Temat: rozeznanie oceniające - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Wpływ psychozy maniakalno-depresyjnej na poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego w świetle wyroku Coram Turnaturi z 20 lutego 1998 r.
Autorzy:: Leszczyński, Grzegorz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/663257.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2009
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: psychoza maniakalno-depresyjna
rozeznanie oceniające
brak rozeznania oceniającego
manic-depressive psychosis
assess understanding
defect of discretion of judgment
Opis:: L’incidenza di psicosi maniaco-depressiva sul difetto di discrezione di giudizio alla luce della sentenza coram Turnaturi del 28 febbraio 1998. Il can. 1095, primo tra i vizi del consenso matrimoniale, riguarda l’incapacità proveniente dalle mancanze d’inteletto e di volontà. Come causa di questa incapacità, in presente articolo, viene segnata la psicosi maniaco- epressiva. Questa psicosi di carattere bipolare, cioè di presenza di due episodi diversi, quello maniacale e quello depressivo, viene considerata sotto l’aspetto che riguarda la sua incidenza sull’incapacità descritta nel can. 1095, 2° CIC.L’analisi fatta, in particolare quella che riguarda la sentenza coram Turnaturi del 28 febbraio 1998 ci permette di formulare una conclusione che la psicosi maniaco-depressiva è la causa dell’incapacità consensuale di cui parla il can. 1095 per quanto riguarda la mancanza del discrezione di giudizio. Questo succede nei casi di mania e di depressione grave, i quali sono presenti nel soggetto prima di compiere l’atto di matrimonio.Bisogna sottolineare che è sempre il compito del giudice di esaminare gli atti della causa e di decidere se in ogni singolo caso la psicosi è stata così grave da impedire il valido consenso matrimoniale. Per prendere ogni decisione il giudice usa le prove tra cui quella periziale, fondamentale, accanto alle dichiarazioni delle parti e dei testi, per provare l’influsso della psicosi aniaco-depressiva sull’incapacità consensuale del nubente.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2009, 20, 14; 171-185
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: "Defectus discretionis iudicii, incapacitas assumendi i gravis timor reverentialis" w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. De Lanversin z 19 stycznia 1994 r.
Defectus discretionis iudicii, incapacitas assumendi e gravis timor reverentialis in view of a decision of the Roman Rota c. De Lanversin of 18 January 1994
Autorzy:: Góralski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/663099.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: nieważność małżeństwa
rozeznanie oceniające
obowiązek małżeński
defectus discretionis iudicii
incapacitas assumendi
gravis timor reverentialis
annulment of the marriage
understanding
marital obligation
Opis:: This decision refers to a marriage contracted between Bernard and Martyna on 11 October 1969 (in Paris), which lasted for about ten years and then, on 21 January 1983 the man applied to the tribunal in Paris for annulment of the marriage due to his defectus discretionis iudicii and wife’s incapacitas assumendi. On 15 January 1987 the tribunal issued the pro nullitate decision only for the latter reason. After the appeal of the defender of the matrimonial tie to the tribunal of the second instance (in Versailles), on 17 May 1989 a negative decision for the appealed reason (Martyna’s incapacitas assumendi) was issued. After that Bernard appealed to the Roman Rota and on 24 April 1991 c. Lanversin bench proceeded to trial for three reasons for annulment of the marriage: 1) the respondent’s incapacitas assumendi (examined in the third instance); 2) the petitioner’s defectus discretionis iudicii (examined in the second instance); 3) the petitioner’s gravis metus reverentialis (added reason and examined in the first instance). On 19 January 1994 the Negative ad omnia decision was issued.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2013, 24, 18; 181-208
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Salvatori z 7 maja 2020 roku
Grave defect of discretion of judgment (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) in the sentence of the Roman Rota c. Salvatori of 07 May 2020
Autorzy:: Góralski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21150621.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-10-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: wyrok c. Salvatori z 7.05.2020
małżeństwo
nieważność małżeństwa
rozeznanie oceniające
sentence c. Salvatori of 7.05.2029
marriage
nullity of marriage
discretion of judgment
Opis:: The negative sentence c. Salvatori in the case under the gravis defectus discretionis iudicii (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) on both sides, taken in the second instance, when the first ruled positively in relation to both parties, is an example of a reliable assessment of the collected material evidence. In the sentence, quite a lot of space was devoted to the role and tasks of an expert in the cases of can. 1095, n. 1-3 CIC. It is worth emphasizing here that an opinion prepared solely on the basis of the case file is not a true expert opinion. Salvatori pointed to the practice developed in rotational jurisprudence, according to which a judge should reject an expert’s conclusions when they do not comply with the case files or violate the rules of logic or go beyond the premises on which they are based, or when they are inconsistent with Christian anthropology. Ponens convincingly demonstrated the groundlessness of prof. D. (with respect to the woman) grossly inconsistent with the case files and going far beyond the premises that served him to formulate such a thesis.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2019, 30, 4; 101-122
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 20 listopada 2018 roku
Grave defect of discretion of judgment (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) in the sentence of the Roman Rota c. Caberletti of 20 November 2018
Autorzy:: Góralski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21150844.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020-12-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: wyrok c. Caberletti z 20.11.2018
małżeństwo
nieważność małżeństwa
rozeznanie oceniające
sentence c. Caberletti of 20.11.2018
marriage
nullity of marriage
discretion of judgment
Opis:: The sentence of the Roman Rota, c. Caberletti, concerns the marriage of a 34-year-old man, which was concluded in a certain haste. Therefore, from the very beginning the parties lived side by side, and after less than two years they broke up. The immediate reason for the claimant's departure was the defendant's infertility. The case for nullity was initiated by a man pointing to two grounds of nullity: a mistake as to the attribute of a woman intended directly and principally (can. 1097 § 2 CIC) and the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage by the woman (can. 1101 § 2 CIC). After the handing down (in 2006) of a negative verdict on both headings, the man resigned from the appeal. However, wishing to regulate his civil status, after eight years (in 2014) he applied for the nullity of his marriage to another Tribunal – this time due to a grave defect of discretion of judgment the essential matrimonial tights and duties mutually to be handed over and accepted (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC). Two years later, nullity of the marriage had not been ruled, and the man appealed against it to the Roman Rota, where a positive decision was made. The opinion of an expert in a rotating instance played a significant role in the positive outcome of the case.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2020, 31, 2; 91-114
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095 n. 2 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej "coram" Erlebach z 16 października 2008 r.
A serious lack of the evaluative analysis regarding significant marital rights and obligations (can. 1095, n.2 of the Code of Canon Law) in view of a decision of the Roman Rota c. Erlebach of 16 October 2008
Autorzy:: Góralski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/663133.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: rozeznanie oceniające
prawo i obowiązek małżeński
poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego
prawa małżeńskie
obowiązek małżeński
kanon 1095 n. 2 KPK
marital rights
conjugal duty
grave defect of discretion of judgment
canon 1095 n. 2 CIC/1983
Opis:: The author presents and comments on the Rotal decision (negative) issued in the second instance after appealing against the decision (positive) issued in the first instance (by one-man tribunal) by the respondent due to a serious lack of the evaluative analysis of both parties. The Rotal judge, after a thorough interpretation of the code-based expression discretio iudicii (including three elements), emphasizes that not always the lack of such analysis constitutes inability to come to a marital agreement. This inability shall constitute exclusively the serious lack of discretio iudicii, both in its internal and external aspects.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2013, 24, 18; 219-232
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) u powoda i wykluczenie przezeń nierozerwalności małżeństwa (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Erlebach z 21.07.2016 r.
Serious lack of discretion of judgement (canon 1905 § 2 of the Code of Canon Law) of the complainant and exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage because of it (canon 1101 § 2 of the Code of Canon Law) in in the light of the judgment of the Roman Rota
Autorzy:: Góralski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/663455.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: rozeznanie oceniające
brak
wykluczenie
nierozerwalność małżeństwa
wykluczenie nierozerwalności małżeństwa
kanon 1095, n. 2 KPK
kanon 1101 § 2 KPK
discretion of judgement
indissolubility of marriage
exclusion of indissolubility of marriage
canon 1095 n. 2 CIC/1983
canon 1101 § 2 CIC/1983
Opis:: This case concerns a marriage concluded on 13 June 1987 in St. Nichola’s Church San Gemini in Interamnen.-Narnien.-Amerinae diocese, between a 37-years-old Paulus and 27-years-old Maria, who split up several years later.On 22 December 2009 Paulus launched an action for annulment of his marriage before the Tribunal of First Instance, providing exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage and later also lack of discretion of judgement on his side as reasons. On 28 October 2011, the Tribunal passed a pro vincula sentence in both reasons for annulment and the complainant immediately appealed to the Roman Rota.Turnus of the Rota c. Erlebach heard the case in the second instance and, on 21 July 2016, issued a decree of nullity of marriage because of both reasons. When it comes to the lack of discretion of judgement, the complainant’s lack of internal freedom (pathological jealousy and constant fear as well as dependence on his mother) has been observed. When proving the exclusion of the inseparability of marriage, the Tribunal drew attention both to the complainant’s testimony (judicial and non-judicial ones) as well as reasons for simulation and circumstances. The extensive sentences c. Erlebach is of great significance since it indicates the compatibility of two of the above mentioned reasons for nullity: defectus discretionis iudicii and simulatio consensus.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2017, 28, 2; 107-145
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095 n. 2 KPK) oraz wykluczenie nierozerwalności małżeństwa (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w świetle wyroku Trybunału Roty Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Hiszpanii c. Morán Bustos z 9 lipca 2007 r.
Grave defect of discretion of judgment concerning (can. 1095 n 2 CCL) and exclude indissolubility marriage (can. 1101 § 2 CCL) under sentence of the Tribunal of the Rota of the Apostolic Nunciature in Spain c. Morán Bustos of 09 July 2007
Autorzy:: Białobrzeski, Tomasz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/663135.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: rozeznanie oceniające
nierozerwalność małżeństwa
wykluczenie nierozerwalności małżeństwa
poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego
kanon 1095 n. 2 KPK
kanon 1101 § 2 KPK
discretion of judgment
indissolubility marriage
exclusion of indissolubility of marriage
grave defect of discretion of judgment
canon 1095 n. 2 CIC/1983
canon 1101 § 2 CIC/1983
Opis:: Presented sentence of the Tribunal of the Rota of the Apostolic Nunciature in Spain adjudicate definitely in II instance adjudication nulitatis matrimonii by virtue of grave defect of discretion of judgment concerning by both parties (can. 1101 § 2 CCL) and lack of the freedom internal also by both parties (can. 1095 n 2 CCL). The question which was considering concerned matrimony which was got in 15.03.1972. The libellus was lodged in 26.04.1996. Tribunal I instance in sentence of 15.11.2000 declared that there was no proved the nullity of the marriage. The petitioner lodged appeal to the Rote of the Spain. In 09.07.2009 the Rote declared the validity of the marriage.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2013, 24, 18; 233-246
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Błąd co do przymiotu osoby (kan. 1097 § 2 KPK), brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2) i niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095. n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. De Angelis z 16 czerwca 2006 roku
L’errore circa una qualità della persona (can. 1097 § 2), il difetto di discrezione di giudizio (can. 1095, n. 2) e l’incapacità ad assumere gli obblighi essenziali del matrimonio (can. 1095, n. 3) alla luce della sentenza della Rota Romana c. De Angelis
Autorzy:: Góralski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/663625.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:: przymiot osoby
błąd co do przymiotu osoby
rozeznanie oceniające
brak rozeznania oceniającego
kanon 1097 § 2 KPK
kanon 1095, n. 2 KPK
niezdolność do podjęcia obowiązków małżeńskich
obowiązek małżeński
quality of person
error as to the quality of person
discretion of judgment
defect of discretion of judgment
canon 1097 § 2 CIC/1983
canon 1095, n. 2 CIC/1983
conjugal duty
incapacity to fulfil conjugal duty
Opis:: L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza della Rota Romana c. De Angelis nella causa Reg. Apuli seu Baren. Nullitatis matrimonii del 16 giugno 2006, giudicata dai cinque titoli di invalidità, tra i quali i due sono stati introdotti dopo l’appello dalla sentenza della prima istanza. Nella sua sentenza il turno rotale ha pronunciato – come tribunale di prima istanza –l’invalidità del matrimonio solo dal titolo l’incapacitas assumendi dalla parte dell’attore.
Źródło:: Ius Matrimoniale; 2012, 23, 17; 139-159
1429-3803
2353-8120
Pojawia się w:: Ius Matrimoniale
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "rozeznanie oceniające" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język