Temat: relationship with others - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Przyjaźń w życiu i twórczości Klemensa Janickiego
Friendship in life and literary output of Klemens Janicki
Autorzy:: Bering, Piotr
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1045901.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017-06-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: Renaissance
Ianicius
relationship with others
poetry
biography
Opis:: The present paper focuses on friendship’s role in life and poetry of Klemens Janicki (1516–1543). Unfortunately there is a noticeable lack of sources and testimonies. The analysis of poetical works written by Janicki is only partially useful. In the epoch of the Renaissance very often the statements on friendship were exaggerated. Despite of these circumstances it is possible to analyze the poetical techniques used in texts about friends and friendship. The paper ends with an attempt to describe the nature of Ianicius’ relationships with his friends.
Źródło:: Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2017, 27, 1; 121-129
0302-7384
Pojawia się w:: Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Czy po Heideggerze i Levinasie możliwa jest etyka w tradycyjnym tego słowa znaczeniu?
Is ethics in the traditional meaning of the word possible after Heidegger and Levinas?
Autorzy:: Moń, Ryszard
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1402440.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2009-01-01
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: etyka
prawda bycia
relacja z innymi
myślenie refleksyjne
ethics
the truth of being
relationship with others
reflexive thinking
Opis:: The author tries to answer the question whether thinking is possible as a type of knowledge about human behaviour. To this end, he compares two thinkers, who, while differing considerably from one another, are similar in that they reject the traditional philosophy of existence, and use language with multiple meanings. Heidegger considered ethics as something of fundamental importance, but differing from ethics as knowledge, or as normative science. Levinas, on the other hand, believed ethics was the first philosophy, but did not treat it as normative. He argued that ethics was not cultivation of good, nor even a system of values, but a relationship with others. Heidegger criticized traditional ethics and morality, treating them as immature, juvenile even. Nevertheless, there is something in his writings that suggests what he had in mind was the necessity of existence. The ethics criticized by Heidegger or by modern French anti-humanists as well as Levinas reemerges in the form of humanities, as a discipline which puts man in the centre of the universe and defines actions that are appropriate for him. Shouldn’t we, however, following the train of Kant’s thought on the role of judgment, affirm the ontological difference Heidegger talked about? Since Kant accepted valuation of beauty, one can hazard a guess there exists a certain minimum of substantiation; if not of moral truth, then at least of substantiation at the level of meaning. Subjectivity must be shown as the power to create meaning, and thus to take moral action. Ethics after Heidegger still seems to be possible.
Źródło:: Filozofia Chrześcijańska; 2009, 6; 117-126
1734-4530
2450-0399
Pojawia się w:: Filozofia Chrześcijańska
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "relationship with others" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język