Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "stan ochrony zabytków" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Ratio legis est anima legis a potrzeba istnienia i wzmacniania państwowej służby konserwatorskiej w Polsce
    Ratio legis est anima legis and the need to exist and strengthen the state conservation service in Poland
    Autorzy:
    Dobosz, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113995.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    cultural heritage
    protection of monuments and sites
    state historic preservation service
    dziedzictwo kulturowe
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    stan ochrony zabytków
    Opis:
    This article focuses on the latin legal maxim read as „ratio legis est anima legis.” it needs to be emphasised that, unless they are well-considered, no approval will be granted to acts which are invalid from legal and formal perspective or under which legally incorrect substantive solutions are to come into force. the author of this article claims that polish central government may prove useful in the field of protecting historic monuments and sites. Furthermore, the article also explores experiences through which the German government went in the areas pertaining to constitutional law and organisation of German (federal and lance) historic preservation administration. In the conclusion, the author summarizes his deliberations on the polish model of administrative bodies responsible for conservation and protection of historic monuments and sites.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 41-50
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Polityka - konserwacja - prawo
    ГНЕ POLICY — CONSERVATION — LAW
    Autorzy:
    Pruszyński, Jan Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535121.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1982
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    stan prawny ochrony zabytków w Polsce
    wpływ polityki na ochronę zabytków
    wpływ przemian politycznych i społecznych po wojnie na ochronę zabytków
    działanie polityki w stosunku do dóbr kultury
    polityka państwa wobec dóbr kultury
    ochrona zabytków w Polsce po II wojnie światowej
    Opis:
    The author starts by saying that some representatives of conservation in Poland have been able to notice changes in the nature of conservation work towards reconstruction, an operation which is very expensive but inconsistent with the rules of conservation art. One of the reasons for ill-success in conservation is the law (the 1962 Law on the Protection of Cultural Property and on Museums) which has been recognized as best, although non-respected and incomplete due to the lack of some executory regulations. The author puts forward the thesis that the policy and the law, next to conservation principles, decide of the ups and downs in this field. A present picture of the protection and conservation of monuments is the result of war destruction, territorial and national changes, political and social transformations. Unpublished circular letters of the Board of Museums and Monuments Protection of the Ministry of Culture and Arts could not be respected by field administration that was indifferent to them. They were respected by the conservation services who, however, were subjected to district authorities as a result of the administrative reform of the country (1975). Shortcomings of the Law were also the reason for the lack of respect for its regulations by other ministries and users of historic structures. The author presents fundamental tasks in the field of general state policy towards cultural property: recognition of the supreme principle that the cultural property is of utmost significance to the nation, introduction of necessary changes into the curriculum, restitution of the standing due to conservation services, better information in the means of mass communication and finally exaction of the duties of the users with regard to planning and repairing. It is also indispensable to update the Law. The organization of the protection of the cultural property calls for changes both at central and field administrative levels. With this in mind, the author suggests to establish the Council for the Protection of Cultural Property as a supervising, coordinating and opinion-giving body, to vest the Minister of Culture and Arts with the right to inspect qualifications of field conservation services, to provide financial means for the execution of the provisions of the Law No 179 of the Council of Ministers (financial aid given to future users who will undertake reconstruction and conservation work on monuments of architecture), to vest the Minister with the right to revise verdicts in actions closely associated with the protection of monuments, to restructure the field conservation bodies and to carefully select a candidate for the post of voivodship monuments conservator, and finally to statutorily separate the conservation office as department of the Voivodship Council.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 3-4; 176-181
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    REJESTR ZABYTKÓW W PRAKTYCE OCHRONY KONSERWATORSKIEJ
    THE REGISTER OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN THE PRAXIS OF CONSERVATION PROTECTION
    Autorzy:
    Gawlicki, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535590.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    GENERAL CONSERVATOR
    HISTORICAL MONUMENTS' REGISTER
    PRAXIS OF CONSERVATION PROTECTION
    stan rejestru zabytków
    rola rejestru zabytków
    rejestr jako narzędzie ochrony
    historia rejestru zabytków
    klasyfikacja zabytków nieruchomych
    Spis zabytków architektury i budownictwa
    diagnoza zawartości rejestru zabytków
    formy ochrony zabytków
    ochrona obszarowa
    Opis:
    The intention of this article is to assess the state of the register of historical monuments, the role it plays in the domestic system of the protection of the cultural heritage as well as its character and representative nature. Should it be regarded as an important protection instrument, is it shaped in a planned manner, what sort of forms does it assume, and are they an effective element of the protection system? The present-day condition of the register of monuments is the outcome of a more than 90-years long process that essentially affected its shape. The reasons for the current problems tackled by the national system of the protection of monuments should be sought in the history of the formation of this most important tool applied by conservation protection. The Polish register of historical monuments dates back to a decree issued by the Regency Council in 1918. The necessity of differentiating the collection by means of a scientific assessment of its value and the application of a classification of the monuments was noticed soon afterwards. Although work on a complete inventory of monuments, interrupted by the war cataclysm, was never finished, conservation legislation from the interwar period, especially concerning the creation of a register of monuments, should be regarded as a modern and complex treatment of assorted questions relating to protection. The conservation views that assumed shape the 1930s and the conceptions of the creation and valorisation of an inventory of monuments were never developed during the post-war period. The introduction of a classification of immovable monuments was not finalised until 1964 and the preparation and publication of a complete list of the monuments of architecture and construction, divided into five categories. In the face of numerous later negative experiences and critical opinions stemming from daily praxis and, primarily, the destruction of a significant number of monuments from the lower groups, it would be difficult to find any arguments in favour of the categorisation launched at the time. Let us note, however, that it was carried it in a totally different political system and that the assumed objectives were quite dissimilar from the attained effect. In time, the absence of a firm coordination, including administrative, of the activity pursued by the voivodeship conservators of historical monuments upon a central level, i,e. the General Conservator of Historical Monuments, with the exception of the State Service for the Protection of Historical Monuments in 1991-1996, produced a further discernible erosion of uniform principles for classifying monuments for the register, and furthered the differences and divisions within the range of the already existing resources. Meanwhile, the register of historical monuments is one of the statutory forms of protection, and daily praxis confirms that an unregistered object is deprived of all chances for effective conservation protection or for benefitting from financial aid provided by public funds. In this way, the register plays the role of the most important and, as daily activity demonstrates, in many cases the sole instrument for shaping the conservation policy. Within this context special relevance is assumed by its contents, measured not with the number of the registered objects and regional statistics, or even the correctness of administrative documents, but with the contents and representativeness of a collection assessed from the vantage point of the dimension of the cultural heritage of the whole country. The extensive Polish cultural heritage resource protected by law is composed of several collections of immovable, movable and archaeological monuments. In the presence of an almost universal general definition of historical value, formulated in administrative decisions, effective protection is significantly restricted; this factor too hinders a definition of the range and character of the planned conservation undertakings and the financing of the protection of historical monuments. In practical terms, such a state of things gives rise to a number of potential conflicts between owners and conservation offices, and favours the relativism of the assessments of historical values and the principles of conservation activity, rendered dependent upon current pragmatic needs and investment pressure; it also hampers the propagation of knowledge about the actual resources of the protected heritage. Finally, it limits the possibility of winning allies involved in protection ventures. Despite the ostensibly considerable number of monuments listed in the register of immovable monuments, the content of this collection is far from complete. The elementary criteria of historical, scientific or artistic evaluation, determined by a general statutory definition and not modified for decades, are applied in totally arbitrary manner. As a result, numerous valuable monuments with distinctive historical values still remain outside the range of legal protection, while conservation is encompassing a growing number of examples of contemporary architecture. The great differentiation of the register of monuments can be perceived upon the basis of just several select instances. Its range also contains a number of inner divisions whose justification poses a difficult task. Alongside monuments possessing supreme values that do not require any validation, we come across buildings with highly doubtful features, at times giving rise to warranted reservations concerning the presence of even elementary cultural values. The register, a theoretically uniform collection of administrative decisions devoid of divisions into categories, remained unaltered, thus forcing the conservation services to treat equally all the components of this, after all, by no means uniform collection. The possibilities of an actual impact of the voivodeship conservators of monuments upon the contents of the register, in other words, the establishment of areas and objects to be subjected to legal conservation protection, are becoming more limited. It is also impossible to perceive features indicating an actual and well-conceived influence of the voivodeship conservator of monuments upon the ultimate contents of the register. Owing to a profound crisis of spatial planning and the absence of effective instruments shaping the landscape, the register has become the most prominent form of treating the cultural environment. Its representative nature should correspond to the richness and diversity of the Polish heritage. Imperfections and errors weaken the effectiveness of the whole national system of the protection of monuments. Due to the dynamic development of studies dealing with cultural heritage, the progress of scientific theories, and the almost total disappearance of the time barrier, which used to be one of the most important criteria for delineating historical value, the very concept of the object of the conservation protection is becoming increasingly capacious. True, the number of monuments listed in the register is constantly growing, but the needs are so considerable that the attainment of a state that would fully reflect the historical resources is becoming part of a distant future. Meanwhile, the lack of cohesive criteria for assessing values, whose outcome is the non-existence of a hierarchy of the monuments, makes it difficult to establish protection standards. Different ways of solving this problem should be sought in more profound reflections about the current state, function and directions of indispensable legislation changes concerning the register of monuments, with one of the key issues being a precise and, at the same time, modern definition of the object of protection. The principles and role of the register in the Polish system of the protection of monuments must be perceived in a way different from the applied one. The philosophy of transformations has to be based on a determined conviction that we are dealing with resources differentiated as regards their contents. A suitable solution would be to seek an alternative organisation of conservation administration, together with a conception of an intentional sharing of responsibility for the fate of the recorded monuments by the government administration and local self-governments. The favourable effects of the merely outlined but necessary directions of activity will involve the introduction of order into the register, the amassment of numerous scattered entries into a single cohesive register of information about historical resources, and the creation of a collection of the most valuable national heritage monuments. The ensuing outcome will make it possible to conceive of a uniform state policy in reference to monuments representing assorted values within a wide range of research and documentation, to define forms of protection, and to finance conservation undertaking, promotion and effective administration.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 55-82
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    „PARKI ZABYTKOWE – OCHRONA I KONSERWACJA” Seminarium, Warszawa, 16- 17 czerwca 2009 r.
    ”HISTORICAL PARKS – PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION” Seminar, Warsaw, 16-17 June 2009
    Autorzy:
    Sikora, Dorota
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535750.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    parki zabytkowe
    ochrona
    konserwacja
    ogrody zabytkowe
    stan zachowania ogrodów
    rejestr zabytków
    WKZ
    Fundusz Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej
    Opis:
    The organiser of the seminar on ”Historical Parks – Protection and Conservation,” held in Warsaw on 16-17 June 2009, was the National Heritage Board of Poland. The seminar was attended by the staff of the voivodeship offices for the protection of historical monuments and their delegatures dealing with historical vegetation, representatives of science, and employees of the National Heritage Board of Poland. The purpose of the seminar was to discuss numerous essential questions pertaining to the protection and conservation of historical parks and gardens, the state of their preservation, and the ways of their administration and use. The participants also considered problems associated with the creation by the National Board of a new reference list of historical parks and gardens for the National Fund for the Protection of the Natural Environment and Water Management, while a representative of the Fund defined the tasks that this institution can finance. One of the seminar blocks dealt with tree cultivation, and the debates ended with a presentation of examples of historical parks and gardens, which in recent years were subjected to conservation. The next meeting will be held in 2010.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 3; 5-6
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies