Temat: private litigation - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: How Can Be Increased the Accessibility and Effectiveness of Advance Directives?
Jak zwiększyć dostępność i skuteczność testamentów życia?
Autorzy:: Tőkey, Balázs
Hoffman, István
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31344083.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:: advance directive
private litigation
register
healthcare law
testament życia
postępowanie prywatnoprawne
rejestr
prawo medyczne
Opis:: One or more forms of advance directives are regulated in the majority of legal systems. However, people generally do not create advance directives. The main reason for this problem is that people do not have enough information about this legal institution, and it is too difficult or expensive to create one. Furthermore, it is also questionable if someone has an advance directive whether it will be able to achieve the aimed legal effect. Similarly, the enforcement of the advance directives could be problematic, especially if litigation is required to enforce these wills. The situation of advance directives is more or less the same in the majority of legal systems. Our aim is to show that these problems could be solved using the already existing, e.g. in Austria or Hungary, digital health databases and by introducing a non-litigation legal dispute framework.
Większość systemów prawnych reguluje jedną lub więcej form testamentu życia. Generalnie jednak ludzie ich nie sporządzają. Główną przyczyną tego problemu jest niedoinformowanie o tej instytucji prawnej oraz fakt, że sporządzenie takiego aktu jest zbyt trudne lub zbyt kosztowne. Ponadto nawet w sytuacji, gdy ktoś sporządził taki akt woli, rodzą się wątpliwości, czy wywoła on zamierzony skutek prawny. Podobnie problematyczna może być egzekucja testamentów życia, zwłaszcza gdy wymaga postępowań sądowych. Sytuacja dotycząca testamentów życia jest mniej więcej podobna w większości systemów prawnych. Naszym celem jest wykazanie, że można rozwiązać te problemy z wykorzystaniem już istniejących (np. w Austrii lub na Węgrzech) baz danych medycznych oraz poprzez wprowadzenie nieprocesowych rozwiązań w zakresie rozstrzygania sporów prawnych.
Źródło:: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia; 2023, 32, 5; 359-370
1731-6375
Pojawia się w:: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Individuals and the Enforcement of Competition Law – Recent Development of the Private Enforcement Doctrinein Polish and European Antitrust Law
Autorzy:: Gac, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530053.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015-06-30
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:: collective redress
damages actions
group litigation
private enforcement
public enforcement
Opis:: The following article focuses on the issue of private enforcement of competition law as one of the key elements of the current European and national debate on the efficiency of competition law. By analyzing this concept, the article aims to determine the influence of the European private enforcement model on the national competition law enforcement practice. The goal of the analysis is to answer two main questions: Does the current convergence of the national competition law enforcement system towards the European model guarantee the establishment of an effective, public-private system of antitrust enforcement? Under which conditions may the development of private methods of antitrust enforcement lead to an increase in the efficiency of Polish and European competition law? In order to address these questions, the article analyses the development of the private enforcement doctrine in the European Union and Poland. It refers to European and Polish jurisprudence on private enforcement, the competition policy of the European Commission as well as of the Polish competition authority – the UOKiK President. It also covers recent legislative changes introduced in the European and national legal orders. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the current convergence of the national antirust system towards the European model did not lead to the establishment of an effective mechanism of private enforcement in Poland. Nevertheless, the assessment of recent changes at the European level gives grounds to assume that the adoption of the Directive on Damages Actions, and its transposition into the national legal order, might overcome this problem and allow for better protection of individuals against anti-competitive behaviors.
Źródło:: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(11); 53-82
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Access to Documents in Antitrust Litigation – EU and Croatian Perspective
Autorzy:: Butorac Malnar, Vlatka
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530371.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015-12-31
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:: EU Damages Directive
private enforcement
cartels
antitrust litigation
access to documents
access to file
evidence in antitrust litigation
Opis:: The paper analyses access to documents in cartel-based damages cases from the EU and Croatian perspective. It considers all relevant EU and Croatian legislation and case-law primarily focusing on the expected impact of the newly enacted Damages Directive. It is argued that the new rules on access to documents provided by the Directive will not necessarily have a significant impact on damages proceedings following cartel decisions issued by the Commission. This is due to the introduction of an absolute ban on the disclosure of leniency statements and settlement submissions via a ‘maximum harmonization’ rule. This conclusion is drawn from statistic figures showing that EU cartel enforcement rests solely on the leniency and settlement procedures. With that in mind, it is concluded that the Directive’s general, permissive rules on access to documents (other than leniency and settlement procedures) will not be applicable in most damages cases following the cartel infringement decision issued by the Commission. However, it is also observed that the Damages Directive’s new rules on access to documents may have the opposite impact on private enforcement in cases following infringement decisions issued by National Competition Authorities (NCAs) which do not rely as much on leniency in their fight against cartels as the Commission. The Directive’s general rule on access to documents will apply in jurisdictions such as Croatia, where all of its cartel decisions so far have been reached within the regular procedure. It is argued that the general access rule, coupled with other rules strengthening the position of claimants in antitrust damages proceedings, might actually be beneficial for both public and private enforcement in such jurisdictions.
Źródło:: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(12); 127-160
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "private litigation" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język