Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "semipelagianizm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    Specyfika głównych ośrodków życia monastycznego w Galii w IV i V wieku
    Specifics of main centres of monastic life in Gaul in the fourth and five century
    Autorzy:
    Pochwat, Józef
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/571724.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    mnich
    szatan
    pelagianizm
    semipelagianizm
    pryscylianizm
    monk
    Satan
    pelagianism
    semi-pelagianism
    pryscilianism
    Opis:
    Postaciami kluczowymi dla monastycyzmu Galii w IV i V wieku są: św. Marcin z Tours, Sulpicjusz Sewer, Jan Kasjan, Romanus i Lupicynius. Monastycyzm galijski odsłania inne podejście niż zasady wypracowane na Wschodzie. W samej Galii wykazuje również pewne zróżnicowanie. Monastycyzm Wschodu charakteryzował się tym, że był zdecydowanie ascetyczno-anachorecki, w odróżnieniu od monastycyzmu galijskiego o nastawieniu apostolsko-ewangelizującym. Oba te podejścia wcale się nie wykluczają, wręcz przeciwnie, uczą zasady jedności w różnorodności. Pokazują, że w życiu monastycznym chodzi o praktykowanie życia oddanego Bogu w pełnym jego wymiarze, zarówno duchowym, jak i cielesnym. Jednakże sposób realizacji tych założeń nie musi być wszędzie jednakowy, na szczyt prowadzi bowiem wiele dróg.
    The key figures for Gaul’s monasticism in the fourth and fifth century are: Martin of Tours, Sulpicius Severus, John Cassian, Romanus and Lupicinius. Monasticism in Gaul reveals a different approach to the principles developed in the East. In Gaul itself, some diversity can be observed. Monasticism of the East had a strong ascetic-anchoritic character, unlike Gallic monasticism with its apostolic and evangelical attitude. These two approaches do not contradict each other, quite the reverse, they both teach the principles of unity in diversity. They show that monastic life is about practicing a life devoted to God in its full dimension; both spiritually and bodily. The way of putting into practice these principles does not have to be the same. There are many routes leading to the aim.
    Źródło:
    Polonia Sacra; 2017, 21, 3(48); 107-128
    1428-5673
    Pojawia się w:
    Polonia Sacra
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dwie monastyczne koncepcje – o tym co łączy a zarazem dzieli Jana Kasjana i św. Augustyna
    Two monastic concepts – the similarities and at the same time differences between John Cassian and st. Augustine
    Autorzy:
    Nehring, Przemysław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/612060.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    Augustyn
    Jan Kasjan
    monastycyzm
    semipelagianizm
    Augustine
    John Cassian
    monasticism
    semi-pelagianism
    Opis:
    Author of this paper juxtaposes several issues which are fundamental for monastic concepts of St. Augustine and John Cassian, two figures that had the greatest impact on the development of the western pre-Benedictine monasticism. The difference in intellectual inspirations, personal monastic experiences, addressees of their monastic works and positions held by them in the institutional Church influenced very deeply their teaching. Thus they interpret in a different manner an account on the Jerusalem community (Acts 4:31-35) that – in their common opinion – began the history of monasticism. Cassian sees in it just the historical outset for this phenomenon while Augustine perceives it as a still valid model of behavior for his monks. They look differently at the relation of monastic communities towards the community of the Church but also at inner rules governing the life of monks in monasteries. Unlike Augustine, Cassian sees possibility of spiritual growth gained by monks through ascetical practices and decisions made on their free will. This anthropological optimism had played the key-role for the statement that Cassian made in the face of radical views of Augustine on the Grace and free will, formulated by him during the Pelagian controversy but also in other controversial issue, namely of possible legitimacy of lying under particular circumstances.
    Źródło:
    Vox Patrum; 2018, 69; 527-545
    0860-9411
    2719-3586
    Pojawia się w:
    Vox Patrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Initium fidei w ujęciu Jana Kasjana
    John Cassian’s concept of initium fidei
    Autorzy:
    Nocoń, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/612483.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    łaska
    wolna wola
    initium fidei
    pelagianizm
    semipelagianizm
    synergizm
    grace
    free will
    pelagianism
    semi-pelagianism
    synergism
    Opis:
    The problem of the „beginning of faith” (initium fidei) was among those which vividly captured the attention of theologians at the beginning of the 5th century, particularly in the wider context of the controversy concerning the relationship between free will and God’s grace in the work of salvation. Generally it is assumed that John Cassian, concerned, on the one hand, to show the Pelagians the necessity of grace and the radical Augustinians, on the other, the need for cooperation with the work of divine grace, failed to avoid errors which would subsequently be referred to as semi-pelagianism. With regard to the „beginning of faith”, his error is supposed to consist in the fact that the salvific initiative could derive from man. This view, however, derives from an over simplification of the thought of the Abbot of St. Victor: not only because most of his comments underline the necessity for grace in order for faith to begin in man (theological argument), but also because even in his rare „semipelagian” affirmations Cassian speaks of scintilla of good will in man, without however calling this the moment of faith strictly understood (philological argument). Above all, however, it is forgotten that for Cassian, who was educated in the spirit of oriental theology, salvation is simultaneously divine and human and lacks any form of „arithmetical” parity between God and man, which would make man an equal partner with God in the work of salvation. For Cassian, everything concerning the primacy of God in salvation is beyond question and human efforts are nothing other than the response expected by the Divine Pedagogue of His pupils as He leads them along the path of salvation, from the initium fidei to its end.
    Źródło:
    Vox Patrum; 2014, 61; 359-371
    0860-9411
    2719-3586
    Pojawia się w:
    Vox Patrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przebóstwienie człowieka w pismach Jana Kasjana
    The divinization of man in the writings of John Cassian
    Autorzy:
    Nocoń, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613859.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    przebóstwienie
    obraz i podobieństwo
    wolna wola
    semipelagianizm
    divinization
    image and likeness
    free will
    semi-pelagianism
    Opis:
    One of the principal ideas in oriental anthropology is that of the divinization of man. The author studies this idea in John Cassian and draws the conclusion that not only was it known to Cassian, but indeed it is the filter through which he views the question of grace. The author arrives at this conclusion, above all, by underlining oriental monasticism as the original context of the theology of divinization. Cassian was trained as a theologian and monk in this very ambience. All of the elements of the concept of divinization are present in the writings of Cassian and the two biblical models for the qšwsij of man – its creation of man in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1: 26-27) and the Transfiguration on Mount Tabor (Mt 17: 1-8; Mc 9: 2-8; Lc 9: 28-36) – are widely commented on by Cassian and form the basis of his theological and ascetical teaching. Cassian’s doctrine on grace, which is deeply penetrated by the concept of divinization, propounds the idea that, after original sin, the likeness of God in man is destroyed, but the image of God in man – reason, free will, and conscience – remains. The grace of God, perceived through the prism of divinization, in Cassian implies not a “resurrection” of the dead nature of man, but a strengthening of his relationship with God, a passage from the condition of “slave” to that of “friend”. This teaching, characterized as it is by a salvific optimism which is typically oriental, according to the author, should no longer be regarded as a form of semipelagianism. Rather, but with due qualification, it should be regarded as a valid and interesting way of speaking on the perennially difficult quaestio of the relationship between grace and free will.
    Źródło:
    Vox Patrum; 2015, 63; 185-197
    0860-9411
    2719-3586
    Pojawia się w:
    Vox Patrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Tischnera z Kołakowskim spór o łaskę i wolność
    Autorzy:
    Hołda, Miłosz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2195222.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    Józef Tischner
    Leszek Kołakowski
    grace
    freedom
    Augustinianism
    Pelagianism
    semi-Pelagianism
    łaska
    wolność
    augustynizm
    pelagianizm
    semipelagianizm
    Opis:
    Niniejszy tekst traktuje o jednej z odsłon zapoczątkowanego przez Pelagiusza i św. Augustyna sporu o łaskę i wolność. Bohaterami tej odsłony sporu są Leszek Kołakowski i Józef Tischner. Kołakowski, rekonstruując XVII-wieczne dyskusje między jansenistami i molinistami, stawiał pytanie o znaczenie tego sporu dla współczesności. Tischner, krytykując poglądy Kołakowskiego, proponował własne, idące śladem myśli św. Augustyna, rozwiązanie problemu łaski i wolności. W niniejszym tekście umieszczam spór Tischnera z Kołakowskim na tle starszych odsłon sporu i omawiam poglądy obu myślicieli. Podejmuję także próbę rozstrzygnięcia tego sporu oraz wskazuję jego znaczenie dla filozofii wychowania i filozofii polityki.
    The present text addresses one of the stages of the controversy over grace and freedom originated by Pelagius and Saint Augustine. The protagonists of this stage are Leszek Kołakowski and Józef Tischner. As he was reconstructing the 17th-century debates between Jansenists and Molinists, Kołakowski posed a question about the relevance in: of this controversy for the contemporary times. Tischner, as he was critical of Kołakowski’s views, put forward his own solution to the problem of grace and freedom, which was in line with the thought of Saint Augustine. In the present text I place Tischner’s dispute with Kołakowski against the backdrop of earlier stages of the controversy, and I discuss the views held by both the thinkers. I also attempt to resolve this dispute and point to its significance for the philosophy of education and the philosophy of politics.
    Źródło:
    Logos i Ethos; 2021, 57; 107-137
    0867-8308
    Pojawia się w:
    Logos i Ethos
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Synergizm Bożej łaski i ludzkiej wolności. Czy droga przebóstwienia człowieka w teologii wschodniej jest pelagiańska?
    Synergism between Divine Grace and Human Freedom: Is the Orthodox Idea of Man’s Deification Really Pelagian?
    Autorzy:
    Składanowski, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31343323.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    łaska
    przebóstwienie (theosis)
    synergizm
    synergia
    pelagianizm
    semipelagianizm
    grace
    deification (theosis)
    synergism
    synergy
    pelagianism
    semi-pelagianism
    Opis:
    According to the Holy Bible, God gives us unceasingly his grace in order to liberate humanity from sin and death. One of the most fundamental Christistian beliefs – which expresses the absolute primacy of God’s salvific will – says that God’s grace is necessary for salvation. The doctrine of divine grace was the main topic of the theological discussion between St. Augustine and Pelagius. The Augustinian doctrine presented clear opposition between the omnipotence of God’s grace and the weakness of the sinner. Augustine’s teachings prevailed in the Catholic doctine, although without its extremities. Meanwhile in the East, the Pelagian controversy was not understood and the Augustine’s doctrine of divine grace was not accepted. The Eastern theology speaks of synergism as a divine-human salvific cooperation. Is this not a Pelagian denial of the absolute salvific primacy of God? To answer this question, the article seeks the notion of divine grace in the doctrine of the Orthodox Church. The concept of God’s grace is in this doctrine associated with the concept of deification (theosis). Essentially, God’s grace is the same as God’s uncreated energies. It is some kind of active presence of the Holy Trinity in the world. Its manifestations are the sacraments of the Church. Its aim is the final fulfillment of human destiny and of the world. Man’s free will is also an important gift of grace. God’s salvific action toward mankind leads to theosis which is the purpose of human life. It is achievable only through a synergy (cooperation) between human will and God’s uncreated energies. The omnipotence of God’s grace does not destroy human freedom, because freedom of the human will itself is a God’s gift. The Orthodox doctrine of synergism, however, does not distinguish clearly God’s grace and human freedom. Man’s salvation is possible through the cooperation of grace and freedom, although ultimately divine Providence leads mankind to eternal fulfillment. There are still some important doctrinal differences between Catholic and Orthodox theologies. The Eastern thought emphasises the deification of man and the ultimate goal of the human life. The Catholic doctrine is more practical: it seeks the way of salvation for a sinner. However, it does not mean that these two concepts are totally incompatible. They both are based on the main Christian idea of God’s love toward mankind. The most important expression of this redemptive and salvific love is Christ’s Cross and Resurrection.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Teologii Ekumenicznej; 2011, 3; 71-87
    2081-6731
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Teologii Ekumenicznej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies