Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "punitive damages" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    The Current European Perspective on the Exequatur of U.S. Punitive Damages: Opening the Gate But Keeping a Guard
    Autorzy:
    Vanleenhove, Cedric
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706749.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-07-26
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    European Union
    punitive damages
    United States
    Opis:
    Global trade and intercontinental tourism are on the rise in today’s world. This, in turn, leads to more cross-border law suits. Inevitably, jurisdictions will be confronted with legal concepts that are unknown in the host forum. This contribution investigates whether, and to what extent, punitive damages judgments originating in the United States can be enforced against the assets of a defendant in a number of selected Member States of the EU. More specifically, the article explores the possibilities of enforcing American punitive damages judgments in five EU countries, namely Germany, Italy, Spain, France and England. This comparative analysis reveals that the case law in these selected countries is relatively divergent as to the stance adopted towards foreign punitive damages, resulting in different degrees of acceptance of this legal remedy.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 235-264
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Private Antitrust Enforcement Without Punitive Damages: A Half-Baked Reform?
    Autorzy:
    Massa, Claudia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530338.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-08-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
    Tematy:
    competition law
    private antitrust enforcement
    compensation
    punitive damages
    deterrence
    Opis:
    Directive 2014/104/EU on private antitrust enforcement opted for the exclusion of punitive damages from the category of recoverable damages following a violation of antitrust law. This article will outline the concept of punitive damages and analyse the relevant case-law of the courts of the Member States, of the ECtHR and of the ECJ. Then, it will examine the regime laid down in the Directive and consider the possible reasons why the European legislator opted for this exclusion. Thus, the opportunity to introduce such a provision into the European legal system will be evaluated, taking into consideration the problem of overdeterrence, the problem of the division of functions between public and private enforcement, and making a comparison with the relevant provisions of Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Finally, a possible modification of Article 3(3) of the Directive will be suggested, in the framework of the review that the Commission is required to undertake by December 27, 2020
    La Directive 2014/104/UE sur l’application privée du droit de la concurrence a opté pour l’exclusion des dommages-intérêts punitifs de la catégorie des dommages recouvrables suite à la violation du droit de la concurrence. Cet article décrira la notion de dommages-intérêts punitifs et analysera la jurisprudence pertinente des tribunaux des États membres, de la CEDH et de la CJUE. Ensuite, il examinera le régime prévu par la Directive et examinera les raisons possibles pour lesquelles le législateur européen a opté pour cette exclusion. Donc, l’opportunité d’introduire une telle disposition dans le système juridique européen sera d’évaluée en prenant en considération le problème de la dissuasion excessive, celui de la répartition des fonctions entre l’application publique et privée du droit de la concurrence et en faisant une comparaison avec les dispositions pertinentes de la Directive 2004/48/ EC relative au respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle. Enfin, une éventuelle modification de l’article 3, paragraphe 3, de la Directive sera d’envisagée, dans le cadre d’une révision de la Directive que la Commission doit faire au plus tard le 27 décembre 2020
    Źródło:
    Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2018, 11(17); 93-111
    1689-9024
    2545-0115
    Pojawia się w:
    Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Rozważania na temat represyjnych i prewencyjnych elementów odpowiedzialności odszkodowawczej na przykładzie instytucji odszkodowania karnego (punitive damages) w świetle orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego oraz Trybunału Konstytucyjnego
    Deliberations on the punitive and preventive elements of the liability for damages in light of the rulings of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal
    Autorzy:
    Kochanowski, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927080.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-04
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    the law of obligations
    liability for damages
    punitive damages
    the compensatory function of damages
    Opis:
    The verdict of the Supreme Court of 11 October 2013 (fi le I CSK 697/12) and the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal of 25 June 2015 (fi le SK 32/14) are discussed and their signifi cance for the understanding of punitive damages analysed. The main problem discussed in this paper is the question whether there is room under Polish law for punitive damages modelled a common law system and whether the adoption of this solution could possibly infl uence the basic premises constituting the liability for damages already adopted. The main focus has been put on the argumentation of the Supreme Court presented in its verdict regarding the possibility of enforcing by Polish courts a judgment in which a foreign court awarded punitive damages, and the arguments of the Constitutional Tribunal regarding the constitutionality of a legal provision establishing a possibility of fl at-rate damages, being awarded and increased in the event of the determination of guilt by the breaching party. Certain detailed provisions that are contradictory from the point of view of the fundamental assumptions underlying the liability for damages in Polish law and the laws of most European legal systems (and the German system in particular) are also examined. Further, a synthetic analysis of the positive and negative aspects of punitive damages identifi ed by other researchers is presented. This is followed by a mention of other institutions available under Polish law which may constitute an alternative to punitive damages, at least when it comes to the provision of an adequate preventive and punitive measure in the event of gross or culpable damage.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2017, 1 (17); 83-100
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Nawiązka orzekana na podstawie art. 46 § 2 Kodeksu karnego w świetle Ustawy z dnia 20 lutego 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy Kodeks karny oraz niektórych innych ustaw. Zagadnienia wybrane
    The punitive damage predicated pursuant to Art. 46 § 2 of the Criminal Code in the light of the Act of 20 February 2015 amending the Criminal Code Act and some other acts. Selected issues
    Autorzy:
    Filek, Bartłomiej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697538.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Opolski
    Tematy:
    punitive damage
    compensatory measure
    liability for damages or compensation for suffered harm
    the victim
    Opis:
    The issue of the publication is the problematic aspect of compensatory measure of the punitive damage that is predicated pursuant to Art. 46 § 2 of the Criminal Code in the light of the Act of 20 February 2015 amending the Criminal Code Act and some other acts. In the publication the author has analyzed the issue of the scope of meaning of the various conditions necessary to predicate punitive damage pursuant to Art. 46 § 2 of the Criminal Code. Furthermore, the issue of the article is the problematic aspect of how to determine the amount of punitive damage, in particular the aspect of the application of this compensatory measure while judicial decision about the size of penalty set out in Art. 53, Art. 54 § 1 and Art. 55 of the Criminal Code. At the same time the author has analyzed the relationship that occurs between the punitive damage and liability for damages or compensation for suffered harm. Additionally, in publications, apart from the comments de lege lata, de legeferenda proposals were also presented within the scope of the subject of the analyzed problems.
    Źródło:
    Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2016, 14, 1; 47-57
    2658-1922
    Pojawia się w:
    Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies