Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "ochrona zabytków i miejsc" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    System służb ochrony zabytków w Polsce a społeczna partycypacja w ochronie zabytków
    The system of monument protection services in Poland and social participation in the protection of monuments
    Autorzy:
    Fuglewicz, Stefan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/114016.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    protection of monuments and sites
    participation
    Social Guardian of Monuments and Sites
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    uczestnictwo
    Opis:
    The role that civil society plays in protection of historic monuments and sites is defined in Polish strategic documents. No procedures for cooperating with historic preservation officers have been, however, established. This article looks at an organisation named “Social Guardians of Monuments and Sites” and says why it is necessary to use its services in view of the existing system being inefficient. Additionally, it also explains reasons behind this inefficiency and explores various cooperation possibilities. Moreover, the article points out that even when the services responsible for protection of monuments and sites are reformed, cooperation with the above-mentioned organisation will be still needed and justified. This results not only from considerable disproportion between responsibilities and possibilities of both institutions but also from effectiveness of the government body being questionable. Furthermore, the structure of historic preservation services should be based on cooperation requirements - it should be simple, clear, and should allow for using already gained experience.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 51-60
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Razem czy osobno, czyli o potrzebie zintegrowanej ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego i przyrodniczego w działalności urzędów konserwatorskich
    Together or separately, i.e. the need for integrated protection of cultural and natural heritage in the activities of conservation offices
    Autorzy:
    Lewicki, Jakub
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113828.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    cultural heritage protection
    protection of monuments and sites
    natural heritage protection
    nature conservation
    environmental protection
    ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    ochrona dziedzictwa naturalnego
    ochrona przyrody
    ochrona środowiska
    Opis:
    Before 1945, protection of monu-ments and sites and nature conservation had beena single field. After this year, however, they were separated and hence, both fields are nowadays independent of each other and develop in different directions. It has been emphasised for a number of years that cooperation and symbiosis between protection of monuments and sites and nature conservation need to be improved. It has been even suggested that both fields, for which different offices and two ministries are responsible, should be joined. This aim needs to be achieved not only due to the ways in which these fields function but also in order to increase their importance. New legal acts which emphasise the significance of cultural and natural heritage in managing and shaping the surrounding areas have come into force. Moreover, descisions pertaining to protection of cultural and natural heritage became more important and the changes to the body of law and ownership rights resulted in these decisions being risen to higher rank. As cultural and natural heritage protection intertwine each other, it is necessary to introduce integrated protection in both fields. This necessityis emphasised not only in a considerable number of legal acts and international documents but also in practical solutions applied in offices whose members of staff are responsible for nature conservation and protection of historic monuments and sites. Integrated protection can be also a successful attempt at strengthening the increasingly ineffective monument protection system. Increased cooperation between these two fields as well as their connection can be a strong impetus to develop practical aspects in protection of cultural and natural herit-age. It can additionally result in creating new tools which government bodies would be able to use for protecting historic monuments and sites – it must be emphasised that this protection, in order to be effective and successful, needs to be adapted to the changing reality and needs to be ready to face challenges posed by the modern world.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 85-92
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ratio legis est anima legis a potrzeba istnienia i wzmacniania państwowej służby konserwatorskiej w Polsce
    Ratio legis est anima legis and the need to exist and strengthen the state conservation service in Poland
    Autorzy:
    Dobosz, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113995.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    cultural heritage
    protection of monuments and sites
    state historic preservation service
    dziedzictwo kulturowe
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    stan ochrony zabytków
    Opis:
    This article focuses on the latin legal maxim read as „ratio legis est anima legis.” it needs to be emphasised that, unless they are well-considered, no approval will be granted to acts which are invalid from legal and formal perspective or under which legally incorrect substantive solutions are to come into force. the author of this article claims that polish central government may prove useful in the field of protecting historic monuments and sites. Furthermore, the article also explores experiences through which the German government went in the areas pertaining to constitutional law and organisation of German (federal and lance) historic preservation administration. In the conclusion, the author summarizes his deliberations on the polish model of administrative bodies responsible for conservation and protection of historic monuments and sites.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 41-50
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Programy ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami – niedoceniony element polskiego systemu ochrony zabytków
    Programs for the protection and care of monuments - an underestimated element of the Polish system of monument protection
    Autorzy:
    Siwek, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113900.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    dbałość o zabytki i miejsca historyczne
    opieka nad zabytkami i miejscami
    zarządzanie dziedzictwem
    samorząd
    dokumenty strategiczne
    protection of historic monuments and sites
    care for historic monuments and sites
    guardianship of monuments and sites
    heritage management
    local government
    strategic documents
    Opis:
    Under the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments, a coherent model for caring for historic monuments and sites on both central and local levels was introduced. This concept is intertwined with monitoring and flow of information. The system of managing documents is aimed at optimising actions pertaining to the protection of cultural heritage. As there is a clear hierarchy of these documents, which can also correlate with each other, there are sound reasons behind establishing a coherent protection policy – from municipal/communal level to the central one. National, regional, district, and municipal/communal programmes pertaining to care for historic monuments and sites are strategic tools which shape policy, direct actions towards specific aims, and reflect the will. In a number of cases, however, no programmes have ever been developed. Administrative and legal supervision is still the predominant model in the protection of monuments and sites. The period of 2003 - 2016 was the time to „become familiar” with the new tool applied in heritage protection and management. One should learn from these experiences and promote the idea of devising a coherent strategy aimed at protecting historic monuments and sites by implementing programmes on all administrative levels.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 107-115
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Meandry organizacyjne służb konserwatorskich w Polsce po 1918 r.
    Organizational meanders of conservation services in Poland after 1918
    Autorzy:
    Oleksicki, Antoni
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113912.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    history of historic preservation administration in Poland
    protection of monuments and sites
    organisation of monument protection
    historia administracji ochrony zabytków w Polsce
    ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    organizacja ochrony zabytków
    Opis:
    This article briefly describes the history of historic preservation service in Poland after the year 1918. The author attempts to set out justifiable reasons behind the fact that historic preservation service is subordinate to the Minister of Culture and National Heritage. This subordinance was established between World Wars and right after the transformation in 1989, i.e. in the years 1991–1996. After this time, solutions used in socialism were readopted and hence, it was not possible to standardise protection of historic monuments and sites in Poland. The main message emerging from this article is that the bodies of historic preservation service should be subordinate to the General Historic Preservation Officer. Consequently, the structure will become less ambiguous: currently, in terms of merits, Regional Historic Preservation Officers are responsible to General Historic Preservation Officer. In administrative aspects, however, they are subordinate to governors of particular regions.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 93-106
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Jaki system ochrony zabytków? Pytania bez odpowiedzi…
    What is the system of monument protection? Unanswered questions ...
    Autorzy:
    Gawlicki, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/114014.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    conservation and protection of monuments and sites
    monument protection system
    monument protection law
    konserwacja i ochrona zabytków i miejsc
    system ochrony zabytków
    prawo ochrony zabytków
    Opis:
    The Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments has never been flawless and the historic preservation milieu has been aware of the consequently deteriorating monument protection system. This article explores the following problems existing in the area of cultural heritage: description and evaluation of cultural heritage, document production rules, sources of financing works carried out to heritage, effectiveness of legal processes, professional development of members of staff, organisational structure of historic preservation offices, and cooperation opportunities on different levels of state and local government administration bodies dealing with protection of monuments and sites. While reading questions provided in this article, one may be willing to ponder on directions of expected changes and ways of introducing them in Poland.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 1; 61-70
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies