Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "odor measurements" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Investigation of an odor source in Changwon City using multi-monitoring methods. A case study of Korea
Autorzy:
Prueksakorn, K.
Kim, T.-H.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/207109.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
Tematy:
odor
industrial plants
industrial city
odor measurements
odor nuisance
odor pollutants
odorimetry
Changwon City
zapach
zakłady przemysłowe
miasto przemysłowe
pomiary zapachu
uciążliwość zapachowa
badanie zapachu
emisja substancji zapachowych
jakość zapachowa powietrza
metody pomiarowe uciążliwości zapachowych
ocena uciążliwości zapachu
Changwon
Opis:
It is a regular occurrence for residents living near industrial plants to complain regarding odor problems. Those plants may also try to protect themselves from liability by demonstrating some environmental evidence. An investigation to prove whether the accused industrial complex is the major source of released odors among several potential sources of odor problems was carried out using the combination of measurement techniques. The multi-monitoring methods comprise utilizations of olfactory system, questionnaire, electronic detector and chemical analysis. This study demonstrated the achievement of integrating scientific monitoring methods to support the enforcement of odor acts for management in the industrial city.
Źródło:
Environment Protection Engineering; 2015, 41, 4; 109-130
0324-8828
Pojawia się w:
Environment Protection Engineering
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Improving environmental odor measurements : comparison of lab-based standard method and portable odor measurement technology
Autorzy:
Maurer, D. L.
Bragdon, A. M.
Short, B. C.
Ahn, H.
Koziel, J. A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/204983.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
odor
volatile organic compounds
air quality measurements
standardization
olfactometry
Opis:
Current standard odor measurement methods are lab-based and require substantial investment in hardware, sample collection, training, and maintenance. Odor samples must be collected in the field using bags and brought to the lab to test. This can be a time-consuming process, with the possibility of the sample loss. The actual odor measurements are based on dilution olfactometry, embodied in the AC’SCENT® International Olfactometer, following the ASTM E679-04 standard. In recent years a portable olfactometer, the Scentroid SM100i, has been developed for odor measurements. The portable olfactometer has many advantages over lab-based standard method, especially the lower cost-per-sample. However, very little is known about the performance and reliability of portable olfactometer where the dilutions are controlled with orifices in metallic plates. It is important to evaluate the Scentroid SM100i accuracy to determine the usefulness of using it as a comparable technology for odor measurements. The main objective of this research is to compare the performance of the lab-based ASTM E679-04 method with portable odor measurement technology. Specific objectives include: (1) determining the accuracy of the dilution ratios specified by the manufacturer of both the AC’SCENT International Olfactometer and the Scentroid SM100i; (2) comparing results between olfactometers using n-butanol, a commonly used standard gas in the olfactometry field, and (3) determining the accuracy of odor measurement using real odor samples collected from livestock farms in Iowa. The AC’SCENT olfactometer had an average percent error between the factory specifications and measured dilution ratios of 5.23% compared with 14.1% for Scentroid SM100i (using plate i-2 with dilution range most comparable to the AC’SCENT olfactometer). The use of other dilution plates resulted in average percent errors ranging from 9.68% to 25.31%. The Scentroid SM100i deviated from the manufacturer specifications for flowrates and dilution ratios, but these flowrates were generally consistent with each dilution setting. Overall, the Scentroid SM100i overestimated the odor concentrations with the mean difference of 22.9% (ranging from 0.95% to 93.34%). When the post-measurement adjustment using dilution correction was made, the mean percent average difference was 11.8%.
Źródło:
Archives of Environmental Protection; 2018, 44, 2; 100-107
2083-4772
2083-4810
Pojawia się w:
Archives of Environmental Protection
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies