Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "perpetrator of the crime" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Przestępczość zorganizowana w RP po 1989 roku
    Organized crime in the Republic of Poland after 1989
    Autorzy:
    Domański, Michał A.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/526952.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Collegium Civitas
    Tematy:
    organized crime
    economic crime
    criminal groups
    counteraction
    perpetrator of the crime
    Opis:
    The article is describing the development of the organized crime in the Republic of Poland from 1989. A development of crime and her influence on coming into existence of the new democracy were described. The particular attention was devoted to the definition of the organized crime and the difference which is appearing between her and ordinary crime.
    Źródło:
    Securitologia; 2013, 2(18); 85-95
    1898-4509
    Pojawia się w:
    Securitologia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Pozaustawowy kontratyp działania w ramach uprawnień wynikających z prawa do obrony w kontekście nowelizacji art. 233 §1 Kodeksu karnego
    Non-statutory justification of action within the framework of entitlement which results from the right of defence in the context of the amendment of Art. 233 §1 of the Criminal Code
    Autorzy:
    Lapawa, Dominika
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035709.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-05-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    instances of justification of action
    the right to defence
    giving false testimony
    the actual perpetrator of a crime
    Opis:
    The work is devoted to the non-statutory justification of action in the scope of the right to defence, whose purpose was the exclusion of criminal responsibility for giving false testimony by a witness – the actual perpetrator – in his or her case. It was emphasised that the defence which heretofore resulted from Art. 182 and 183 kk was insufficient for the witness. One discussed inter alia the legal basis of the justification, its constituent elements, one indicated the  controversies which were caused by the concept of justification, and which to a great extent were associated with the violation, by the Supreme Court, of the constitutional principle of the tripartite division of powers and with the substantive and temporal limits of the right to defence which result both from the norms of international and domestic law. One indicated the position of the representatives of the doctrine as to the concept of justification. Scholarship on the subject, even though it did not take a uniform stand in reference to the problem in question, basically discerned the necessity of the improvement of the situation of the witness – the actual perpetrator, who, testifying in his or her own case, would run the risk of self-incrimination. The considerations of the doctrine resulted in numerous alternative propositions de lege ferenda. In the work, one suggests to seek such a solution in the substantive approach to the nemo se ipsum accusare tenetur rule. Then it was emphasised that the problem of justification once again became the subject of discussion owing to the amendment issued on 11 March 2016 about the modification of the act of law – The Code of Criminal Procedure and certain other acts of law Art. 233 §1a kk. At that time one penalised the behaviour of a witness, who in fear of criminal liability to be faced by the witness or his relatives gives false testimony or conceals the truth. For the sake of recapitulation, one indicated that the amendment which was described above rendered the justification in question invalid, and the perpetrator who is heard in a court of law as a witness continues de lege lata to be entitled to use the right to refuse to answer the question from Art. 183 §1 kpk. One emphasised that the doctrine recurrently discerned the shortcomings of defence which result from Art. 183 §1 kpk. Above all the institution from Art. 183 §1 kpk was not intended for a witness – the actual perpetrator. Therefore, in the article, in order to realise the warranty nature of the entitlement in question one suggests that this admonishment should be rendered obligatory, so that every witness would be aware that the right exists and that he or she may exercise it.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2018, 28, 2; 91-123
    0208-5577
    2353-9712
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Active Repentance as an Incentivizing Tool of Criminal Law: Ukrainian Model
    Autorzy:
    Mishchenko, Erik
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1930594.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-06-30
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    active repentance
    restorative justice
    release from criminal liability
    reconciliation of the perpetrator with the victim
    active assistance in disclosure of a crime
    Opis:
    The article analyses the Ukrainian model of active repentance in criminal justice through the lens of restorative justice. Restorative justice has incrementally attracted the increasing attention of scholars, legislators, and policymakers across the globe. Ukrainian criminal legislation, representing a combination of post-soviet and Western approaches to criminal justice, offers a remarkable experience. Unlike many other Western European countries, the Criminal Code of Ukraine creates a strong incentive for an offender to show remorse at every stage of his interaction with the criminal justice system: during the pre-trial inquiry, throughout the trial, while serving punishment and even after the punishment while subjected to certain limitations (criminal record). At every stage, active repentance of an offender triggers/might trigger the possibility of leniency. This leniency might result in a release from criminal liability, mitigation of the imposed punishment, release the convict on parole or early expungement of collateral consequences of a criminal conviction, etc. The Criminal Code of Ukraine does not provide a clear demarcation of active repentance. Instead, the law defines it through the inexhaustive list of behavior patterns in which it manifests itself. This approach enables judicial discretion and reduces the formality in the assessment of the acts of an offender. The main shortcoming of the Ukrainian approach to active repentance is that the reconciliation between the offender, the victim, and the wider community is being advanced poorly.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2021, 2(30); 97-109
    1643-6911
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies