Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "standing orders of the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat procedury uchwalania przez Komisję Ustawodawczą opinii dla Marszałka Sejmu w trybie określonym w art. 34 ust. 8 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the procedure for adoption by the Legislative Committee of an opinion for the Marshal of the Sejm specified in Article 34 paragraph 8 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16715444.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Legislative Committee
quorum
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The article provides an analysis of the procedure for adoption by the Legislative Committee of a resolution containing an opinion referred to in Article 34 paragraph 8 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. It deals, in particular, with taking a decision whether a quorum is present and an assessment of the consequences of the meaning of the phrase “in the presence of at least half of the number of members of the Committee” for the validity of resolutions adopted by the Committee. The author claims that the said requirement determines the Committee’s capability of making legally binding decisions under Article 34 paragraph 8 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm (the procedure for adoption of a resolution finding a bill inadmissible under Polish law). The notion of “presence” contains all members of the Committee staying at the place where its meeting is held, irrespective of whether they participate in the vote or not. The requirement of presence of at least half of the number of members of the Committee should be referred to the total number of its members elected by the Sejm as it stands at the moment of election.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 4(36); 90-95
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności przeprowadzenia wysłuchania publicznego w odniesieniu do części projektu ustawy budżetowej
Legal opinion on the admissibility of holding a public hearing in relation to individual parts of draft budgets
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16711504.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
public hearing
State budget
Sejm committees
legislative procedure
Opis:
The article deals with the question whether, in the context of the power of appropriate Sejm committees to consider individual parts of draft budgets, as referred to in Article 106 paragraph 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, it is admissible to submit a motion for and to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing (Article 70a of the Standing Orders of the Sejm). Based on the analysis of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, the author draws a conclusion that Sejm committees do not have such a power. According to the Standing Orders of the Sejm, in the course of work on a draft budget, an exclusive right to adopt resolution on holding a public hearing belongs to the Public Finances Committee.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 4(36); 87-89
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności przeprowadzenia wysłuchania publicznego w odniesieniu do części projektu ustawy budżetowej
Legal opinion concerning the admissibility of holding a public hearing with re‑ gard to a part of a budgetary bill
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16539489.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
standing orders of the Sejm
public hearing
State budget
committees of the Sejm
bill
legislative process
Opis:
Committees of the Sejm which, according to Article 106 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, consider respective parts of a budgetary bill, are not entitled to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing. In the course of work on the budgetary bill only the Public Finances Committee may be classified as “the committee to which the bill has been referred for consideration”, i.e. as an entity which, according to Article 70a para. 2 of the Standing Orders, possesses an exclusive right to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing (in the phase of work specified in Article 70a para. 4 of the Standing Orders.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 1(33); 76-78
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat dopuszczalności zastosowania art. 51 pkt 2 regulaminu Sejmu w postępowaniach w sprawach projektów kodeksów oraz projektów zmian kodeksów
Legal opinion on the admissibility of applying Article 51 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the proceedings in relation to draft law codes and bills to amend draft law codes
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12238239.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
proceedings in relation to bills
legislative process
law code
Opis:
The author is critical on the application of Article 51 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in proceedings in relation to draft law codes and bills to amend draft law codes. He emphasizes that, despite the lack of a provision which would prevent beginning the second reading of the above‑mentioned drafts immediately after the conclusion of the first reading without referral to the committee, extended work on draft law codes and on bills to amend them are useful for the reflection on this legislation which is, in principle, extensive and complex. The author concludes that Article 51 (2) of the Rules of Parliament is contrary to the reason of the law of the proceedings carried out in accordance with a law‑code.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 80-86
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat potrzeby przeprowadzania na posiedzeniu Sejmu głosowania w sprawie odwołania ze stanowiska członka Prezydium Sejmu, w wypadku złożenia przez tę osobę rezygnacji z zajmowanego stanowiska
Legal opinion on whether there is need to take a vote, during the sitting of the Sejm, to remove from office of the member of the Presidium of the Sejm in the event of his/her resignation
Autorzy:
Mordwiłko, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855196.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Speaker of parliament
removal from office
Presidium of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion analyses the possibility of removal from office of the Marshal (Speaker) and Vice-Marshals (Deputy Speakers) of the Sejm. In the author’s view, the provision contained in the amendment to the Standing Orders (2008) making possible such a remove is not compatible with Article 110 (1) of the Constitution, which does not relate to appointment of a Marshal or Vice-marshals, but rather deals with the “election” of a Marshal (which would imply his/her irremovability during the term of parliament). He also points to the controversies relating to the possibility of an appropriate application of the provision on resignation from the function of Marshal when the Vice-Marshal has been removed from office. Such an interpretation seems to be abuse of law, since an appropriate application of the provisions in similar situations cannot be assumed, but should rather be expressly formulated in a legal provision. From an analysis of Article 10a (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm it follows that the future regulation should be made more specific, particularly by the inclusion of the case of death and the conditions of resignation of the Vice-Marshal.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 47-51
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat projektu uchwały w sprawie zmiany regulaminu Sejmu RP
An opinion on a draft resolution to amend the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543155.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
lawmaking procedure
legislative process
European Union
Opis:
The opinion concerns a draft resolution to amend the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. The principal purpose of the amendment was to abolish the requirement to seek an opinion of the minister competent for Republic of Poland’s membership in the European Union when considering matters concerning the conformity of provisions of the considered bills to the legislation of the European Union. Sponsors of the resolution justify the amendment on legal grounds, such as the need for implementation of the principle of separation of powers, and on extra‑legal grounds, such as the need for modernisation and restoration of functionality of the provision of opinions on legislative proposals. The author of the opinion challenges the arguments of the sponsors of the draft resolution, pointing out its lack of appropriate justification and possible inconsistency with the provisions of both the Constitution and the Act on the Branches of Government Administration.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 107-112
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat skutków prawnych głosowania prowadzącego do odrzucenia projektu uchwały komisji sejmowej
Legal opinion on the legal consequences of a vote resulting in the rejection of a committee’s draft resolution
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543265.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
bills
Opis:
The opinion was drawn up in the context of the work of Sejm committees on the Concept for Town and Country Planning 2030 (Paper No. 169). The author finds the occurrence of procedural inconsistency in the conduct of the committee’s procedures and the ineffectiveness of the election of a Deputy‑Rapporteur. She claims that the formal requirements provided in Article 43 (2) of the Standing Orders for the adoption by the committee of a report on a bill (draft resolution) should also be applied to other committee resolutions relating to reports, information or other documents supposed to be discussed by the Sejm, as well as committee desiderata and opinions. The lack of support from the majority of Deputies participating in the vote does not necessarily mean support for the motion to the contrary. Therefore, in the author’s view, the committees have not finished their work on the above‑mentioned draft resolution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 113-120
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 157 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543270.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Sejm oversight
Opis:
The opinion deals with the exercise of parliamentary oversight functions by Sejm committees. It provides an analysis of whether the representatives of State administration might be held responsible for failure to discharge their duties resulting from Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, Sejm committees have at their disposal the means to enforce only political responsibility. Moreover, as concerns suspension of work on a bill in the event of breach of the obligations specified in Article 157 by the representatives of public administration, the author believes that the legitimacy of such action cannot be assessed in abstracto. The author does not rule out that, depending on circumstances and seriousness of the infringements, suspension of work on a bill may be justified.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 121-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 70 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 70 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855250.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Speaker of parliament
Standing Orders of the Sejm
report
Opis:
The opinion deals with the interpretation of the provision which states that the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm may request the committee to express its attitude to the conclusions and remarks made by the legal services of the Chancellery of the Sejm, which have not been taken into consideration, and whether – in this context – it is possible to change the report adopted by the committee. The author argues that the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm provide no grounds for claim that expressing by the committee of its attitude to the conclusions and remarks could take place by way of modification of the report already adopted by the committee. In this situation, it seems that it could only be admissible that the Deputy Rapporteur takes position at the sitting of the Sejm considering the bill or draft resolution in the second reading.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 68-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości ewentualnego podjęcia przez Prezydium Sejmu uchwały wykładniczej dotyczącej ograniczania liczby interpelacji i zapytań poselskich w tej samej „sprawie”
Legal opinion on possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12236964.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation |
Deputy’s question
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Presidium of the Sejm
parliamentary oversight
Deputy
Opis:
Examining the possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”, the author of the opinion concludes that any restrictions in this regard should be formulated with caution. The rights of Deputies to submit interpellations cannot be only illusory. He also notes that the Standing Orders of the Sejm have already introduced a mechanism for control by the Presidium of the Sejm over interpellations and Deputy’s questions. In order to counter the practice of submitting excessive number of interpellations of similar content to the same body, the author examines the possibility of combining by the Presidium of the Sejm similar interpellations into one interpellation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 73-79
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wniosku grupy posłów, złożonego w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu, o zwołanie posiedzenia Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka
Legal opinion on a motion to convene a meeting of the Justice and Human Rights Committee, submitted by a group of Deputies under Article 152 (2) of the Standing Orders
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855200.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Constitution
parliamentary control
independence of courts
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion deals with a motion to convene a meeting of a Sejm committee to consider the consequences of a particular court decision. In the author’s view, the subject matter of the motion is outside the scope of a committee’s competence as provided in the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Therefore, the motion is defective and the convening of a committee meeting to consider the abovementioned matter is inadmissible.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 52-59
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wniosku o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji sejmowej, złożonego w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on a motion to summon a meeting of a Sejm committee, submitted under Article 152 (2) of the Standing Orders – in response to in-depth questions
Autorzy:
Wrona, Zbigniew
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855243.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
radio and television
Standing Orders of the Sejm
telecommunications
Opis:
The opinion deals with the powers of a Sejm committee to demand that the minister and a member of the State institution provide information about pending administrative proceedings and to require the committee to take position in relation to such proceedings. In the authors’ view, there are no provisions under which the motion would be found inadmissible. The committee may also express its position on the discussed issue which, however, has no binding character, and it cannot impose the content of a solution in pending administrative proceedings.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 60-67
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie art. 30 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu RP
Opinion on Article 30 (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12232901.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine the possibility of referring the recommendation for election or appointment by the Sejm of individual persons to particular State offices specified in Articles 26, 27–29 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, or dismissal therefrom, to more than one Sejm committee for their opinion thereto. In the author’s view, a flexible interpretation of Article 30 (5) is possible, as it is implied by the wording of that article which does not state that the recommendation is to be referred to “one” committee, so it does not preclude referring it to a greater number of committees.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 70-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wątpliwości interpretacyjnych odnoszących się do art. 193 ust. 1 i 2 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on interpretative doubts on Article 193 paras. 1 and 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543113.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellations
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion provides an assessment of the legal acceptability of limiting the form of submission of interpellation and Deputies’ questions to the format an electronic document. The analysis of Article 193 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm currently precludes such a possibility, as both interpellations and Deputies’ Questions must meet the formal requirements that include, inter alia, the need to be in writing. The Standing Orders of the Sejm do not contain a legal definition of the phrase “in writing”. From literal interpretation it follows that it is a paper document, signed in person by its author. The inability to accept that the meaning of the written form can also include the form of electronic document is proved by an absolute requirement to append two copies to an answer to a Deputies’ question. The imposition of an obligation for interpellations and Deputies’ question to be submitted in the form of an electronic document therefore requires amendment of Article 193 (1) and (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 43-47
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni pojęcia „forma pisemna” występującego w przepisach regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of the term “in writing” appearing in the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szydło, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543116.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The requirement to perform a particular act “in writing”, as provided for in the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should be understood as an obligation to fix on paper the content of a particular act, using in this purpose graphic symbols, as required by the so-called written language, and such a paper document should be signed in person. The requirement to perform a particular act “in writing” cannot be satisfied by making it in an electronic form. Electronic form is a form of making certain acts (separate and autonomous from a written one) which the Standing Orders of the Sejm provides for only in special situations. A written response to a Deputy’s interpellation must therefore be filed in paper, hand-signed by the person giving response to the interpellation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 53-73
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies