Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "regulation of liberty" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    The limits of individual freedom in a democratic state. A contribution to the discussion based on the example of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland
    Autorzy:
    Chorążewska, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21971896.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-09-30
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Prawa w Bielsku-Białej
    Tematy:
    human dignity
    individual liberty
    rule of law
    limitations of freedoms and rights
    health protection
    COVID-19
    implementing regulation
    Opis:
    In the Polish Constitution, freedom does not have a status equivalent to the principle of dignity. However, freedom is genetically linked to dignity. Two fundamental consequences follow from the above. Firstly, the protection of dignity requires that a person is guaranteed the right to freedom, understood as the freedom to act according to one’s own will. Secondly, freedom may be subject to limitations. Still, these may not be introduced arbitrarily but only under a procedure and principles set out in the Polish Constitution. Freedom is also subject to harmonisation with other constitutional principles and values of higher or equivalent rank. Freedom and the resulting subjective right entail the right to freedom within the limits set by law. The sanctioning of freedom and the related subjective right significantly limits public authorities in action, especially the legislature and the executive. Under the COVID-19 pandemic, it became necessary to confront the scope of protection of two conflicting values: human freedom and the duty of public authorities to ensure health protection and prevent epidemic diseases. This article demonstrates that, as the law currently stands, adequate alignment of these two tasks is not possible. An appropriate constitutional amendment is required.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Finansów i Prawa w Bielsku-Białej; 2023, 27, 3; 59-67
    2543-9103
    2543-411X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Finansów i Prawa w Bielsku-Białej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prawo spontanicznego porządku – Friedricha A. Hayeka koncepcja regulacji
    Law of spontaneous order – Hayekian concept of regulation
    Autorzy:
    Firlej, Mikołaj
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/531627.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej – Sekcja Polska IVR
    Tematy:
    Friedrich A. Hayek
    regulacja porządku
    regulacja wolności
    społeczna inżynieria
    regulation of order
    regulation of liberty
    social industry
    Opis:
    In the article three general questions were posed as a means of presenting explorative issue: (1) Law as regulation of an order; (2) Law as regulation of a liberty; (3) Controversy of social industry in law. In order to realize the issue thus outlined in the first section it has been shown two different and opposites kinds of orders in widely understanding term ‘sociology of law’ as well as Hayekian criticism of Descartes rationality. The structure of exogenous and endogenous orders has been carefully analysed in relation to their ancient equivalents: taxis and nomos. Special attention has been given to make an explanation of Hayekian understanding of legal frameworks connected with the process of organization and division of power. It has been outlined the rule of law in political system of Austrian economist (concept of demarchy) and his principal arguments for legislature and problem of ‘good regulation’. In the second part of thesis it has been shown a widely connection between spontaneous order and both liberty and the process of progression. In this section the strive was to present mostly values and good points in Hayekian conception, but there is also a critical part concerning both unsymmetrical constraint of freedom and symmetrical. In the third part of this thesis it has been shown the historical background of Hayekian research connected with the controversy of social industry in law. Referring to the intellectual dispute between Spencer’s organicism and Durkheim’s paternalistic conception Hayek has divided between law and law-making (legislation) and he has proved that law is only a spontaneous order notwithstanding good legislation means rules of harmonization and maintenance this kind of abstract social structure. Hayek’s concept of law is in accordance with philosophical, sociological, economical and political research of the general and popular nowadays problem with the new paternalism.36-50
    In the article three general questions were posed as a means of presenting explorative issue: (1) Law as regulation of an order; (2) Law as regulation of a liberty; (3) Controversy of social industry in law. In order to realize the issue thus outlined in the first section it has been shown two different and opposites kinds of orders in widely understanding term ‘sociology of law’ as well as Hayekian criticism of Descartes rationality. The structure of exogenous and endogenous orders has been carefully analysed in relation to their ancient equivalents: taxis and nomos. Special attention has been given to make an explanation of Hayekian understanding of legal frameworks connected with the process of organization and division of power. It has been outlined the rule of law in political system of Austrian economist (concept of demarchy) and his principal arguments for legislature and problem of ‘good regulation’. In the second part of thesis it has been shown a widely connection between spontaneous order and both liberty and the process of progression. In this section the strive was to present mostly values and good points in Hayekian conception, but there is also a critical part concerning both unsymmetrical constraint of freedom and symmetrical. In the third part of this thesis it has been shown the historical background of Hayekian research connected with the controversy of social industry in law. Referring to the intellectual dispute between Spencer’s organicism and Durkheim’s paternalistic conception Hayek has divided between law and law-making (legislation) and he has proved that law is only a spontaneous order notwithstanding good legislation means rules of harmonization and maintenance this kind of abstract social structure. Hayek’s concept of law is in accordance with philosophical, sociological, economical and political research of the general and popular nowadays problem with the new paternalism.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej; 2012, 2(5); 36-50
    2082-3304
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wolność jako modus wartości
    Freedom as a mode of value
    Autorzy:
    Matysiak, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/593036.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Pluralizm wartości
    Regulacja wolności
    Społeczeństwo otwarte
    Swoboda
    Wolność
    Zagrożenia
    Zasady sprawiedliwości dystrybutywnej
    Freedom
    Freedom regulation
    Liberty
    Open society
    Principles of distributive justice
    Threat to value pluralism
    Opis:
    W artykule dowiedziono, że pojęcia swobody i wolności są logicznie od siebie niezależne. Główną cechą wolności jednostki jest jej niezależność od woli innych ludzi. Nie istnieje wolność w ogóle, tylko wolności szczegółowe, konkretne, które są instrumentem urzeczywistniania pożądanych przez człowieka wartości. W społeczeństwie otwartym istnieje konieczność ograniczania wolności szczegółowych jednostki oraz regulacji swobody działania. Teoria sprawiedliwości dystrybutywnej J. Rawlsa wymaga uzupełnienia systemu wolności podstawowych o wolności instrumentalne, sformułowane przez A. Sena, i zasadę ochrony słabszego. Obecnie głównym zagrożeniem społeczeństwa otwartego jest postępująca komercjalizacja sfery publicznej i kultury.
    The article proves, that concepts of liberty and freedom are not logically dependent on each other. The main characteristic of an individual’s freedom is their independence on other people’s will. There is no universal freedom; there are particular freedoms which constitute an instrument for realization of values desired by an individual. In open society it’s necessary to constrain individuals’ particular freedoms and regulate the liberty of action. The system of basic liberties in J. Rawls’ theory of distributive justice should be complemented by instrumental liberties formulated by A. Sen, and by a principle of protecting the weak. The main threat to the open society is progressive commercialization of public sphere and culture.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ekonomiczne; 2018, 349; 153-163
    2083-8611
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ekonomiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies