March Constitution directly referred to the principle of separation of powers. The other, April Constitution was a contradiction of the former. The political system of the PRL was without any doubt a totalitarian one. The Third Republic of Poland returned to a system based on the separation of powers, especially in the period when it regained full sovereignty and it quickly returned to building its political system based on this very principle.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL; 2014-2015, 10-11, 1; 167-178
    1896-6365
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zasada podziału i równowagi władz w polskim prawie konstytucyjnym w ujęciu historycznym i w Konstytucji RP z 1997 r.
    The Principle of Separation and Balance of Powers in the Polish Constitutional Law. A Historical View and in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997
    Autorzy:
    Wiśniewski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38937397.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2009
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    podział i równowaga władz
    Monteskiusz
    Druga Rzeczpospolita
    Trzecia Rzeczpospolita
    Konstytucja 3 maja
    konstytucja
    separation and balance of powers
    Montesquieu
    Second Republic of Poland
    Third Republic of Poland
    the Third of May Constitution
    Constitution
    Opis:
    In the 18th century, the doctrine of separation of powers was established as a remedy for tyranny . It is Montesquieu who is commonly regarded as the founder of the classic doctrine of separation and balance of powers. Later, attempts to create more of less original models were also made. It should be noticed that the reception of the principle of separation and balance of powers in Poland was very fast, relative to its formulation. This happened together with the establishment of the Third of May Constitution. Unfortunately, that Constitution was quickly abolished and Poland disappeared from the map of Europe for 123 years. The revived state – the Second Republic of Poland – had two constitutions let alone provisional acts of constitutional rank. The first, March Constitution directly referred to the principle of separation of powers. The other, April Constitution was a contradiction of the former. The political system of the Second Republic of Poland in the years 1935-1939 was called authoritarian. The April Constitution directly speaks of a uniform authority of the state. PRL principally had one constitution (1952) – but we have to remember about its amendments of 1976. The political system of PRL was without any doubt a totalitarian one. The Third Republic of Poland returned to the system based on the separation of powers even before its own constitution was passed (1997). Hence, despite attempts to tear the Polish State off the principle of separation of powers, its perception in the society and attachment to it were so strong and permanent that Poland, especially in the periods when it regained full sovereignty, quickly returned to building its political system basing on this very principle. The constitution of 1997 states explicitly that the Polish state system is based on the division and balance of powers: legislative (exercised by the Sejm and Senate), executive (exercised by the President and the Council of Ministers) and judiciary (exercised by the courts and tribunals) (Article 10 Section 1 and 2.) The Constitutional Tribunal, in its ruling of 1994, stated that the separation of powers cannot be regarded as a separation in the case of the relationship between the legislative and executive powers. This is different for the relationship between the judiciary and other authorities (legislative and executive). Here the separation is obligatory . The concept of the essence of individual powers assumes that there exists a sort of competence core of legislative, executive and judiciary powers. The core cannot be entered by the other powers, because it would mean violating the principle of separation of powers. It is true that acts may transfer specific powers between the powers, but the intrusion into the field belonging to another power cannot be too deep, because such a legal normalization would violate the constitutional principle of the separation of powers. The principle of separation and balance of powers involves a system of checks and balances or a system of mutual restraint and balancing of powers. L. Garlicki writes that there are two basic models of the relationship between the legislative and the executive: the parliamentary one (parliamentary-cabinet) and the presidential one. The Constitution of Poland of 1997 preserved the parliamentary system of government in Poland. Art 10 Section 1 of the Constitution of Poland of 1997 provides for the mutual balance of relations between the legislative and executive powers, subsequent provisions of the constitution give a far stronger position to the parliament, and within it - to the Sejm. This corresponds to the Polish tradition. L. Garlicki talks of the specificity of the current Polish model.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL; 2009, 5, 1; 181-203
    1896-6365
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies