Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "systemy osadnicze" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Teorie układów osadniczych jako paradygmat neopozytywistyczny
Theories of settlement systems as a neopositivistic paradigm
Autorzy:
Jedrzejczyk, D.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2085647.pdf
Data publikacji:
1989
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych
Tematy:
systemy osadnicze
paradygmaty neopozytywistyczne
fizyka
Opis:
Theories of settlement systems interpreting the notion of a system in physical categories, derive from a very fertile current fo European philosophy, namely neopositivism (logical empiricism). They contain three fundamental postulates of neopositivistic learning; physicalism, formalism and conventionalism. The postulate of physicalism means that empiricial propositions can be considered as such only in the case when they describe intersubjectively ascertainble phenomena, that is objects and their states. The language that each science should use whould be the langauge of objects. Statements which cannot be fully translated into the language of objects are not worth treatment as statements of science. The second of the above mentioned postulates is the postulate of formalism which as a matter of fact is just another expression of the first postulate. It says that the language of mathematics is the basic language of all theories. In theoretical physics, to which the theory of settlement systems reduces, the first language that is being formed in the course of scientific explanation of phenomena is usually the language of mathematics - mathematical schema which makes it possible to foretell future states of the system. In physics notions occurring in general theorties must be declined as precisely as possible and this can be achieved only due to mathematical abstraction. Thus the process of transfer from empirical statement to formulation of general, basic theories of settlement systems requires abandoning of the natural language in favour of the language of mathematics. And finally the third postulate of the neopositivistic paradigm is contained in a principally metaphysical thesis which says that in reality there exist only objects and physical processes which proceed according to the laws of physics. And all the rest either will be possible to be reduced to those physical objects or does not exist at all. Physicalism of theories of settlement systems in consequence reaches so far that even logical formations are treated as physical objects. This is connected with extreme nominalism and this in turn ds intertwined with strong conventional and rational tendencies.
Źródło:
Prace i Studia Geograficzne; 1989, 10; 37-58
0208-4589
Pojawia się w:
Prace i Studia Geograficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Układ osadniczy jako system
Settlement structure as a system
Autorzy:
Jedrzejczyk, D.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2085650.pdf
Data publikacji:
1989
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych
Tematy:
systemy osadnicze
koncepcje
obiekty
Opis:
System interpretations study the essence of settlement structure on two ontological planes: on the plane of interactio of elements and on the plane of creating of a separate category of integrity. The ontological substance of interaction consists in the fact that it constitutes the basic mechanism joining elements of the class into a whole. However, freedom of interpretation of the interaction notion results in recognizing the system either as an analogue of an organic system whose purposedly organized elements are kept in dynamic balance, or in treating it as a sui generis convention understood as a useful tool of study. However, with the use of only the interpretation of the substance of interaction mechanisms it is impossible to prove existence of settlement system as a separate category of entity. Between all elements of the class of settlements always there are some interactions, and they can be of mechanical, field or thermodynamic character. However, it is impossible to determine which of the internations have system-creative properties and which are devoid of these properties. These diffilculties cause that settlement theories look for the essence of the system in a class of settlements, constituted into a specific wholeness. This means that a settlement system cannot be constructed by adding elements one by one, thait is it cannot be analysed through application of theories concerning its parts and their interrelations. In other words, an interpretation of a settlement system in system categories resolves itself into recognizing it as an organic whole which requires during in analysis appliiation of irreducible principles of such systems. This is determined by the system's structure which excludes the possibility to analyse it from the so-called „summatiive” point of view. To recognize a settlement system as a separate ontological category requires to show how a „summative” analysis differs from analysis of another „non-summative” type. This differentiation seems to be based on a statement that elements of an organic whole do not behave independently of one another, and one may assume that the principles applying to them when they are not elements of an organic whole, are valid for them as elements of such a whole. Therefore it seems that a „summative” analysis is such which explains properties of a system basing on principles concerning its elements and the prtinciples do not refer to features of the elements as components of a system. And „non-summative” analysis seems to be an analysis describing a system basinig on principles on connections between elements as functional elements of the system. But if these are the differences between such aellegedly different methods of analysis, the differenees are not important. This proves that border between systems cannot be determined aceurately - between „organic wholes” and other systems - „non-summative”. If even elements of summative wholes relate casually to one another (e.g. in gravitational systems), summative analysis of such wholes must contain special assumptions describing organization of elements of such wholes so that a basic theory can be applied to them, similairly to systems recognized as „summative”. This means that from the ontological point of view there is no justification to recognize a „non-summative” whole, which is a substratum of settlement system, as a separate real entity.
Źródło:
Prace i Studia Geograficzne; 1989, 10; 13-35
0208-4589
Pojawia się w:
Prace i Studia Geograficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies