Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "of evolution" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 325
Tytuł:
Self-Organization and the Theory of Evolution
Autorzy:
Nowiński, Czesław
Ługowski, Włodzimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/42565530.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
Synthetic theory of evolution
driving (and other) factors of evolution
theory of stabilizing selection
historical variability of factors and mechanisms of evolution
Opis:
The author distinguishes three types of evolutionary theories: 1) ahistorical theories, constructed according to the methodological patterns of classical physics (mechanics), 2) supra-historical theories, in which the historical nature of the evolutionary process is reflected in a more complete (than only in the sense of the chronology of events) and richer, but its mechanism remains unchanged—“taken out of history,” 3) fully historical theories, recognizing that the factors and mechanisms of evolution themselves are entangled in history: are subject to changes in the course of historical development. A prominent representative of the third type is the theory of Ivan I. Schmalhauzen. Some peculiarities of its methodological structure are analyzed. This analysis allowed to reveal the premises of the process of evolution understood as a process of self-organization and to determine the basis on which it can be concluded that the general theory of evolution is nothing else than a theory of biological organization.
Źródło:
Filozofia i Nauka; 2024, 12; 95-117
2300-4711
2545-1936
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia i Nauka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór wokół teorii ewolucji przed stu laty
Contention about theory of evolution a century ago
Autorzy:
Polak, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690632.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
theory of evolution
Erich Wasmann
Opis:
Father Erich Wasmann, a German Jesuit, played the crucial role in the debates with monists on the interpretation of theory of evolution. He showed that monistic interpretation of this theory is not necessary, and he proposed theistic interpretation of evolution. In this paper the history of these debates, that took place in Germany in 1907 was presented together with the philosophical examination of the arguments used by opponents. The second part of this paper presents how those debates influenced philosophical and theological thought in Poland.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2007, 41; 56-90
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On the Theory of Prebiotic Evolution
Autorzy:
Rudenko, Alexander Prokofievich
Ługowski, Włodzimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/42565016.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
biogenesis
theory of evolution of open catalytic systems
Opis:
The main theorems of the theory of evolution of open catalytic systems are briefly presented. The difference between the “natural-historical” and “actualistic” approach to the problem of the origins of life was highlighted.
Źródło:
Filozofia i Nauka; 2024, 12; 83-88
2300-4711
2545-1936
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia i Nauka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Textual Analysis of John Paul II’s Teaching on Evolution
Autorzy:
Chaberek, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507520.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
John Paul II
evolution
theory of evolution
evolutionism
Opis:
The author considers John Paul II’s treatment of the topic of evolution in order to retrieve its full content. He starts with an analysis of the Pope’s 1996 Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, especially addressing the problem of the meaning of the words that “the theory of evolution . . . [is] more than a hypothesis,” and the problem of hominization. Then, he explores papal statements from 1985 and 1986. Finally, he concludes that John Paul II’s teaching on evolution appears as fragmentary and ambiguous and, as such, requires greater precision and further development, especially for the sake of the Catholic theology of creation.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 2; 231-247
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rosyjski Kościół Prawosławny a nauka. XX-wieczne debaty wokół teorii ewolucji
Russian Orthodox Church and science. Debates on the theory of evolution in 19th and 20th Centuries
Autorzy:
Obolevitch, Teresa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690634.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
Russian Orthodox Church
theory of evolution
Opis:
In this article the author considers an attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church towards the theory of evolution beginning with the year of publication of Darwin 'The Evolution of Species' until contemporary times. The orthodox theology relies upon the thought of Greek Fathers of the Church who emphasized a difference between the incomprehensible essence of God and His actions (energies), by which He reveals Himself in the created world. In the light of the above conception the Orthodox Church acknowledges every scientific theory as an reflexion of this revelation, if only it doesn't trespass its relevant boundaries. Thus, the Russian Orthodox Church has never condemned the evolution theory itself, although some of her theologians have been criticizing some of its aspects. In the last part the author presents contemporary polemics between orthodox evolutionists and creationists. He also suggests some insight into their arguments exposing their limitations. In this article the author considers an attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church towards the theory of evolution beginning with the year of publication of Darwin 'The Evolution of Species' until contemporary times. The orthodox theology relies upon the thought of Greek Fathers of the Church who emphasized a difference between the incomprehensible essence of God and His actions (energies), by which He reveals Himself in the created world. In the light of the above conception the Orthodox Church acknowledges every scientific theory as an reflexion of this revelation, if only it doesn't trespass its relevant boundaries. Thus, the Russian Orthodox Church has never condemned the evolution theory itself, although some of her theologians have been criticizing some of its aspects. In the last part the author presents contemporary polemics between orthodox evolutionists and creationists. He also suggests some insight into their arguments exposing their limitations.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2007, 41; 91-124
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy teoria inteligentnego projektu i neodarwinizm mogą być komplementarne?
Are theory of intelligent design and neo-darwinism complementary?
Autorzy:
Wójcik, Bogusław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690628.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
intelligent design
neo-darwinism
theory of evolution
Opis:
Today the theory of evolution is under attack from the point of view of Intelligent Design (ID), which remains not only intellectual position but a political movement too. In some interpretations ID is a continuation of the Creationism; in others ID is coherent with the scientific background. According to W. A. Dembski ID is best characterized by three things: 'a scientific research program that investigates the effects of intelligent causes; an intellectual movement that challenges Darwinism and its naturalistic legacy; and a way of understanding divine action'. Taking account of this situation it is extremely important to reinforce the dialogue between true science and theology. God of the New Testament remains the source of the innovation and from this perspective neither chance in nature excludes God, nor destiny in nature requires God. These and other reasons lead one to accept the position of Cardinal J. H. Newman: 'I believe in design because I believe in God, not in a God because I see design'. Today the theory of evolution is under attack from the point of view of Intelligent Design (ID), which remains not only intellectual position but a political movement too. In some interpretations ID is a continuation of the Creationism; in others ID is coherent with the scientific background. According to W. A. Dembski ID is best characterized by three things: 'a scientific research program that investigates the effects of intelligent causes; an intellectual movement that challenges Darwinism and its naturalistic legacy; and a way of understanding divine action'. Taking account of this situation it is extremely important to reinforce the dialogue between true science and theology. God of the New Testament remains the source of the innovation and from this perspective neither chance in nature excludes God, nor destiny in nature requires God. These and other reasons lead one to accept the position of Cardinal J. H. Newman: 'I believe in design because I believe in God, not in a God because I see design'.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2007, 41; 28-45
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bioetyczne uzasadnienie udoskonalania człowieka. Refleksje wokół książki Poprawianie ewolucji Johna Harrisa
Autorzy:
Urbaniak, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2188258.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-10-24
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
transhumanism
theory of evolution
natural selection
bioethics
Opis:
Bioethical justification for human improvement. Reflections on the book of John Harris Enhancing evolution: The author discusses the transhumanist perspective on evolution, and considers Harris’ views in a wider context of the ongoing anthropological and ethical debate. While doing so he addresses some of the crucial issues at the interface of modern technologies, medical progress and bioethical challenges.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2022, 12, 1; 215-224
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Some Remarks on the Theological Interpretation of the Theory of Evolution
Autorzy:
Pabjan, Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/668608.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
Creation
evolution
creationism
Bible
theory of evolution
evolutionary creationism
God of the gaps
God and evolution
Opis:
This paper deals with the problem of alleged conflict between the theological idea of the creation of man by God and the scientific theories that explain the origin of the human body referring to the process of evolution. It is argued that there is no contradiction between these two domains and that there is no real conflict between the idea of creation and the theory of evolution. At first, the conception of evolution is introduced. Afterwards, the evolutionary creationism is presented as the theological doctrine which claims that God created man, using for this purpose mechanisms of evolution. It is argued that the Biblical account of creation must not be understood literally and that during the lecture of this account one should respect the interpretative principle of St. Augustine concerning metaphorical sense of some Biblical texts. Finally, a “method” of explaining of the emergence of the human body by a direct action of God (“God of the gaps”) is criticized.
Źródło:
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II; 2013, 3, 1
2391-6559
2083-8018
Pojawia się w:
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Edward Osborn Wilsons views on the relationship between science and religion
Edwarda Osborne’a Wilsona poglądy na relację nauka-religia
Autorzy:
Twardowski, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/560622.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne i Drukarnia w Sandomierzu
Tematy:
sociobiology
religion
theory of evolution
socjobiologia
religia
teoria ewolucji
Opis:
Edward Osborne Wilson does not want to follow Richard Dawkins's example and ignore religion. He expresses the belief that as a result of our genetic makeup religion is a part of our inherent nature. Wilson explains religion as a kind of illusion which is neces-sary for effective survival and reproduction. Organisms that have faith are more able to survive and reproduce than those that are devoid of it. In Wilson's opinion, nobody will ever be able to eliminate religion. At the most we can promote Darwinian evolution as an alternative to „lay religion”. In this article Wilson's views on the relationship between science and religion are to be addressed and evaluated, which will then be supported by the arguments of well-known authorities in the fields of biology and philosophy.
Edward Osborne Wilson nie chce bagatelizować religii na wzór Richarda Dawkinsa. Wyraża przekonanie, że dzięki naszym genom religia jest częścią naszej wrodzonej natury. Wilson wyjaśnia religię jako rodzaj iluzji, która jest konieczna dla efektywnego przetrwa-nia i reprodukcji. Organizmy posiadające wiarę są w stanie lepiej przetrwać i się reprodu-kować niż te, które jej nie mają. Zdaniem Wilsona, religii nigdy nikomu nie da się wyeli-minować. Co najwyżej możemy promować darwinowską ewolucję jako alternatywną „świecką religię”. W niniejszym artykule zreferowano poglądy Wilsona na relację nauka-religia oraz dokonano ich krytycznej oceny, wspierając się argumentami znanych autorytetów w dziedzinie biologii i filozofii.
Źródło:
Studia Sandomierskie. Teologia-Filozofia-Historia; 2016, 23; 221-229
0208-7626
Pojawia się w:
Studia Sandomierskie. Teologia-Filozofia-Historia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Transhumanism and Evolution. Considerations on Darwin, Lamarck and Transhumanism
Autorzy:
Bardziński, Filip
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781446.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Charles Darwin
Theory of Evolution
transhumanism
Nick Bostrom
procreative eneficence
Opis:
In the paper, I discuss the possible gap between the transhumanist perspective of controlling and perfecting human evolution through scientific means and the Darwinian and neo-Darwinian theory of biological evolution. I argue that, due to such gap, the transhumanist programme is flawed and requires a new and better understanding of biological mechanisms in order to attain its goals.
Źródło:
Ethics in Progress; 2014, 5, 2; 103-115
2084-9257
Pojawia się w:
Ethics in Progress
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka — ewolucja — utopia. Uwagi na marginesie Poprawiania ewolucji Johna Harrisa
Autorzy:
Hanuszkiewicz, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2188273.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-10-24
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
theory of evolution
natural selection
deliberate selection
bioethics
utopian discourse
Opis:
Ethics — evolution — utopia. Remarks on John Harris’ Enhancing evolution: The paper is divided into two parts. The first part justifies the thesis that the project of enhancing evolution presented by Harris, consisting in replacing natural selection with deliberate selection, is based on misunderstanding of the scientifically defined theory of evolution. In the second part, it is shown that Harris’ argument may serve as a classic example of a utopian discourse in which a pseudoscientific narrative is mixed with a quasi-religious belief.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2022, 12, 1; 225-236
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Neutralistyczna i syntetyczna teoria ewolucji
Neutralist and Synthetic Theory of Evolution
Autorzy:
Herda, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013361.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
neutralistyczna teoria
syntetyczna teoria ewolucji
wyjaśnianie
dylemat Haldane’a
mutacje neutralne
neutralist theory of evolution
synthetic theory of evolution
explication
Haldane’s dillema
neutral mutations
Opis:
In the article the author undertakes a scrutiny of two different kinds of explication of evolutionary processes. One of them is explication with the use of natural selection and favorable mutations as the main factors of evolutionary changes. Another attempt at explication of those changes is the one presented by the author of neutralist theory, Motoo Kimura. It accepts accidental genetic drift and accumulation of neutral mutations as the basic mechanisms of evolution. Numerous researchers say that this is non-Darwinian theory of evolution. However, it should be noted that natural selection and the possibility of occurrence of positive mutations are not altogether eliminated from the presented picture of evolution. In the case of changes in environmental conditions the accumulated neutral changes may prove to be adaptive ones and then they will be selected by natural selection. The neutralist theory does not seem to be involved in the difficulties that the synthetic theory of evolution encounters. Such problems are meant here as the costs of the action of the natural selection, the speed of the evolution that seems to be too low for such evolutionary changes that we can see now to occur (assuming given costs of natural selection) and corpuscular polymorphism that occurs rather commonly. Also criticism of neutralist explication is presented as well as a possibility of harmonizing these two kinds of explication.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2007, 55, 1; 47-70
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dlaczego teoria ewolucji nie spełnia kryterium naukowości
Why Evolution Fails the Test of Science
Autorzy:
Hunter, Cornelius G.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/553206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski. Instytut Filozofii
Tematy:
teoria ewolucji
fakt ewolucji
anatomia porównawcza
zmiana na małą skalę
zapis kopalny
nauka
religia
teologiczne założenia teorii ewolucji
theory of evolution
fact of evolution
comparative anatomy
small-scale change
fossil record
science
religion
theological presuppositions of the theory of evolution
Opis:
Istnieje, jak lubią twierdzić ewolucjoniści, góra świadectw na rzecz teorii Karola Darwina. Jednak ilość nie zawsze przekłada się na jakość. W większości świadectwa te można zaliczyć do jednej z trzech kategorii: anatomii porównawczej, zmian na małą skalę i zapisu kopalnego. Przestudiujemy wszystkie te kategorie i zobaczymy, że w każdej z nich obecny jest ten sam schemat: świadectwa przemawiają za teorią ewolucji tylko wówczas, gdy rozpatrywane są w sposób wybiórczy i powierzchowny. Natomiast po skrupulatnym ich przeanalizowaniu okazują się niejednoznaczne, a nawet przemawiają przeciwko teorii ewolucji. Świadectwa przemawiające za teorią ewolucji oceniane są na podstawach religijnych, przy przyjęciu założeń na temat natury Boga i tego, co ten Bóg by zrobił, a czego nie. Ewolucjonizm darwinowski znacznie trafniej byłoby postrzegać jako teorię religijną, która przeniknęła do nauk przyrodniczych, niż jako teorię naukową, która jest sprzeczna z pewnymi religijnymi przekonaniami. Usiłując zachować wolność nauki od religii, teoria ewolucji w istocie narzuca jej religię i skutkiem tego narusza integralność nauki per se. Ewolucjoniści zawsze utrzymywali, że ich teoria jest obiektywnym wnioskiem, którego podstawę stanowi ściśle naukowa analiza danych. To jednak po prostu nieprawda. Teoria ewolucji jest nieprawdopodobną opowieścią, której siłą napędową są teologiczne założenia i religijne sentymenty, nie zaś naukowe rozumowanie.
There is, as evolutionists like to say, a mountain of evidence for Charles Darwin’s theory. But quantity does not always make for quality. For the most part, this evidence falls into three categories: comparative anatomy, small-scale change, and the fossil record. We will survey each category and see the same pattern in each case: only when used selectively or superficially does the evidence support evolution. When carefully considered, the evidence is ambiguous and even argues against evolution. The evidence for the theory of evolution are assessed on religious grounds, based on presuppositions about the nature of God and what this God would and would not do. It would be far more accurate to view Darwinian evolution as a religious theory that has penetrated natural science rather than as a scientific theory that impinges on our religious understandings. In purporting to keep science free from religion, evolution foists religion on science and thereby subverts the very integrity of science. Evolutionists have consistently promoted their theory as an objective conclusion based on a purely scientific analysis of the data. This is simply inaccurate. Evolution is an unlikely story fueled by theological presuppositions and religious sentiment, not scientific reasoning.
Źródło:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy; 2012, 9; 53-78
2299-0356
Pojawia się w:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Neotomistyczna recepcja teorii ewolucji w polsce w latach 1900–1939 w kontekście relacji nauka-wiara
Neo-scholastic reception of the theory of evolution in Poland (1900-1939) in the context of the relations between science and religion
Autorzy:
Polak, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690532.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
Franciszek Gabryl
Feliks Hortyński
Konstanty Michalski
theory of evolution
Kazimierz Wais
Opis:
Encyclical 'Aeterni Patris' of Leo XIII (1879) caused significant development of neo-scholastic movement in Poland in the beginning of 20th century. This movement was strongly influenced by philosophers from Louvain (Leuven). The struggles between German monists and Jesuit Erich Wasmann in the years 1905-1907 inspired Polish neo-scholastics to take a stand in philosophical discussions about the theory of evolution. The aim of this paper is to show how Polish neo-scholastics resolved problems of relations between 'fides' and 'ratio' with respect to the theory of evolution. In this paper there are presented some ideas of such philosophers as Franciszek Gabryl (1866-1914), Kazimierz Wais(1865-1934), Feliks Hortynski SJ (1869-1927) and Konstanty Michalski (1879-1947). Their ideas show how philosophical, historical and sociological background of the theory of evolution's reception in Poland looked like.Encyclical 'Aeterni Patris' of Leo XIII (1879) caused significant development of neo-scholastic movement in Poland in the beginning of 20th century. This movement was strongly influenced by philosophers from Louvain (Leuven). The struggles between German monists and Jesuit Erich Wasmann in the years 1905-1907 inspired Polish neo-scholastics to take a stand in philosophical discussions about the theory of evolution. The aim of this paper is to show how Polish neo-scholastics resolved problems of relations between 'fides' and 'ratio' with respect to the theory of evolution. In this paper there are presented some ideas of such philosophers as Franciszek Gabryl (1866-1914), Kazimierz Wais(1865-1934), Feliks Hortynski SJ (1869-1927) and Konstanty Michalski (1879-1947). Their ideas show how philosophical, historical and sociological background of the theory of evolution's reception in Poland looked like.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2008, 43; 44-88
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nosy Be (Madagascar) and the neighbouring islands versus tourism development
Autorzy:
Jędrusik, Maciej Henryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2137049.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-02-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych
Tematy:
Nosy Be
tropical island
tourist area cycle of evolution
tourism development
Madagascar
Opis:
Madagascar is one of the trendiest holiday destinations. One of two key destinations is Nosy Be and surrounding smaller islands. It can be considered a local tourist hub. This work aims to illustrate the variability of the region's tourism evolution in reference to Butler's concept, and to specify circumstances characteristic of tropical islands, especially in less developed countries. Typology of islands has been performed according to level of tourism development; moreover, the brief evolution of post-1960s tourism development was assessed. The archipelago's evolutionary stages of tourism development are significantly diversified, evolution has been non-linear and not always unidirectional. It is dificult to observe all stages of the cycle. The stage tends to be hard to determine, evolutionary pace tends to vary, and some stages are absent. Regional under-development and external factors may cause a regression in development. No stage changes were observed on most islands where enclave tourism developed.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development; 2019, 23, 1; 23-32
0867-6046
2084-6118
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 325

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies