Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "parliamentary immunity |" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie udostępniania osobom trzecim pism wpływających do biura poselskiego
Legal opinion on making available documents which are being delivered to a Deputy’s office
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215743.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary immunity
mandate
Deputy
Opis:
The author states that a Deputy does not have an obligation to make available document received from a private person, regardless the content of the document. Parliamentary immunity, according to the author, does not release the Deputy from an obligation to testify as a witness or does not release the Deputy from an obligation to provide public authorities with a document which may serve as an evidence. However, pursuant to Article 21 the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a Deputy or Senator, the Deputy might refuse to provide information about a person who has provided an information to a deputy. This principle applies to civil procedure, criminal procedure and other investigative procedures that include an obligation to testify. The scope of this privilege contains also the possibility of refusing to issue a document received within limits of exercising of the mandate whose content would reveal information of a deputy’s informer.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 2(54); 159-166
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dopuszczalność zatrzymania posła przez Straż Graniczną
Admissibility of a Deputy’s detention by the Border Guard
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215619.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary immunity
Deputy
border guard
Opis:
In the opinion it was stated that although examining identity documents is associated with a temporary restriction of freedom of a Deputy by an authorized body, it does not constitute a violation of the privilege of parliamentary inviolability. Undertaking Deputy’s activities related to the exercise of the mandate in a border zone, does not require an appropriate consent. The privilege of inviolability does not absolve the Deputy from the obligation to respect the law. As a rule, a Border Guard officer cannot detain the Deputy during performing activities falling within the scope of the parliamentary mandate in the border zone. Deputies may be detained only in the event of joint fulfillment of requirements provided in the Article 105 para. 5 of the Constitution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 4(56); 163-170
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat udostępnienia informacji niejawnych na posiedzeniu Sejmu w procedurze uchylenia immunitetu
Legal opinion on the release of classified information at the sitting of the Parliament under the procedure for waiver of immunity
Autorzy:
Sakowicz, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542850.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary immunity
classified Information
Deputy
Opis:
The author analyzes the possibilities and consequences of the disclosure of classified information by a person covered by the motion for waiver of immunity at a sitting of the Sejm, in the course of examination of the motion. He claims that a person to whom the motion to waive immunity pertains is entitled to comment the information contained therein, including the use of classified information, insofar as they relate to the circumstances of the case and the allegations formulated in the motion. This is a guarantee of the right to defence in the course of proceedings relating to waiver of immunity. The author points out that such proceedings must respect basic procedural standards and, in particular, take into account the constitutional right to defence.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 229-234
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości udostępniania – w trybie udzielania informacji publicznej – wniosków immunitetowych przedkładanych na podstawie art. 105 ust. 2 Konstytucji
Legal opinion on the admissibility of giving access – in the procedure of providing public information – to applications, submitted according to Article 105 para. 2 of the Constitution, for waiving the parliamentary immunity
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12700575.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary immunity |
publicly accessible information
Constitution
Opis:
The author claims that applications for waiving the so‑called formal parliamentary immunity (Article 105 para. 2 of the Constitution) are examples of information about the activities of organs of public authority, regulated by Article 61 of the Constitution (public information). Therefore each citizen possesses the right to acquire access to such applications. However, it does not mean that each of applications may be disclosed. In some cases applications may include information that may be classified as secret under the relevant legislation or whose disclosure would violate the constitutional right to privacy. In case it happens, an application cannot be disclosed – due to the prohibition of granting access to such information provided by Article 5 of the Act on Access to Public Information.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 4(40); 213-221
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Możliwość pociągnięcia do odpowiedzialności prawnej byłego posła, członka Zgromadzenia Parlamentarnego Rady Europy
The possibility of bringing legal responsibility to a former Deputy, who was a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211950.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary immunity
Deputy
The Council of Europe
Opis:
A former Deputy to the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, and at the same time a former member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), cannot be held responsible to the Sejm. Potentially, bringing the above-mentioned person to a criminal liability may be considered, because, according to the author, in the analyzed case, that person was not protected by immunity privileges granted under international law to the members of PACE. A possible launch of this type of legal responsibility would, however, require determining of a few strictly criminal-law matters described in the opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 4(60); 55-58
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Immunitet parlamentarny we współczesnym świecie – ujęcie prawnoporównawcze
Autorzy:
Andrzej, Jackiewicz,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/894618.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-05
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
parliamentary immunity
comparative law
constitutions
immunitet parlamentarny
ujęcie prawnoporównawcze
konstytucje
Opis:
The purpose of the article is to determine the current form of parliamentary immunity in various countries. The author uses the comparative-law method to analyse constitutions that represent the most common solutions, taking into account the geographic criterion, used in countries located on different continents and having different legal cultures. The author analyses the subjective scope of non-accountability and non-violability and focuses on the time and place in which the protection is provided, and trace the objective scope of the protection and the solutions related to the possibility to lift the parliamentary immunities. The analysis leads to the conclusion that non-accountability is similar in different countries, has undergone few modifications over the years, and it is permanently formed. In the case of non-violability, there are more extensive differences, in particular in the objective scope and the degree of protection. However, various solutions prove that there is not a single universally accepted model of immunity and that the scope of the guaranteed protection can be more diverse, it can be subject to change, and be adapted to the changes in political systems and the political and social expectations.
Źródło:
Przegląd Europejski; 2019, 1; 57-74
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies