Temat: summary translation - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Drugi v Drugem: književni citati v poljskem in italjanskem prevodu romana "Gimnazijka" Antona Ingoliča
Obcy w obcym: cytaty literackie w polskim i włoskim przekładzie powieści "Gimnazijka" Antona Ingoliča
The Other in the Other: literary citations in Polish and Italian translations of Anton Ingolič’s youth novel "Gimnazijka"
Autorzy:: Grošelj, Robert
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/971856.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014-10-01
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:: mladinski roman Gimnazijka
Anton Ingolič
književni citat
zvesti prevod
delni prevod
povzemalni prevod
powieść młodzieżowa Gimnazijka
cytat literacki
wierny przekład
przekład częściowy
przekład streszczający
youth novel Gimnazijka
literary citation
faithful translation
partial translation
summary translation
Opis:: V prispevku je analizirano prevajanje književnih citatov v poljskem in italijanskem prevodu slovenskega mladinskega romana "Gimnazijka" Antona Ingoliča. S književnimi citati avtor sooblikuje svoje pripovedovanje (autoreferencialnost), bralca pa tudi informira — s konkretnimi besedilnimi zgledi — o kanonskih avtorjih svetovne (Shakepeare, Molière) in slovenske (Kette, Murn, Gradnik) književnosti (referencialnost). V analiziranih prevodih "Gimnazijke" prihaja pri citatih pogosto do poenostavljanja ciljnega besedila: poljska prevajalka se je za ohranitev citata odločila v treh, italijanski prevajalec pa le v dveh od petih primerov. V obeh prevodih je pogosto tudi poenostavljanje citatnega sobesedila, tudi če je citat ohranjen (poenostavljanje je večje v italijanskem prevodu). Na tak način sta se prevoda oddaljila od slogovne oblikovanosti in vsebinske kompleksnosti izhodiščnega besedila, hkrati pa se je z neupoštevanjem citatov zmanjšala njegova referencialnost (informativno-didaktična dimenzija).
The paper discusses the translation of literary citations in Polish and Italian translations of the Slovenian youth novel "Gimnazijka" by Anton Ingolič. With the help of literary citations the author shapes his narrative (autoreferentiality) and also informs the reader — by using concrete text examples — of the authors included in the canon of world (cf. Shakespeare, Molière) and Slovenian (cf. Kette, Murn, Gradnik) literature (referentiality). In the analyzed translations of "Gimnazijka", text fragments with citations are frequently simplified: Polish translator has opted for preserving three, the Italian only two citations out of five. In both translations the text fragments with citations have been frequently simplified, even if the citation itself is preserved (the summary translation has been used more widely by Italian translator). In such a way, the analyzed translations have not only reduced the stylistic qualities and the content complexity of the source text, but also diminished its referentiality (informative-didactic dimension) by disregarding some of the literary citations.
Źródło:: Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2014, 5, 1; 272-303
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:: Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Nieznany siedemnastowieczny polski przekład „Deconstantia” Justusa Lipsjusza. Rekonesans
An Unknown 17th Century Polish Translation of De Constantia by Justus Lipsius – a Preliminary Analysis
Autorzy:: Dąbkowska-Kujko, Justyna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1902465.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: Justus Lipsjusz
Andrzej Kryszpin-Kirszensztein
przekład
parafraza
streszczenie
omówienie
kontaminacja
oryginał łaciński
pierwowzór
dialog
cytat
Justus Lipsius
translation
paraphrase
summary
description
contamination
the Latin original
source text
dialogue
quotation
Opis:: This paper is devoted to the Polish translation of the 16th-century work by Justus Lipsius, entitled De Constantia. The translation was made by the Voivod of Vitebsk Andrzej Kazimierz Kryszpin-Kirszensztein in 1698. When studying Kryszpin's documents in the 18th century, Gedeon Jeleński found a manuscript entitled Stateczność umysłu albo Nauka polityczna o statecznej cierpliwości podczas złych czasów [Constancy of the mind or a political lesson in balanced patience during unfavourable times]. As there were no other hints or indications concerning the authorship of the text, it was credited to Kryszpin. Thus, mistakenly recognized as the original, the work was published by Franciszek Bohomolec in 1769. The author of the paper analyses the principles that Kirsztensztein adopted in the introduction to the manuscript, where he presented how difficult it was to write the text and where he argued that writing it was possible owing to his vast expertise in Antique literature. The techniques that Kryszpin used to keep under cover the relationship between his work and its Latin source are discussed, as are the strategies of how Kryszpin deluded the reader into thinking that his thought was original. The paper ends with an appendix containing Kryszpin's foreword to the reader. This text unveils Kryszpin's clear intention to have the text published. The paper also discusses a selection of remarks on Kryszpin's attitude towards the source text. The preliminary analysis ventured by the author seems to indicate that Kryszpin-Kirszensztein's work is a paraphrase, a vast summary, and a descriptive analysis of Lispius's work and that the two works stay in a relatively loose aesthetic and compositional connection. The closest bond between the two texts obtains on the level of main ideas and thoughts.
Źródło:: Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2012, 60, 1; 9-17
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "summary translation" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język