Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "open proceedings" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Jawność postępowań dyscyplinarnych
The Openness of Disciplinary Proceedings
Autorzy:
Korzeniewska-Lasota, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/512452.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum
Tematy:
disciplinary proceedings
disciplinary liability
open proceedings
Opis:
The principle of open proceedings is a guarantee of reliable judicial process. The considerations aim at answering the question whether this principle of open proceedings is applicable to discipli-nary trials. Starting by a short characteristic of the specificity of disciplinary proceedings, the authoress passes to justifying a need of the applicability of the principle of open proceedings into all the models of disciplinary liability in order to ensure the procedural fairness and constitutional identity for the accused.
Źródło:
Studia Ełckie; 2012, 14; 511-524
1896-6896
2353-1274
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ełckie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Habilitacje w Polsce Ludowej. Część 1. Warunki i przebieg habilitacji w prawie szkół wyższych
Habilitation degrees in the Polish People’s Republic. Part 1. The requirements and conditions of habilitation proceedings under the law on schools of higher education
Autorzy:
Wojtczak, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927074.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
the People’s Poland
habilitation procedure
the Polish People’s Republic
habilitation proceedings
conditions entitling to open habilitation proceedings
Opis:
Until 1965 the requirements and conditions of habilitation proceedings in Poland were governed by the law on schools of higher education. The solutions adopted under that law showed a relatively high degree of stability. In the fi rst years after WWII the habilitation qualifi cation was based on the solutions governing in Poland in the 1930s, with only slight changes introduced in the fi rst month after the end of the war. The fi rst reform of higher education of 1947 left the right to confer habilitation degrees with schools of higher education then in existence and retained the existing order of the habilitation proceedings. However, it implemented a number of rather signifi cant amendments in the area of the requirements needed to be fulfi lled at each stage of these proceedings. The right to lecture remained inherent to the habilitation qualifi cation and degree. What changed was the scope of infl uence of the minister of education supervising schools of higher education regarding habilitation proceedings and the appointment of the Main Council of Higher Education with the right of fi nal say and consent to the opening of the habilitation qualifi cation and to run the habilitation proceedings. Habilitation was abandoned by the reform of 1951 and replaced, following the Soviet model, with a higher degree of a doctor of science. Further changes followed in 1958 when it was restored by relevant provisions of the Act on higher education. It was then that more than forty years after Poland regained independence, the habilitation degree was for the fi rst time tied to a successful completion of the habilitation proceedings and earning the degree of a ‘docent’. The Main Council of Higher Education continued to function but its role in habilitation proceedings was reduced to issuing opinions before the minister of higher education decided on habilitation matters. Apart from schools of higher education, the right to confer habilitation degrees was granted to the Polish Academy of Sciences and academic institutions operating outside schools of higher education.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2017, 1 (17); 25-61
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przedstawiciel społeczny w transparentnym procesie karnym
Autorzy:
Paweł, Czarnecki,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902830.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-09-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
social representative
principle of open proceedings
Criminal Law Codification Commission
Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment of 10 June 2016
interests of justice
the community organisation
przedstawiciel społeczny
zasada jawności
Komisja Kodyfikacyjna Prawa Karnego
nowelizacja Kodeksu postępowania karnego
interes wymiaru sprawiedliwości
organizacja społeczna
Opis:
The article analyses the rights and duties of a social representative in criminal proceedings (article 90 Code of Criminal Procedure). Participation in court proceedings may be declared, before the commencement of judicial examination, by a representative of a community organisation, if there is a need to defend a social interest or an important individual interest within the statutory purposes of such an organisation, especially in matters pertaining to the protection of human rights and freedoms. The representative of a community organisation who has been admitted to participate in court proceedings may participate in the trial, express their points of view and make statements in writing. The court shall admit a representative of a community organisation if it finds this to be in the interests of justice. This person shall not be allowed to ask questions to person questioned by the court, he has no right to make a complaint with the court, can`t submit motions for evidence and are not entitled to participate in a session or in an investigation. The author emphasizes the importance of participation by the citizenry in the administration of justice principle and the right to a fair and public hearing of his case. In article they were also discussed old draft bills in the position of social representative in criminal cases, and in particular the advantages and disadvantages of amending article 90 c.c.p. Amendment of 10 June 2016. The author argues that the changing of position will not increase the participation of the public in the proceedings, because the legislature did not admit procedural rights.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2017, 69; 21-37
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies