Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "prepositional unit" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Analytic tendencies in modern Polish and Russian
Autorzy:
Sosnowski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/677018.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Tematy:
analytical tendencies
analitism
prepositional unit
secondary prepositions
noun-based
adverb-based and participle-based preposition
Opis:
Analytic tendencies in modern Polish and RussianModern Polish and Russian are characterized by some features which demonstrate an increasing level of analitism. In the process of transformation from synthetic to analytical language, a crucial role is played by prepositional units. In this research, analitism is understood in a traditional way as a morphological and syntactic phenomenon. The fact that the synthetic structure of a language may, in some conditions, turn into an analytical one, as happened in the case of Bulgarian and Macedonian, has been intriguing linguists ever since, and has made me attempt to answer the question: What is the condition of modern Polish and Russian, which are languages with a rich literary tradition and solid grammatical norms, which belong to a group of synthetic languages? The analytical tendencies in morphology include the following: a decrease in the number of cases in all inflected parts of speech; a more frequent use of uninflected nouns and adjectives; the growing importance of nouns with common gender, and, in particular, the use of forms of masculine gender to depict feminine gender; differences in expressing collectiveness in a group of nouns (using collective meaning for forms that have singular meaning; substituting case forms with prepositions; substituting case forms with subordinate clauses; substituting case forms with “helper” words. Analytical tendencies in the area of numeral functioning include: substituting inflected forms of ordinal numerals with cardinal ones; the gradual disappearing inflection of numerals; confusing the forms of noun cases after numerals; the disappearing declination of collective numerals; displacing other cases with so-called simple cases; changing the syntactical position which the numeral should be inflected in; abandoning the declination of first elements of collective numerals. During the study of analytic tendencies in morphology, it was necessary to examine personal pronouns as this part of speech seems to be the most stable as far as other forms except nominative are concerned. Having analysed the material, it can be claimed that analitism in Slavic pronouns is observed at the level of the replacement of short forms with full ones, through the use of various forms after prepositions and eliminating all the alternative forms of personal pronouns. This review of analytic tendencies has also involved studying the article and its role in analytic languages, as the article is the area of a language which should be filled while the inflection disappears. Having analysed the material, I have concluded that there is a possibility that the article may appear in Polish and Russian.The most important part of speech in analytic languages is the preposition. An increase in the number of prepositional units is said to be an essential element of syntactic transformation in 20th century Polish and Russian i.e. their ongoing transformation from synthetic into analytic languages. In accordance with this tendency, secondary prepositions are gradually replacing proper prepositions and case forms in their traditional usage. The secondary preposition has been defined as a lexical unit, not being a preposition initially but used secondarily in this function. Such a definition requires adopting a functional perspective in the description, more so because the transformation of various language units (nouns, prepositional phrases, adverbs, conjunction, phraseological nexuses) into prepositions takes place gradually and the same set can be interpreted otherwise in different contexts. This comprehensive analysis of two modern Slavonic languages shows that the number of prepositional units in both languages has grown and is still increasing.
Źródło:
Cognitive Studies; 2011, 11
2392-2397
Pojawia się w:
Cognitive Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ ПАРАДИГМА ПРЕДЛОГА
Funkcjonalny paradygmat przyimka
Functional paradigm of the preposition
Autorzy:
Zahnitko, Anatolii Panas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1181175.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-07
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Rusycystyczne
Tematy:
предложная единица
функциональная грамматика
семантическая парадигма
морфосинтаксическая парадигма
формально-грамматическая парадигма
коммуникативная парадигма
jednostka przyimkowa, gramatyka funkcjonalna, paradygmat semantyczny, paradygmat morfosyntaktyczny, paradygmat formalno-gramatyczny, paradygmat komunikacyjny
prepositional unit, functional grammar, semantic paradigm, morphosyntactic paradigm, formal-grammatical paradigm, communicative paradigm
Opis:
Прорецензировано оригинальное издание "Русские предлоги и средства предложного типа. Материалы к функционально-грамматическому описанию реального употребления. Кн. 2: Реестр русских предложных единиц: А – В (объективная грамматика)" ( Издательство УРСС, Москва 2018) с определением статуса формально-грамматической, семантической и морфосинтаксической их парадигм, рассмотрением эволюции взглядов авторов материалов и выявлением квалифицирующих признаков ядерной, приядерной, первой периферийной и второй периферийной зон предложных единиц. Рассмотрены особенности лексикографической статьи в анализируемых материалах и установлены квалификационные характеристики статуса предложных единиц в семантико-синтаксической и коммуникативной страктурах предложения.      
The original edition “Russian prepositions and prepositional type means. Materials for a functional and grammatical description of real use. Book 2: A register of Russian prepositional units: A – B (objective grammar)” (URSS Publishing House, Moscow 2018) with a formal-grammatical status was reviewed , their semantic and morphosyntactic paradigms, examining the evolution of the views of the authors of materials and identifying qualifying attributes of the nuclear, nuclear, first peripheral and second peripheral zones of the prepositional units. The features of the lexicographic article in the analyzed materials are considered and qualification characteristics of the status of prepositional units in the semantic-syntactic and communicative sentence structures are established.
Oceniony oryginalne wydanie „Rosyjskie przyimki i środki przyimkowe. Materiały do funkcjonalnego i gramatycznego opisu rzeczywistego użycia. Książka 2: Rejestr rosyjskich przyimków: A - B (gramatyka obiektywna)” (Wydawnictwo URSS, Moskwa 2018) o statusie formalno-gramatycznym , ich paradygmaty semantyczne i morfosyntaktyczne, badając ewolucję poglądów autorów materiałów i identyfikując kwalifikujące atrybuty jądrowej, jądrowej, pierwszej strefy peryferyjnej i drugiej strefy peryferyjnej jednostek przyimkowych. Uwzględniono cechy artykułu leksykograficznego w analizowanych materiałach oraz określono cechy kwalifikacyjne statusu jednostek przyimkowych w semantyczno-syntaktycznych i komunikacyjnych strukturach zdań.
Źródło:
Przegląd Rusycystyczny; 2021, 1; 243-240
0137-298X
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Rusycystyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies