Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "syntactic connotation" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Functional class (so called “part of speech”) assignment as a kind of meaning-bound word syntactic information
    Autorzy:
    Wajszczuk, Jadwiga
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/677127.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Slawistyki PAN
    Tematy:
    part of speech
    syntactic partitioning of words
    functional properties of word classes
    two kinds of position opening: with and without semantic impact (syntactic connotation)
    syntactic lexemes vs. quasi-syntactic (para-syntactic) lexemes
    Opis:
    Functional class (so called “part of speech”) assignment as a kind of meaning-bound word syntactic informationThe traditional division of the lexicon into parts of speech which seems to satisfy the requirements of a syntactic description, on the one hand, and a word formation description, on the other hand, cannot be looked upon as a result of a strict classification covering the totality of the lexicon and being based on a coherent set of criteria. Making the criteria more precise or correcting them is an issue of extreme importance and urgency in the work on the theory of language. Such achievements can help solve many other problems, in particular, syntactic ones. The article presents a scheme of several preliminary steps of an amelioration program (a scheme which has been improved compared to the author’s earlier attempts going in the same direction). The program is based on combinability characteristics of words, i.e. on those properties that are responsible for the tasks to be accomplished by a given class of expressions in making up a higher order unit, i.e. a syntagm (the author emphasizes this point: it is syntagm rather than sentence which is the category the recommended approach is focusing on), and that, importantly, determine the limits of syntactic rules, i.e. the ins and outs of the rules (the limits concerning the overall stock of words).
    Źródło:
    Cognitive Studies; 2010, 10
    2392-2397
    Pojawia się w:
    Cognitive Studies
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Schematy składniowe grup nominalnych w łacinie wyodrębnione na podstawie konotacji leksemów rzeczownikowych
    The Syntactic Schemas of Nomina Groups in Latin
    Autorzy:
    Górska, Małgorzata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2127740.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2007
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    konotacja składniowa
    konotacja łacińskich leksemów rzeczownikowych
    grupa nominalna
    łacińskie grupy nominalne
    schematy składniowe łacińskich grup n
    syntactic connotation
    connotation of Latin nominal lexems
    nominal group
    Latin nominal groups
    syntactic schemes of Latin nominal groups
    Opis:
    The paper seeks to present a tentative list of syntactic schemes, according to which a certain type of nominal groups in Latin is constructed. These are groups with constitutive elements in the form of nominal lexems, having connotative properties. Connotation here is understood as a systematic property of lexems which consists in the fact that they open “empty places” (positions) to be filled in the text by definite (subordinate to them) elements called supplements. Like in other languages, the connotative properties in Latin is depicted by three types of nominal lexems. These are nouns derived from verbs, i.e. above all nomina actionis (e.g. reading – what?, by whom?) and nomina agentis (e.g. reader – of what?) and nouns derived from adjectives, i.e. first of all nomina essendi (e.g. lenght – of what?). The third type is composed of some nouns derivationally non-motivated. We find here among other things “relational” names of persons (e.g. son – whose?) or names of the parts of a certain whole (e.g. shore – of what?). The nominal lexems mentioned here may open one, two, three, or even four “empty places.” In the text they are filled with supplements in the form of nouns in the dependent cases, propositional phrases, constructions accusativus cum infinitivo, or even the whole sentences. The list contains ten syntactic schemes which are a symbolical inscription of the types of syntactic structures carried out in the texts by the Latin nominal groups. Such kind of schemes may be supplemented by a description of nominal groups in Latin, as the connotation of nominal lexems as a mechanism of making groups has not been, as it seems, taken into consideration up to now.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2007, 54-55, 3; 263-280
    0035-7707
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wymagania składniowe form trybu rozkazującego we współczesnym języku polskim (w nawiązaniu do artykułu M. Gębki-Wolak i A. Moroza (2011))
    Syntactic requirements of imperative forms in contemporary Polish (in relation to the article of M. Gębka-Wolak and A. Moroz (2011))
    Autorzy:
    Bojałkowska, Krystyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/567890.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
    Tematy:
    imperative mood
    connotation
    syntactic requirements
    syntactic position
    Opis:
    The aim of this paper is to discuss some statements concerning the syntactic features of imperative forms of the verbs BAĆ SIĘ, OBAWIAĆ SIĘ, LĘKAĆ SIĘ ('to fear (of) sth') made by M. Gębka-Wolak and A. Moroz in the article Individual syntactic propensities of imperative forms (on the basis of the verbs: BAĆ SIĘ, OBAWIAĆ SIĘ, LĘKAĆ SIĘ) (2011). The conclusion is that the imperative forms of the verbs BAĆ SIĘ, OBAWIAĆ SIĘ, LĘKAĆ SIĘ, against the opinion of these Authors, do not have syntactical requirements different from those of the forms of the indicative mood of these verbs.
    Źródło:
    Linguistica Copernicana; 2016, 13; 273-291
    2080-1068
    2391-7768
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistica Copernicana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies