Temat: parallel Polish-Lithuanian corpus - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Znaczenie dwujęzycznych korpusów w polsko‑litewskich badaniach konfrontatywnych
Autorzy:: Roszko, Roman
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/676881.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Tematy:: Lithuanian
Polish
contrastive studies
hypothetical modality
parallel Polish-Lithuanian corpus
Opis:: The meaning of bilingual corpora in the Polish-Lithuanian comparative studiesIn his article, the author compares and contrasts the results of his own research on the hypothetical modality in Polish and Lithuanian: a) carried out together with Danuta Roszko, using the traditional method (without use of bilingual corpora in the 90s); b) with use of parallel Polish-Lithuanian corpora resources. As for the contrast of the two methods, special attention has been drawn to the lexical exponents singled out. The use of the corpora resources resulted in the fact that the number of exponents of hipothetical modality singled out in the two languages has slightly risen. Moreover, the borders between the corresponding groups of exponents have become more distinct and obvious. There has been confirmed a possibility of using the corresponding groups of exponents to express the meanings of the adjacent groups. The conclusion has been drawn that this phenomenon is as obvious now as it was earlier expected (in studies without use of bilingual corpora). The separate analysis of corpora resources with the division into the material being a) mutual Polish-Lithuanian translations (i.e. from Polish into Lithuanian and vice versa) and b) translations into Polish and Lithuanian from third languages (here: from German, English or Russian) does not significantly influence the number and diversity of the lexical exponents applied in the two languages. This fact proves a high competence of the translators. The formal resemblance of some of the Polish and Lithuanian exponents does not have a significant influence on which form to choose in the target language. In the translations from Polish into Lithuanian, part of the lexical exponents are conveyed with morphological exponents (lack of such in Polish). The hypothetical modality understated in Polish is sometimes clarified in translations into Lithuanian with the help of morphological forms. In some translations from Lithuanian into Polish the total omission of meanings (also the hypothetical) can be noticed, which results from applying the Lithuanian modus relativus forms. In several cases where some Lithuanian-Polish divergences in translations from Lithuanian into Polish have been noticed, a preliminary comparison of a Lithuanian original material and its translation into Russian can suggest that despite the confirmed direction of translation (from Lithuanian into Polish), it can indeed be a translation from Russian into Polish. However, proving this hypothesis requires the establishing of a trilingual Polish-Lithuanian-Russian corpora for the selected material to allow systematic and consistent studies in this direction. The author gives statistical data for the Polish-Lithuanian lexical exponents of hypothetical modality to distinguish between the mutual translations (Polish-Lithuanian) and those of third languages.
Źródło:: Acta Baltico-Slavica; 2012, 36
2392-2389
0065-1044
Pojawia się w:: Acta Baltico-Slavica
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Semantic contrastive linguistics theory and dialectological studies
Autorzy:: Roszko, Danuta
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/677320.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Tematy:: contrastive studies
hypothetical modality
Polish (PL)
Lithuanian (LT)
local dialect of Puńsk in Poland
corpus of local dialect of Puńsk
parallel corpus of PL and LT
Opis:: Semantic contrastive linguistics theory and dialectological studiesTheoretical contrastive studies (hereinafter referred to as TCS) emerged with a view to compare and contrast natural languages on the basis of a logical interlanguage. The idea of making the TCS guidelines available to science resulted in discontinuing the division into the original language and the target language when comparing and contrasting two (or more languages), and at the same time, terminating the dependence of the resulting material (i.e. form indexes in the target language) on the formal structures in the original language. The TCS essence is included in the interlanguage, which is used as tertium comparationis in the studies. To get more on this topic see Koseska, Korytkowska, R. Roszko (2007). Till now, TCS have not been applied in dialectal studies. There are a lot of reasons for this conjuncture. First of all, dialectal studies usually concentrate on one code (i.e. only a single local dialect is being specified), whilst in TCS, a comparison and contrast between (at least two) languages is provided. Moreover, research on the dialectal differentiation of a specific language (i.e. at least two dialects (/ local dialects) are being specified together) is based on demonstrating the features shared and differentiated on the level of (a) lexis, (b) morphology (most often narrowed to demonstrate differential morphological features) and (c) syntactic (relatively most rarely). Thus, dialectal studies are essentially a description of the formal conjuncture, whereas semantic aspects are out of the area of researchers interest. With this article, I am going to break the current patterns and prove that dialectal studies can be conducted in accordance with the TCS guidelines. The advantage of such dialectal studies is not only a different/new look at a specific local dialect, but also a possibility of an instant comparison and contrast between the local dialect and the standardized language or other local dialects (of one language or another) on the semantic level providing the highest standard of the relevances demonstrated (i.e. similarities and differences).
Źródło:: Cognitive Studies; 2012, 12
2392-2397
Pojawia się w:: Cognitive Studies
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Énoncés définitoires directs français et leurs équivalents lituaniens et polonais dans le corpus parallèle
French Direct Defining Statements and Their Lithuanian and Polish Equivalents in the Parallel Corpus
Wypowiedzi definicyjne bezpośrednie w języku francuskim oraz ich litewskie i polskie odpowiedniki w korpusie paralelnym
Autorzy:: Cholewa, Joanna
Valiukienė, Vita
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31341830.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022-09-19
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: wypowiedź definicyjna
korpus paralelny
ekwiwalenty litewskie i polskie
désigner
signifier
vouloir dire
c’est-à-dire
defining statement
parallel corpus
Lithuanian and Polish equivalents
énoncé définitoire
corpus parallèle
équivalents lituaniens et polonais
Opis:: L’article porte sur les énoncés définitoires avec les marqueurs désigner, signifier, vouloir dire et c’est-à-dire. Les données linguistiques proviennent du corpus parallèle des textes littéraires contemporains français-lituanien-polonais. L’analyse sera focalisée sur les équivalents lituaniens et polonais des marqueurs sélectionnés. Nous chercherons à savoir (1) quels sont ces équivalents dans les deux langues de traduction, (2) s’il y a des régularités dans les traductions des énoncés avec les marqueurs sélectionnés. Dans le cas de désigner, les traductions polonaise et lituanienne gardent le caractère de l’énoncé définitoire, dans lequel s’exprime la relation signe→chose. Le rapport interprétatif des énoncés définitoires de signification (marqueurs signifier et vouloir dire) est également majoritairement préservé dans la traduction. Par contre, le caractère de reformulation paraphrastique, présent grâce à c’est-à-dire, est préservé en polonais seulement dans 3 cas sur 19 avec czyli. En lituanien, cette relation persiste dans 11 cas grâce à deux marqueurs : tai yra et kitaip tariant.
Artykuł dotyczy wypowiedzi definicyjnych w języku francuskim ze znacznikami désigner, signifier, vouloir dire i c’est-à-dire. Dane językowe pochodzą z korpusu paralelnego współczesnych tekstów literackich francusko-litewsko-polskich. Analiza skupiona będzie na litewskich i polskich ekwiwalentach wybranych znaczników. Jej celem będzie stwierdzenie: (1) jakie są owe ekwiwalenty w obu językach docelowych oraz (2) czy istnieją prawidłowości w tłumaczeniu wypowiedzi z analizowanymi znacznikami. W przypadku désigner, tłumaczenia na język polski i litewski zachowują charakter wypowiedzi definicyjnej, w której wyrażana jest relacja znak→obiekt. Relacja interpretacyjna wypowiedzi definicyjnych z signifier i vouloir dire jest również w większości zachowana w tłumaczeniu. Natomiast charakter parafrazy w przypadku c’est-à-dire jest zachowany w języku polskim jedynie w 3 przypadkach na 19 dzięki partykule czyli. W języku litewskim relacja ta utrzymana jest w 11 wypowiedziach dzięki znacznikom tai yra i kitaip tariant.
This article deals with defining statements containing the markers désigner, signifier, vouloir dire and c’est-à-dire. The linguistic data come from the parallel corpus of contemporary French-Lithuanian-Polish literary texts. The analysis focuses on the Lithuanian and Polish equivalents of the selected markers. We seek to know (1) what are these equivalents in the two languages of translation, and (2) if there are regularities in the translations of the statements with the selected markers. In the case of désigner, the Polish and Lithuanian translations retain the character of the defining statement, in which the sign→thing relationship is expressed. The interpretative relationship of defining meaning statements (the markers signifier and vouloir dire) is also mostly preserved in translation. However, the character of paraphrastic reformulation, present thanks to c’est-à-dire, is kept in Polish only in 3 cases of 19 with czyli. In Lithuanian, this relationship persists in 11 cases, thanks to two markers: tai yra and kitaip tariant.
Źródło:: Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2022, 70, 8; 95-108
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "parallel Polish-Lithuanian corpus" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język